「step」の検索結果

Assemble the FREE steps of the product-hypermotion + kinetic-typography video format — dice ONE Seedance 2.0 hypermotion clip into 5-6 segments and intercut them with PIL kinetic-typography spec/CTA cards (italic skew, 1.08x outline echo, 3D extrusion, slam-with-shake, inversion flash) plus a real-logo PIL end card (base64-decoded from the brand SVG), center-crop 1:1 to 9:16, and explicit-map mux a music bed. Deterministic, FREE (PIL + FFmpeg), no paid calls, the real logo and spec typography stay pixel-crisp. The paid steps (the ONE Seedance i2v, the music) are separate capabilities; the recipe orchestrates them. Use for the product-hypermotion format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assemble a multi-scene GRWM beauty-demo ad from a config — a locked-identity creator applies ~5 products step by step while a SEPARATE ElevenLabs voiceover narrates and every scene cut is snapped to the VO's product-name word-starts (Whisper word-level timestamps), then ~5 Playwright product overlay cards (real PDP-verified taglines) are composited onto the master each on its product-NAME word-start, the SEPARATE VO is mixed on top of a ducked music bed at loudnorm I=-14, clean-white 3-words/cue captions are burned, and the video closes on a flat-lay end card. This is the FREE deterministic assembly stage (re-cut to the VO word-starts, hard-concat, Playwright card render + card composite, VO plus music mix, caption burn, flat-lay end card); the VO, scene clips, product cutouts, and music come from create-music-elevenlabs / create-image-gpt-image-fal / create-video-fal. Use for the glassy-matte-grwm format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWS Step Functions workflow orchestration with state machines. Use when designing workflows, implementing error handling, configuring parallel execution, integrating with AWS services, or debugging executions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, select, and analyze waveforms for radar, sonar, and active sensing using the Phased Array System Toolbox. Covers LFM, NLFM, FMCW, phase-coded, CW, stepped FM, custom IQ, ambiguity functions, sidelobe reduction, and Doppler tolerance. Key objects: phased.LinearFMWaveform, phased.NonlinearFMWaveform, phased.CustomFMWaveform, phased.PhaseCodedWaveform, phased.FMCWWaveform, phased.SteppedFMWaveform, phased.MFSKWaveform, phased.RectangularWaveform, nlfmspec2freq, shapespectrum, ambgfun, pambgfun, sidelobelevel, legendreseq, mlseq, radarWaveformGenerator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when driving a web page in a browser — clicking, typing, navigating, logged-in or JS-rendered pages. Jev picks each step from the elements observed, under a host allowlist and a step budget.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define, validate, run, resume, and audit repo-local multi-step automations with current `asc workflow` and `.asc/workflow.json`, including step outputs and safe release/TestFlight workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render an ordered timeline of one Claude Code session's events (every event type) with per-event durations and tool names, reconstructed from Agent Monitor data. Pairs PreToolUse with PostToolUse to compute tool durations and surfaces gaps, errors, and compaction points. Use when reconstructing what happened in a session step by step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trace the full event chain for one Claude Code session into an ordered timeline of every event type with tool_name and summary, highlighting gaps, out-of-order events, and failures. Reads /api/events?session_id= and /api/sessions/:id from the Agent Monitor dashboard. Use when debugging what a session actually did, step by step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate complete user documentation for a web app with screenshots. Browses the app via browser automation, screenshots every screen, and produces a structured user guide with step-by-step instructions, annotated screenshots, workflow diagrams, and reference tables. Supports quick (key screens), standard (all pages), thorough (every state and flow), and exhaustive (publishable documentation suite). Triggers: 'document the app', 'user guide', 'app documentation', 'screenshot docs', 'generate user docs', 'help docs', 'how-to guide', 'write the docs'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Step-by-step workflow for creating complete Power BI reports from scratch using pbir CLI. Covers model discovery, report creation, page layout, theme setup, visual placement, field binding, filtering, formatting, validation, and publishing. Automatically invoke when the user asks to "create a new report", "build a report from scratch", "make a dashboard", "set up a report with KPIs", "create an executive dashboard", "add pages and visuals to a new report".