스킬 찾기

Delegate an approved finite batch of independent engineering or research responsibilities using the operator's existing worker channel. Use for broad repository discovery, multiple search directions, repeated checks and substantial dirty work; keep coupled single tasks with one worker and explicit solo work in the main session.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run or continue an operator-authorized external ACP worker through cwr-acp when ACP is the operator's standing default or explicit task selection. Use the configured default or selected route with explicit per-turn permissions; mere native tool availability does not change the channel.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Choose the authorized worker channel and hand over complete engineering responsibilities, including in-scope self-check, repair and delivery. Use for substantial investigation, implementation, continuation and recovery — an ordinary substantial goal is enough, no special phrasing required; use swarm for approved independent batches. Respect the operator's standing ACP/native choice, explicit solo, and tiny or nearly finished work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Assess, adapt, and apply specified discussions, feedback, findings, or references to existing project work. Preserve coverage, corrections, and selected intent; judge fit and carry adopted effects through the authorized result. Includes technical review feedback; incidental sources or understanding material without a target-work adoption question need no separate incorporation workflow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Review a diff, commit, branch, PR, or implementation for actionable correctness and risk issues without duplicate reviewer loops or invented findings.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use for hands-on repository work when a quiet, risk-scaled engineering method can improve design, execution strategy, implementation, material incorporation, debugging, review, delegation, workspace lifecycle, or verification. Keep clear local changes direct, preserve the complete requested outcome, and add method only where risk or uncertainty justifies it. Do not use for general technical explanations, simple file lookup, casual discussion, or non-engineering writing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Preserve an approved specification through a complete implementation plan and execution. Use for major refactors, migrations, or multi-session work when a confirmed spec is authoritative; keep scope and order changes explicit.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Verify code or product claims after changes using fresh, risk-matched evidence. Use before saying a bug is fixed, tests pass, requirements are met, or a branch is ready.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Choose, reuse, restore, park, or clean up Git workspaces while preserving work and host ownership. Create isolation only when it resolves a real conflict; inspection does not authorize creation or deletion.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Choose responsibility for substantial work before deep execution: keep one responsibility's coupled parts in a single lane, and hand a bounded or independent lane to a worker when clean context, an unknown cause, independent review, or coordinator attention materially improves the outcome.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Finish a development change safely by inspecting the final tree, verifying at the right scope, and performing only the requested Git or PR actions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Apply risk-based test-driven development to bugs, domain logic, state transitions, parsers, contracts, migrations, and behavior where a failing test sharpens the design.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Investigate and fix bugs, failing tests, regressions, build failures, or unexpected behavior using boundary localization, evidence, and bounded hypotheses.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turn a rough feature, product interaction, or architecture idea into a concrete design. Use when meaningful decisions remain open; avoid for already-clear local edits.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Implement a settled request or current execution strategy through connected slices, feed observations into the same task record, and revise affected work when evidence changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Form and maintain execution strategy when order, effort, evidence timing or recovery materially affects the outcome, even with a settled goal. Reuse durable task records when continuity needs them; keep clear work direct.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Complete MCP engineering work on the live path: build or repair servers and Apps, debug stdio or Streamable HTTP, migrate protocol/SDK/transport versions, reconcile source with package and activated runtime, inspect capability/effect authorization, and verify named-host claims without promoting weaker evidence. Use for real Model Context Protocol implementation, review, migration, runtime, or host-integration tasks. Do not use for ordinary non-MCP APIs, generic frontend work, or incidental product copy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design, audit, harden, review, or upgrade MCP servers and MCP Apps with revision-aware protocol profiles, explicit HTTP/deployment boundaries, capability-centered validation, bilingual reporting, and reproducible evidence. Use for MCP server architecture, JSON-RPC or Streamable HTTP bugs, security hardening, protocol-version migration, MCP Apps widget boundaries, review reconciliation, test planning, and public engineering evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Resolve repository documentation authority, repair reading paths and explanations, or shape a bounded public projection. Maintain docs after a bounded change when indirect reader promises, generated or paired sources, version/evidence boundaries, or unclear authority need attention. Ordinary known updates stay in normal development; not for isolated prose polishing, code review, or broad runtime audits.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design, audit, harden, review, or upgrade MCP servers and MCP Apps with revision-aware protocol profiles, explicit HTTP/deployment boundaries, capability-centered validation, bilingual reporting, and reproducible evidence. Use for MCP server architecture, JSON-RPC or Streamable HTTP bugs, security hardening, protocol-version migration, MCP Apps widget boundaries, review reconciliation, test planning, and public engineering evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.