Locate relevant code in an unfamiliar repository or after a direct search fails. This read-only explorer returns a short list of file paths, verified line ranges, and relevance notes for another agent to use.
Review Caveman Cloud spending, latency, errors, and potential improvements using current reports and traces, or individual execution records. Produce findings tied to time windows and trace IDs, while keeping measured costs, estimated opportunities, and verified savings separate.
Make agent replies shorter and easier to scan by putting answers first and removing filler. Preserves technical details, exact commands, numbers, and essential conditions while keeping the user's chosen language.
Create short commit messages using Conventional Commits, a format that labels the type of change. Emphasize intent, keep the subject concise, and include explanatory text when breaking changes, security fixes, data migrations, or reversions require context.
Build a narrowly scoped feature or integration using existing repository structures. Define observable acceptance criteria and non-goals, complete the working path across relevant layers, and stop when focused checks confirm the requested outcome.
Rewrite agent replies in Classical Chinese, a compact historical writing style, while keeping code and technical identifiers unchanged. Use it to shorten on-screen text and avoid repeated explanations, with ordinary prose when clarity requires it.
Turn a Caveman token-usage report into specific edits to instruction files, repeated context, and memory. Review each proposed change before approval, then measure the result and distinguish confirmed file reductions from less certain session-level effects.
View recorded output tokens, cache-read tokens, response counts, and available mode attribution for a Claude Code session. In other agent environments, find the native usage report where supported, without treating observed usage as proof of savings.
Review code changes and produce concise comments ready to paste into a pull request. Each finding includes its location, the problem, and a concrete fix, with fuller explanations for security issues, architectural disagreements, or authors who need context.
Compress agent replies into short phrases while preserving technical details, negations, numbers, and exact commands. Use it to reduce repeated explanations and keep chat responses brief until you explicitly turn the mode off.
Restructure code through extraction, consolidation, or responsibility moves while preserving its behavior. Establish checks before editing, repeat them afterward, and keep intermediate versions buildable and testable without mixing in feature changes.
Evaluate Caveman optimization observations by selecting a specific code change with operator approval. Compare the original and changed versions on identical inputs, checking both task quality and resource usage before deciding whether to keep the change.
Verify that existing work meets its acceptance conditions using the smallest sufficient set of checks. Reuse results that still match the repository state, report outcomes precisely, and stop once the evidence is complete without adding unrelated work.
Compress memory files and task lists into shorter wording to reduce input tokens. Keeps code and document structure intact, saves a readable backup separately, and sends the text to the configured model provider.
Investigate unclear failures, intermittent behavior, and performance regressions before changing code. Separate symptoms from assumptions, trace how failures arise, and rank possible causes by evidence and ease of testing, then report the cause and supporting proof.
Look up commands for concise response modes, commit messages, review comments, and Markdown compression. The reference also explains how to check the current mode, return to normal responses, and configure startup defaults.
Review Caveman Cloud experiment states, evaluation results, and safety checks to recommend a supported next action. Identify missing or failing evidence and explain execution blocks; the current agent interface reads experiment data without changing its lifecycle state.
Fix bugs and small behavior changes by tracing the cause and editing the smallest responsible part of the code. Preserve surrounding behavior and existing user changes, then run focused checks to confirm the fix and guard against recurrence.
Find LLM workflows in a codebase and label them by the job they perform, so Caveman Cloud can separate spending by workflow. Present a labeling proposal for approval, apply focused code changes, and check an affected execution path.
Delegate code lookup, small edits, and diff reviews to three specialized subagents. Their compact, structured results help conserve the main agent's context, with guidance on when to delegate and when to keep work in the main conversation.
Connect an application's LLM calls through the Caveman Cloud gateway to measure usage and cost without changing request content. The skill updates connection settings and verifies the integration with one small, real provider request.
Plan and implement migrations for data, APIs, configuration, and dependencies while preserving existing data and compatibility. Define rollback steps, check old and new behavior, and handle retries and partial failures during staged transitions.
Bug → spec protocol. When a bug is found or a test fails, trace the cause, decide whether a new §V invariant would catch recurrence, append to §B. This is the one non-obvious thing SDD does that plan-then-execute doesn't. Triggers on test failure, bug report, post-mortem, or explicit user ask.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Gather external knowledge the spec needs and distill it into §R — the durable research log — so build grounds in facts instead of hallucinating library behavior. Each finding cites a source; unsourced claims are flagged, never written as fact. Triggers when a spec decision hinges on a library/API/best practice the agent is unsure of, when the user says "research this", "what's the best lib for…", "check current best practice", or invokes /ck:research. Defers the §R write to the spec skill.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Is this your account? Link GitHub to bring it onto your creator page (Japanese)