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to optimize for Featured Snippets, Position Zero, or snippet extraction. Also use when the user mentions "featured snippet," "position zero," "snippet optimization," "answer box," "definition box," "list snippet," "table snippet," "paragraph snippet," "PAA optimization," or "win position zero." For schema, use schema-markup. For step-by-step HowTo sections (lists, copy), use howto-section-generator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up the current empty folder with the AI App Starter, so the agent builds a Next.js, Supabase and Vercel app with the owner step by step, from idea to launch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Step-by-step guide for creating your own Claude Skills, from deciding whether a skill is the right tool to writing the SKILL.md file, structuring reference material, and making it trigger reliably. Use when you want to package a workflow, framework, or repeated task into a reusable Skill, when an existing skill is not triggering or not loading the right context, when you are auditing a skill that is underperforming, or when you want to publish a skill for others. Also triggers when someone asks "how do I make a skill" or "what makes a good skill". Useful for individuals, teams, and anyone publishing skills publicly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design forms that convert, validate well, resist spam, and integrate cleanly with downstream systems. Use this skill when designing or auditing any form (contact, signup, checkout, multi-step, embedded), planning validation logic, fighting spam, choosing form tooling, or improving form conversion. Triggers on form design, form validation, form conversion, multi-step form, form spam, captcha, honeypot, form abandonment, signup form, contact form. Also triggers when form completion rates are low or spam is overwhelming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build resilient, long-running, multi-step applications with AWS Lambda durable functions with automatic state persistence, retry logic, and orchestration for long-running executions. Covers the critical replay model, step operations, wait/callback patterns, error handling with saga pattern, testing with LocalDurableTestRunner. Triggers on phrases like: lambda durable functions, workflow orchestration, state machines, retry/checkpoint patterns, long-running stateful Lambda functions, saga pattern, human-in-the-loop callbacks, and reliable serverless applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build workflows with AWS Step Functions state machines using the JSONata query language. Covers Amazon States Language (ASL) structure, state types, variables, data transformation, error handling, AWS service integration, and migrating from the JSONPath to the JSONata query language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Terraform provider acceptance test patterns using terraform-plugin-testing with the Plugin Framework. Covers test structure, TestCase/TestStep fields, ConfigStateChecks with custom statecheck.StateCheck implementations, plan checks, CompareValue for cross-step assertions, config helpers, import testing with ImportStateKind, sweepers, and scenario patterns (basic, update, disappears, validation, regression), and ephemeral resource testing with the echoprovider package. Use when writing, reviewing, or debugging provider acceptance tests, including questions about statecheck, plancheck, TestCheckFunc, CheckDestroy, ExpectError, import state verification, ephemeral resources, or how to structure test files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when authoring a Relayflows flow (@relayflows/surface / @relayflows/sdk, the journal-based v2 engine — the CLI is `flows`, package versions 2.0.x) in TypeScript or YAML/JSON. Covers the three-rung ladder (run/llm/agent), the resident verbs (human/dispatch/done), verification gates, TypeScript vs YAML authoring, per-step cli/model selection and its resolution order, flows.json, and `flows check`/`run`/`resume` with their real refusal shapes and exit codes. Not for the older, unrelated `@relayflows/core` WorkflowBuilder engine (`.pattern('dag')`/.agent()/.step() chains) that `writing-agent-relay-workflows` and `migrating-persona-to-relayflow` cover — that's a different product despite the similar name.