23건 · 관련도순
This skill should be used when the user asks to "task-breakdown", "タスク分割", "タスク分解", "タスクを分割", "タスクを分解", "WBSを作成", "作業分解", "break down task", "decompose task", "create WBS". 依頼をゴール/制約/前提に正規化し、トップダウンで構造分解（1階層1軸）、粒度の停止条件を適用し、MECE・依存関係・DoD を検証して、ツリー＋表のタスク分割結果を生成する。分野を問わない汎用スキルで、単独利用と他スキル/コマンドからの呼び出しの両方に対応。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and WBS Dictionary from project charter deliverables. Covers hierarchical decomposition, WBS coding, effort estimation, dependency identification, and critical path candidates. Use after a project charter is approved, when planning a classic or waterfall project with defined deliverables, breaking a large initiative into manageable work packages, or establishing a basis for effort estimation and resource planning.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
把项目目标分解为可执行工作包时使用。适用于项目启动、Sprint 规划、需求拆任务。优先使用 WBS（Work Breakdown Structure）逐层分解到 5~60 分钟粒度。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Review WBS (Work Breakdown Structure) Excel files against requirements docs, hearing sheets, and prior decisions to identify gaps, inconsistencies, and deviations. Add review comments to Excel cells and generate summary reports.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Cross-reference project artifacts (WBS, meeting minutes, requirements docs) by date, participant, and action items. Extract commitments from meeting minutes and link to WBS tasks. Generate traceability reports showing which decisions were captured in which documents.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from the GAO Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide (GAO-20-195G). Use for program cost estimating: the four characteristics of a reliable estimate (comprehensive, well documented, accurate, credible) and the 18 best practices; the 12-step cost estimating process (purpose, plan, technical baseline, WBS, ground rules and assumptions, data, point estimate, sensitivity, risk/uncertainty, document, present, update); estimating methods (analogy, parametric, engineering build-up, learning curves); Monte Carlo risk/uncertainty analysis, confidence levels and contingency; auditing and validating an estimate against the characteristics; earned value management (EIA-748, BCWS/BCWP/ACWP, CPI/SPI/TCPI, EAC, PMB, IBR); and specialized techniques (software cost estimating, learning curves, Analysis of Alternatives, WBS templates, the Green Book internal-control framework). This is the cost-estimating companion to the GAO Schedule and Technology Readiness Assessment guides. Does not cover schedule estimating/risk in depth (see the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide), agency-specific cost models, or the full text of referenced standards (EIA-748, MIL-STD-881D, the Green Book) — these are named, not reproduced.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from MIL-STD-881F (13 May 2022), DoD Standard Practice for Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Materiel Items. Use for Program/Contract/Subcontract WBS construction, 100% rule and dictionary discipline, commodity appendices A–J, Common Elements (K), sustainment CES reporting (L), Government ST&E (M), and RFP/post-award implementation. Technical planning & WBS and PM/measurement focus—not a cost manual substitute for CAPE policy.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design, review, and implement Gantt charts for project schedules. Assess source data, task dependencies, and resource needs, then define suitable views, editing behavior, rendering tools, accessibility, exports, and tests—or recommend a clearer alternative.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Estimate software development effort by breaking requirements into tasks and choosing three-point estimates, relative T-shirt sizes, or function points that measure functional scope. Produce workload reports with uncertainty ranges and relevant risk adjustments.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 영어 요약을 표시하고 있습니다.
