'interview' 검색 결과

A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design, which also creates docs (ADR's and glossary) as we go.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a company needs its record of processing activities for the first time, or has one that is really a list of tools, and asks "build our RoPA", "records of processing", "data map for GDPR", "Article 30 record", "what personal data do we process and why", "data inventory for privacy" or "our DPO needs a processing register". Drafts the record by processing activity from systems, vendors and team interviews, with purposes, data and subject categories, proposed legal bases, recipients, transfers and concrete retention, plus a separate processor record when the company processes data for customers, and a notes file of open questions per owner.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when someone wants to contribute, submit or publish a GRC skill to the grcskills library (github.com/better-isms/grcskills, grcskills.com), or update a skill or author profile they already published there. Interviews the contributor for practitioner judgment, drafts the files in the library format, runs the validator and opens one pull request.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Establishes a project's quality bar as a written contract and stops agents quietly lowering it. Interviews the user on which dimensions matter, supplies sane default thresholds when they have no number in mind, records everything in CONSTRAINTS.md, and watches the diff for a weakened bar — new @ts-ignore or eslint-disable suppressions, skipped or deleted tests, assertions stripped out, unimplemented stubs, thresholds edited down. Use when no quality bar is written down, when the user says "set up constraints" or "define our standards", when the user wants dimensions they care about — accessibility, web performance, coverage — set up as enforced constraints, when an agent keeps silencing checks or skipping tests to get to green, when you need a coverage or performance threshold and don't know what number to pick, or when an agent writes more code than anyone will read.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Pre-PRD Research methodology combining Business Analysis, Creative Problem-Solving, Brainstorming, and Innovation Strategy. Use before writing any PRD for problem validation, market research, competitive analysis, stakeholder interviews, ideation, root cause analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Stress-test the owner's plan, decision or idea by interviewing them to a shared understanding before any work starts.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Produces a DRAFT product requirements document from the discovery notes, interview summaries, support themes, analytics notes and stakeholder messages the user provides: problem statement, target users, goals with measures as stated, numbered requirements each with a testable acceptance criterion, non-goals, constraints, dependencies and open questions, with every statement tagged evidenced, assumed or UNKNOWN so each assumption is visible for the product owner to confirm. Use when the user asks to "write a PRD", "draft the product requirements", "turn these discovery notes into requirements", "document what this feature needs to do" or "build the requirements doc for this epic". Do not use for supplier-facing requirements in a tender, use rfp-requirements-pack instead; for a technical design decision, use architecture-decision-record; for the change ticket that ships the work, use change-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turns a control list and an audit scope into draft evidence requests grouped by control owner, each with the control as stated, the audit period, evidence examples (commonly requested) and a proposed due date derived from the fieldwork dates. Never judges whether evidence is sufficient, never selects the sample and never sends a request; the auditor decides. Use when the user asks to "prepare the evidence requests", "draft the PBC list", "build the evidence request pack for the audit" or "what do we need to ask each control owner for". Do not use for document requests and interview questions built from an audit plan, use audit-prep-pack instead; to check claims in a report against sources, use claims-evidence-map. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turns process notes, a walkthrough or interview transcript, a transcript of a meeting recording or a stale existing procedure into a draft standard operating procedure: purpose and trigger, scope, definitions, roles with a RACI table, numbered steps with the check that closes each one, records produced, controls as stated, and open questions for the process owner. Every step traces to the source or reads UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "write an SOP from these notes", "turn this walkthrough into a procedure", "document how we do this", "draft the standard operating procedure for", "build a RACI for this process" or "tidy up this old procedure". Do not use for technical runbooks with commands and rollback, use runbook-drafter instead; for meeting minutes and action lists, use transcript-to-actions. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Coach German writing and conversation with minimal corrections, persistent root-cause mistake tracking (FehlerDNA), mistake-based spaced repetition with a new sentence every time, roleplay whose words return in spaced reviews, continuing preparation for real-life goals across sessions, and an honest progress profile. Use for German correction, personalized review, vocabulary, progress, roleplay, or preparation for an interview, presentation, appointment, or other concrete event; do not use for translation-only requests without learning or feedback.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Synthesize user interviews, observations, surveys, support tickets, reviews, or feedback into traceable themes, insights, tensions, opportunities, and research gaps; use when evidence must inform product or design decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Relentless one-question-at-a-time interview (tappable options with a recommended answer) that sharpens a requirement, business plan, project plan, proposal, or raw idea through conversation, then writes it up as a brief with a glossary and decision log. Use whenever the user wants their thinking stress-tested or pinned down before acting — trigger phrases include "grill me", "grill this", "詰めて", "詰めたい", "壁打ち", "要件を固めたい", "企画を練りたい", "計画を整理したい", "アイデアをぶつけたい", "突っ込んで", "clarify", "質問して", "何が決まってないか教えて", or when the user describes a plan/idea vaguely and asks what to do next. Do NOT use for reviewing a finished document (use a document-review skill) or when the user just wants an answer, not questions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

