「milestone」の検索結果

Knowledge base from the DoD M&Q BoK (the Manufacturing and Quality Engineering Body of Knowledge), v3.0 of July 2025, published by OUSD(R&E). Use for the manufacturing-and-quality view of the defense acquisition life cycle: what M&Q engineers do across the Adaptive Acquisition Framework phases (Pre-MDD, Materiel Solution Analysis, Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction, Engineering and Manufacturing Development, Production and Deployment, Operations and Support); the twelve M&Q threads (A–L) built on the '5 Ms'; manufacturing feasibility and producibility; Manufacturing Readiness Levels and assessments; Key/Critical Characteristics and process capability (Cp/Cpk, SPC); the standards stack (AS6500, AS9100/ISO 9001, AS9103, AS9145); technical reviews (ASR/PDR/CDR/PRR) and milestone gates; DCMA surveillance; industrial base and supply chain; and sustainment (LCSP, IPS, ILA, ISR). Scope is DoD acquisition M&Q practice on the Major Capability Acquisition path — it is a best-practice compilation, not policy, and is thin on detailed shop-floor process engineering, contract law, and the full text of the cited industry standards (which it names but does not reproduce).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA-STD-8729.1A — NASA's R&M (Reliability and Maintainability) standard covering spaceflight and support systems (Revision A, 2017-06-13). Use for NASA's objectives-driven R&M framework — the R&M objectives hierarchy (one Top Objective decomposed into four sub-objectives, paired with tailorable strategies), how R&M requirements are established inside the SMA Plan required by NPR 7120.5, the SMA Technical Authority concurrence/independent-evaluation governance, milestone vs. readiness review gates, the reliability/maintainability/availability vocabulary (Ai vs. Ao, the failure causal chain, risk as a triplet), and the R&M Evidentiary Methods catalogue (FMEA/FMECA, FTA, RBDA, RCM, LORA, plus the space-environment and parts-pedigree analyses). Scoped to NASA spaceflight and support systems and to assurance planning: it is an objectives-and-strategies standard, so it deliberately does NOT prescribe step-by-step analysis procedures (those live in the referenced NASA Preferred Reliability Practices) and is thin on facility R&M, detailed math/derivations, and non-NASA or commercial life cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NASA Fault Management Handbook (NASA-HDBK-1002, Draft 2, April 2012). Use for the systems-engineering discipline of designing what a system does when it fails — the fault/failure/anomaly vocabulary, the five FM strategies (two prevention strategies — design-time fault avoidance and operational failure avoidance — plus three tolerance strategies — failure masking, failure recovery, and goal change), the six FM process activities across NASA mission phases Pre-A to E, response-latency-versus-time-to-criticality (TTC) design trades, fault/failure containment regions and FEPPs, the four redundancy approaches, top-down FM requirements development, FM verification vs. validation, the seven dedicated FM milestone reviews (FMCR/FMARR/FMPDR/FMCDR/FMTRR/FMLRR/FMCERR), FM organizational structure, and mined NASA Lessons Learned. Space-mission oriented (flight/ground/operations); spacecraft examples throughout. IMPORTANT: built from an UNAPPROVED DRAFT — several sections (detailed architecture building blocks, the Assessment & Analysis guidance, and Operations & Maintenance) are placeholders in the source and are thin here. Thin on detailed FDIR algorithms, terrestrial/IT fault management, and any approved-standard terminology that may have changed since Draft 2.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) Deskbook (Version 2022, OSD ManTech / Joint Service–Industry MRL Working Group). Use for assessing and managing manufacturing maturity and producibility risk in defense acquisition: the 10-level MRL scale and its non-linear, target-not-grade nature; the five demonstration environments (laboratory → production-relevant → production-representative → pilot line → production line); the nine manufacturing-risk threads and sub-threads; how MRL targets map onto Adaptive Acquisition Framework milestones (MRL 4/6/7/8/9); conducting an MRL Assessment; building a Manufacturing Maturation Plan; putting MRL maturity into contract language (Section L/M, SOW, AS6500A, DIDs); tailoring criteria for S&T, single-system, ship, sustainment, and industry contexts; and screening operational-technology cybersecurity. Manufacturing-readiness focused — it measures producibility risk and frames mitigation; it is NOT a technology-readiness (TRL) guide, a full systems-engineering process model, a cost-estimating or schedule guide, or a deep cybersecurity audit method (see sibling packs for those).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the GAO Technology Readiness Assessment Guide (GAO-20-48G, 2020). Use for evaluating technology maturity in acquisition programs and projects: Technology Readiness Levels (TRL 1–9) and related scales (MRL, IRL), identifying Critical Technology Elements (CTEs), the five-step process for a high-quality TRA, the four characteristics of a reliable TRA (comprehensive, well-documented, credible, defensible), Technology Maturation Plans (TMPs), and using TRA results in knowledge-based, milestone decisions. Assessment/maturity oriented: it measures readiness and frames risk — it is not a full SE process model, cost-estimating, or schedule guide (see sibling packs for those).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through a 6-phase pipeline to plan a complete project — from brainstorming through project metadata to blueprint, starter-file generation, and per-milestone micro-task design with inline pedagogical choreography.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "keep the launch momentum going after launch week", "plan a changelog / release-notes cadence as GTM", or "is this update worth a relaunch"; produces a T+1→T+30 momentum plan — a launch-moment calendar (milestone / shipped-loop / badge moments only), announcement-tier routing (major = full-channel, medium = targeted, minor = changelog-only), a relaunch legitimacy call, spike-to-owned handoff briefs, and the next Tier-1 moment with launch-stacking spacing. Not for the 30-day content-reuse map or paid amplification execution — use content-amplifier; not for planning the next launch end to end — use launch-tier-planner. 抗第二周断崖/changelog-as-GTM/relaunch/下一发布时刻

