'dispatch' 검색 결과

Parallel map-reduce bulk ingest for large source sets. Map phase dispatches read-only knowledge-extractor agents (≤N-wide, default Haiku) emitting per-source JSON extracts; Python routes extracts by target library file (fuzzy-merging new topics, pre-allocating new files, flagging oversized topics); reduce phase dispatches one agent-knowledge-updater per file (parallel, one writer per file); single shelf-index rebuild + one log.md entry. Resumable. Supersedes kb-ingest-batch.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Orchestrate complex development with AUTOMATIC parallel subagent execution, continuous dispatch scheduling, dependency analysis, file conflict detection, and IOSM quality gates. Analyzes task dependencies, builds critical path, launches parallel background workers with lock management, monitors progress, auto-spawns from discoveries. Use for multi-file features, parallel implementation streams, automated task decomposition, brownfield refactoring, or when user mentions "parallel agents", "orchestrate", "swarm", "continuous dispatch", "automatic scheduling", "PRD", "quality gates", "decompose work", "Mixed/brownfield".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Before any multi-step work with a stated goal — a feature, a bugfix spanning multiple files, a QA sweep, a doc draft + iterations, a multi-day investigation — create an ATO Mission instead of doing it via bare `ato dispatch` calls. A Mission persists the goal + the verifiable success criteria, lets the coordinator tick drive the work across days, captures every event in a structured audit trail (SQLite + markdown narrative), and integrates parallel agents' work via merge strategies. Complement to `ato-warroom` (the cross-family decision before you start) and `ato-review` (the post-code-diff review). Missions is where multi-step work LIVES; war-rooms are where decisions ABOUT it get made; reviews are where the resulting commits get vetted. Fires when: the work has more than one decision point, a verifiable end state, or runs across more than one session. Use it for any ATO development that doesn't fit in a single dispatch.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze Ascend NPU schedule, operator dispatch, operator launch, and Host Bound profiling issues in Ascend profiling data. Use when need to diagnose device Free time, framework/operator dispatch latency, launch latency, PYTORCH_API/CANN_API launch gaps, aclrtSynchronizeStream stalls, task queue behavior, CPU scheduling interference, GC/lock pauses, CPU affinity, or schedule-side optimization actions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

The Arbor research-coordinator protocol: the OBSERVE -> IDEATE -> SELECT -> DISPATCH -> DECIDE cycle over a durable Idea Tree. Preloaded automatically on /auto-research sessions. The coordinator never edits code or runs commands — executors do that in isolated worktrees; the coordinator steers the tree with idea_tree / dispatch_experiments / merge_experiment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Dispatch to the right problem-solving technique based on how you're stuck

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when legacy prompts or older framework flows reference `dispatching-parallel-agents` and you need the modern runtime to resolve that capability cleanly.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when hunting CI/CD bot comment command vulnerabilities where issue_comment or pull_request_review_comment triggers invoke privileged workflows without verifying the commenter's identity or authorization. Trigger on: "bot command injection", "issue_comment trigger", "@github-actions", "slash command CI", "CI bot command", "comment triggered workflow", "unauthenticated bot", "github-actions publish", "comment dispatch", no authorization check on workflow_dispatch from comment, chatops CI/CD, supply chain via PR comment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Defeats control-flow-flattening obfuscation by identifying the dispatcher/state- variable structure and reconstructing the original control flow so the logic becomes readable. Activates for requests to defeat control-flow flattening, deobfuscate an OLLVM-flattened function, or recover original control flow from a dispatcher loop.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Dispatcher — assigning a new job to the best available driver/technician in real time, managing an ETA slip and deciding who to notify, triaging a coverage gap in a service territory, sequencing a driver's remaining stops after a delay, or deciding whether a job needs to be reassigned versus the customer rescheduled.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a task needs the judgment of an airline pilot — checking whether an ETOPS diversion-time rating still holds against a current MEL downgrade, deciding whether to accept or query a dispatch release, applying sterile-cockpit discipline and Pilot Flying/Pilot Monitoring role separation on a two-pilot flight deck, resolving a captain-dispatcher operational-control disagreement, or checking Part 117 flight-duty-period legality against an irregular-operations delay.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run work as an explicit event-driven state machine executed by subagents. The orchestrator is the runtime from the canonical loop — `state, effects = init(machine); execute(effects); while state is active: event = nextEvent(); state, effects = transition(machine, state, event); execute(effects); return state.output`. All routing judgment is authored ONCE, at plan time, into a machine file (states, event alphabet, transition table, budgets, final states); at runtime the orchestrator does pure table lookups and dispatches effects — it never decides, never authors, never ingests artifacts. Subagent/sync protocol is the timeboxed-iterating one: role prompts scaffolded once to disk and dispatched BY PATH, an initialiser preamble every subagent reads first, a self-populating cheatsheet, per-unit files, tiny structured returns, independent measurement gate. Use when the user says "workmachine", "run this as a state machine", "state-machine this", or when a goal has a small number of clearly named phases with explicit outcomes (built / passed / failed / blocked) and you want the routing to be auditable rather than judged on the fly. For clock-driven loops use timeboxed-iterating; for wide graphs with judged edge criteria use workgraph.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit a 911 dispatch or emergency response system for operational reliability and compliance. Triggers: building or reviewing CAD systems, PSAP software, dispatch platforms, or emergency operations center tools.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Dispatch to the right problem-solving technique based on how you're stuck

