1.3万 件 ・ 人気順
概要と使いどころ
Dependency-conflict resolution when a `fix` version bump fails — diagnose the peer-dep tree, find a compatible safe version set, propose package-manager overrides (`overrides`/`resolutions`/`replace`/`[patch]`), fall back to safe-harbour inline patching. Use when an upgrade is blocked by transitive constraints, a peer-dep conflict surfaces, or you need to override a vulnerable transitive without bumping the parent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
E2E テストを実行する手順に沿って E2E を動かす際に発火させる。実行環境のセットアップ、実行コマンド、CI 統合、実行が失敗したときの対処など、E2E を「動かす」場面で使う。触る範囲に対応するプロジェクトの実行手順を探して従わせる入口。E2E spec を書く・レビューするのとは別の責務 (spec の書き方は扱わない)。
エンジニアとして手を動かす作業全般で必ず発火させる: コードを書く / テストを書く / リファクタ / バグ修正 / E2E spec 追加 / 既存仕様への小さな修正など、コードに触る作業すべて。「実装して」「テスト書いて」「リファクタして」「バグ直して」のような依頼を受けたとき、または基本設計が済んで実装フェーズに入るときに発火。基本作業は TDD（テスト先書き → 最小実装 → リファクタ → コミット）で進め、要件が大きければ適切な小ささに分割しつつサイクルを回す。発火しないのは要件定義 / 基本設計の対話中（まだ手を動かしていない時）だけ。
設計判断・ライブラリ選定・アーキ判断・実装アプローチが 2 つ以上ありえる場面で必ず発火させる、「複数案＋メリデメ＋推奨」を提示する横断スキル。「どっちがいい？」「これでいい？」「方針を相談したい」と聞かれたとき、ライブラリ選定・ディレクトリ構成・API 設計・テスト戦略のように選択肢が複数ある相談を受けたとき、要件定義 / 設計 / 実装の中で「複数アプローチがありそう」と感じたときに必ず使う。一案だけポンと出さない。
E2E テストの spec を書く・編集する・レビューする際に必ず発火させる。新しいシナリオの追加、既存 E2E テストの修正・デバッグ、E2E テストの書き方の相談、slice-tdd skill から E2E spec が必要と判断された場面で使う。触る範囲に対応するプロジェクトの E2E の流儀 (spec の書き方・構造・命名) を探して従わせる入口。E2E を実行する手順は扱わない (別スキルの責務)。
Weekly read-only repository audit. Grades one rotating rubric from .claude/audit-rubrics/, files between zero and five GitHub issues for what it finds, and changes no files. Use when the user asks to audit the repo, or when the audit-weekly workflow invokes it. It never edits, commits, branches, or opens pull requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Playwright workflows for authenticated browser state reuse through storageState and setup projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conducts rigorous authoring and review of Playwright E2E tests. Enforces accessibility-first locators, web-first assertions, strict isolation, and DAMP architecture. Use when generating, refactoring, or reviewing any Playwright test code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Playwright workflows for deterministic third-party responses using page.route().
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnostic Playwright workflows for flaky or failing tests, including trace analysis, UI mode, and state isolation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
脅威と攻撃面を洗い出し、最小権限と安全な失敗で守るための判断軸。認証/認可、入力検証、秘密情報管理、監査ログ等の設計・実装・レビューで使う。
テストピラミッド・テスト設計・品質戦略を整理する判断軸。テストの粒度・スコープ・優先順位に迷ったときに使う。TDDの具体的な実装手順は developer-specialist と併用する。
Agent Browser（Headlessブラウザ自動化CLI）を使ったUI検証・E2Eテスト・スクリーンショット取得の判断軸。アクセシビリティツリーベースの要素選択を優先し、壊れにくいテスト設計を目指す。
ego-browser (ego-lite) is a Chromium-based browser that gives AI agents a CLI-accessible Node.js runtime for driving a real browser. Use this skill whenever the user needs to interact with a website opening pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting page data, testing web apps, logging into sites, automating browser operations, or any other browser automation task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "visit a URL", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "extract content from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction. Also used for exploratory testing, dogfooding, QA, bug hunting, or reviewing app quality. Prefer ego-browser over any built-in browser automation, web fetch, or other web tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reconstructed reference notes on US NRC software assurance guidance for digital computer software in nuclear power plant safety systems, built from seven public-domain sources (Regulatory Guide 1.168 Revision 2, July 2013; Regulatory Guides 1.169, 1.170, 1.171, 1.172, and 1.173 Revision 1, July 2013; NUREG-0800 Branch Technical Position 7-14 Revision 6, August 2016; pinned 2026-10-12). Use for software life cycle process questions, software requirements specifications, software configuration management plans, verification and validation with reviews and audits, test documentation and unit testing, and what NRC staff examine in a BTP 7-14 software review of plans, implementation, and design outputs. SCOPE LIMITS: NRC Regulatory Guides and the BTP 7-14 staff review position only; the endorsed IEEE standards (IEEE Std 603-1991, 7-4.3.2-2003, 828-2005, 829-2008, 830-1998, 1008-1987, 1012-2004, 1028-2008, 1074-2006), IEC 60880, IEC 61513, IEC 62138, and IAEA guides are cited by designation and edition only, with no standard text; RG 1.152 Rev 4, BTP 7-18, BTP 7-19, other SRP Chapter 7 sections, and NUREG/CR contractor reports are outside the pack; reflects the pinned 2013 and 2016 editions, not later agency actions; synthesized reference