'depth' 검색 결과

Conversational profile builder. Produces validated JSON config files for any rootnode Skill that consumes profile-shaped configuration (handoff trigger check, mode router, critic gate, future Skills). Reads a target JSON Schema (draft-07), conducts a progressive-depth interview using plain-language questions, validates answers, and writes the resulting JSON to a destination path. Schema-agnostic — works with any profile schema conforming to draft-07. Use when a user needs to create, clone, or revise a profile and you do not want them hand-editing JSON. Trigger on: "build me a profile," "create a profile," "I need a profile for X," "set up my profile," "edit my profile," "clone the X profile," "walk me through making a profile." Do NOT use when the user already has a working profile and only wants to invoke the consuming Skill, when the schema cannot be located, or for non-profile JSON config work. Always validate before writing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audits and scores Claude Projects using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics and detects seven structural anti-patterns. When global layer info is provided, adds cross-layer alignment findings. Use when user says "audit my project," "review my custom instructions," "score my project," "evaluate my Claude project," "improve my system prompt," "what's wrong with my project," "why is my project underperforming." Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "my project doesn't work right," "Claude is inconsistent in my project," "my Project used to work and now doesn't." Also use when the user pastes Custom Instructions asking why output is poor or generic. Do NOT use when the user's primary request is a global-layer audit (use rootnode-global-audit if available), single-prompt evaluation (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available), or Memory-only optimization (use rootnode-memory-optimization if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Guides selection of identity, reasoning, and output approaches for Claude prompts based on task characteristics. Trigger on: "help me choose an approach," "which approach fits this task," "recommend a prompt pattern," "compare reasoning methods," "map this task to the right approach," "what combination of approaches," "which identity fits," "which reasoning method." Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "my prompt feels generic," "I don't know which approach to use," "my output lacks domain depth." Covers decision-tree logic across 8 identity approaches, 18 reasoning variants, and 10 output formats. After selection, use the relevant catalog skill if available to retrieve full templates. Activate whenever approach-selection across multiple categories is the primary decision. Do NOT use when the user already names a specific approach to retrieve (use the relevant catalog skill directly if available) or for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audits and optimizes the five global Claude layers (User Preferences, Styles, Global Memory, Skills, MCP Connectors) using the Global Layer Scorecard (six dimensions, anchored 1-5 rubrics). Detects eight cross-layer failure modes and produces evolutionary recommendations (Promotion, Demotion, Codification, Skill Extraction). Use when user says "audit my global setup," "optimize my preferences," "review my Claude configuration," "check my cross-project setup," "are my preferences working," "clean up my global memory," or "what should be in my preferences vs my project." Also use when a user has 3+ Projects and wants to improve their shared foundation. Do NOT use for single-Project audits, Project Memory optimization, or full-stack audits (use rootnode-project-audit, rootnode-memory-optimization, or rootnode-full-stack-audit respectively, if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Builds complete, optimized Claude prompts and Project scaffolds from task descriptions. Use when building, designing, creating, or structuring a Claude prompt or system prompt. Trigger on: "build me a prompt," "compile a prompt for," "create a system prompt," "write a Claude prompt," "design a prompt for," "help me write a prompt," "scaffold a Claude Project," "design a Project for." Uses a four-stage methodology (Parse, Select, Construct, Validate) and a tested 5-layer architecture (Identity, Objective, Context, Reasoning, Output + Quality Control). In Project Mode, the Compiler is global-layer-aware — checks User Preferences, installed Skills, and MCP Connectors to avoid redundancy and flag gaps. Do NOT use for auditing existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or diagnosing existing Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive audit of a user's entire Claude environment — combines Project audit (six-dimension Project Scorecard, seven anti-patterns) with Global audit (six-dimension Global Layer Scorecard) plus Cross-Layer Alignment Check across all nine layers and Evolutionary Recommendations across four pathways. Produces a unified action plan. Use when user says "full audit of everything," "audit my entire Claude setup," "full stack audit," "comprehensive review of my project and preferences," "check everything," or wants the complete health check of both a specific Project AND their global configuration. Also use when a project audit reveals cross-layer issues that require full-stack visibility. Do NOT use for auditing only a Project (use rootnode-project-audit if available) or only global layers (use rootnode-global-audit if available). Do NOT use for single prompt evaluation (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Transform academic papers into in-depth technical articles with multiple writing style options. Use the MinerU Cloud API for high-precision PDF parsing, automatically extracting images, tables, and formulas. Optional formula explanations and GitHub code analysis, generating Markdown and HTML formats.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when navigating kernel source, understanding boot flow, initcall levels, or major subsystems (VFS, scheduler, MM) in linux.git. Not for driver-model depth: use device-drivers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when asked to explain or teach a subsystem, module, pattern, or change in progressive layers from purpose to code depth. Not for design rationale: use why. Not for source or remote-system changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use for ANY bug bounty, penetration test, or web/API/mobile security assessment: recon, testing endpoints, analyzing Burp traffic or any bug-bounty platform's MCP (HackerOne, Intigriti, Bugcrowd, YesWeHack, Immunefi), reviewing APKs, bypassing a WAF, enforcing scope, hunting a specific vuln class, validating findings, writing reports, or when you are stuck on a target and about to give up. Activates automatically for all bug-bounty and pentest sessions. Runs an autonomous, never-surrender predator methodology: refuses to conclude "secure", exhausts each vuln class to depth, proves a real attacker-path with impact and no false positives, tracks coverage so nothing is re-tested or skipped, diagnoses failed tooling from full logs, and hunts at maximum effort with intelligent token use until the goal is found. Activates and follows instructions in ANY language the operator writes in (the skill itself is English). Bundles a per-class web-exploitation KB, a writeup library, and PayloadsAllTheThings.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Bulk extract content from an entire website or site section. Use this skill when the user wants to crawl a site, extract all pages from a docs section, bulk-scrape multiple pages following links, or says "crawl", "get all the pages", "extract everything under /docs", "bulk extract", or needs content from many pages on the same site. Handles depth limits, path filtering, and concurrent extraction.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Validate at every layer data passes through to make bugs impossible

