리서치·학습 스킬

Run leave-one-out sensitivity analysis for a meta-analysis from a CSV file. Recalculate the pooled effect after removing each study in turn, then produce a forest plot and a data table to help assess how individual studies affect the overall result.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking whether one study strongly affects a meta-analysis result
• Creating a leave-one-out forest plot from study data
• Exporting sensitivity results as a CSV table

Create a Baujat plot from meta-analysis data to show how individual studies contribute to the pooled result and statistical heterogeneity. The skill exports a PNG plot and a CSV of study contributions, helping locate studies for further review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Visualizing study contributions in a meta-analysis
• Finding studies that contribute strongly to heterogeneity
• Reviewing potential outlier studies

Combine results from multiple studies by calculating pooled effect sizes, such as odds ratios or mean differences. Assess variation between studies and possible publication bias, then produce forest and funnel plots to help summarize and inspect the evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Pooling effect sizes across clinical studies
• Comparing study results with a forest plot
• Assessing heterogeneity with I-squared

Create a meta-analysis forest plot for binary outcomes using a CSV of study names, event counts, and group sample sizes. The skill outputs a PNG plot and CSV table, with a combined effect estimate and heterogeneity information when the analysis succeeds.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Plotting pooled results for binary outcomes across studies
• Creating a forest plot from event counts and sample sizes
• Exporting meta-analysis results as PNG and CSV

Screen papers by comparing their titles and abstracts with your inclusion and exclusion criteria. Get a consistent Yes, No, or Maybe decision with a reason, ready to review when filtering studies for a systematic review or meta-analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Screening search results for a systematic review
• Filtering studies before a meta-analysis
• Applying inclusion and exclusion criteria consistently

Assess whether a proposed topic may support a new meta-analysis by searching PubMed for clinical trials and existing meta-analyses. The workflow compares available studies with prior reviews to identify whether newer evidence may make an update viable.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking a proposed topic before starting a meta-analysis
• Finding whether prior meta-analyses already cover a question
• Assessing whether newer clinical trials may support an update

Assess bias and applicability in clinical diagnostic accuracy studies with QUADAS-2. Review patient selection, the index test, reference standard, and study flow, supporting each judgment with a paper quotation and marking missing information as unclear.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Assessing a diagnostic accuracy paper with QUADAS-2
• Reviewing risk of bias across the four study domains
• Checking whether a study applies to a target setting

Create a funnel plot from meta-analysis data in a CSV file and assess possible publication bias with Egger’s regression and Begg’s rank correlation tests. The workflow checks required columns and study count, then produces a plot and test results.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking possible publication bias in a meta-analysis
• Creating a funnel plot from study-level CSV data
• Reviewing Egger and Begg test results

Screen a paper’s full text against inclusion and exclusion criteria for a meta-analysis, then return a structured Include or Exclude decision with a standard reason. If a PMID is supplied, PubMed title and abstract metadata can also be checked.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Screening a full-text paper for a meta-analysis
• Applying PICO-based inclusion and exclusion criteria
• Checking PubMed metadata when a PMID is available

Extracts population, intervention or exposure, comparator, outcomes, and study design (PI(E)COS) from a clinical study or meta-analysis title, then returns the fields in a consistent JSON structure.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Extracting PI(E)COS elements from a clinical study title
• Structuring the key elements of a meta-analysis title
• Preparing title-based information for a research workflow

Draft inclusion and exclusion criteria for a systematic review or meta-analysis from a title or keywords. The skill organizes eligibility around PICO—population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes—plus study design, and checks that exclusion rules do not contradict the inclusion criteria.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Drafting eligibility criteria from a review title
• Turning review keywords into PICO-based criteria
• Checking exclusion rules against inclusion criteria

Turn a CSV of study-level ROB2 assessments into two PNG figures: a Traffic Light Plot showing each study across assessment domains, and a Summary Bar Plot showing the risk distribution by domain. The input must contain the documented study and rating columns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Visualizing ROB2 assessments across studies
• Preparing figures for a systematic review
• Summarizing risk ratings by assessment domain

