'gap' 검색 결과

Review mathematical proofs in LaTeX for logical gaps, missing assumptions, and unjustified steps. Attempt counterexamples, develop explicit repairs, and repeat the review, producing an audit report that distinguishes completed fixes from assumptions and unresolved proof obligations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Checking theorem assumptions and logical dependencies
• Finding counterexamples to key lemmas
• Repairing missing derivations in LaTeX proofs

Compare a regulatory change with an indexed company policy library. Identify affected policies, missing or conflicting provisions, responsible owners, and specific changes needed, with source labels and flags for uncertainty about whether the rule is in force.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Identifying policies affected by a regulatory change
• Comparing new requirements with existing policy wording
• Finding requirements that need a new policy

Find changes in observable behavior that existing tests could miss. Map public results to test assertions, identify gaps in boundaries, permissions, and calculations, and propose focused tests, with optional verification when requested.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Check whether existing tests would catch a bug
• Find missing boundary and permission-denial tests
• Review exact amounts and rounding in financial calculations

Plan philosophy and interdisciplinary papers by comparing preprint platforms, searching literature, identifying unanswered questions, and assessing originality. Receive a detailed outline with section word counts, key citations, and improvements based on a reviewer-style assessment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Planning a philosophy or interdisciplinary paper
• Choosing a suitable preprint platform
• Finding research gaps and assessing originality

Competitor page gap analysis — take a query you want to win and the pages currently outranking you, and produce a concrete brief on what to add or change to compete. Compares content depth and coverage (subtopics they cover that you don't), structure (headings, format, tables, media), search-intent match, E-E-A-T signals, schema/rich-result eligibility, internal linking, and on-page optimization — across your page vs. the top-ranking competitors. Use this skill whenever the user wants to know why a competitor outranks them on a specific query, what a top-ranking page does better, a content-gap analysis against specific competitor URLs, or a brief to beat a specific SERP. Trigger on: "why does competitor X outrank me", "content gap analysis", "competitor page analysis", "what does the top result have that I don't", "how do I beat this page", "analyze competitor pages", "SERP gap", "compete for [keyword]". For seed keyword discovery use /keyword-research; for a content calendar use /content-planner.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Map where you are against the next level and build a concrete plan to close the gap. Use when asked to map a career ladder, find the gap to the next level, build a development/growth plan, or figure out what to work on to get promoted. Produces a level-gap map — current vs. target competencies side by side, the specific gaps, and a prioritised 1–2 quarter plan of evidence-generating projects to close them.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Panel health assessment, firm exit management, coverage gap analysis, and panel refresh brief for in-house legal ops teams. Produce an annual Panel Health Report synthesising scorecard data, billing compliance, and step-out patterns into per-firm recommendations — Retain, Watch, Improvement Plan, or Exit Review. Produce a firm exit pack: formal exit notice with active matter transition plan, plus an internal exit record. Identify practice area, geographic, or tier gaps and produce a structured Coverage Gap Report with remediation options. Produce a Panel Refresh Brief as a scoped input to the RFP process. Trigger on: 'review our panel', 'annual panel review', 'is our panel working', 'which firms should we exit', 'write the exit notice', 'coverage gap', 'we don't have anyone for restructuring', 'refresh the panel', 'panel rationalisation', 'too many firms', 'step-out problem', 'do we have the right firms'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Identify content gaps between your site and competitors. Use when the user says "content gaps", "what am I missing", "competitor content", "content opportunities", "topics I should cover", "content gap analysis", or asks about finding topics and keywords their site doesn't cover but competitors do.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Guides compliance with Singapore's Personal Data Protection Act 2012 (PDPA). Covers PDPC advisory guidelines, Do Not Call Registry, data intermediary obligations, deemed consent, notification requirements, and the 2020-2021 amendments. Keywords: Singapore PDPA, PDPC, Do Not Call Registry, deemed consent, data intermediary, advisory guidelines.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Guides conducting privacy law gap analysis for market entry into new jurisdictions. Covers target jurisdiction assessment, existing compliance mapping, remediation effort estimation, and implementation timeline planning. Keywords: gap analysis, market entry, jurisdiction assessment, remediation planning, compliance mapping.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Append-only gap closure and the cadence engine for research theses. Evaluates artifact CURRENT state (never git history, never task checkboxes) against current pins and wrong_if falsifiers, then appends a Convergence section to tasks.md re-proposing the gaps. A clean run leaves tasks.md byte-identical. Deterministic gaps (stale, invalidated) are uncapped; judgment-class gaps are capped per spec 046 Q40.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run a compliance gap analysis against SOC2, GDPR, HIPAA, or ISO 27001. Use when asked "are we SOC2 ready", "run a GDPR gap analysis", or "what is missing for ISO 27001".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detect missing docs, undocumented files, project health issues, and coverage gaps on session start or on-demand. Scans for README gaps, TODO/FIXME counts, and test coverage holes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Cyclical dogfooding loop: test AI-AGENT-STORIES.md against the live graph, discover new stories, analyze gaps, fix root causes, re-test, write report. Use when: (1) user says "/gap-loop", (2) periodic dogfooding session, (3) after a release or major feature to re-validate stories, (4) before sprint planning to prioritize product gaps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

