'poc' 검색 결과

音乐制作 / 混音 (音乐制作 / 混音 (Music Production & Mixing) — 录音棚与卧室工作室里把一首歌从编曲/录音/编程做到混音/母带成品的工程+艺术认知操作系统，面向制作人(producer)、混音师(mixing engineer)、母带工程师(mastering engineer)、beatmaker、唱作人/bedroom producer，以及想入行/服务这行(录音棚、plugin 厂商、sample 公司)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **服务歌曲/情绪 (serve the song / emotion-first: 技术只为打动人，'if it sounds good it is good'，用耳朵不用眼睛) ⇄ 技术正确/工程纪律 (technical correctness: gain staging 增益结构、headroom 余量、相位 phase、监听校准、LUFS 响度规范)**; **黄金耳朵/直觉混音 (mix by ears, reference-driven, 不看分析仪) ⇄ 看表/分析仪/规则 (mix by metrics: EQ 曲线、频谱仪 spectrum analyzer、相关计 correlation meter)**; **少即是多/减法混音 (subtractive, 'less is more', 录好源头 = 混音成功一半) ⇄ 重度处理/'we'll fix it in the mix' (heavy processing, 后期补救)**; **In-the-box 全数字 (ITB: DAW + 插件，召回方便，bedroom 可达专业) ⇄ 模拟硬件/outboard (analog console + 硬件，'mojo'/谐波染色 vs 召回噩梦)**; **人性化/groove/不完美 (humanize, push/pull, 'the feel') ⇄ 量化/网格/修音 (quantize to grid, pitch-correct, 'in the pocket' 靠编辑)**; (b) 核心工作流 / pipeline (最标准、最易蒸高质量+CLI 化) — 编曲制作 arrangement/production → 录音/编程 tracking/programming → 编辑 editing (comping 选段/quantize/pitch-correct/time-align) → 混音 mixing (gain staging → balance 平衡 → EQ → compression → 空间 reverb/delay → 自动化 automation → 总线/母线处理 bus/mix-bus) → 母带 mastering (响度/EQ/限制 limiting/dither/排序+间隔) → 交付 delivery (DDP/streaming spec/stems); (c) 工具栈 — DAW (Pro Tools 录音棚标准/Ableton Live 电子+现场/Logic Pro Mac 性价比/FL Studio beatmaker/Cubase/Studio One/Reaper); 插件 (EQ: FabFilter Pro-Q/SSL/API; 压缩: 1176/LA-2A/SSL bus comp 及其复刻 Waves/UAD/Plugin Alliance; 混响: Valhalla/Lexicon/Bricasti; 调音: Auto-Tune/Melodyne; 限制器 limiter: Pro-L 2/Ozone); 硬件 (监听音箱 monitors: Yamaha NS-10/Genelec; 声学处理 acoustic treatment; 转换器 converters: Apollo/RME; 话筒 mics: U47/SM7B/57); 采样/音色 (Splice/sample packs/Kontakt/Serum 合成器); (d) 知识正典 — Mixing Secrets for the Small Studio (Mike Senior)、The Mixing Engineer's Handbook / Recording Engineer's Handbook (Bobby Owsinski)、Zen and the Art of Mixing (Mixerman)、The Art of Mixing (David Gibson 可视化)、Modern Recording Techniques、Sound on Sound 杂志、Mix With The Masters 大师课、Pensado's Place; (e) figures/流派 — 混音大师 (Chris Lord-Alge CLA 摇滚/Andrew Scheps 'Stadium' 3-bus/Tony Maserati/Manny Marroquin/Serban Ghenea 流行隐形混音/Michael Brauer multing); 制作人 (Rick Rubin 减法/氛围、Quincy Jones、Dr. Dre 完美主义、Max Martin 流行结构、Jack Antonoff、Finneas bedroom→Grammy、Metro Boomin/trap、Timbaland、Pharrell); 母带 (Bob Katz K-system/响度战争批判、Bob Ludwig、Greg Calbi); 教育者 (Mike Senior、Pensado、Warren Huart Produce Like A Pro、Dan Worrall 技术深挖); (f) 行业话术/黑话 — gain staging/headroom/LUFS/true peak/comping/bouncing/printing/stems/DI/reamp/sidechain/parallel compression 并行压缩/mid-side/bus/aux/send-return/dry-wet/transient/sibilance/de-ess/pumping/mud 浑浊/harsh 刺耳/boxy/muddy/in the pocket/the pocket/quantize/swing/groove/vibe/mojo/reference track/A/B/recall/print/glue 胶水; (g) 争议/批判 — 响度战争 loudness war (Bob Katz/Loudness Penalty/streaming 归一化 LUFS 终结了吗)、修音/Auto-Tune 之争 (artistic vs cheating)、ITB vs 模拟玄学 (硬件 'warmth' 是否安慰剂、null test 盲测)、preset/AI 混音 (iZotope/LANDR/sample-based 是否毁了 craft)、bedroom producer 民主化 vs 录音棚消亡、'loudness'/over-compression、plugin 复刻 vs 真硬件、Spotify normalization 对母带的影响、过度依赖 reference/抄袭; (h) 创意 vs 技术张力是本行业 deep tacit 知识的核心 — 大量隐性 '听感' 知识难以言传，靠 reference/学徒/千小时积累。不含: 现场扩声 live sound/PA、音乐理论/作曲 composition (虽相关但聚焦录音棚后期制作)、配乐/film scoring (虽相关但聚焦歌曲制作)、纯硬件电子工程/合成器 DIY、音乐商业/版权/发行 (虽相关但聚焦制作技艺本身)。) Master OS — automated mastery of 音乐制作 / 混音 (Music Production & Mixing) — 录音棚与卧室工作室里把一首歌从编曲/录音/编程做到混音/母带成品的工程+艺术认知操作系统，面向制作人(producer)、混音师(mixing engineer)、母带工程师(mastering engineer)、beatmaker、唱作人/bedroom producer，以及想入行/服务这行(录音棚、plugin 厂商、sample 公司)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **服务歌曲/情绪 (serve the song / emotion-first: 技术只为打动人，'if it sounds good it is good'，用耳朵不用眼睛) ⇄ 技术正确/工程纪律 (technical correctness: gain staging 增益结构、headroom 余量、相位 phase、监听校准、LUFS 响度规范)**; **黄金耳朵/直觉混音 (mix by ears, reference-driven, 不看分析仪) ⇄ 看表/分析仪/规则 (mix by metrics: EQ 曲线、频谱仪 spectrum analyzer、相关计 correlation meter)**; **少即是多/减法混音 (subtractive, 'less is more', 录好源头 = 混音成功一半) ⇄ 重度处理/'we'll fix it i