Act as a project-management copilot (PM/PMO) for the delivery loop: charters, plans and schedules, estimates, risk registers, status reports, scope changes, stakeholder communication, meeting actions, lessons learned, and portfolio roll-ups, in a per-project `_project/` workspace. Use whenever the user wants to start, plan, track, rescue, or report on a project: "kick off this project", "make a project plan / timeline / WBS", "what date can I commit to", "build a risk register", "run a pre-mortem", "write the weekly status report", "the deadline slipped, what now", "turn this meeting into action items", "review my project portfolio", in any language ("quản lý dự án", "gestion de projet", "プロジェクト管理", "项目管理"), even when they never say "project management". Also use whenever a `_project/` directory exists and the user asks about schedule, deadline, risk, status, scope, budget, or stakeholders. Not for what to build (product-manager) or company-level bets (strategy-board).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Reverse-engineer comprehensive specification documents from existing codebases through goal-driven reconnaissance, WBS-based parallel investigation, and iterative question-bank dialogue.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
识别项目关键路径和并行机会时使用。适用于已经完成 WBS 任务分解后的下一步、确定哪些任务必须串行、哪些可以并行。优先使用 CPM（Critical Path Method）+ DAG 可视化。
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Generate a project status report by reading existing artifacts (charter, backlog, sprint plan, WBS), calculating metrics, identifying blockers, and summarizing progress with RAG indicators for schedule, scope, budget, and quality. Use at the end of a sprint or reporting period, when stakeholders request a health update, before steering committee or governance meetings, or when a new blocker or risk materializes mid-project.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a diagram", "draw a flowchart", "make a swimlane diagram", "create WBS", "generate RACI matrix", "build network diagram", "create org chart", or mentions draw.io, diagrams.net, BPMN, UML, Gantt, PERT, or project management diagrams. Integrates with next-ai-draw-io MCP server for real-time diagram creation and editing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Project plan ครบ — WBS, Gantt, sprint, retrospective, RAID log, stakeholder communication
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
This skill should be used when creating cost estimates and quotations for software development projects. Use this skill when you have an RFQ (Request for Quotation), project requirements, or a project description and need to create a comprehensive estimate with WBS, effort calculations, cost breakdowns, and ROI analysis. Supports Japanese (default) and English, with systematic work breakdown, effort estimation, and markdown-formatted estimate documents.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
This skill should be used when creating comprehensive project plans for system development or implementation projects. Use this skill when you need to create Project Charters, Project Plans, WBS, Gantt Charts, RACI matrices, Risk analysis, or other PMBOK-aligned project management artifacts. Outputs are in Markdown format with Mermaid diagrams for visualizations. Leverages comprehensive PM knowledge base in references/ directory (544KB, 11 files) including PMBOK standards, Software/SaaS best practices, IT industry guidance, and specialized PM methodologies.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Transform client hearing sheets and meeting notes into structured requirements documents. Use when converting raw hearing data (Japanese/English) into formal requirements, generating traceability matrices, identifying gaps/ambiguities, and mapping requirements to WBS items. Triggers include "hearing to requirements", "meeting notes to specs", "requirements traceability", "gap analysis for requirements", or requests involving hearing sheet analysis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from the OUSD(R&E) guidebook Implementing a MOSA in DoD Programs (Feb 2025). Use for the Modular Open Systems Approach as a DoD acquisition + design discipline: the statutory/regulatory basis (10 U.S.C. 4401–4403, FY2017/FY2021 NDAA, DFARS), the five OUSD(R&E) pillars, the plan→modularize→identify→define→standardize interface lifecycle, technical levers (WBS/MIL-STD-881F taxonomy, standards profiling, API-first software, COTS/cybersecurity), MOSA assessment metrics and tools (PART/OAAT/KOSS/SEAM/MAUT), technology-change and DMSMS management, roadmaps, MOSA across the six AAF pathways, and contracting/IP/data-rights mechanics. SCOPE LIMITS: this is U.S. DoD weapon-system acquisition policy, not a general open-architecture or interface-standards reference — it names standards (FACE, OMS, DISR) without reproducing them, is light on detailed engineering of any specific standard, and does not cover the underlying SE processes (use dau-se-guidebook / nasa-npr-7123) or general systems-engineering theory (use sebok).