「quality」の検索結果

Online presence audit — Google Business Profile completeness, Yelp listing quality, website assessment, online ordering setup, third-party platform presence

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Menu engineering analysis — item placement, description quality, pricing psychology, upsell opportunities, photo presence, Kasavana matrix (Stars/Plowhorses/Puzzles/Dogs)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate NowStack Mobile app icons and logos. Use for `/ns icon`, app icon, iOS logo, launcher icon, favicon, or logo refresh. By default ALWAYS generate exactly 8 different iOS-quality icon candidates first, then finalize one icon and derive app/web assets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fundamental Analysis skill — valuation ratios, growth metrics, profitability, balance sheet health, competitive moat analysis, and management quality. Returns Fundamental Score (0-100). Triggered by "trade fundamental <TICKER>".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investment Thesis Generator — complete institutional-quality thesis with bull/bear cases (3-5 reasons each with evidence), catalyst timeline, entry/exit strategy with specific price levels, position sizing tables, timeframe classification, and asymmetry assessment. Triggered by "trade thesis <TICKER>".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create high-quality, SEO-optimized content that ranks AND reads like a human wrote it. Performs live SERP gap analysis, writes with anti-AI detection techniques, and adds schema markup. Use when someone needs a blog post, article, SEO page, or wants content that drives search traffic. Triggers on 'SEO content', 'blog post', 'article', 'SERP', 'programmatic SEO', 'content at scale', 'template pages at scale', 'write a post about', 'rank for', or 'search-optimized content'. Two modes: single article or programmatic SEO at scale. Owns programmatic SEO and content-at-scale generation. For a single alternatives or vs/comparison page, see /competitor-alternatives; for a multi-phase page roadmap with a persistent tracker, see /seo-machine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits brand/ files for completeness, consistency, and freshness. Use when the agent or user wants to review brand files, audit marketing docs, check brand consistency, verify brand health, or assess what's missing from brand memory. Produces a structured audit report with per-file scores, cross-file contradiction detection, staleness flags, and recommended next skills to run. This is the quality gate for the brand memory system. Also use when someone says 'check my brand', 'brand audit', 'what's missing', 'is my brand ready', 'brand health', 'review my marketing docs', or before running any campaign to verify brand foundations are solid.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants professional brand-quality product images via Higgsfield's mode-specific prompt enhancement pipeline. Entry point for any product visual with a specific format or platform target. Use whenever: "product photoshoot", "lifestyle product shots", "Pinterest pin", "hero banner", "ad pack", "virtual try-on", "studio shot", "carousel images", "Meta ads creative", "model wearing product", "levitating product", "splash shot", "CGI style product", "restyle product image", Shopify image, brand campaign visual. 10 modes: product_shot, lifestyle_scene, closeup_product_with_person, moodboard_pin, hero_banner, social_carousel, ad_creative_pack, virtual_model_tryout, conceptual_product, restyle. Backend assembles the prompt — never call gpt_image_2 directly for product shots. NOT for: one-off images without a product (use image-gen), branded video with avatars (use higgsfield-generate), Soul training (use higgsfield-soul-id). Requires Higgsfield CLI and authed account.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create high-converting free resources that capture emails and build trust. Produces complete lead magnets (ebooks, checklists, templates, toolkits, quizzes) with landing page copy, thank-you page, and follow-up email sequence. Use when someone needs a list-building asset, wants to grow their email list, needs an opt-in incentive, a content upgrade, a gated download, or top-of-funnel content. Triggers on 'lead magnet', 'ebook', 'checklist', 'template', 'free resource', 'opt-in', 'grow my list', 'email capture', 'content upgrade', 'list building', 'gated content', or 'free download'. Even if someone just says 'I need something to capture emails' or 'how do I get more subscribers', this is the skill. Every lead magnet passes a 4-gate quality test before shipping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactoring pipeline: analyzes a target file or directory for code quality issues, plans safe incremental improvements, optionally writes tests first as a safety net, implements the changes, and reviews the result. Orchestrates refactor-planner → (test-writer) → parallel-task-orchestrator → code-reviewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when editing a draft, checking for AI voice patterns, reviewing prose quality, running readability analysis, auditing consistency, or validating SEO requirements on finished content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user needs SCI/SCIE/ESCI/SSCI journal-submission help: evidence-backed candidate-journal discovery from a title, abstract, keywords, or manuscript text; public-metric and risk lookup for a known journal; or a pre-submission compliance check of a draft against a chosen journal's Author Guidelines and same-journal conventions. Also for Chinese requests such as 选刊、投稿期刊推荐、期刊查询、中科院分区、投稿前检查、期刊要求核对. This skill produces candidates, evidence, checks, and uncertainty; it does not judge research quality, predict acceptance, choose a uniquely best journal, draft prose, or simulate peer review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

最近変更・追加されたコードを、可読性・パフォーマンス・ベストプラクティスの3観点でレビューし、各指摘に理由と改善前後のコード例を添えて提示する。

Calculates CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) score for .NET methods, classes, or files. Use when the user asks to assess test quality, identify risky untested code, compute CRAP scores, or evaluate whether complex methods have sufficient test coverage. Requires code coverage data (Cobertura XML) and cyclomatic complexity analysis. DO NOT USE FOR: writing tests, general test execution unrelated to coverage/CRAP analysis, or general code coverage reporting without CRAP context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TypeScript and JavaScript performance and code-quality rules, usable in any framework. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring hot paths, data-structure choices, async flows, or bundle-size-sensitive code. Triggers include "optimize this function", "too slow", "reduce allocations", "bundle size", "lazy load", "speed up imports", or general code review of utilities and services.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for quality, simplicity, and common mistakes before declaring work complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews design artifacts for quality, pattern application, and API design. Use when performing design reviews in Construction Phase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Customize any Cowork skill or workflow to match your specific industry, company, and style. For tuning default skill outputs to your voice, when adapting generic workflows to a specific industry, or during a skill quality review. Use when the user says "customize this skill", "output is too generic", "make this work for my industry", "personalize this workflow", "results do not match my style", or "how do I get better results from Cowork".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when writing Phase 1a behavioral specifications in VCSDD. Provides EARS format requirements writing, purity boundary analysis, edge case enumeration, and spec quality validation patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating /goal directives, reusable testable outcome-oriented success standards for agentic workflows. Use whenever the user asks to create a goal, write a /goal directive, define what good looks like, set success criteria for an agent, define a reusable instruction, create a quality standard, write acceptance criteria for an agent workflow, or specify done conditions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured threat assessment methodology. Intent + Capability + Opportunity = Threat Level. Use when formally evaluating a threat. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Confidence is capped by the weakest load-bearing claim, and at Moderate when the evidence is ungraded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to write a threat / risk / vulnerability assessment, or wants the appropriate template for each type. Distinct structures and section ordering per assessment kind. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Confidence is capped by the weakest load-bearing claim, and at Moderate when the evidence is ungraded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。