'evidence-based' 검색 결과

Run user-authorized black-box web security tests and evidence-based reports. Use for 黑盒安全测试、渗透测试、数据泄露、未授权访问、公开 JS/API、登录爆破防护、CORS 或安全响应头检查。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when coaching hypothesis-driven debugging that requires the learner to gather evidence and reason about root causes before applying fixes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Standard Operating Procedures for read-only codebase exploration, symbol search, dependency mapping, code tracing, code review, architecture analysis, technical research, source evaluation, and evidence-based reporting.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

MBSR fundamentals, body scan, and breathing exercises. Evidence-based mindfulness techniques according to Jon Kabat-Zinn for everyday life.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

You are a senior documentation engineer that generates comprehensive technical documentation pages with evidence-based depth.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Write an evidence-based status update from Linear data - summarize what shipped, what is in progress, what is blocked or stale for a project, cycle, or a person's issues, and optionally post it as a Linear project status update after the user approves the text. Use for "status for project X", "weekly update", "what moved this cycle".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run a Busabase-backed sales prospecting and first-touch outreach desk with a bundled Hono App-in-Skill deployable to AirApp. Use whenever the user invokes $kelly-sales-outreach or /kelly-sales-outreach, wants to enter a product or service and discover its ideal customers, asks to continuously find target accounts or public business contacts, needs evidence-based ICP scoring and personalized outreach drafts, or wants to review and send cold outreach safely. Four subcommands - setup, profile, research, send - plus the desk itself. Every first-touch message requires human approval; one company receives one initial email; guessed addresses, purchased lists, secret exposure, automated spam, and unreviewed external sends are forbidden.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Project gene annotations across genomes using TOGA (Kirilenko 2023 whole-genome-alignment chain-based projection with intactness classification), CESAR 2.0 (Sharma & Hiller 2017 codon-aware exon projection), LiftOff (Shumate & Salzberg 2020 reference-based annotation transfer), Liftover (UCSC), GeMoMa (Keilwagen 2019 evidence-based projection), and Comparative Annotation Toolkit (CAT). Use when transferring annotations from a well-annotated reference to query genome(s), classifying gene-loss vs gene-intact across many genomes at scale, building Zoonomia-style comparative annotations across hundreds of mammals or birds (Kirilenko 2023), detecting pseudogenization, projecting alternative isoforms, or selecting between WGA-anchored (TOGA) vs ortholog-based (LiftOff) annotation transfer strategies.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Diagnose repository and PWDEV Flow health without changing the project. Use when the user asks for a health check, workspace consistency check, dependency assessment, readiness report, or evidence-based scorecard.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Put on the adversarial hat and systematically attack any document, plan, strategy, or idea to expose its weakest points before commitment. Structured devil's advocate with red team rigour — not pessimism, but evidence-based critique across three phases: diagnostic (are claims accurate?), creative (is the problem artificially constrained?), challenge (are solutions robust?). Load when the user asks to stress test a document, red team this plan, poke holes in this, devil's advocate this, challenge my assumptions, or when product-soul, brainstorming, prd-writing, or inversion calls for adversarial review. Also triggers on "what am I missing", "what could kill this", "find the flaws", or "critique this rigorously".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Project gene annotations across genomes using TOGA (Kirilenko 2023 whole-genome-alignment chain-based projection with intactness classification), CESAR 2.0 (Sharma & Hiller 2017 codon-aware exon projection), LiftOff (Shumate & Salzberg 2020 reference-based annotation transfer), Liftover (UCSC), GeMoMa (Keilwagen 2019 evidence-based projection), and Comparative Annotation Toolkit (CAT). Use when transferring annotations from a well-annotated reference to query genome(s), classifying gene-loss vs gene-intact across many genomes at scale, building Zoonomia-style comparative annotations across hundreds of mammals or birds (Kirilenko 2023), detecting pseudogenization, projecting alternative isoforms, or selecting between WGA-anchored (TOGA) vs ortholog-based (LiftOff) annotation transfer strategies.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a driver or carrier asks about trucker mental health — depression, isolation, stress, fatigue, suicide risk, addiction, EAP programs, or wellness benefits. Covers evidence-based programs, hotlines, carrier-side EAP design, and how mental health affects safety and retention.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a Spark implementation needs an evidence-based review for correctness, ownership, compatibility, failure handling, maintainability, and unnecessary complexity.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when writing recommendation letters, reference letters, or award nominations for students, postdocs, or colleagues. Invoke when user mentions recommendation letter, reference, nomination, letter of support, endorsement, or needs help with strong advocacy, comparative statements, or evidence-based character assessment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

[21] UNDERSTAND. Deep research workflow for this project using 150% scope (100% core + 50% boundary), evidence-based reasoning, and structured investigation notes. Use when the task requires investigation, root-cause analysis, or mapping unknown areas. Always maintain a research log file that captures findings, hypotheses, and next branches; use web.run when external verification is needed.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze and fix production errors from Sentry crash reports. Use when investigating AppHang, ANR, crashes, or production errors. Includes complete workflow from JSON analysis to bug fix implementation with evidence-based methodology. Triggers on sentry, crash, AppHang, ANR, error analysis, production error, bug analysis, crash report, freeze, hang, not responding, stacktrace, breadcrumbs, exception.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate concise (3-4 page), focused medical treatment plans in LaTeX/PDF format for all clinical specialties. Supports general medical treatment, rehabilitation therapy, mental health care, chronic disease management, perioperative care, and pain management. Includes SMART goal frameworks, evidence-based interventions with minimal text citations, regulatory compliance (HIPAA), and professional formatting. Prioritizes brevity and clinical actionability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a Spark implementation needs an evidence-based review for correctness, ownership, compatibility, failure handling, maintainability, and unnecessary complexity.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when reviewer comments arrive and each one needs a tracked decision, when a revise and resubmit letter must map every comment to a manuscript change, or when contradictory reviewer demands need evidence-based, editor-facing framing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.