Validates completed work against defined acceptance criteria. Use after completing a task that has specific success criteria defined in issues, specs, or task descriptions.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Generates edge case, failure mode, and spec-driven test cases. Covers boundary values, nil inputs, concurrency, resource exhaustion, malformed data, and requirement-linked traceability tests. Use after happy-path tests exist and before claiming coverage is complete, when requirements lack tests, or before a security review.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Happy-path tests prove your code works. Adversarial tests prove it doesn't break. Spec-linked tests prove it does what it's supposed to.
vibe-spec-sync or vibe-coverage-enforcer reports uncovered requirementsGenerate tests that break assumptions across 6 categories.
Generate tests that trace back to specific spec requirements.
Read the spec — Find the specification document for the feature under test
Extract requirements — Parse each requirement into an atomic, testable statement:
Map existing tests to requirements — Scan test files for:
# req:[REQ-ID] or // req:[REQ-ID]test_req_[REQ-ID]_*Identify uncovered requirements — Requirements with no mapped tests
Generate tests for uncovered requirements:
test_req_[REQ-ID]_[description] (e.g., test_req_AUTH003_password_reset_sends_email)# req:AUTH-003
// req:AUTH-003
// req:AUTH-003
skip(), no TODO, no empty bodiesReport coverage delta:
Tests Generated: X Categories Covered: Y/6
| # | Category | Input | Expected | Actual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nil input | nil | ErrNilInput | PASS |
| 2 | Empty string | "" | ErrEmpty | PANIC! |
Spec: [path/to/spec.md] Requirements Found: N Previously Covered: X/N (Y%) Now Covered: Z/N (W%)
| REQ ID | Requirement | Test Status | Test Function |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUTH-001 | Login requires email + password | Covered | test_req_AUTH001_login_requires_credentials |
| AUTH-002 | Failed login locks after 5 attempts | NEW | test_req_AUTH002_lockout_after_five_failures |
| AUTH-003 | Password reset sends email | UNCOVERED | (requires email service mock) |
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Validates completed work against defined acceptance criteria. Use after completing a task that has specific success criteria defined in issues, specs, or task descriptions.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Catches shortcuts and reward hacking — weakening or deleting tests to make them pass, hard-coding expected outputs, silently dropping requirements, or claiming work is done without running it. Use before declaring a task complete and whenever a test or requirement feels like it's in the way.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Safely integrates commits from parallel agent branches using sequential cherry-pick. Use after parallel work completes in isolated branches or worktrees.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Audits tests for concurrency safety — race conditions, shared mock state, cleanup ordering. Use when writing tests that involve goroutines, async operations, or shared mutable state.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Enforces tiered test coverage standards with three dimensions — line coverage by tier, spec-to-test traceability, and spec-to-code implementation mapping. Use before claiming code is complete.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Extracts and records architectural decisions from diffs, conversation context, and explicit choices. Supports automatic extraction from staged changes, deduplication against prior decisions, and persistent ADR-format logging with spec traceability. Use after a significant design or architecture choice, before committing a diff that embeds implicit decisions, or when the same question keeps resurfacing.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.