'gap' 검색 결과

Turn a research interest into a defined question and practical plan. Use structured brainstorming, literature review, gap analysis, and method comparison to produce a research proposal, organized review, and references, with Zotero support for paper management.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Develop a research topic using 5W1H
• Organize literature and identify unanswered questions
• Compare research methods and required resources

Monitor another AI agent’s work and independently investigate the same task. Compare the original request with actual changes and test evidence, report gaps and concrete follow-up steps, and make limited fixes when authorized.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Monitor an agent session until completion or a blocker
• Audit a pull request against the original request
• Compare findings from multiple agents

Audit search performance, page speed, and site structure to investigate traffic drops and content gaps. Combine findings from Google Search Console and technical checks into practical improvements and a 30-day action plan.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Investigating a drop in organic search traffic
• Auditing search performance and page speed together
• Finding content gaps and keyword opportunities

Measure JS SDK test coverage and identify untested behavior using coverage reports. It supports gap assessments and scoped test improvements, prioritizing public behavior, error handling, cancellation, and lifecycle paths, then reporting verification results and remaining gaps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Auditing current JS SDK test coverage
• Investigating a decline in coverage metrics
• Adding tests for uncovered public behavior

Analyze competing social media accounts to compare topics, formats, posting patterns, and audience responses. Receive a report identifying successful content patterns, gaps competitors leave open, and prioritized actions suited to your own account.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.

• Compare competitors’ topics and posting patterns
• Examine what high-engagement posts have in common
• Find opportunities to distinguish your account

Use when the user asks to "find content gaps", "竞品写了什么", or "还应该写什么"; builds a competitor-relative coverage map of missing topics, keyword gaps, and editorial-calendar opportunities. Not for raw keyword demand discovery — use keyword-research. 内容缺口/选题规划

