「the」の検索結果

Cold-start brownfield reconnaissance — reconstruct the WHOLE game design from an existing codebase when there is no GDD yet. Optionally accepts a free-text game description, notes, or reference links to guide and enrich the scan. Use when the user wants to build the game design from the code, e.g. "create a GDD from this codebase", "reconstruct the design from our code — it's a roguelike deck-builder", "build a design doc from the existing project, here are some refs". Scans the project (engine auto-detected), extracts a system roster + dependency graph and content-type schemas / resources / entities into one passive .unikit/gamedesign/RECON.md, tags every fact provenance:extracted-from-code, and writes a mandatory Intent Gap for what code cannot know (pillars, fantasy, the "why"). Writes nothing else and calls no skill. STRICTLY whole-project cold-start — if a GDD already exists and the user wants a specific part investigated, use /unikit-gd-explore (code lens); to author the GDD use /unikit-gd-spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research and ideation partner for GAME DESIGN — think through design ideas before writing them into the GDD; produces a brief, never edits the GDD itself. Use to assess a genre or market for viability, dissect a reference game (mechanics → dynamics → aesthetics), explore how to improve or extend an existing system, flow, or content type, research new mechanics the design lacks, investigate a part of the GDD in code, or develop the research bucket of a /unikit-gd-review report into decided edits. Trigger on "explore how to improve the flow", "ways to improve the combat system", "is this genre saturated", "break down the combat of Hades", "work out the review's open questions". GAME-DESIGN research only — for CODE or technical research use /unikit-explore; to reconstruct a design from code use /unikit-gd-recon; to write a change into the GDD use /unikit-gd-system or /unikit-gd-spec; to apply edits you know use /unikit-gd-apply; to invent a new game use /unikit-gd-brainstorm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an implementation plan for a feature — a dependency-ordered, actionable task list for the project. Has four modes: fast (a quick single-pass plan), full (a richer plan that can also create a git branch), ultra (a multi-file bundle — a manifest plus one deeply specified file per phase — for execution by a smaller model), and add (extend an existing plan with more tasks). Pick the mode from the user's wording: "full plan" runs full; "quick plan" or "fast plan" runs fast; "ultra plan", "ultraplan" or "ultra-plan" runs ultra; a plain "create a plan" with no qualifier defaults to fast; "add to the plan" or "extend the plan" runs add. Use whenever the user wants to plan a feature or task, e.g. "create a plan", "create a full plan", "create a quick plan", "run an ultra plan for the inventory system", "plan this feature", "add this to the plan", "extend the plan", "add a phase to the plan". Ultra runs only when the user names it — never because the feature looks large.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level mathematical logic knowledge. Use when working with propositional logic, first-order logic, proof theory, model theory, computability theory, Godel incompleteness theorems, set theory, type theory, or formal verification. Also use when the user mentions 'formal proof', 'Godel', 'incompleteness', 'Turing machine', 'decidability', 'Zermelo-Fraenkel', 'axiom of choice', 'model theory', 'completeness theorem', 'computability', 'formal language', or 'type theory'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publish a new Canvas Notebook release. Use this skill whenever the user asks to bump a version, prepare release notes, update CHANGELOG.md, create or push a git tag, publish a GitHub Release, deploy, or automate the release workflow. This skill covers the full release sequence for this repository: inspect commits/tags, push completed product-code commits first when authorized, confirm the pushed code has built on GitHub, choose the next calendar version, update package and CLI versions, update the changelog, run the required local build, commit, push the release commit, wait for the remote Build and Push worker on the pushed branch, tag, push the tag, and publish the release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the Tamanu release-branch CUTOFF checks when preparing to cut a new release/X.YY branch: confirm the previous release's hotfixes are merged to main, reconcile the commits since the previous release against the "Merged to main" card list from Linear, and scan for data/reporting/schema changes. Use when the user is cutting a Tamanu release and wants to verify the codebase is ready, wants to check main against the previous release branch, or wants to reconcile commits with a Linear "Merged to main" column (they should paste the card list). Handles Tamanu's train-release model (release/X.YY branches vs vX.YY.Z patch tags) and the cherry-pick model where the same logical fix has different SHAs on different branches. Purely git-based — no live database or Canopy access needed. Not for verifying an existing release branch's hotfix integrity (see pre-release-checks) or for deciding which tests to run (see scope-tamanu-release-tests).