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from the DoD Risk, Issue, and Opportunity (RIO) Management Guide for Defense Acquisition Programs (OUSD R&E, Sep 2023 incl. Change 2.2). Use for the defense-acquisition mechanics of program risk management: the RIO definitions (risk/issue/opportunity), the five-step risk process (plan-identify-analyze-mitigate-monitor), 1-5 likelihood/consequence scoring and the 5x5 risk matrix, the four mitigation options (accept/avoid/transfer/control), burn-down plans, issue management (probability=1), opportunity management toward should-cost, cross-program/interface risk, tailoring RIO to the six AAF acquisition pathways (UCA/MTA/MCA/Software/DBS/Services), specialized methods (RMF, MBCRA/Cyber Table Top, Agile metrics, FMECA, ITRA/DTRAM), and institutionalizing RIO via the PRMP, boards (RMB/JRMB/ROMB/RWG), tools, tiered roles, and WBS/IMP/IMS/EVM/TPM integration. This is the DoD-acquisition complement to nasa-risk (general CRM/RIDM theory) and dau-se-guidebook (the SE process frame). Does NOT teach general risk theory from scratch, and defers specialized risk regimes (system safety/ESOH, HSI, detailed cyber/RMF, spectrum) to their own DoD instructions and the relevant packs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from the NASA Schedule Management Handbook (2024 edition, Revision 2). Use for program/project schedule management of aerospace and large engineering efforts: the five sub-functions (Planning, Development, Assessment & Analysis, Maintenance & Control, Documentation & Communication); the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and the WBS/OBS/CBS breakdown structures; the Schedule Management Plan (SMP) and Basis of Estimate (BoE); Critical Path Method, logic, durations, float and margin; tiered schedule assessment (Requirements/Health/Basis checks, the Shock Test) and the Dimensions of Schedule Reliability; Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA), Integrated Cost-Schedule Risk Analysis (ICSRA), Monte Carlo, correlation, merge bias, and the Joint Confidence Level (JCL); baselining, replan vs. rebaseline, EVM schedule metrics (SPI, BEI, CEI, HMI, Earned Schedule, CPLI), and status/progress/forecast reporting. This is NASA's scheduling doctrine grounded in NPR 7120.5 and the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide. Thin on the underlying mechanics of CPM, statistics, and EVM (it points to companion handbooks); aerospace/space-flight-centric; anchored to the 2024 second edition.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from the NASA Cost Estimating Handbook (CEH) v4.0. Use for NASA's 12-step, three-part cost estimating process (Project Definition, Cost Methodology, Cost Estimate); the WBS, CADRe, and ONCE data backbone; estimating methodologies (analogy, parametric/CER, engineering build-up, EVM, Delphi); ground rules and assumptions, data normalization and inflation (BY/CY/RY); the point-estimate-to-S-curve cost-risk chain and Unallocated Future Expense (UFE) reserves; Joint Cost and Schedule Confidence Level (JCL) analysis via probabilistic cost-loaded schedules; decision-support analyses (sensitivity, trade studies, make/lease-vs-buy, affordability, CAIV); and economic analysis (discounting, NPV, OMB Circular A-94). The cost-estimating complement to NASA's SE and risk packs. Does NOT reproduce the handbook's tool-specific procedures, worked examples, or appendix-depth methods (it names the appendices), nor cover full DoD/GAO cost guides, schedule construction, or formal risk management beyond the cost interface.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Knowledge base from the GAO Agile Assessment Guide (GAO-24-105506, 2023). Use for assessing and managing Agile software development in federal programs: the Agile Manifesto and framework family (Scrum, Kanban, XP, SAFe, DA, DSDM, Lean, DevOps); the three adoption perspectives (team dynamics, program operations, organization environment); requirements decomposition (epics, features, user stories, INVEST, MoSCoW, definition of done); Agile-aware federal contracting (FAR, modular contracting, SOO/PWS/SOW, product owner vs. COR); program monitoring and control (WBS, cost, schedule, EVM at the feature level); Agile metrics (velocity, lead/cycle time, CFD, burn charts); and the auditor's key-question bank. Oversight- and acquisition-oriented: it tells you how to *assess and govern* Agile programs, not how to code. Thin on hands-on engineering practice, deep cost/schedule checklists (see gao-cost, gao-schedule), and any non-US-federal context.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.