241건 · 관련도순
Orchestrates a systematic review and meta-analysis workflow following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, from protocol development through multi-database search, screening, data extraction, and evidence synthesis. Use when conducting evidence-based reviews, meta-analyses, or scoping revi...
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). ...
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evidence-based medical knowledge and research mentor grounded in the Bian Que tradition. Covers clinical reasoning, diagnostic thinking (望闻问切), pharmacology, pathology, differential diagnosis, medical literature appraisal, and the philosophy of early intervention. Trigger whenever users ask about medicine, clinical science, drugs, disease mechanisms, diagnosis, lab interpretation, treatment comparison, or health sciences. Even without explicit research framing, trigger on any topic touching disease, therapeutics, or clinical decision-making. Part of the AIPOCH Medical Research Skill Hub.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when evaluating Muddy Waters-style forensic short research: fraud, channel checks, related-party structures, cash verification, governance failure, and evidence-based short theses.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when evaluating David Einhorn-style forensic shorts and longs: accounting red flags, governance problems, capital allocation failures, and evidence-based short theses.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Teaches evidence-based analysis of transaction logs and traces. Use when reconstructing transaction behavior from tables, TSV/CSV files, timestamps, counters, object histories, validation records, abort records, retries, partial logs, or when producing classified transaction outputs from trace evidence.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Execute tasks through competitive multi-agent generation, meta-judge evaluation specification, multi-judge evaluation, and evidence-based synthesis
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
AI DevKit · Enforce evidence-based completion claims — require fresh command output before reporting success. Use when completing any task, fixing a bug, finishing a phase, running tests, building, deploying, or making any "it works" claim.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create or resume an evidence-based RPI implementation plan with an optional independent critique. Use when a task needs an implementation plan or an existing plan needs revision.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Reviews skill quality with evidence-based design rubrics and read-only batch inventories. Use for self-review, external skill or repository audits, and authorized auto-PR improvements. Separates design quality from measured task benefit and host compatibility.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Transforms raw meeting transcripts into structured, evidence-based meeting minutes — merges multiple versions without losing content, reviews existing minutes against the transcript for missing items, and identifies anonymous speakers (Speaker 1/2/3, 发言人1). Triggers on 会议纪要, 会议记录, 整理纪要, 妙记转纪要, "write meeting minutes", "merge these minutes". Not for fixing ASR/STT errors first (use transcript-fixer).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Runs an evidence-based health audit of this skills marketplace repo — code safety, docs/SSOT, security/PII, PR/issue triage, manifest integrity — via a parallel workflow, then verifies findings by priority. Use for 全面体检 / 检查仓库状态 / 审计一下仓库, a pre-release sweep, or "is this repo OK" even without saying "workflow". Not for building marketplace.json (use marketplace-dev) or cache drift (use skill-governance).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Clones and audits competitor repositories into evidence-based intelligence with file:line citations. Use to track competitors, add a competitor repo, review competitor code, compare capabilities, build a competitor landscape, or check for code updates: 竞品分析 / 竞品 / competitor scan / analyze competitor / compare with X / latest competitor code. Not for market research without code (use deep-research).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run a fast, honest competitive scan — the dimension table built from public evidence (sites, docs, pricing pages, changelogs, reviews), the claims-vs-observed discipline, and the so-what synthesis that ends in moves, not a landscape mural. Use when asked what are competitors doing, quick scan of these three rivals, how does our pricing/feature set compare, or prep the competitive slide honestly. Produces the evidence-based comparison table, the marketing-vs-reality flags, the so-what synthesis, and the staleness date.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Turn interview notes into a structured candidate scorecard and hire recommendation. Use when asked to write an interview scorecard, a candidate evaluation, an interview debrief, or to summarize feedback into a hire/no-hire call. Produces a per-competency assessment with evidence and ratings, an overall recommendation with confidence, and the open questions for the next round — evidence-based, bias-aware, and decision-ready.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Full video production sequence with script review, actual ingredient choices, controlled generation, editing, evidence-based quality review, polish, captions and delivery. A host binding supplies project storage, authentic approvals, provider access and billing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate a high-quality deep-reading note for a single paper and write it into an Obsidian-style vault. Use when the user gives a paper title, DOI, URL, arXiv ID, Zotero item, or local PDF and wants a polished Markdown note with strong structure, evidence-based analysis, and figure placeholders.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Project gene annotations across genomes using TOGA (Kirilenko 2023 whole-genome-alignment chain-based projection with intactness classification), CESAR 2.0 (Sharma, Schwede & Hiller 2017 codon-aware exon projection), LiftOff (Shumate & Salzberg 2021 reference-based annotation transfer), Liftover (UCSC), GeMoMa (Keilwagen 2019 evidence-based projection), and Comparative Annotation Toolkit (CAT). Use when transferring annotations from a well-annotated reference to query genome(s), classifying gene-loss vs gene-intact across many genomes at scale, building Zoonomia-style comparative annotations across hundreds of mammals or birds (Kirilenko 2023), detecting pseudogenization, projecting alternative isoforms, or selecting between WGA-anchored (TOGA) vs ortholog-based (LiftOff) annotation transfer strategies.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Profile, diagnose, and remediate SwiftUI runtime performance using code review, Instruments, and repeatable measurements. Use when a SwiftUI screen renders slowly, scrolling or animations hitch, view bodies update excessively, list identity churns, layout work spikes, or broad Observation dependencies raise CPU cost. Covers evidence-based triage, SwiftUI Instruments lanes, lazy-container guardrails, state lifetime, and before/after verification.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build an evidence-based competitive pricing strategy for ecommerce products. Use when a seller asks how to position a price against competitors, set regular and promotional prices, protect contribution margin, design bundles or price tiers, respond to competitor moves, or coordinate prices across Amazon, Shopify, TikTok Shop, Walmart, eBay, or other channels. Do not use for automated repricing implementation or claims of a mathematically proven optimal price without sufficient data.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Write compelling award submissions, grant applications, and competition entries. Maps achievements to selection criteria using evidence-based narratives. Use whenever the user is applying for a business award (Telstra, chamber of commerce, industry awards), a grant, a competition, or any submission demonstrating merit against defined criteria.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Produce honest product reviews and buying guides without fabricated first-hand experience, using disclosed evidence tiers: verified specs, owner-experience synthesis at scale, expert triangulation, and hands-on only when true. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write product reviews or buying guides without hands-on access, set up a review methodology, add evidence disclosure to review content, align reviews with Google's reviews system or FTC affiliate disclosure expectations, or decide when Review and Product schema are honest to use. Triggers on product review, buying guide, best-of list, review methodology, evidence basis, hands-on testing, we tested, affiliate review site, review disclosure, methodology block, original research, reviews system. Also triggers when review content claims testing that did not happen, or when an affiliate site needs a trust mechanism that survives scrutiny.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Evidence-based clinical decision support and diagnostic reasoning
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Turn a novel into a fully playable game on the selected target platform. Orchestrates the whole adaptation pipeline — requirements intake, gameable deconstruction, concept selection, world and visual design, target-runtime build, and evidence-based QA — for a novel in any language. Use for novel to game, story to game, book to game, adapt this novel into a game, turn this book into a playable prototype, make an interactive story or text adventure from this novel. NovelToGame 总入口。把任意语言的原始小说、拆文库或 oh-story 写作工程转成有原著依据、可在目标平台完整游玩的游戏，编排游戏化拆解、概念选择、游戏与视觉设计、目标运行环境构建和证据化质量验证。用于小说转游戏、把这本书做成游戏、把小说改成互动小说 / 互动叙事 / 文字冒险游戏等需求。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.