キーニーズ法（梅澤理論）に基づいて深掘りヒアリングを行い、会話ログを保存し、強さ×未充足度で分析したいときに使う。新商品・サービスのニーズ発掘や既存ヒアリングログの分析に使う。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Master context for Sophon — an agentic programmatic SEO toolkit. Teaches the framework, entity model, adapter system, and operating rules. Invoke this skill before using discover, generate, technical, enrich, optimize, or run so you have the full context. Call with 'teach' to run the onboarding interview and create .sophon.md.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan a refactor as a sequence of tiny safe commits via interview and codebase exploration. Use when restructuring working code, or when the user says 'plan a refactor'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding. Use when fleshing out an idea, stress-testing a design, or when the user says "grill me".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design. Use when the user says "grill me", "grill mich", "grill mich zu diesem Plan", or explicitly invokes /grill-me. Does NOT fire on generic "review this", "poke holes", "stress-test", "devil's advocate" or "critique" phrasing -- for reviewing an already-written artifact (code, PR, paper) use code-review, 3agenten-review, 7phasen-review or caveman-review instead; grill-me interrogates a still-open plan or idea before it is built.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Erstellt oder überarbeitet einen Skill FÜR DIESES ÖKOSYSTEM: delegiert die generische Interview-/Entwurfs-/Eval-Schleife an das offizielle skill-creator-Plugin (Anthropic, Apache-2.0), setzt aber zusätzlich die ellmos-Anforderungen durch, die das offizielle Plugin nicht kennt — Haus-Frontmatter (9 Felder), Kategorie/Sichtbarkeits-Regeln, anbieter-/nutzer-/ellmos-neutrale aber ellmos-sensitive Erkennung via grounding-seed, mitgelieferte config.json (inkl. Lernvertrag) + connections.json, Anbieter-/Vendor-Bewusstsein (State-of-the-Art-Alternativen inkl. eigener ellmos-Komponenten vorschlagen), einen Selbstaktualisierungs-Abschnitt UND einen wiederverwendbaren Lern-/Abdeckungs-Dateisatz (user-usecases.json, usecase-gaps.json, known-providers-and-abilities.json, gap-closing-analysis.json — an skill-creators evals.json und A2A/AgentSkill angelehnt, kein Parallelstandard). IMMER nutzen, wenn ein NEUER Skill für dieses System entstehen oder ein bestehender auf ellmos-Konformität nachgerüstet werden soll — auch bei "erstelle einen Skill", "bau mir einen Skill für X", "skill-creator nutzen", "neuen Skill anlegen", "diesen Skill ellmos-konform machen", "Lernvertrag/Verhaltenscodex für einen Skill anlegen", "Usecase-Abdeckung eines Skills prüfen". Für reines Skill-FINDEN/ROUTEN stattdessen skill-finder, für Landschafts-Audit skill-explorer.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Automate recruiting and hiring workflows in Ashby -- manage candidates, jobs, applications, interviews, and notes through natural language commands.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

You are an expert requirements gatherer and agent builder. You must progressively interview the user to understand what type of agent they are looking to build. You should ask one question at a time w

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to "codify how our founder sounds", "build a founder voice dossier", or "set our content pillars"; runs an 80%-extraction interview over the user's OWN posts, emails, and decks (never competitor scraping, never an invented persona) and produces the versioned voice record — a per-platform register map (incl. 小红书/微信公众号), banned phrases, per-context disclosure lines (the ECHO C2 upstream), a few-shot bank built exclusively from own posts, and 3-5 content pillars with Estimated %-allocations — submitted via memory/events/channels.ndjson for channel-registry to store as voice-dossier.md, the record every Craft-phase skill reads first. Not for the brand-level voice canon — use brand-language-codifier; not for audience/persona research — use audience-mapper. 声音档案/品牌语气/创始人语气/内容支柱/披露声明

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to "map what our buyers believe", "capture the objections we keep hearing", or "find the switching forces that move the beachhead"; produces a belief map of the beachhead — held beliefs and mental models, the recurring objections and their reframes, and the JTBD four forces (push of the problem, pull of the new, anxiety of switching, habit of the present) — each item sourced from interviews or win-loss notes (User-provided) and labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated, with any unverified quote or comparative claim marked "[needs source]" and routed to the claims candidates, never adjudicated here. Not for demographic or persona profiling — use audience-mapper; not for the positioning canvas — use positioning-truth-tracer. 受众信念/异议地图/切换四力/流失语言

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.