Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

vibe-coverage-enforcer

Enforces tiered test coverage standards with three dimensions — line coverage by tier, spec-to-test traceability, and spec-to-code implementation mapping. Use before claiming code is complete.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

vibe-coverage-enforcer

Coverage numbers don't guarantee quality, but low coverage guarantees surprise.

When to Use This Skill

  • Before claiming a feature is complete
  • After writing tests, to verify coverage meets standards
  • During periodic coverage health checks
  • When deciding "do I need more tests?"
  • After vibe-spec-sync updates the spec — verify tests still cover requirements

When NOT to Use This Skill

  • Prototype/spike code that will be rewritten
  • Generated code (API clients, schema types)
  • Configuration files
  • When the user explicitly says coverage isn't a priority for this task

Three Coverage Dimensions

Dimension 1: Line Coverage (by Tier)

Not all code needs the same coverage:

TierTargetWhat's Included
Critical>=90%Security, authentication, authorization, payment/billing, data integrity, encryption
Business>=80%Core business logic, API handlers, state management, validation
General>=70%Utilities, formatting, UI components, logging
ExemptN/AGenerated code, test helpers, one-time scripts

Dimension 2: Spec-to-Test Coverage

Which spec requirements have corresponding tests?

  1. Parse requirements from the spec document — each atomic requirement gets an ID
  2. Scan test files for traceability markers:
    • Comment markers: # req:[REQ-ID] or // req:[REQ-ID]
    • Function name patterns: test_req_[REQ-ID]_*
  3. Map: requirement → test function(s) or UNCOVERED
  4. Report: X/N requirements covered (Y%)

Dimension 3: Spec-to-Code Coverage

Which spec requirements have corresponding implementations?

  1. For each requirement, search the codebase for implementing code
  2. Evidence: Note which file(s) and function(s) implement each requirement
  3. Map: requirement → implementation location(s) or NOT_IMPLEMENTED
  4. Report: X/N requirements implemented (Y%)

Steps

  1. Run line coverage for the project:

    • Go: go test -cover ./... or go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...
    • JS/TS: npm test -- --coverage
    • Python: pytest --cov
  2. Classify packages/modules into tiers

  3. Compare actual vs. target for each package (Dimension 1)

  4. If a spec document exists, run Dimensions 2 and 3:

    • Find the spec (same logic as vibe-spec-sync Step 1)
    • Extract requirements with IDs
    • Scan tests for traceability markers
    • Map requirements to implementations
  5. Report all dimensions

Output Format

Coverage Report

Dimension 1: Line Coverage

Overall: X%

Package/ModuleTierActualTargetStatus
auth/Critical92%90%PASS
handlers/Business75%80%FAIL (-5%)
utils/General68%70%FAIL (-2%)

Dimension 2: Spec-to-Test Coverage

Spec: [path/to/spec.md] Requirements Covered: X/N (Y%)

REQ IDRequirementTest(s)Status
AUTH-001Login requires email + passwordtest_login_credentialsCOVERED
AUTH-002Lockout after 5 failed attempts—UNCOVERED
CACHE-001Cache TTL is 24 hourstest_req_CACHE001_ttlCOVERED

Dimension 3: Spec-to-Code Coverage

Requirements Implemented: X/N (Y%)

REQ IDRequirementImplementationStatus
AUTH-001Login requires email + passwordsrc/auth.py:login()IMPLEMENTED
AUTH-002Lockout after 5 failed attempts—NOT IMPLEMENTED
CACHE-001Cache TTL is 24 hourssrc/cache.py:get()IMPLEMENTED

Summary

DimensionScoreTargetStatus
Line Coverage (Critical)92%90%PASS
Line Coverage (Business)75%80%FAIL
Line Coverage (General)68%70%FAIL
Spec-to-Test8/12 (67%)100%FAIL
Spec-to-Code10/12 (83%)100%FAIL

Action Required

  1. handlers/ needs +5% line coverage — suggest testing: [specific untested functions]
  2. AUTH-002 not implemented and not tested — implement first, then test
  3. 4 requirements lack tests — run vibe-adversarial-test-generation in spec-driven mode

Suggested Tests

[Specific test skeletons for uncovered requirements, with req:[ID] markers]

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Validates completed work against defined acceptance criteria. Use after completing a task that has specific success criteria defined in issues, specs, or task descriptions.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ash1794/vibe-engineering164Updated Oct 8, 2026

Generates edge case, failure mode, and spec-driven test cases. Covers boundary values, nil inputs, concurrency, resource exhaustion, malformed data, and requirement-linked traceability tests. Use after happy-path tests exist and before claiming coverage is complete, when requirements lack tests, or before a security review.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ash1794/vibe-engineering164Updated Oct 8, 2026

Catches shortcuts and reward hacking — weakening or deleting tests to make them pass, hard-coding expected outputs, silently dropping requirements, or claiming work is done without running it. Use before declaring a task complete and whenever a test or requirement feels like it's in the way.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ash1794/vibe-engineering164Updated Oct 8, 2026

Safely integrates commits from parallel agent branches using sequential cherry-pick. Use after parallel work completes in isolated branches or worktrees.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ash1794/vibe-engineering164Updated Oct 8, 2026

Audits tests for concurrency safety — race conditions, shared mock state, cleanup ordering. Use when writing tests that involve goroutines, async operations, or shared mutable state.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ash1794/vibe-engineering164Updated Oct 8, 2026

Extracts and records architectural decisions from diffs, conversation context, and explicit choices. Supports automatic extraction from staged changes, deduplication against prior decisions, and persistent ADR-format logging with spec traceability. Use after a significant design or architecture choice, before committing a diff that embeds implicit decisions, or when the same question keeps resurfacing.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

ash1794/vibe-engineering164Updated Oct 8, 2026

See all skills by ash1794

Report a problem with this skill