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA System Safety Handbook (Dec 30, 2000). Use for system safety as a specialty within systems engineering: the five-step safety risk management process (mandated by FAA Order 8040.4 and the AMS), the severity-by-likelihood risk matrix and acceptance bands, the Safety Order of Precedence, system-description models (5M, SHEL(L)), the hazard-analysis activities (PHL/PHA/RHA/SSHA/SHA/O&SHA/HHA), integrated system hazard analysis, the analysis techniques (FTA, FMEA/FMECA, Fault Hazard, Common Cause, Sneak Circuit, Energy Trace), closed-loop hazard tracking (Safety Action Record), and the specialty domains the handbook covers — acquisition-lifecycle safety and contracting (OSA/CSA/SSPP/ISSPP), software safety (control-capability ranking, SHCM, DO-178B), test & evaluation safety, facilities safety, commercial launch safety (AST licensing, expected casualty, MPL/DAMP), system safety training, and Operational Risk Management (ORM) with human/organizational factors. Scope limits: this is a year-2000 FAA how-to; it predates the modern FAA/ICAO Safety Management System (SMS) and Just Culture regulatory frameworks, and many cited orders, advisory circulars, and launch-licensing rules have since been restructured. It is FAA/NAS-centric, leans on MIL-STD-882C, and does not define the SE life-cycle processes themselves (use nasa-npr-7123 / dau-se-guidebook) or reproduce third-party standard text (MIL-STD-882, DO-178B, ISO/IEC/IEEE).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the GAO Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide (GAO-20-195G). Use for program cost estimating: the four characteristics of a reliable estimate (comprehensive, well documented, accurate, credible) and the 18 best practices; the 12-step cost estimating process (purpose, plan, technical baseline, WBS, ground rules and assumptions, data, point estimate, sensitivity, risk/uncertainty, document, present, update); estimating methods (analogy, parametric, engineering build-up, learning curves); Monte Carlo risk/uncertainty analysis, confidence levels and contingency; auditing and validating an estimate against the characteristics; earned value management (EIA-748, BCWS/BCWP/ACWP, CPI/SPI/TCPI, EAC, PMB, IBR); and specialized techniques (software cost estimating, learning curves, Analysis of Alternatives, WBS templates, the Green Book internal-control framework). This is the cost-estimating companion to the GAO Schedule and Technology Readiness Assessment guides. Does not cover schedule estimating/risk in depth (see the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide), agency-specific cost models, or the full text of referenced standards (EIA-748, MIL-STD-881D, the Green Book) — these are named, not reproduced.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a list of merged changes, closed work items or commit messages the user provides into DRAFT release notes under the version heading and date the user supplies, grouped as features, fixes and other, in the organisation's tone from the style guide or prior notes given, with every entry traced to its source item, breaking changes and required actions flagged first, and internal-only items held back for the release owner to confirm. Use when the user asks to "write the release notes for this version", "turn these merged pull requests into a changelog", "summarise what shipped this sprint for customers", "draft the what's new for this release" or "group these closed tickets into release notes". Do not use for an announcement email or intranet post about a launch, use announcement-drafter instead; for a change ticket, use change-request-pack; for a how-to article about one fix, use knowledge-article-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads a risk register together with meeting notes and incident reports and returns a draft update pack: existing risks whose exposure, controls, ownership or status the sources say have changed, new risk candidates, closure candidates, and the one owner decision each item needs. Never assigns or changes a likelihood, impact, score or colour and never edits the register; owners decide. Use when the user asks to "update the risk register from these minutes", "refresh the register with the incidents since the last review", "reconcile the register against the notes" or "what changed on our risks". Do not use for writing up an incident itself, use incident-postmortem-drafter or data-incident-impact-brief instead; to track actions from minutes, use corrective-action-tracker. