1,513 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Plan database migrations before executing them: risk assessment, dependency mapping, multi-service sequencing, rollback budgets, and stakeholder communication plans. Use when deciding HOW to migrate, not when writing the actual DDL. NOT for: writing migration SQL (use database-migration-manager), data ETL pipelines (use data-migration-specialist), query optimization, or ORM configuration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply recognition-primed decision making to agents operating under time pressure, uncertainty, and ambiguous cues. Use for situation assessment, RPD-style action selection, and decision-support design in operational settings. NOT for batch optimization, static planning with full information, or tasks where exhaustive search is cheap and harmless.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive AWS security posture assessment using AWS CLI and security best practices
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep-dive framework for analyzing crypto tokens — market data, liquidity health, tokenomics, unlock schedules, and risk assessment. Combines on-chain data, API queries, and multi-source validation to generate actionable investment verdicts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert-level environmental remediation covering site characterization, risk assessment, remediation technology selection, in-situ and ex-situ treatment, and regulatory closure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert-level green chemistry knowledge. Use when working with sustainable synthesis, atom economy, solvent selection, catalysis, renewable feedstocks, waste reduction, life cycle assessment, or the 12 principles of green chemistry. Also use when the user mentions 'atom economy', 'E-factor', 'green solvent', 'catalysis', 'renewable feedstock', 'waste minimization', 'sustainable chemistry', 'life cycle assessment', 'PMI', 'solvent selection guide', or 'benign by design'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess bounded Codex software development requests before choosing direct work or TaskBelay, then prepare confirmed TaskBelay Tasks in new local branches by default, current branches, or dedicated Git worktrees. It may be selected implicitly or explicitly with $taskbelay-codex:taskbelay; the selector never skips assessment. Explicit Task resume and receipt-backed confirmed bootstrap bypass duplicate assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants a security-maturity scorecard / posture assessment of a module — category ratings with evidence, not a vulnerability hunt. Also on 'wie sicher ist dieses Modul aufgestellt?'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Modelo de espaço de estados com complexidade O(n) versus O(n²) dos Transformers. Inferência 5× mais rápida, sequências de milhão de tokens, sem cache KV. SSM seletivo com design aware de hardware. Mamba-1 (d_state=16) e Mamba-2 (d_state=128, multi-head). Modelos 130M-2.8B no HuggingFace.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess and migrate cross-cloud workloads to Azure. Generates assessment reports and converts code from AWS, GCP, or other providers to Azure services. WHEN: migrate Lambda to Azure Functions, migrate AWS to Azure, Lambda migration assessment, convert AWS serverless to Azure, migration readiness r...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive AWS security posture assessment using AWS CLI and security best practices
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conducts penetration testing of iOS and Android mobile applications following the OWASP Mobile Application Security Testing Guide (MASTG) to identify vulnerabilities in data storage, network communication, authentication, cryptography, and platform-specific security controls. The tester performs static analysis of application binaries, dynamic analysis at runtime, and API security testing to evaluate the complete mobile attack surface. Activates for requests involving mobile app pentest, iOS security assessment, Android security testing, or OWASP MASTG assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill details how to conduct cloud security audits using Center for Internet Security benchmarks for AWS, Azure, and GCP. It covers interpreting CIS Foundations Benchmark controls, running automated assessments with tools like Prowler and ScoutSuite, remediating failed controls, and maintaining continuous compliance monitoring against CIS v5 for AWS, v4 for Azure, and v4 for GCP.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Standard Operating Procedures for architecture decisions, security audits, deep code analysis, risk assessment, and critical problem solving.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
サプライチェーン最適化コンサルティングスキル。需要予測、在庫最適化、調達戦略、 物流ネットワーク設計、S&OP(Sales and Operations Planning)を支援。 Use when optimizing supply chain operations, improving inventory management, designing logistics networks, or conducting supply chain risk assessments. Triggers: "supply chain", "在庫最適化", "inventory optimization", "demand forecasting", "S&OP", "procurement strategy", "logistics network".
