1.2K skills · sorted by relevance
Write tests that demonstrate a pull request’s user-visible changes through before-and-after steps, screenshots, and recorded observations. Extend an existing core journey or create a one-off proof that helps reviewers understand the outcome and access boundaries.
Create, edit, and validate URDF files describing robot structure. Check links, joints, coordinate frames, units, mesh placement, and mass properties, then use CAD Viewer to inspect the model and review each movable joint.
Create and edit 3D parts and assemblies with adjustable dimensions using cadgen. Export STEP, STL, 3MF, or GLB files, inspect geometry, and open existing models in CAD Viewer for visual review.
Guide desktop actions on a connected Linux computer using accessibility information that identifies buttons and fields. It covers checking keyboard focus, verifying results with screenshots, and handling limitations in XWayland apps and remote desktop viewers.
Plan and run ablation studies, experiments that remove or replace parts of a method to test their contribution. Organize reviewer questions, priorities, expected outcomes, and compute costs, then record results and findings.
Address trusted human reviewers’ change requests on an existing Otto pull request. It guides fixes on the same branch, verification, replies with supporting evidence, and requests for another review before handing over the results.
Create static technical drawings from object descriptions, photographs, or CAD models. Produce consistent views that explain shape or assembly, plus a viewer with zoom, editable colors, and downloads in SVG, PNG, and PDF formats.
Review fiction for problems in structure, characters, prose, and consistency. Receive prioritized suggestions supported by passages from the text, using multiple reviewers when available or a single reviewer when the required setup is unavailable.
Read comments and replies on a Canva design, turn feedback into an edit plan, and apply approved changes. Identify conflicting requests and edits requiring manual work, then provide a checklist and reply to reviewers with the outcome.
Extract YouTube transcripts and analyze messaging, structure, intended viewers, emotional appeal, credibility, and calls to action—requests for viewers to act. Analyze one video or compare several keyword-selected videos to identify recurring strategies and content gaps.
Apply improvement plans from skill-quality-reviewer to Claude Skills. Groups edits by file, handles conflicting recommendations by priority, backs up originals, and verifies the updates before producing a report of changes and verification results.
Draft and revise research papers, thesis sections, and responses to reviewers, primarily in Chinese or in English on request. Organize arguments around supplied evidence while preserving formulas, citations, terminology, and measured results.
Apply improvement plans from skill-quality-reviewer to Claude Skills. Groups edits by file, handles conflicting recommendations by priority, backs up originals, and verifies the updates before producing a report of changes and verification results.
Review difference-in-differences analyses, which compare changes across treated and comparison groups. It checks pre-policy trends, event-study charts, assumption violations, placebo tests, and robustness, then organizes findings and suggested revisions into a structured report.
Develop game theory papers from topics, model ideas, or drafts. The skill guides research questions, model design, equilibrium analysis, writing, and revision, with checks for mathematical rigor, citation gaps, and responses to reviewer comments.
Draft and review statistical manuscripts in LaTeX, a document preparation format. Turn outlines into sections, prepare abstracts and keywords, check references and structure, and draft reviewer reports, response letters, or a book manuscript framework.
Plan philosophy and interdisciplinary papers by comparing preprint platforms, searching literature, identifying unanswered questions, and assessing originality. Receive a detailed outline with section word counts, key citations, and improvements based on a reviewer-style assessment.
Evaluate feedback from reviewers, CI bots, or other AI agents against the actual code and requirements. Apply valid fixes one at a time, verify each change, and explain disagreements using evidence from callers, tests, or existing conventions.
Turn a specified GCP access request into a reviewable Pulumi change and pull request. Select the narrowest suitable role and encrypt personal email identities, covering resource permissions and Cloud Run viewer access through IAP, an access gateway.
Validate screenshot and viewer HTML quality for PR evidence. Run this after adding or modifying images under .agents/evidence/pr/ or .agents/recordings/, or after generating a new viewer HTML file. Combines image quality checks (resolution, blankness, file size) with Playwright-based viewer rendering verification.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
omicsViewer visualizes ExpressionSet (or SummarizedExperiment) in an interactive way. The omicsViewer has a separate back- and front-end. In the back-end, users need to prepare an ExpressionSet that contains all the necessary information for the downstream data interpretation. Some extra requirements on the headers of phenotype data or feature data are imposed so that the provided information can be clearly recognized by the front-end, at the same time, keep a minimum modification on the existin
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Review IEEE conference, journal, Transactions, Letters, or magazine manuscripts from a technical reviewer perspective using routed IEEE review gates. Use when evaluating scope fit, novelty, validity, data, clarity, compliance, advancement, engineering significance, method soundness, experiment sufficiency, baseline fairness, figure/table quality, formatting risks, rejection risk, major revision strategy, pre-submission readiness, or the quality and specificity of reviewer comments that may be generic, careless, contradictory, or possibly AI-generated.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Draft, diagnose, and improve IEEE rebuttals, revision plans, cover letters, response letters, and point-by-point replies using routed reviewer-comment handling. Use when responding to IEEE reviewer or editor comments about novelty, scope, method, experiments, baselines, figures, tables, citations, writing, LaTeX formatting, limitations, compliance, technical correctness, or reviewer comments that appear generic, contradictory, unsupported, careless, or possibly AI-generated.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Address PR reviewer feedback by evaluating comments, proposing fixes, and executing after user approval. Use when the user wants to handle review comments on an existing PR, address PR feedback, fix PR comments, respond to reviewer suggestions, or process code review feedback. Triggers on "address PR feedback", "handle review comments", "fix PR comments", "respond to PR review", "process reviewer feedback", or when given a PR number/URL with intent to address its comments.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.