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Intelligent financial management skill for Claude Code that provides comprehensive PocketSmith API integration with AI-powered analysis, transaction categorization, rule management, tax intelligence, and scenario planning. Use when working with PocketSmith data for (1) Transaction categorization and rule management, (2) Financial analysis and reporting, (3) Australian tax compliance (ATO) and deduction tracking, (4) Scenario analysis and forecasting, (5) PocketSmith setup health checks, (6) Budget optimization and spending insights.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Recommends real-time CGM with confirmatory bedside POC-BG monitoring for insulin dosing adjustments rather than POC-BG testing alone in adults with insulin-treated diabetes at high risk of hypoglycemia. Consider this approach for patients aged ≥65 years, BMI ≤27 kg/m², total daily insulin dose ≥0.6 units/kg, CKD stage ≥3, or recent hypoglycemia.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Capture a POC's signed-off behaviour into its spec ledger (`<poc>/spec.json`) — the structured, walkable behaviour contract graduation freezes as authoritative. Run at the moment a behaviour gets signed off ("ok, this works"), while it's fresh — the same trigger as the HANDOFF.md update, but capturing the *behaviour as a testable entry* rather than the *decision as prose*. Use when a POC behaviour is approved, or asked to "capture this spec", "write the spec entry", "log this to the ledger".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Cleanly tear down a crouton poc/app — the inverse of /deploy. Removes the code, the Cloudflare Worker + D1 + KV (both env scopes), the app's stray branches, and closes its epic/sub-issues — with a --dry-run first and a typed confirm for anything destructive. Use when asked to "remove an app", "tear down a poc", "delete app X and its resources", or to clean up after an abandoned proof-of-concept. Counterpart to /deploy, /poc-deploy, crouton init.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

명세서와 관련 티켓의 의존 관계를 읽고 여러 에이전트가 구현을 진행합니다. 테스트와 검토를 거쳐 결과를 하나의 통합 브랜치로 모으고 티켓 완료 처리까지 진행합니다.