Professional project management skill aligned with PMBOK® 6th/7th Edition standards. Use this skill when you need to define requirements (ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148), review project plans, generate progress reports with Earned Value Management (EVM), conduct risk analysis, estimate costs, or provide project health assessments. Ideal for creating comprehensive project documentation, analyzing project performance metrics (SPI, CPI, EAC), managing risks across 14 categories, and ensuring stakeholder alignment. Triggers: "create project plan", "analyze project health", "calculate EVM", "risk assessment", "requirements definition", "progress report", "cost estimation", or requests involving PMBOK knowledge areas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
コンプライアンス・内部統制支援の専門スキル。J-SOX/SOX対応、リスクコントロールマトリクス（RCM）作成、 内部監査計画策定をサポート。内部統制の整備・運用評価から監査対応まで一貫した支援を提供。 日英両言語のテンプレートを提供し、グローバル企業にも対応。COSO内部統制フレームワーク（2013年版）に準拠。 Use when: creating J-SOX/SOX compliance documentation, building risk control matrices, planning internal audits, or assessing internal control effectiveness. Triggers: "J-SOX", "SOX", "内部統制", "コンプライアンス", "RCM", "リスクコントロールマトリクス", "内部監査", "compliance", "internal control", "internal audit", "risk assessment", "COSO"
4人の異なる専門家ペルソナ（20年ベテランエンジニア、TDDエキスパート、Clean Codeエキスパート、バグハンター）で ソースコードを批判的にレビューするスキル。設計判断、テスト容易性、可読性、バグ検出の観点から コードの問題を検出し、改善提案を行う。Python/JavaScriptに対しては追加のチェックポイントを適用。 バグハンターは状態遷移、例外パス、依存関係、非同期競合に特化し、本番環境での問題を事前に検出する。 Use when reviewing source code from multiple expert perspectives to find design flaws, testability issues, code quality problems, and runtime bugs. Triggers: "critical code review", "multi-persona code review", "expert code review", "code quality assessment", "find bugs".
Conduct a Marty-Cagan-style opportunity assessment interview and produce a ~2-page Opportunity Brief in Confluence. Covers business objective, customer, problem, success metric, current alternatives, assumptions/risks, and what we don't know yet. Triggers on "opportunity brief", "opportunity assessment", "discovery brief", "who is this for", "why are we building this", "validate this idea", "product discovery", or any request to frame a feature before implementation. One question at a time. Records accepted research gaps as structured Confluence Decision pages with bidirectional links.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the GAO Technology Readiness Assessment Guide (GAO-20-48G, 2020). Use for evaluating technology maturity in acquisition programs and projects: Technology Readiness Levels (TRL 1–9) and related scales (MRL, IRL), identifying Critical Technology Elements (CTEs), the five-step process for a high-quality TRA, the four characteristics of a reliable TRA (comprehensive, well-documented, credible, defensible), Technology Maturation Plans (TMPs), and using TRA results in knowledge-based, milestone decisions. Assessment/maturity oriented: it measures readiness and frames risk — it is not a full SE process model, cost-estimating, or schedule guide (see sibling packs for those).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NASA-STD-7009B (Standard for Models and Simulations) with implementation depth from NASA-HDBK-7009B. Use for M&S criticality and programmatics, development evidence and capability assessment, verification/validation domains, uncertainty and sensitivity, use-phase results assessment, risk-informed decision reporting, and handbook life-cycle products. Covers STD-7009B (2024-03-05) + HDBK-7009B (2026-02-03) synthesized notes only; does not replace program-specific TA direction, NPR 7150.2 software requirements detail, or full PRA methodology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts a DRAFT self-assessment, peer feedback note or manager review narrative from the evidence the writer supplies (goals, examples, metrics, notes), in the review template where given: every sentence tied to a numbered evidence item, unsupported claims removed and logged, and a gaps list to complete before submitting. Never assigns, suggests or implies a rating, score, ranking, pay or promotion outcome. Use when the user asks to "write my self-assessment", "draft peer feedback for a colleague", "turn these notes into a performance review", "help me write the year-end review for my report", "summarise my achievements against my goals" or "draft the mid-year review". Do not use for a job description or role profile, use job-description-drafter instead; for a new hire's first 90 days, use onboarding-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads a project or processing description and returns a DRAFT data protection impact assessment pack: processing description, necessity and proportionality questions, a risk table with blank rating cells, mitigations to consider and open questions. Never rates risk, determines the lawful basis or judges adequacy; the DPO assesses and signs. Works from descriptions, never personal data. Use when the user asks to "start a DPIA for the new monitoring tool", "draft a data protection impact assessment", "scaffold a DPIA from this processing description" or "what would the DPO need for a DPIA on this". Do not use for redacting or de-identifying a document, use document-deidentification-pass instead; do not use for working out what data an incident exposed, use data-incident-impact-brief instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simulate a Nature-style reviewer assessment from the referee perspective rather than an author rebuttal. Use when the user wants a pre-submission review, reviewer report, peer-review style critique, novelty/significance/technical soundness assessment, reviewer-style manuscript evaluation, 审稿人视角评估, 预审稿意见, or Nature reviewer report. Return 3 reviewer reports plus a cross-review synthesis, grounded only in the local Nature reviewer source basis. Also trigger on general pre-submission review requests during academic writing even without the word "Nature", such as getting a mock peer review for any journal, critiquing a draft as a reviewer would, assessing novelty/rigor before submission, and Chinese phrasings like 审稿人视角、模拟审稿、预审、帮我审一下论文、投稿前自审、审稿意见模拟、找论文问题.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。