'multi-agent' 검색 결과

An innate exploratory drive that guarantees no graph node remains permanently invisible to an agent population. After a warm-up period (step > 3), each agent fires a coverage scan with probability |unseen_nodes| / |all_nodes|. When triggered, the agent teleports directly to the globally unseen node with the highest belief uncertainty, works it, and returns control to the normal action-selection loop. Probability is self-annealing: it starts near 1.0 when almost everything is unseen and decays toward 0.0 as coverage saturates, requiring no manual schedule. The mechanism is "innate" (hard-coded into the agent step loop) as distinct from the "adaptive" EFE path, which requires local neighbors and learned precision weights. Together they form a two-layer exploration architecture: adaptive for locally-guided foraging, innate for topological completeness.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

FIPA standard library of agent interaction protocols for structured multi-agent communication

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Apply GPGP/TAEMS coordination as local-scheduler constraints under explicit task, view, commitment, and delivery assumptions. NOT for assuming global task visibility, reliable delivery, or modern execution authority.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Cooperative vibe coding across machines — real-time collaborative development with humans and AI agents. Covers current tools (Live Share, Code With Me, Zed, Cursor multiplayer, tmux), git-based async patterns, AI agent coordination, and the aspirational future of multi-human multi-agent development. Activate on: "pair programming", "vibe coding together", "collaborative coding", "mob programming", "remote pairing", "code together", "multiplayer coding", "Live Share", "Code With Me", "ensemble programming", "cooperative development". NOT for: building a real-time collaboration ENGINE (use real-time-collaboration-engine), git workflow mechanics (use git-best-practices), single-user AI coding assistance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Apply Conway's homomorphism principle to multi-agent system design, recognizing that agent coordination structure predetermines system architecture and capability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design an individual agent's belief, goal, intention, and reconsideration model. Use when specifying autonomous decision state, commitment policy, or recovery from failed plans. NOT for AgentSpeak interpreter mechanics, organization modeling, normative conflicts, or multi-agent execution waves.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Verify every visual-evidence artifact (screenshot/GIF/recording) attached to a PR carries a provenance manifest binding it to real daemon-backed truth — daemon port, run id, transcript head hash, agent node id, commit, and an honest real/fixture/mock source label — and that operator-control-panel PRs cover the required set of proof states. Use when gating a PR's proof artifacts before merge, auditing whether a "LIVE" visual claim is backed by a real daemon run versus a reused or fixture-backed mock, or defining the required state-coverage set for a control-panel change. NOT for the capture technique itself — headless Playwright, `screencapture -x -l`, non-interruptive capture (use port-daddy-agent-skill's visual-evidence doctrine), designing the receipt body schema an artifact attaches to (use agent-work-receipt-designer), or the broader dogfood/Potemkin product-quality bar (use multi-agent-authoring-product-bar).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Declare an agentic application's interaction disclosure, state, context, capabilities, and effect-control boundaries. Use for a reviewable design specification and static consistency audit before implementation. NOT for proving that controls are deployed or enforced, exposing private chain-of-thought, selecting a model/router, or designing a multi-agent protocol.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design discovery, directories, and guilds for agent swarms at scale. Use when agents need to find each other on a shared surface: capability indices, yellow-pages directories, whois/phonebook routing, reputation-aware discovery, and guild structures that scope trust. Covers the canonical prior art (FIPA Directory Facilitator, Contract Net, Chord/DHT, DNS-SD/Consul, EigenTrust, Greif's merchant guilds) and the failure modes (read-poverty, Sybil reset, Goodhart on rank, directory staleness, cold-start). Triggers: "agents can't find each other", "who owns this file/skill", "route a question to the right agent", "capability registry", "agent reputation", "guild / federation of fleets". NOT for issuing identities, granting authority, or automatically assigning work from a directory entry.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design low-friction UX, interaction patterns, and comeback loops for AI coding assistant apps, agent consoles, background coding agents, and Port Daddy swarm/operator surfaces. Use when creating flows like prompt-to-diff, context attach, plan/apply/review, checkpoint rollback, background-agent dashboards, visual proof, or multi-agent invocation. NOT for generic landing pages, static dashboards, or implementation-only changes without product flow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Discipline an AI agent needs to work an issue/task tracker (Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues) as the shared source of truth: pull the right next item instead of inventing work, search before creating to avoid duplicates, write actionable items with checkable acceptance criteria, keep status transitions honest, and link work to items via branches/PRs/commits so progress is legible. Use when an agent picks up tracker work, files a new issue, updates status, or closes an item. NOT for authoring the PR itself (use agent-pr-authoring), roadmap-level planning and prioritization (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests), or the mechanics of multiple agents coordinating on the same codebase (use multi-agent-coordination).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Data structures and serialization formats for agent-to-agent communication. Covers message envelopes, structured output schemas, capability declarations, task handoff payloads, error/retry signaling, and context windows as data structures. Compares the version-pinned A2A, MCP, and JSON-RPC role boundaries covered by this bundle; OpenAI and LangChain-specific APIs require their own current sources. Teaches when to use rigid schemas versus free-form content with validation, typed versus untyped boundaries, and streaming versus batch. Activate on: "agent message format", "agent communication schema", "agent-to-agent protocol", "A2A protocol", "MCP message format", "structured output for agents", "agent interop", "interchange format", "agent serialization", "task handoff format", "capability declaration". NOT for: what agents say to each other (use agent-conversation-protocols), orchestration topology (use multi-agent-coordination), building agent infrastructure (use agentic-infrastructure-2026).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs and audits closed, ordered, replay-safe message protocols between already admitted agent bodies. Use when a multi-agent exchange needs explicit epochs, audiences, per-sender sequencing, gathers, terminal fences, acknowledgements, and deterministic replay. NOT for selecting or spawning agents, granting identity or authority, choosing a runtime topology, general human facilitation, wire transport implementation, or deciding whether evidence is true.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Install Port Daddy's bounded interactive coordination hooks ("tentacles", from the Giant Squid Harness) into the INTERACTIVE sessions of agentic coding CLIs (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Antigravity/agy) by auto-detecting which CLIs are installed and writing PER-PROJECT hook config behind a runtime gate, so coordination fires only inside a Port Daddy project while the daemon is running — never machine- wide-always-on. Use when the user says "install port daddy hooks", "agent CLI hooks", "interactive session hooks", "make coordination hooks fire in interactive sessions", "codex/gemini/agy hooks", or "auto-detect agent CLIs". NOT for generic software/package installation; NOT for installing the Port Daddy daemon or `pd` CLI itself (delegate to the `port-daddy` skill / `pd setup`); NOT for MCP server setup (delegate to `pd mcp install`); NOT for authoring new skills (delegate to `skill-architect` / `skill-creator`); NOT for editing the tentacle scripts themselves (owned by the Giant Squid Harness program; this installer layer is pd-adr-090).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