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes documents and processes against FINRA, SEC, Federal Reserve, and CFPB regulatory frameworks. Identifies compliance gaps, classifies findings by severity, and recommends remediation. Use when performing compliance audits, regulatory reviews, gap analyses, or verifying policy adherence to financial regulations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Diagnostic-only test suite auditor. Classifies repo type, maps against 7-layer testing taxonomy (git hooks → static → unit → integration → system → E2E → acceptance), runs deterministic quality gates (coverage, mutation, CRAP, architecture, escape-scan), builds RTM / personas / journeys traceability, produces TEST_AUDIT.md, updates tests/TESTING.md, and mandatorily hands off to implement-tests when gaps are found. Use when auditing test quality, finding test gaps, or running the full 7-layer sweep. Trigger with "audit tests", "find gaps", "test audit", "check test quality", "full sweep", "7-layer audit", "rtm check".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Rapidly maps the evidence landscape around a medical topic by organizing major research streams, target populations, endpoints, methods, evidence density, and thin areas. Use this skill BEFORE medical-research-gap-finder — it provides the structured landscape that makes formal gap analysis more rigorous. Do not use for formal gap identification, study design, or protocol planning directly.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Map an organisation's risks against its insurance policy portfolio to find what's uncovered, underinsured, or double-covered. Use when asked to run a coverage gap analysis, review an insurance programme against a risk register, check what risks aren't insured, or audit a policy portfolio. Produces a risk-by-coverage matrix, flagged gaps and overlaps, a deductible stack review, and recommendations ranked by expected-loss severity.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generate a prioritised compliance checklist for GDPR, SOC 2, ISO 27001, FCA, HIPAA, or other frameworks with a gap analysis. Use when asked for a compliance checklist, gap analysis, readiness assessment, or audit preparation for any regulatory framework. Produces a structured checklist with prioritised gaps, quick wins, and evidence requirements. Optimised for Opus 4.7 and newer models. Not a substitute for legal or compliance professional advice.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyse a construction bid or tender package for scope gaps, risk-shifting exclusions, unit-rate red flags, and front-loading in the schedule of values. Use when asked to review a bid, level bids, check a tender for gaps, compare sub quotes, or vet a schedule of values before award. Produces a structured bid review with a gap register, exclusion risk table, pricing red flags, and an award recommendation with pre-award clarifications.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when conditioning, loading, preparing, or labeling signal data for analysis or ML training. Covers: cleaning a single signal (fill gaps, remove drift, deoutlier, denoise, resample/align a time base) BEFORE analysis; building a `signalDatastore` pipeline; creating a `labeledSignalSet` for Signal Labeler; deriving labels (filename, folder, in-file, ROI, time-frequency ROI); stratified train/val/test splits; framing long signals; parallel processing; and shaping datastore output for `trainnet`. Triggers include "clean up this signal", "remove drift / detrend", "fill gaps", "remove spikes / outliers", "denoise", "resample to a uniform rate", "align channels", "labels from filenames", "stratified split", "prepare for Signal Labeler", and function names like `fillgaps`, `fillmissing`, `detrend`, `filloutliers`, `smoothdata`, `resample`, `synchronize`, `signalDatastore`, `labeledSignalSet`, `filenames2labels`, `folders2labels`, `splitlabels`, `framesig`, `framelbl`, `createDatastores`.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Maps every competitor and the gap they leave. Finds the direct competitors, indirect ones and the substitutes a buyer would use instead, from public sources only, and records what each sells, at what price, how they position themselves and what their customers complain about in public reviews, every fact with a link. Ends with a positioning map and the gap the new business can own. Use when the user says "who are my competitors", "is this market crowded", "what else is out there", "competitor analysis", "find the gap", or "who am I up against".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit content gaps and decay using Ahrefs MCP data: missing topics, thin coverage, outdated content, and decaying pages. Use this skill when planning a content roadmap, refreshing a stale catalog, building topical authority, or identifying which existing pages need update versus replacement. Triggers on content gap, content audit, content refresh, content roadmap, decaying content, content decay, topical authority, what topics should we cover, where is competitor content stronger. Also triggers when organic traffic is flat despite consistent publishing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Run a competitive SEO analysis comparing the user's site to chosen competitors across SERP overlap, content depth, backlink profiles, technical posture, and brand presence. Use this skill whenever the user wants to analyze competitors, find content gaps, identify backlink opportunities, understand why competitors outrank them, or benchmark against the rest of their category. Triggers on competitor analysis, competitive analysis, SERP analysis, content gap, backlink gap, why is X ranking, who is winning the SERP, beat my competitor, benchmark, market positioning. Also triggers when planning a content strategy and the question 'what are competitors doing' is implicit.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Find keywords competitors rank for that the target property does not, and prioritize them by opportunity. Uses Ahrefs MCP for keyword and competitor data. Use this skill when planning content investment, identifying quick wins, building a content calendar against a competitor set, or scoping a market entry. Triggers on keyword gap, content gap, competitor keywords, opportunity keywords, what should we target, where are competitors winning, keyword opportunity. Also triggers when planning content for a new market or after losing organic share to a specific competitor.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Takes a curriculum framework and a statutory or accreditation requirement list; produces a coverage table, gap summary, and CSV showing which framework content covers each requirement and where gaps exist.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyse student work against criteria to identify specific gaps between current performance and learning objectives. Use when reviewing submissions, planning feedback, or diagnosing learning needs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Panel structure design, firm selection criteria, right-sourcing analysis, and coverage gap assessment for in-house legal teams. Build panel frameworks from scratch or formalise existing informal arrangements. Define weighted selection criteria for firm evaluation. Run right-sourcing analysis (ABC tiering) to identify work sent to expensive providers that doesn't require that level of resource. Assess existing panels for practice area, geographic, and capability gaps. Trigger on: 'design our panel', 'how many firms do we need', 'panel structure', 'firm selection criteria', 'which firms should we use', 'right-sourcing', 'are we sending work to the right firms', 'panel gaps', 'too many firms', 'consolidate our panel', 'we need a firm for', 'preferred provider', 'panel tiers', 'do we need BigLaw for this', 'convergence', 'D&I panel targets', 'how do we choose firms'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when asked to analyze how Iceland has implemented an EU directive or regulation into national law, identify gaps between EU/EEA law and Icelandic implementation, or assess Iceland's compliance with EEA obligations. Triggers on questions about EEA transposition, ESA infringement, or EU-Iceland legal gaps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a milestone audit reported gaps and you want the fix phases created in one pass. Reads MILESTONE-AUDIT.md, groups gaps into phases, adds them to ROADMAP.md and offers to plan each one.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Performs a gap analysis between two artifacts (a current state and a desired state) and produces a plain-language, stakeholder-readable report indexed by stable gap IDs. Use when the user wants to compare, evaluate, audit, or reconcile one artifact against another. Does not investigate runtime bugs — use investigate. Does not assess module-level architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not research open-ended options with no second artifact to compare against — use research.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.