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help funded SCF teams write tranche submission reports. Use when a team has completed a tranche milestone and needs to document their deliverables for review to unlock the next payment. Covers deliverable documentation, completion evidence, demo preparation, and the specific format tranche reviewers expect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Team operations dashboard template — Linear/Asana-clean hybrid with sprint status hero, 4-segment progress bar, workstream cards, chronological activity stream with colored event badges, right-rail with today's schedule + team-presence + upcoming milestones. For team status snapshots, OKR reviews, "team this week" all-hands views.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use quando um roadmap pwdev-roadmap/1 (roadmap.json) precisar ir para o GitHub — 'publicar o roadmap', 'criar as issues do roadmap', 'publish roadmap.json' — com issues, sub-issues, milestones, blocked-by e campos do Project, com dry-run, idempotente e retomável. Não use para uma issue avulsa (github-issues).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a personalized learning roadmap with milestones and practice checkpoints

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tactical fast path: turn a small problem, bug report, edit request, or narrow refactor into three deliverables — a brief change-spec (docs/specs/), a detailed implementation-ready plan (docs/plans/), and a TODO.md with agent-pickable tasks and milestones. Load when the user describes a tactical problem and wants quick planning artifacts, says "plan this change", "create a TODO", "write a plan for this", "problem to plan", "break this into tasks for agents", "I want to change X — plan it", or when process-decomposer routes here after determining the user needs lightweight planning deliverables. Also triggers on "create tasks from this problem", "make this actionable", or "turn this into a plan agents can execute". For feature-sized work that needs an executable spec + constitution + cross-check gate, route to `spec-driven-development` (or `feature-spec`) instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[71] CLOSE. Quick, safe cleanup after completing a milestone. Fix objective issues only (syntax errors, dead code, poor naming). Must be <5% of main task time, <30 seconds per fix, and reversible. Use after key points, not after every small change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and update pitch decks, one-pagers, investor memos, accelerator applications, financial models, and fundraising materials. Use when the user needs investor-facing documents, projections, use-of-funds tables, milestone plans, or materials that must stay internally consistent across multiple fundraising assets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch personalized daily horoscope forecasts from zodiac-today.com API based on natal chart calculations. Use when a user wants: (1) daily guidance on what activities to pursue or avoid, (2) life planning help — best days for interviews, travel, romance, important decisions, (3) energy/focus/luck/romance forecasts to optimize their schedule, (4) lucky colors and numbers for the day, (5) future date analysis for planning events, trips, or milestones (paid tiers). Triggers: horoscope, zodiac, star sign forecast, daily guidance, lucky day, best day to, astrology advice, what should I do today, is today a good day for, plan my week astrology. Required env: ZODIAC_API_KEY (hsk_ API key), ZODIAC_PROFILE_ID (birth chart profile ID). Collects sensitive PII (email, birth date, birth city) for natal chart — requires user consent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep project planning workflow—goals and non-goals, work breakdown, dependencies, critical path, risks and buffers, milestones, and communication rhythm. Use when kicking off initiatives, replanning after slips, or coordinating cross-team delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and track delivery — plan, sprint, project, timeline, milestone, task breakdown, backlog, Kanban, RACI, changelog governance. The COO office's workflow coordination domain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, update, and manage GitHub issues using MCP tools. Use this skill when users want to create bug reports, feature requests, or task issues, update existing issues, add labels/assignees/milestones, set issue fields (dates, priority, custom fields), set issue types, manage issue workflows, link issues, add dependencies, or track blocked-by/blocking relationships. Triggers on requests like "create an issue", "file a bug", "request a feature", "update issue X", "set the priority", "set the start date", "link issues", "add dependency", "blocked by", "blocking", or any GitHub issue management task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and promote backlog items to active milestone

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture a forward-looking idea with trigger conditions — surfaces automatically at the right milestone

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add phase to end of current milestone in roadmap

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Archive accumulated phase directories from completed milestones

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a research proposal needs work packages, milestones, deliverables, a timeline, a risk register, and budget-justification scaffolding, while keeping scientific claims and feasibility honest and human-owned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically onboard new clients with checklists, welcome sequences, milestone tracking, and success metrics. Reduce churn by nailing the first 90 days.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。