• 여러 티켓으로 나뉜 명세 구현
• 독립적인 작업의 병렬 구현
• 구현 결과를 통합 브랜치에 모으기

개발 스킬의 첫 사용에 앞서 작업 관리 위치, 분류 라벨, 용어집과 설계 결정 기록의 위치를 확인합니다. 사용자 검토를 거쳐 저장소 공통 설정 문서를 정리합니다.

• 개발 스킬의 초기 설정
• 작업 관리 위치와 분류 라벨 정리
• 용어집과 설계 결정 기록의 위치 결정

아이디어 정리, 구현, 오류 조사에 맞는 관련 스킬과 사용 순서를 안내합니다. 작업의 규모와 단계에 따라 다음 절차를 선택하도록 돕습니다.

• 아이디어부터 구현까지의 절차 선택
• 오류 조사를 시작할 지점 찾기
• 여러 세션에 걸친 개발 진행 방식 상담

지정한 커밋이나 브랜치를 기준으로 코드 변경을 검토합니다. 문서화된 개발 규칙 준수와 요구 사항 구현을 별도로 확인하고 두 관점의 지적 사항을 나누어 보고합니다.

• 브랜치나 PR의 변경 검토
• 지정 커밋이나 태그 이후 변경 확인
• 문서화된 개발 규칙과 대조

현재 대화와 코드베이스에 대한 이해를 바탕으로 명세서를 작성해 프로젝트 이슈 관리 시스템에 게시합니다. 사용자 요구, 구현과 테스트 방침, 제외 범위를 정리합니다.

• 기능 논의를 명세서로 정리
• 합의한 요구 사항을 이슈로 게시
• 구현과 테스트 방침 문서화

이슈와 외부 코드 변경 요청을 분류하고 보고 내용을 검증합니다. 누락된 정보와 처리 상태를 정리하며, 에이전트나 사람이 착수할 작업 설명을 남깁니다.

• 관리자의 검토가 필요한 이슈 찾기
• 버그 보고와 외부 코드 변경 요청 검증
• 에이전트용 작업 설명 작성

계획, 명세, 대화를 각각 동작을 확인할 수 있는 작은 개발 티켓으로 나눕니다. 의존 관계와 착수 순서를 명시하고 사용자 확인 후 로컬 파일이나 이슈 관리 도구에 등록합니다.

• 명세를 개발 티켓으로 나누기
• 티켓 의존 관계와 착수 순서 정리
• 광범위한 변경을 단계적으로 진행

Test a running web application with Strix to find authentication, access control, and other security flaws. Review working proof-of-concept exploits, which demonstrate each issue, and use the evidence to guide fixes and retesting.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Security testing a staging web application
• Checking access between accounts and organizations
• Testing a local development server

Use Strix to test web apps, APIs, and source code for exploitable security flaws. Choose local or cloud execution, set testing scope and budget, and review validated findings with reproducible examples and structured reports.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Security testing an application or API
• Testing source code alongside a deployed application
• Choosing between local and cloud execution

Assess a single suspected security issue using Trailmark's graph of code relationships. Gather evidence about reachable paths, input flow, and potential impact, then receive a priority verdict and a list of remaining manual checks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Prioritizing a static analysis finding before proof-of-concept work
• Checking whether entry points can reach a suspicious function
• Preparing code evidence for exploit validation

