「decide」の検索結果

Routes any game-development request to the right specialized skill(s): it detects the engine (Godot, Unity, Unreal, Bevy, Phaser, PixiJS, three.js, LÖVE, pygame, Roblox) and the task, then reads the chosen skill before acting. Use to make a game or to decide which skill applies — for players, levels, enemies, shaders, art direction, sprites, tiles, textures, 3D assets, UI/UX, cameras, game feel, physics, input, audio, saving, multiplayer, AI, dialogue, procedural generation, or performance, for genres (platformer, roguelike, RPG, FPS, tower-defense, card game, visual novel, survival-crafting, puzzle), and for shipping (game jam, Steam, itch). Start here when unsure which gamedev skill to use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run /develop to build a feature, UI or backend, from an approved design, a page, component, API, service, or data slice. If something load bearing is undecided and no spec records it, it stops and routes you to /architect; otherwise it reads the spec plus AGENTS.md, builds, and advances the scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Never get auto-renewed into another year again — the contract inventory with the dates that matter (notice deadlines, not renewal dates), the calendar system with decision-time buffers, and the renewal-decision ritual that renegotiates instead of rubber-stamping. Use when asked track our contracts and renewals, we got auto-renewed again, when do we have to decide on this vendor, or set up renewal management. Produces the inventory with notice-deadline math, the alert system, the renewal-decision checklist, and the negotiation-window playbook.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Estimate economic compensation (经济补偿金) when employment ends in mainland China: N, N+1 or 2N under the Labour Contract Law, with the high-earner cap, the part-year rule and the questions that decide which case applies. Use when asked 我被裁员了能拿多少补偿, N+1 怎么算, 经济补偿金计算, 违法解除 2N, or how much severance am I owed in China. Produces the scenario that likely applies and why, the calculation shown step by step, what to check before signing anything, and where to get it confirmed. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start a cross-team project with the collaboration contract that prevents the classic collisions — who decides what, how work flows between teams, the communication channels and cadence, and what done means — agreed before the first collision instead of during it. Use when asked kick off this cross-team project right, our two teams keep colliding, define how we'll work with the other team, or set up the partnership before we start. Produces the one-page contract: decision rights, interfaces, cadence, and the done-definition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked 数据出境要申报吗, 数据出境安全评估还是标准合同, 个人信息出境标准合同怎么备案, 我们把数据传到海外总部合规吗, or decide how to transfer data out of mainland China lawfully. Produces a data map of what leaves China, the route that applies (an exemption, the personal information export standard contract, certification, or a CAC security assessment) with the thresholds to confirm, the filing steps, and the documents to prepare, including the personal information protection impact assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage an incoming insurance claim: check the coverage trigger against policy wording, band severity and complexity, screen for fraud indicators, set a first-pass reserve range, and route with an SLA. Use when asked to triage a claim, review a first notice of loss (FNOL), assess a new claim, decide fast-track vs adjuster routing, or screen a claim for SIU referral. Produces a structured triage note with coverage view, severity band, indicator screen, reserve range, and a routing recommendation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a family meeting to make a big care decision together. Use when asked help me run a family meeting about care, we need to decide together about mom's care, my siblings and I disagree about our parent, or facilitate a care decision. Produces an agenda and structure for the meeting, how to prepare (facts, options, everyone's input), ground rules to keep old family dynamics from derailing it, how to include the person being cared for, ways to work through disagreement toward a decision, and clear next steps with owners. Not legal, medical, or financial advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview you into a durable personal MEMORY.md — your decision rules, patterns, past failures, and preferences — that any AI can read to help you better, with privacy guardrails built in. Use when asked to build my memory file, help my AI remember me, create a MEMORY.md, or set up context about myself. Produces a structured personal-context file drawn out through good questions (how you decide, what you keep repeating, what you don't want to repeat), organized for an AI to use — while explicitly refusing to store sensitive data like credentials, financial, health, or others' personal info.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Allocate a finite budget or headcount across competing initiatives by return and strategic fit. Use when asked to allocate budget, decide where to invest, build a funding/portfolio plan, or make trade-offs across initiatives under a cap. Produces a capital-allocation plan — initiatives scored by expected return × strategic fit per dollar, a funded/unfunded split against the cap, the cut line, and the reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write the band agreement before the money or the breakup arrives — who owns the songs, how money splits (writing vs performing distinguished), who owns the name, what happens when someone quits, and the decision rules for offers — decided while everyone still shares a van. Use when a band asks 'how should we split money', 'who owns our songs', 'our drummer quit, what happens', or is about to record/release/sign anything. Produces a plain-language band agreement and the meeting script to agree it. Not legal advice — it's the conversation that makes the lawyer cheap later.