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Cycle de coordination ai-01 (coordinateur UNIQUEMENT — jamais sur un worker). Lit memoire + dashboards + inbox + GitHub, merge les PRs pretes, tranche les design-gates, dispatche des grains par lane, reporte. Arguments: [--dispatch] [--focus <topic>]

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Judge board subskill for simmer. Dispatches a panel of judges with different lenses, runs one deliberation round where they challenge each other's scores, then synthesizes consensus scores + single ASI. Drop-in replacement for simmer-judge that produces identical output format. Do not invoke directly — dispatched by the simmer orchestrator when JUDGE_MODE is board.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run an org-team workflow — a flat pod of up to four peer Claude Code sessions claims lane-tagged slices of an approved spec over the baseline MCP channel and implements them concurrently, each in its own git worktree. Each peer DECIDES its own in-lane implementation choices in its own main context (Article X); only un-decidable or cross-lane forks escalate peer→lead→human (yield_fork for task-bound forks, ask_lead for free-form queries). Opt-in and OFF by default (velocity.org_mode.enabled). Graduates the retired sprint-dispatch prototype into the constitutionally-sanctioned org-team model (Article X — Multi-session coordinated workflows). Requires git.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turns a plan phase into a PhaseSpec v1 and dispatches it to a specialist subagent via the Agent tool. Subagent reads files itself, returns a structured result, the result is logged into progress.md. Markdown is the shared state; no in-memory shared store across agents.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use multiple Claude agents to investigate and fix independent problems concurrently

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when facing 2+ independent tasks — "in parallel", "independent tasks", "multiple unrelated failures", "different test files or subsystems" — that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies. Dispatch one agent per independent slice, each with only the context it needs, even when the user did not ask for subagents explicitly.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when acting as the orchestrator agent that drives Syntropic137 - running the dogfood loop, deciding what to dispatch next, landing agent PRs, deploying a beta, triaging failed executions, or keeping the scratchpad, paper cuts and retrospectives current. Trigger phrases include "orchestrator tick", "keep the loop running", "what should we dispatch next", "land these PRs", "why are PRs stacking up", "deploy the next beta", "pit stop", "the run failed, what now", "write the retro", "is the system helping", "scale quality", "learning loop for the orchestrator". Do NOT use for deciding whether one task belongs in a workspace or locally (see `dogfooding`), for turning one incident into an eval case (see `learning-loop`), for designing a workflow A/B experiment (see `workflow-experimentation`), or for release-branch and version-bump mechanics (see `devops`).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when: 'do work', 'dispatch builder', or team lead triggers automated task implementation. Governs end-to-end flow from dispatch through verification, fail handling, batch mode, and escalation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

大学業務文書 (広報原稿 / 研修教材 / 申請書 / 学生向け案内等) のドラフトを 読み取り、subagent dispatch で「AI 臭度」「業務文書適切性」「読者負荷」の 3 軸評価を返す。「この広報原稿、AI っぽくない？」「研修資料が硬すぎないか 気になる」「職員が書いたふうに仕上げたい」と問われた時に起動する。 mizchi-blog-style の評価ワークフローを大学業務文書向けに翻訳、職員 / 学生 / 学外読者の 3 ロールのいずれかで subagent がドラフトを読み、 冗長敬語 / 空虚強調 / 両論併記等を行番号付きで指摘する。反復改善は 呼び出し側判断、本 skill 自体はシングル実行。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

open Issue を triage して「次の仕事候補（N 件 + 推奨 1 件）」を窓口が人間へ提示する。 候補はオペレーターが書いたゴール台帳（registry/goals/）の条項に当たるものだけで、条項順に並ぶ。 tools/work_discovery_scan.py を 1 回実行し、その候補 JSON を 設計書 §5.2 / §12 の人間可読フォーマットでレンダリングするところで停止する（propose-only）。 起動主体は窓口に限定。手動 / イベント起動のみ（常駐 /loop なし）。 「次の仕事候補出して」「triage して」「次なにやる？」や PR マージ後の proactive next-dispatch で窓口が手動起動する。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.