13건 · 관련도순
Use when a problem requires structured step-by-step reasoning before acting. Prevents jumping to conclusions or guessing root causes without evidence. Triggers on complex debugging, multi-step analysis, hypothesis verification, or when mk:fix invokes diagnosis phase. NOT for being stuck on approach (too many implementations, forced assumptions, innovation block) — use mk:problem-solving instead.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when complex problems require systematic step-by-step reasoning with ability to revise thoughts, branch into alternative approaches, or dynamically adjust scope. Ideal for multi-stage analysis, design planning, problem decomposition, or tasks with initially unclear scope.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apply step-by-step analysis for complex problems with revision capability. Use for multi-step reasoning, hypothesis verification, adaptive planning, problem decomposition, course correction.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic step-by-step reasoning with revision and branching. Use for complex problems, multi-stage analysis, design planning, problem decomposition, or encountering unclear scope, alternative approaches needed, revision requirements.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Step-by-step complex reasoning for multi-variable problems. Breaks interconnected decisions into ordered logical steps with bias detection, reversibility classification, and second-order effect tracking.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Sequential thinking and structured problem solving. Break down complex problems into steps with revision and branching capabilities. Use for multi-step analysis, planning, and hypothesis verification.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when complex problems require systematic step-by-step reasoning with ability to revise thoughts, branch into alternative approaches, or dynamically adjust scope. Ideal for multi-stage analysis, design planning, problem decomposition, or tasks with initially unclear scope.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when complex problems require systematic step-by-step reasoning with ability to revise thoughts, branch into alternative approaches, or dynamically adjust scope. Ideal for multi-stage analysis, design planning, problem decomposition, or tasks with initially unclear scope.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when stuck on approach, not debugging. Unstick via 7 techniques: simplification, collision-zone thinking, inversion, first principles, via negativa. For debugging use mk:sequential-thinking.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Structured step-by-step reasoning before acting, to avoid guessing. For complex debugging, multi-step analysis, hypothesis checks. NOT for being stuck on approach (mk:problem-solving).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when stuck on approach (not debugging). Strategic unsticking via 7 non-default techniques: simplification cascades, collision-zone thinking, meta-pattern recognition, inversion, scale game, first principles, via negativa. Triggers on complexity spiraling, innovation block, recurring patterns across domains, forced-assumption solutions, scale uncertainty, told-it's-impossible, or bloated systems needing subtraction. For evidence-based root-cause debugging, use mk:sequential-thinking instead.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. Produces a diagnostic report; mk:fix owns remediation and mk:build-fix owns compile/build failures. Use when asked to "debug this", "fix this bug", "why is this broken", "investigate this error", or "root cause analysis". Proactively suggest when the user reports errors, unexpected behavior, or is troubleshooting why something stopped working. NOT for applying fixes without investigation (see mk:fix); NOT for step-by-step evidence-based reasoning (see mk:sequential-thinking).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Structured step-by-step problem decomposition and iterative analysis; explicit request only, never for regular coding tasks, and at most once per task.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.