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide when to buy a big-ticket item to get the best price — the sales cycles, model-refresh timing, and 'buy now vs wait' math for the specific thing you want. Use when asked when's the best time to buy [item], should I wait for a sale, is now a good time to buy, or when do [products] go on sale. Produces the typical discount calendar for that category, whether a new model/version is due (and if the current one will drop), a buy-now-vs-wait recommendation for your timeline, and price-tracking tactics — flagging that timing is a guide, not a guarantee.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert a meeting into async work that actually decides — the doc-plus-deadline format that replaces the room, the comment-window rules, the decision-closure step that async usually fumbles, and the honest test for what still needs synchronous. Use when asked can this meeting be async, replace our status meeting with a doc, run this decision without a call, or async isn't working for us. Produces the conversion design, the async artifact format, the closure protocol, and the still-needs-a-room list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide which of your recurring rituals to put on autopilot — and which to keep manual. Use when asked what to automate, how to set up recurring AI runs, which reports or briefings could run on a schedule, or to design an automation charter for a team. Produces a ritual inventory with automate/assist/keep-manual calls, guardrails per ritual, and a rollout order.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan an apprentice's or new laborer's first week so they're useful by Friday and safe from hour one — day-by-day teaching order, the safety non-negotiables stated before anything else, what they're allowed to touch unsupervised, and the check-out conversation that decides week two. Use when a tradesperson says 'my apprentice starts Monday', 'how do I train the new guy', or 'the apprentice is useless and I don't have time to teach'. Produces a first-week plan, a can/can't-touch list, and the Friday review script.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a decision asynchronously — the memo, the silent-read window, the comment protocol, and the deadline that makes it land without a meeting. Use when asked to decide something async, replace a decision meeting with a document, run an Amazon-style written decision process, or when a decision keeps stalling in comment threads. Produces the decision memo plus the process wrapper: reader roles, response windows, comment-resolution rules, and the tie-breaker. For the document structure alone use decision-memo; this skill runs the process around it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide when and how your product and communications must (or should) label AI-generated content, and write the disclosure policy — surface-by-surface rules, exact label wording, and the review trigger for regulations like the EU AI Act's transparency obligations. Use when asked 'do we have to label AI content', 'write our AI disclosure policy', 'are we covered for the AI Act', or when marketing/support/product start shipping AI-generated output. Produces a disclosure policy with a per-surface matrix and ready-to-use label copy. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users decide where to apply AI effectively, manage the transition from deterministic to probabilistic software, and build long-term defensibility through verticalization and proprietary data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record a decision, document existing code, or file a supplied research material. Modes: document decision (ADR, RFC, or rule), document code (spec, doc, guide, or scenario for existing behavior), document research (only when a finished report or one external material is already in hand). Use for 'we decided', 'record this decision', 'document why we chose X', 'make it our standard', 'draft an RFC', 'should we switch to Y' proposals, 'resolve the RFC', 'we accepted the proposal', 'document the auth module', 'capture how the payment system works', reference material, how-to instructions, or a user flow with examples over an existing spec. Name the type inside the subject to skip the type question. Planning a feature or an intended user journey → /archcore:plan. Checking docs against code or docs health → /archcore:review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codex-native multi-keyword Amazon opportunity scan using LaunchFast MCP. Use when the user wants to research 1-10 keywords, compare niches, or decide whether a product idea is a GO, INVESTIGATE, or PASS. Requires the LaunchFast MCP tool `research_products`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record a decision, document existing code, or file a supplied research material. Modes: document decision (ADR, RFC, or rule), document code (spec, doc, guide, or scenario for existing behavior), document research (only when a finished report or one external material is already in hand). Use for 'we decided', 'record this decision', 'document why we chose X', 'make it our standard', 'draft an RFC', 'should we switch to Y' proposals, 'resolve the RFC', 'we accepted the proposal', 'document the auth module', 'capture how the payment system works', reference material, how-to instructions, or a user flow with examples over an existing spec. Name any document type inside the subject — journey, prd, idea, or cpat included — to get exactly that type. Planning a feature or an unnamed intended user journey → /archcore:plan. Checking docs against code or docs health → /archcore:review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when extensions, edge cases, or applied robustness checks are missing for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript — covering theory extensions (relaxed assumptions, alternative concepts, perturbations) and applied/experimental robustness. Decides which extensions earn their place; it does not prove the main result (see aejmic-theory-model).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting the ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) rebuttal — turning multiple anonymous reviews into one focused, anonymous response that fixes factual errors first, adds small confirmatory cross-modal results, concedes calibratedly, and stays inside policy (anonymous, no new external links), written for the area chair who decides.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。