The doctrine for turning a vision into a finished, verified, deployed system with near-zero owner involvement. Use when launching, coordinating, resuming, or working any large build, module, campaign, or multi-agent project, or when writing its launch prompt.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create and manage teams of specialized AI agents that work together on tasks. Use when setting up multi-agent workflows, agent squads for content/marketing/research pipelines, configuring heartbeat-based agent coordination, or managing agent personalities via SOUL.md files. Enables orchestration of multiple OpenClaw sessions as a coordinated team with shared task systems (Linear, Trello, etc.).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Integration patterns for combining Agent-to-Agent (A2A) Protocol with Model Context Protocol (MCP) for hybrid agent communication. Use when building systems that need both agent-to-agent communication and agent-to-tool integration, implementing composite architectures, or when user mentions A2A+MCP integration, hybrid protocols, or multi-agent tool access.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

RFC-driven multi-agent DAG execution pattern with quality gates, merge queues, and work unit orchestration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Patterns and architectures for autonomous Claude Code loops — from simple sequential pipelines to RFC-driven multi-agent DAG systems.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turn a one-line objective into a step-by-step construction plan for multi-session, multi-agent engineering projects. Each step has a self-contained context brief so a fresh agent can execute it cold. Includes adversarial review gate, dependency graph, parallel step detection, anti-pattern catalog, and plan mutation protocol. TRIGGER when: user requests a plan, blueprint, or roadmap for a complex multi-PR task, or describes work that needs multiple sessions. DO NOT TRIGGER when: task is completable in a single PR or fewer than 3 tool calls, or user says "just do it".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

AI agent development workflow for building autonomous agents, multi-agent systems, and agent orchestration with CrewAI, LangGraph, and custom agents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert in designing and building autonomous AI agents. Masters tool use, memory systems, planning strategies, and multi-agent orchestration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Meta-skill que orquestra todos os agentes do ecossistema. Scan automatico de skills, match por capacidades, coordenacao de workflows multi-skill e registry management.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

工业级多Agent蜂群系统——指挥10+ Agent并行开发的完整框架。覆盖：Agent角色定义、任务分解协议、蜂群调度算法、子Agent通信、冲突消解、质量门禁、OpenClaw原生集成。触发词：蜂群、swarm、多Agent调度、并行开发、Agent集群、任务分解、AI并行开发、swarm intelligence、agent orchestration

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.