3,375 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building or maintaining a personal LLM-powered knowledge base. Triggers: ingesting sources into a wiki, querying wiki knowledge, linting wiki quality, 'add to wiki', 'what do I know about', or any mention of 'LLM wiki' or 'Karpathy wiki'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guidance for Swift Testing: test structure, #expect/#require macros, traits and tags, parameterized tests, test plans, parallel execution, async waiting patterns, and XCTest migration. Use when writing new Swift tests, modernizing XCTest suites, debugging flaky tests, or improving test quality and maintainability in Apple-platform or Swift server projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improves the quality of images, especially screenshots, by enhancing resolution, sharpness, and clarity. Perfect for preparing images for presentations, documentation, or social media posts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Summarizes Google Cloud Data Lineage graphs to help users debug data quality issues and understand data provenance for BQ/GCS. Use when summarizing upstream and downstream data flows, and presenting complex lineage data as an intuitive Markdown report. Don't use for generic BigQuery queries, editing lineage relationships, or downstream deprecation. Don't use for downstream blast-radius impact analysis (use datalineage-bigquery-asset-impact-analysis skill instead).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review Caveman Cloud evidence read-only: costs, Cave Score, Cave Plan, workflows, traces, latency, errors, compression, routing, and verified savings. Use when the user asks what Caveman found, where LLM spend goes, why cost or quality changed, which workflows need attention, or asks for a trace or analytics review. Prefer Caveman MCP tools; fall back to CLI JSON.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Standalone testing skill — owns writing and running tests, verifying behavior, and two-pass TDD orchestration. Default mode analyzes changed scope and runs the relevant tests; `--unit`/`--integration`/`--e2e`/`--all` scope by test type; `--verify` reruns exactly the prior failures; `--all-phases <plan>` sweeps every completed phase for regression. `--tdd --prepare`/`--tdd --verify` bracket `ck:cook` for red-green TDD. Never edits production code, and blocks until a phase's `ck:quality` gate is APPROVED (except `--tdd --prepare`, which runs before any implementation exists).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix a bug using Scout → Diagnose → Fix → Review → Finalize. Use when the user pastes an error message, stack trace, or test failure, or says "fix this bug", "something's broken", "tests are failing", "I'm getting an error". Also accepts `--from-quality <report>` or `--from-test <report>` to fix exactly the findings/failures a report lists. Modes (pick one): --fast (trivial errors — lint, type, build — skip scout and review), --hard (mandatory review, no auto-approve).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement a feature phase by phase from a phased JSON master or Markdown plan. Before each phase, confirm whether to create/run unit tests and whether to run ck:quality, unless explicit flags supply those choices. Supports token-budgeted execution, resumable state, and TDD handoff to ck:test.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix a bug using Scout → Diagnose → Fix → Review → Finalize. Use when the user pastes an error message, stack trace, or test failure, or says "fix this bug", "something's broken", "tests are failing", "I'm getting an error". Also accepts `--from-quality <report>` or `--from-test <report>` to fix exactly the findings/failures a report lists. Modes (pick one): --fast (trivial errors — lint, type, build — skip scout and review), --hard (mandatory review, no auto-approve).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
QA/QC agent. Reads ALL pipeline artifacts (BA + TechLead + PM + BE + FE + Tester) and produces quality-report.md, compliance-check.md, and sign-off.md. Declares Gate 3: Release Sign-off (advisory only — operator has final authority). Part of the Virtual Team Skill pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement a feature phase by phase from a phased JSON master or Markdown plan. Before each phase, confirm whether to create/run unit tests and whether to run ck:quality, unless explicit flags supply those choices. Supports token-budgeted execution, resumable state, and TDD handoff to ck:test.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Standalone testing skill — owns writing and running tests, verifying behavior, and two-pass TDD orchestration. Default mode analyzes changed scope and runs the relevant tests; `--unit`/`--integration`/`--e2e`/`--all` scope by test type; `--verify` reruns exactly the prior failures; `--all-phases <plan>` sweeps every completed phase for regression. `--tdd --prepare`/`--tdd --verify` bracket `ck:cook` for red-green TDD. Never edits production code, and blocks until a phase's `ck:quality` gate is APPROVED (except `--tdd --prepare`, which runs before any implementation exists).