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design effective reasoning processes for AI agents and optimize decision-making strategies. Use when designing agent prompts, improving decision quality, implementing specialized reasoning modes, creating reasoning traces, or debugging agent mistakes. Covers prompting, chain-of-thought, reasoning depth, and decision evaluation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan and protect deep work: scheduling focus blocks, task selection, shutdown rituals, and measuring depth. Use when important work never gets sustained attention or days fill with shallow tasks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Performs fast first-pass triage of an unknown file to decide depth of analysis: file type identification, hashing, reputation lookup, packing/entropy check, and string review. Activates for requests to triage, classify, or do initial assessment of an unknown or suspicious file.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Etcher/Engraver — compensating a resist pattern for expected undercut before etching fine detail, calculating etch time from a known etch rate rather than judging completion visually, verifying a functional engraving's line width/depth against its actual accuracy requirement, or re-validating process parameters on a new material batch before production.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Drilling and Boring Machine Tool Setter, Operator, or Tender — deciding whether a hole's depth-to-diameter ratio requires peck drilling, establishing a straight hole start before wander compounds, reducing cutting parameters for a long-reach boring setup versus a short-reach one, or diagnosing whether a dimensional drift traces to tool wear rather than assuming the tool still looks sharp.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Continuous Mining Machine Operator in underground coal — reading a methane monitor trend and deciding whether to de-energize, judging whether cumulative unbolted advance has hit the roof control plan's cut-depth limit, deciding whether a permissibility defect requires immediate shutdown in a gassy heading, diagnosing whether a shift's production shortfall traces to cutting rate or shuttle-car haulage, or deciding whether a "drummy" roof sound stops the cut.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a task needs the judgment of a construction laborer — determining which OSHA-mandated protective system (sloping, benching, shoring, or shielding) a trench needs given its soil classification and depth, working as spotter/signal person on a crane or heavy-equipment lift, staging material and equipment on an active multi-trade site, or reading which hazard zone (excavation, crane swing, electrical rough-in) is live as work moves across the site.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create QA test strategy documents, coverage matrices, and risk-based test prioritization plans. Use this skill whenever a QA lead or manager needs to plan what to test, why, and at what depth. Trigger on phrases like "write a test strategy", "test strategy document", "what should we test", "prioritize testing", "risk-based testing", "test coverage plan", "QA approach for this project", "coverage matrix", "test scope", "how should we approach testing this quarter", "where are our coverage gaps", or any request to define the strategic plan for testing - not the execution of it. Also trigger at project kickoff when a QA lead asks "how do we approach quality on this?"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Serena code intelligence — LSP-powered symbol navigation, diagnostics, and targeted code surgery. Activate before complex refactors, cross-file analysis, or when graph tools need symbol-level depth.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when authoring INVEST-compliant Salesforce user stories from gathered requirements: shaping the As-A/I-Want/So-That stem, writing Given-When-Then acceptance criteria, sizing complexity (S/M/L/XL), splitting stories that are too large for a sprint, and emitting handoff metadata that names the next downstream agent. Trigger keywords: user story, INVEST, story splitting, story sizing, As-A I-Want So-That, story handoff, recommended_agents, backlog item shape. NOT for requirements elicitation or stakeholder interviews (use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf). NOT for the Given-When-Then technique itself in depth (use admin/acceptance-criteria-given-when-then). NOT for UAT test case design (use admin/uat-test-case-design). NOT for backlog prioritization (use admin/moscow-prioritization-for-sf-backlog).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Requirements for a Salesforce Enterprise Territory Management (ETM) territory design: alignment criteria, coverage model selection, assignment rule logic, hierarchy depth and breadth, and user-to-territory ratios. Trigger keywords: territory design, territory alignment, territory model requirements, sales coverage model, territory criteria, geographic territory, named account territory, overlay territory. NOT for ETM setup steps — use admin/enterprise-territory-management. NOT for loading territory assignment data — use data/territory-data-alignment. Trigger keywords: territory design questionnaire, territory requirements document, assignment rule matrix, territory type priority, realignment plan, territory access level decision, accountAccessLevel, opportunityAccessLevel, ObjectTerritory2Association, UserTerritory2Association, Planning state model, territory acceptance tests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill to define and validate the requirements for a Salesforce Partner Relationship Management (PRM) implementation: deal registration flows, lead distribution models, partner tier hierarchies, MDF budget tracking, and co-marketing content entitlement. Trigger keywords: partner community requirements, PRM deal registration setup, channel partner portal requirements, lead distribution partner, partner tier management, MDF tracking, co-marketing entitlement. NOT for implementing the partner sharing model — use data/partner-data-access-patterns. NOT for building the portal in Experience Builder — use admin/experience-cloud-site-setup. More trigger keywords: partner portal design worksheet, partner tier licence and role depth, PartnerAccountId blank on opportunity, portal role Executive Manager User, sharing set does not support Lead, enable partner user greyed out, offboard a partner firm, PartnerMarketingBudget PartnerFundRequest PartnerFundClaim, ChannelProgramLevel partner tier, deal registration acceptance step.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.