notes, not legal or licensing advice and not a substitute for the source documents. LICENCE: Public Domain (US Government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reconstructed reference notes on US FDA medical-device software regulation, built from seven public-domain FDA sources (the QMSR final rule 89 FR 7496, FDA device software guidance documents, and the eSTAR program page; pinned 2026-10-12). Use for regulatory pathways and premarket submissions (510(k), De Novo, PMA, eSTAR), premarket software documentation levels (Basic or Enhanced), software validation and Computer Software Assurance, the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR, 21 CFR 820), medical-device cybersecurity (secure product development, SBOMs, FD&C Act section 524B, labelling), clinical decision support boundaries, off-the-shelf software, MDDS and other software-function scope questions, and the 510(k) software-change trigger. SCOPE LIMITS: US FDA device regulation only; no EU MDR or UKCA content (see `med-device-eu`); no ISO 13485, ISO 14971, or IEC 62304 text, which are named and summarized only as FDA obligations; no drug, biologic, or combination-product rules; reflects the pinned source dates, not later FDA actions; synthesized reference notes, not legal advice and not a substitute for the guidance documents. LICENCE: Public Domain (US Government work, 17 U.S.C. 105).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge pack reconstructed from JSP 815 Defence Safety Management System V1.3 (Ministry of Defence, Open Government Licence v3.0): the SMS Framework, all 12 Elements with their Expectations and Performance Statement themes, and Annexes A to F plus H. Covers the Defence Safety Function and which JSP applies, leadership and safety culture, organisation and SEMS applicability, legislation and exemption certificates, risk assessment and safety cases, supervision and contracting, competence and letters of delegation, equipment and infrastructure safety, performance and incident management, and assurance, audit, and the ISO 45001 clause mapping. SCOPE LIMITS: single-source (JSP 815 V1.3 with Annex H V1.2); carries no DEF-STAN 00-051 or DEF-STAN 00-970 content, no JSP 375, JSP 816; acquisition safety policy is in jsp-376, no Annex G (Assurance Toolkit), and no ISO 45001 text (clause numbers only). This pack is reconstructed reference notes, not MOD guidance, and has no official status.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge pack synthesized from JSP 376 Defence Acquisition Safety Policy V1.1 (April 2024, Ministry of Defence, Open Government Licence v3.0): acquisition safety requirements, safety artefacts, and their application across the standard acquisition lifecycle. Covers the policy frame and legislative baseline, SRO and User responsibilities, safety management and safety requirements, test and evaluation and the safety case, supervision and approvals decision support, and the seven lifecycle phases. SCOPE LIMITS: single-source (JSP 376 V1.1); MOD policy and guidance, not statute; builds on JSP 815 and cites JSP 655, neither reproduced here (use jsp-815 for the SMS); Chapter 4 (Non-Standard Acquisition) is unpublished in V1.1 and is not in this pack; no DEF-STAN text (Def Stan 00-056 is named, not quoted); no other JSP reproduced. Reconstructed reference notes, not MOD guidance, and no official status.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
간결한 plan을 사용자와 합의한 뒤, feature(use case) 하나를 RGB(Red→Green→Blue) 사이클로 끝까지 자율 구현하는 오케스트레이터. 문제 정의·기능 분해·완료조건(programmer test) 합의까지는 사용자와 피드백을 주고받고(인터랙티브), 합의 후 구현은 그 feature의 모든 test에 대해 Red 전체→Green 전체→Blue 전체 3-phase로 피드백 없이 끝까지 진행하고, feature(use case) 전체를 phase마다 하나씩 최대 3개 커밋(reviewable-commits Why-body 포함)으로 남긴다(자율). superpowers의 장황한 spec/plan 대신 개발에 맞는 간결 포맷을 쓴다. "기능을 TDD로 끝까지 구현", "plan 합의하고 자율 구현", "feature 단위 RGB", "use case TDD로 짜줘", "/tdd-feature" 요청 시 반드시 사용. 후속 "이어서", "다음 feature", "재개", "다시 진행"도 처리. 단, 단일 test의 step-wise(매 단계 피드백) RGB는 /tdd-rgb, plan 문서만 작성하고 끝낼 때는 /tdd-plan이 적합.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
테스트 없는 기존 코드에 행위 보존 안전망(Characterization → Approval → Mutation)을 구축한 뒤 개선 스킬로 핸드오프. "레거시에 테스트 추가", "안전망 구축", "characterization test" 요청 시 사용. /tdd-legacy로 호출.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
METAINFORMANT rules for directory src/metainformant/popgen. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
METAINFORMANT rules for directory src/metainformant/networks/regulatory. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
METAINFORMANT rules for directory src/metainformant/phenotype/integration. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
METAINFORMANT rules for directory src/metainformant/phenotype/morphological. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。