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Panel health assessment, firm exit management, coverage gap analysis, and panel refresh brief for in-house legal ops teams. Produce an annual Panel Health Report synthesising scorecard data, billing compliance, and step-out patterns into per-firm recommendations — Retain, Watch, Improvement Plan, or Exit Review. Produce a firm exit pack: formal exit notice with active matter transition plan, plus an internal exit record. Identify practice area, geographic, or tier gaps and produce a structured Coverage Gap Report with remediation options. Produce a Panel Refresh Brief as a scoped input to the RFP process. Trigger on: 'review our panel', 'annual panel review', 'is our panel working', 'which firms should we exit', 'write the exit notice', 'coverage gap', 'we don't have anyone for restructuring', 'refresh the panel', 'panel rationalisation', 'too many firms', 'step-out problem', 'do we have the right firms'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes any legal task to the right LLM, like OpenRouter but for legal work and grounded in benchmarks instead of brand loyalty. Built from mid-2026 legal evals (legalbenchmarks.ai, Vals AI × Stanford LegalBench across 124 models, Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark, the Atticus Project's CUAD/MAUD/ACORD) plus translation evidence (WMT25, SwiLTra-Bench, ArabLegalEval). Covers five verticals: contract drafting, info extraction, legal research, contract review, and legal translation (including Arabic/MENA). Each asks up to four questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then returns a primary model, a fallback, what to avoid, and what a human must verify. Core principle: capability is not controllability, so every route ends with a verification step. Not legal advice; a lawyer owns the output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GDPR Legitimate Interest Assessment (LIA) — Guided assessment for Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR using the EDPB three-step test. Based on EDPB Guidelines 1/2024, EDPB Opinion 28/2024 (AI models), the OSS Case Digest on Legitimate Interest (McIntyre 2026), CNIL AI guidance (June 2025), ICO guidance, and key CJEU case law. Use when: (1) user needs to assess whether legitimate interest is appropriate, (2) user asks about Art. 6(1)(f), "Interessenabwägung", "berechtigtes Interesse", "balancing test", or "LIA", (3) user wants to document a legitimate interest assessment, (4) user mentions the three-step test, (5) user evaluates necessity or proportionality under Art. 6(1)(f), (6) user discusses direct marketing, fraud prevention, IT security, employee monitoring, AI training, web scraping, or credit checks in context of legal basis, (7) user handles a right to object (Art. 21), (8) user asks about children's data, profiling, or cross-border data sharing under legitimate interest, (9) user compares legitimate interest against other legal bases. Do NOT use for: consent assessments (Art. 6(1)(a)), contract performance (Art. 6(1)(b)), DPIA workflows, or pure ePrivacy/cookie compliance questions — though the skill does address the ePrivacy/GDPR overlap where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

An end-to-end method for drafting and finalising a complex, multi-pillar regulated fintech agreement — from intake to signature. Authored from a senior fintech lawyer's manual: a licensed payment-services provider engaging a counterparty across agent cash-in/cash-out, QR payments, wallet e-payments, and a marketplace, each with its own regulatory profile. Runs five phases and fourteen steps: regulatory mapping (activity-to-licence matrix, grey-zone classification gates), architecture (framework-plus-sub-agreement structure, ring-fenced marketplace), the regulatory–commercial balance (what flexes vs what cannot), core drafting (authority, float mechanics, hard-coded regulator caps, liability — all tracking control), execution-blocker triage, and a pre-signature check closing open blockers as conditions precedent. It refuses to invent licence-specific values or draft a representation as true without executed evidence. Use it to structure, draft, negotiate, or review any regulated payments contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When you want multi-source, multi-step research on a topic — competitor research before a sales call, market research for a new business idea, positioning angles, due diligence on a partnership or podcast guest, tech decision research (which DB, which auth), or any "I need to actually understand X." Combines web search, URL fetch, agent-browser, last30days (Reddit/X/YouTube/HN/web recency), memory, and Notion. Outputs a structured brief with citations, contradictions, gaps, and recommended next steps. Archives every research run to ~/.config/makerskills/deep-research/archive/ so past work is searchable. Triggers on "/deep-research," "research X," "investigate X," "do a deep dive on X," "look into X," "what's actually happening with X," "due diligence on X," "validate this market." Differs from a one-shot web search: this is multi-pass with verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure a decision or design challenge through multiple perspectives before committing to action. Use as a synthesis step after scoping, mapping, and dilemma navigation when a group needs a wiser next step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。