Assess the quality and potential bias of a case-control medical study using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Review selection, comparability, and exposure criteria, explain judgments with evidence from the paper, and organize the results into a structured summary table.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Assessing bias in a case-control study
• Evaluating the quality of a medical paper
• Summarizing NOS ratings in a table

Assess a cohort study article or text with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), a checklist for nonrandomized studies. Score selection, comparability, and outcomes, then provide a criterion by criterion table, overall star rating, quality category, and key strengths and limitations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Assessing a cohort study from its article text
• Scoring a cohort study PDF with NOS criteria
• Summarizing study quality for a meta-analysis

Turn informal invention notes into a structured patent disclosure, identify missing technical details, and prepare or analyze related-patent searches. It compares key features and offers a preliminary novelty assessment and drafting directions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Structuring an invention description for a patent disclosure
• Preparing keywords and IPC suggestions for a patent search
• Comparing related patents with an invention’s key features

Generate USMLE Step 1 or Step 2 CK-style clinical cases for study and exam practice. Cases can include patient history, examination findings, tests, a single-best-answer question, answer choices, explanations, and learning objectives in text, JSON, or Markdown.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Practicing Step 1 questions on basic science topics
• Studying diagnosis and management with Step 2 cases
• Generating cases focused on a specific condition

Review a paper or thesis before submission or internal evaluation. The skill assesses novelty, methods, evidence, reproducibility, and clarity, separates major concerns from minor edits, and turns findings into concrete revision suggestions and a reasoned recommendation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reviewing a manuscript before journal submission
• Assessing a thesis before committee review
• Checking methods and conclusions for evidence alignment

Checks Mendelian randomization results for horizontal pleiotropy, where genetic instruments affect outcomes through other pathways. It applies MR-PRESSO, MR-Egger, and Steiger filtering to examine outliers, directional bias, and causal direction, then supports sensitivity analysis and reporting.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking MR findings for horizontal pleiotropy
• Testing whether genetic instruments have directional bias
• Filtering variants with uncertain causal direction

Read and write phylogenetic trees with Bio.Phylo, convert common tree formats, prune taxa, reroot by an outgroup, calculate distances and basic statistics, and create terminal or Matplotlib visualizations for analysis and figures.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Converting Newick, NEXUS, and phyloXML tree files
• Pruning taxa or rerooting a tree at an outgroup
• Calculating pairwise distances and branch length summaries

Use Biopython tools to examine sequence motifs, restriction enzyme sites, codon usage, and related bioinformatics data. The skill helps produce structured analysis results and supports genomic feature visualization with GenomeDiagram.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Summarizing motifs across aligned sequences
• Finding restriction enzyme cut sites in DNA
• Calculating codon frequencies and basic sequence statistics

Turn a scientific hypothesis into a Chinese application for the NSFC General Program, using its 2026 template. The workflow searches PubMed for real references, drafts the specified sections, and exports the result as Markdown and Word documents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Drafting an NSFC General Program application from a hypothesis
• Finding real PubMed references for a grant proposal
• Preparing a Chinese application in the 2026 template

Interprets a meta-analysis forest plot image and drafts a detailed description in Chinese or English. It can include visible effect sizes, heterogeneity, P values, study counts, and sample sizes, then formats the text with a figure marker and legend.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Describe a forest plot image in English
• Summarize visible heterogeneity and statistical significance
• Format a plot description with a figure marker and legend

Draft or revise a research paper’s Methods section with the details readers need to understand and reproduce the study. Organize it around IMRAD conventions, reporting checklists, statistical choices, ethics, and journal requirements.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Drafting a reproducible Methods section
• Checking a manuscript against CONSORT, STROBE, or PRISMA
• Addressing reviewer requests for methodological detail

Extract ten baseline characteristics from a clinical trial article. Given a PMID, the workflow checks PubMed for basic metadata; when that is incomplete or unavailable, it uses the supplied full text to produce structured JSON and marks unreported fields as null or empty.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Extracting baseline details from a clinical trial article
• Organizing study and participant information from full text
• Checking a PMID and completing missing details from article text