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answers an employee's or manager's HR policy question strictly from the policy documents the user supplies or the agent can reach as knowledge: a DRAFT answer that quotes the governing clause with its document, version and clause reference, lists the conditions and exceptions the text states, returns UNKNOWN where the documents are silent and names the role to ask. Never invents a rule, fills a gap from general practice or decides an individual's case. Use when the user asks to check a policy, for example "what does the policy say about", "am I entitled to", "how many days of leave do I get", "what is the process for requesting", "does the handbook allow" or "which clause covers". Do not use for comparing two policy versions or briefing a change, use policy-change-briefing instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a DRAFT interface register between disciplines or parties from meeting notes, action lists and drawings or document lists: one row per interface with the requesting and providing party, the information needed, the related document number, the need-by date with its source, the status as minuted and a quoted source, plus UNKNOWN and questions where the notes are silent. Never sets a date, rates priority, assigns ownership beyond what the notes state or closes an interface. Use when the user asks to "build an interface register from these minutes", "list the interfaces between piping and civil", "who owes what to whom on this package", "update the interface register from this week's meeting" or "turn these action items into an interface list". Do not use for recording a design or document change raised in a meeting, use management-of-change-intake instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proposes the instrumentation and control content a P&ID adds to an accepted PFD process model: instruments drawn carried over as facts, measurement points and control loops the control philosophy requires, tag structure per the project instrument numbering procedure, system interfaces, and alarms, interlocks, trips and fail actions as quoted. Never assigns safety functions, ranges or setpoints. Use when the user asks to "run the instrumentation and control enrichment", "add the instrument section to the P&ID draft", "list the control loops the philosophy requires" or "carry the PFD instruments into the P&ID" after the piping section. Do not use for safety flags, SIL or trip classification, use process-safety-flags instead; do not use to assign tag numbers, use tagging-and-numbering. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares a DRAFT management-of-change intake record from a change description (email, meeting note, marked-up drawing or request form): what changes from what to what and where, the identifiers named, the candidate affected documents matched against the register, the disciplines to consult with the reason for each, and the numbered questions reviewers must answer, with UNKNOWN wherever the description is silent. Prepares the record only: never approves, classifies the change, decides replacement in kind or makes any hazard or safety judgement. Use when the user asks to "raise an MoC for this", "prepare the change request intake", "which documents does this change touch", "who needs to review this change" or "draft the MoC form from this email". Do not use for tracking who owes information to whom across disciplines, use interface-register-builder instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "design our change narrative", "build the old-world-to-new-game story arc", or "frame the shift our category is undergoing"; produces a Raskin-style strategic narrative arc — old world → the undeniable shift → winners vs losers under the new rules → the promised land → proof the promised land is real — derived from the positioning truth set and the belief/objection map, feeding the TALE Architecture arc sub-item. Every proof beat is labeled Measured / User-provided / [needs source] and this skill never adjudicates a claim. Not for the message house hierarchy — use message-system-architect; not for the pitch deck narrative — use pitch-narrative-builder; not for claim substantiation — use offer-claims-registry. 变革叙事弧/旧世界/应许之地/战略叙事结构

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vendor (copy-import) a single external Claude Code skill into your own skills repo correctly — with license compliance and full provenance/attribution. Deterministic, idempotent primitive: given an upstream ref (owner/repo/path@sha or a GitHub URL) it fetches the skill, detects and gates on the license, copies the folder, injects a provenance frontmatter block (license + metadata: author/source/upstream_commit/vendored_at/provenance), ships the upstream LICENSE, adds a ## Credits section, and records a CREDITS.md ledger entry. Use when the user asks to "vendor a skill", "import a skill", "clone a skill", "borrow someone's skill", "add an external skill with attribution/credit", or スキルを取り込む / vendoring / 他人のスキルを自分のリポに取り込む. This is the import primitive that a skill-scout/curator orchestrator calls; it does NOT discover or evaluate — it correctly imports ONE skill you already chose.

Write or edit Japanese articles, reports, guides, and public-facing drafts so the argument is clear and the prose reads naturally. Preserve the author's meaning, evidence, and voice when revising. Use for requests to write from a topic or notes, remove AI臭 / AIっぽさ, improve awkward wording or structure, or format notes as 箇条書き, チーム共有, 社内共有, a decision note, handoff, Slack post, or Teams post. For existing prose, ask Gemini through Antigravity CLI to rewrite naturally by default, then audit against the source; use the current model if unavailable. Do NOT use for ordinary Japanese answers, progress updates, technical explanations, code review, English-only prose that is not a bullet-formatting request, or an explicitly incompatible format.

Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects running Replay Vision scanners — the standing LLM probes that watch session recordings and write `$recording_observed` events. Watches two promises: that enabled scanners are actually observing (throughput / success-rate cliffs, exhausted quota — a silent watch gap), and that what the scanners see in aggregate gets surfaced (a monitor's `yes`-rate or a scorer's score stepping away from its own baseline, a classifier tag or a recurring summarizer theme concentrating across many sessions). It is the agentic pull complement to the per-session push path: scanners with `emits_signals` already emit one signal per session into this same inbox, so this scout never repeats them — it adds the cross-session shape the per-session probe can't see. Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Why expensive, wasteful, effortful, or self-deprecating actions build trust and desire — Rory Sutherland on signalling. Use when the problem is credibility or desirability rather than meaning: the user asks 'why don't people trust us', 'how do we look more credible/committed/premium', 'is our guarantee/warranty worth it', 'should we spend on brand advertising', 'how do we justify a higher price', or wonders why a cheaper-looking competitor wins. Covers costly signals (advertising spend, guarantees, over-delivery), price-as-quality-signal (Veblen goods), and the Pratfall Effect (admitting a real flaw to gain trust). Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic. 日本語の相談（「信頼されない」「安心してもらえない」「強気な価格で売りたい」「広告費に意味はある？」）にも使う。中文咨询（“不被信任”“想以高价出售”“广告费有意义吗？”）也适用。

Reply to an applicant for an employer's Otameshi Tenshoku listing: match the application against the listed requirements item by item on what the applicant actually stated, list the questions still open, and draft an invitation, a request for clarification, a hold notice or a decline that sticks to the listed conditions, keeps other applicants and internal notes out, and presents any new work or dates as a proposal rather than an agreed term. Use when a hiring manager, recruiter or small-business owner has applications to answer, wants to know what to ask before inviting, or has to decline; do not use to judge an applicant's aptitude or predict hiring outcomes, to screen on personal attributes unrelated to the work, to design the work (trial-work-design) or the listing (trial-listing-draft), or to send the message or update applicant records on the user's behalf.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan the first months at a new Japanese employer after an offer is accepted, listing every expectation and promise made in interviews, the offer, or negotiation with its source, separating what is in writing from what was only said and what has no agreed measure, working out when the probation period ends and whether its criteria and conditions are known, and scheduling who to confirm what with before and after the start date. Use when a user has accepted an offer and wants to prepare for joining, make sure verbal promises such as remote days or a future role are confirmed, or understand what the probation period means for them; do not use to predict whether they will fit in or pass probation, to judge their manager or colleagues, to rule on the legality of probation terms, or to contact the new employer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read this skill before the first step that uses the built-in browser, the browser pane inside the Claude desktop app (also called the in-app browser, the browser pane, Claude's browser, or "your own browser"), whose tools are named mcp__Claude_Browser__* when the session runs in the desktop app and mcp__remote-devices__Claude_Browser__* when a cloud session is linked to the person's computer; before those tools are turned on there may be a single enable__mcp__remote-devices__Claude_Browser tool instead. It covers the pane's persistent sign-ins, tabs and preview_start, reading pages as text, site approvals, what the pane cannot open, and what to do when it cannot be reached. It is not for Claude in Chrome (mcp__claude-in-chrome__* tools), which has its own skill, and it does not decide which browser to use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Requires OFOX_API_KEY — create one at https://app.ofox.ai. Shared execution layer for the Ofox image API (api.ofox.ai) — validates parameters client-side, sends one synchronous request, base64-decodes the result, saves it to a file, and reports the real usage token counts and the computed dollar cost. Does both text-to-image (generate) and editing an existing image you supply as a local file (edit — change the background, recolour an element, alter a product photo, while leaving the rest of the picture intact). This is a library skill, not a standalone user-facing one — it is meant to be invoked by scenario skills that build model/prompt/size choices for a specific use case and then call into this skill's script rather than re-implementing the API calls — image-edit owns "change this image so that...", product-image owns a set of product images to choose between, and seedance-anime-drama owns character images for a video pipeline. Load this skill directly only when a user explicitly names the Ofox image API, asks to call it with specific low-level parameters, asks to debug a failed Ofox image request, or wants a plain "generate an image of..." from text — which is the one common case no scenario skill covers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Undo a haircut trim. Puts back the skills, commands, subagents, MCP servers, hooks, plugins and files that haircut parked into a dated bag, using the receipt it wrote at the time. Use this skill whenever the user says undo the cleanup, undo the haircut, put my config back, restore what was trimmed, I need that MCP server again, that skill is gone and I want it back, roll the trim back, what is in the bag, or which files were moved. Use it also when something stopped working right after a config cleanup and they suspect the cleanup caused it, and whenever they ask how to reverse a config cleanup they regret.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。