Turn stakeholder requests into measurable goals, customer problems, possible solutions, and experiments. Through guided discussion, compare feasibility, expected impact, and customer fit to choose a proof of concept: a small test of a proposed solution.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Reframing a feature request as a customer problem
• Connecting product goals to solutions and experiments
• Explaining why one solution was chosen over alternatives

Predict small-molecule binding poses with DiffDock-L (Corso et al. 2023/2024, github.com/gcorso/DiffDock) — blind diffusion docking that places a ligand into a protein pocket without a predefined search box and ranks the samples with a learned confidence model. Reach for this skill to dock a SMILES or SDF against a PDB, to generate ranked 3D poses for a small fragment library, or to get a starting pose for downstream rescoring. DiffDock predicts geometry, not affinity.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Inverse-fold a backbone with ligand, nucleic-acid, and metal context using LigandMPNN (Dauparas et al. 2023, github.com/dauparas/LigandMPNN). Reach for this skill to redesign the residues lining a binding pocket around a bound small molecule or cofactor, to design metal-coordinating sites where the geometry must be respected, or to get threaded designed-sequence PDBs out of any MPNN run.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Evidence-based medical knowledge and research mentor grounded in the Bian Que tradition. Covers clinical reasoning, diagnostic thinking (望闻问切), pharmacology, pathology, differential diagnosis, medical literature appraisal, and the philosophy of early intervention. Trigger whenever users ask about medicine, clinical science, drugs, disease mechanisms, diagnosis, lab interpretation, treatment comparison, or health sciences. Even without explicit research framing, trigger on any topic touching disease, therapeutics, or clinical decision-making. Part of the AIPOCH Medical Research Skill Hub.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Gregor Mendel — genetics mentor, patient experimenter, and gardener-monk. Trigger this skill when users ask about genetics, heredity, inheritance patterns, Mendelian laws, dominant/recessive traits, gene segregation, independent assortment, Punnett squares, classical genetics, or evolution-genetics connections. Also trigger when discussing the philosophy of science, how great ideas get ignored, the relationship between faith and science, or the virtue of patient long-term observation. Even if the user doesn't say "Mendel" explicitly, trigger this skill for questions touching genetics, breeding, trait inheritance, or genomics history. Part of the AIPOCH Science Mentor Skill Hub.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Rewrites technical research content into a structured lay summary that cross-disciplinary teams can quickly understand and act on. Use when the user wants to explain research to colleagues outside their specialty — clinicians, wet-lab scientists, bioinformaticians, product managers, or leadership. Trigger on: "lay summary", "explain my research to the team", "non-technical summary", "cross-disciplinary summary", "translate my findings", "align our team on the study", or any request to communicate research goals, findings, or next steps to a mixed or non-specialist audience. Part of the AIPOCH Academic Writing skill hub. Sits midstream: after research content is clarified, before downstream deliverables like slide decks or graphical abstracts.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Builds and applies 3D pharmacophore models using RDKit Pharm3D, the apo2ph4 receptor-based workflow (Heider et al. 2023), Pharmer / Pharmit for search, and PharmacoForge for protein-pocket-conditioned pharmacophore generation (Flynn et al. 2025), covering ligand-based pharmacophores from active-set alignment and receptor-based pharmacophores from binding-pocket geometry. Explicitly handles feature types, geometric tolerances, partial matching, and pharmacophore-based virtual screening. Use when identifying scaffold-hopping candidates, building shape-and-feature search queries, or transferring SAR across chemotypes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs adaptive clinical trials including group-sequential (O'Brien-Fleming, Pocock, Lan-DeMets spending), sample-size re-estimation (blinded Friede-Kieser, unblinded Cui-Hung-Wang, Mehta-Pocock promising zone), seamless Phase 2/3 with treatment-arm selection, population enrichment, and response-adaptive randomisation. Covers FDA 2019 Final Adaptive Designs Guidance, FDA 2022 Master Protocols, and ICH E20 Step 2b/3 draft (June 2025, NOT final). Use when planning interim analyses, sample-size re-estimation, or master/platform-trial designs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when using the Popochiu addon — point-and-click adventure framework with rooms, characters, props/hotspots, inventory, dialog trees, and a command-based GUI

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.