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or reviewing Agentforce topic (renamed subagent in April 2026) structure, including topic boundaries, instruction quality, handoff rules, out-of-scope behavior, and topic-selector strategy. Triggers: 'agentforce subagents (formerly topics)', 'topic design', 'topic selector', 'agent scope boundary', 'handoff conditions'. NOT for restricting what the agent may do or say (topic Scope, action filters, abuse prevention) — use agentforce/agentforce-guardrails. NOT for the mechanics of transferring a live conversation out — Omni-Channel routing and the context package — use agentforce/agentforce-agent-handoff-patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when testing, evaluating, or building regression suites for Agentforce agents: conversation testing in Agent Builder, topic (now subagent) coverage and utterance testing, Testing API and AiEvaluationDefinition metadata, Agentforce DX CLI test runs (sf agent generate test-spec, sf agent test create/run/resume/results/list), evaluation metrics (containment rate, escalation rate, CSAT, topic activation accuracy), and post-deploy analytics via Enhanced Event Logs. Triggers: 'how do I test my Agentforce agent', 'agent routes to wrong subagent', 'write utterance tests', 'regression test after topic change', 'measure agent quality', 'agent containment rate', 'run agent tests from the CLI'. NOT for agent creation, topic design, or action contract design — use agentforce/agentforce-agent-creation, agentforce/agent-topic-design, or agentforce/agent-actions respectively.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when Agentforce run costs are climbing, you need to forecast scale, or you want to reduce tokens per conversation without hurting quality. Covers topic (now subagent) design impact on cost, prompt/template reuse, grounding size discipline, caching, and model-tier selection. Triggers: 'agentforce cost', 'tokens per conversation too high', 'reduce agentforce runs spend', 'forecast agentforce scale cost', 'einstein trust layer tokens'. NOT for capping spend per user with a budget gate and fallback — use agentforce/agent-rate-limit-strategy. NOT for org-wide model-tier and BYOLLM platform strategy — use architect/ai-platform-architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing, reviewing, or troubleshooting Salesforce duplicate prevention, matching rules, duplicate rules, and merge governance. Covers cleaning up duplicates that already exist at ordinary volume: merge sequencing, survivorship, stewardship ownership. Also covers the deployable MatchingRule / DuplicateRule metadata, the Alert-vs-Block action pair, DuplicateRecordSet reporting, and the Apex DMLOptions.DuplicateRuleHeader.allowSave bypass. Triggers: 'duplicate rule', 'matching rule', 'merge strategy', 'dedupe', 'survivorship', 'D&B', 'same contact twice', 'clean up duplicate records', 'clean up duplicate accounts', 'DUPLICATES_DETECTED', 'allowSave', 'FindDuplicates'. NOT for cleanup at volume — hundreds of thousands of records, batch merge jobs, DemandTools/Cloudingo — use data/large-scale-deduplication. NOT for which field values and child records the platform keeps in a merge - use data/record-merge-implications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Router for the 101 SfSkills `data` skill packages. Data model, data movement and data quality: migrations, bulk loads, query optimisation, deduplicating at volume, archival. Ordinary-volume duplicate cleanup and prevention use salesforce-admin; come here for hundreds-of-thousands+ dedup or third-party tools. LDV architecture uses salesforce-architect. Use when the request mentions data model, data migration, data load, Data Loader, Bulk API, external id, deduplication at volume, archival, SOSL, cross-object search, sandbox seed data, SandboxPostCopy, native Data Seeding. Finds and opens the exact skill package to read; it does not contain the guidance itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
App Store rejection prevention for iOS/macOS apps. Covers privacy, UGC, IAP, metadata, layout, and quality checks based on real Apple rejection cases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run comprehensive code audit for architecture, dead code, and test quality. Use when reviewing overall codebase health, checking for architectural violations, or before marking a feature complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explore and debate options with fresh documentation and research before committing. Use when facing a real decision with multiple plausible approaches — library/framework choice, architecture call, API or schema design, algorithm selection, or any communication / strategy call where being wrong has cost. Enumerates relevant research domains, looks up current docs and evidence-based methods, weighs options on correctness and elegance, resists bloat. Do NOT use for divergent ideation (brainstorm), extracting user intent (elicit), or reviewing already-written code (quality-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a HyperFrames video composition from a brief/script autonomously. Uses separated builder and critic subagents — builders never review their own work. Quality decisions are grounded in project context (identity, audience, goals) and established visual/motion design principles. Measurable criteria (text size, contrast, overflow) are verified with tooling, not visual judgment. Use when the user says "make this video", "implement this brief", "build this composition", or provides a video script/brief to implement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。