根據使用者的文章或論文草稿，自動用 Semantic Scholar、Crossref、arXiv API 搜尋相關文獻，並查核既有引用(文獻是否真實存在、書目欄位是否正確、內容是否支持文中論點)，也能從主題出發寫出「每個宣稱都有真實文獻支撐」的帶引用文章；另含研究生工具組：文獻矩陣、領域地圖、research gap 偵測、閱讀筆記卡、引用完整性檢查、中英術語一致性、口試/審稿預演、新文獻追蹤、引用需求標記(annotate)、反面證據搜尋(counter)、證據強度評級(strength)、claim-evidence 總表(claims)、撤稿查詢(retract)。凡是使用者提到找文獻、找 paper、補參考文獻、查核引用、檢查 citation、驗證參考文獻、related work、literature review，貼文章要求配文獻、問「這段話有沒有文獻支持」、要求「寫一篇帶參考文獻的文章」、要整理文獻比較表、問已指名兩概念的交集有沒有人做過、要準備口試文獻答辯時，都要使用本 skill。本 skill 的 gap 指令只查證使用者已指名的 X 與 Y 交集；若使用者連題目都還沒有、需要生成並逐一淘汰候選方向，那是題目生成，不在本 skill 範圍(環境裝有 research-gap-hunter 時交給它，沒有就如實說明本 skill 只能查證已指名的交集)。本 skill 的 map 指令盤的是**文獻**——奠基文獻是哪幾篇、關鍵作者是誰、近三年往哪走；若使用者要的是「這個領域現在有哪些**做法**、每一種買到什麼付出什麼、哪些已經飽和」，那是技術盤點不是文獻盤點，交給 research-gap-hunter 的 landscape，沒有那個 skill 就如實說明本 skill 的 map 只回答文獻層的問題。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Find keywords that competitors rank for but the target domain does not, using Ahrefs data. Reveals content opportunities and topic gaps. Use when user says "content gap", "keywords competitors rank for", "missing keywords", "competitor keywords", or "content gap analysis".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a team suspects its policies describe a company that does not exist, before an audit or customer review, or asks "do our policies match what we actually do", "check the policy against reality", "paper versus practice", "will the auditor find gaps in our policies", "our policy says quarterly but we never do it" or "align policies with how we work". Turns each policy into testable statements, samples the systems and records that show the practice, classifies every gap and proposes whether to fix the policy or the practice, with owners and priorities.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

ISO規格（ISO 9001品質、ISO 27001情報セキュリティ、ISO 22301事業継続等）の認証取得支援スキル。 ギャップ分析、文書化支援、内部監査、認証準備を提供。 Use when pursuing ISO certification, conducting gap analysis, or implementing ISO-compliant management systems. Triggers: "ISO 9001", "ISO 27001", "ISO 22301", "ISO certification", "quality management", "ISMS", "gap analysis".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

テストが担保していない公開面（GAP）を検出する。報告のみで、ファイル生成・修正・Issue 起票はしない。Triggers on: '/surface-audit', 'テスト担保を診断', '公開面を監査', 'GAPを検出', 'テストの無い公開面'

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

기존 테스트와 부족한 부분을 점검합니다. 요구 사항, 업무 규칙, 결함을 식별 번호와 실행 결과에 연결하고 테스트 대장으로 검증 여부를 추적합니다.

• 기존 테스트와 부족한 부분을 점검합니다
• 결함 수정의 재발 방지를 확인합니다
• 클라이언트와 서버의 계약 검증을 살핍니다

Build attack trees, diagrams showing paths toward an attacker's goal. Break scenarios into required or alternative steps, assess effort and detectability, and map defenses to identify gaps and prioritize security work.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Visualize complex attack scenarios
• Identify gaps in existing defenses
• Explain security risks to authorized stakeholders

Assess your Claude Code experience with a quick checklist or a deeper review across 10 feature areas. Receive a skill profile, identified gaps, and a personalized learning path with priorities, estimated study time, and practice exercises.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Find a starting point for learning Claude Code
• Review experience across feature areas
• Prioritize topics to learn next

Map security threats into attack trees, branching diagrams that connect an attacker’s goal to possible steps. Assess cost, time, expertise, and detection likelihood to identify defense gaps, prioritize mitigations, and explain risks to stakeholders.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Visualizing complex attack scenarios
• Identifying defense gaps and priorities
• Explaining security risks to stakeholders

Build learning activities where learners explain an idea first, then improve their explanation through focused questions. Include plain language, checks on analogies, application to unfamiliar situations, and a record of remaining gaps and next goals.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Learn a concept by explaining it in your own words
• Turn existing materials into explanation-based activities
• Test explanations without relying on technical terms