「vendor」の検索結果

Builds a new Claude Code skill from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the skill's design tree decision-by-decision — entity fit, use cases, name, description, workflow steps, tools, and progressive-disclosure layout — then reviews the finished skill against the plugin-building guidance and applies every fix it finds. Use when creating, authoring, scaffolding, designing, or drafting a new skill or slash command. Does not build an agent or subagent — use agent-builder. Does not serve, vendor, or refresh the authoring guidance itself — use guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate templated responses for common legal inquiries and identify when situations require individualized attention. Use when responding to routine legal questions — data subject requests, vendor inquiries, NDA requests, discovery holds — or when managing response templates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review contracts against your organization's negotiation playbook, flagging deviations and generating redline suggestions. Use when reviewing vendor contracts, customer agreements, or any commercial agreement where you need clause-by-clause analysis against standard positions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify, assess, and mitigate operational risks. Trigger with "what are the risks", "risk assessment", "risk register", "what could go wrong", or when the user is evaluating risks associated with a project, vendor, process, or decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when publishing, open-sourcing, exporting, sanitizing, or moving code, agent skills, prompts, templates, fixtures, datasets, workshop assets, or other artifacts from a private repository, vendor/runtime environment, or mixed working directory into a public repository or registry. Builds a provenance inventory, license/security review, explicit allowlist, clean staging package, approval dry run, and fresh public clone/install smoke. Triggers on "open source this", "publish these skills", "make this repo public", "export and sanitize", "подготовь публичный релиз", "выложи скиллы", "опенсорсни", "санитизируй и опубликуй". NOT for ordinary upstream bugfix PRs, vulnerability disclosure, or creating a corp-* department.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a preliminary, evidence-based EU AI Act readiness assessment across AI-system inventory, territorial scope, operator roles, prohibited-practice screening, risk classification, transparency, high-risk controls, general-purpose AI obligations, governance, and implementation milestones. Use when an organization needs to triage an AI use case, vendor, model, product, or portfolio for Regulation (EU) 2024/1689; prepare an AI inventory, gap register, implementation roadmap, or counsel briefing; assess provider, deployer, importer, distributor, product-manufacturer, authorised-representative, or GPAI-provider responsibilities; or re-check readiness after regulatory or product changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Real-world Active Directory environment constraints that silently break attacks when ignored: NTLM disabled (Kerberos fallback), AES-only KDCs (RC4 blocked by GPO), LDAP signing and channel binding requiring LDAPS on 636, Kerberos clock skew (KRB_AP_ERR_SKEW), SPNs that must be FQDNs never short names or IPs (the misleading invalidCredentials), Protected Users / LAPS / gMSA / MachineAccountQuota, LDAP 1000-object paging, and VPN latency. Use this whenever a bind, TGT request, LDAP query, or SMB negotiation fails in a way that looks like bad credentials but is really hardening, or before running any AD tooling against a domain you have not fingerprinted. Standard-tooling knowledge (netexec, impacket, certipy, bloodyAD, kerbrute), no vendor-specific engine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The telemetry each Active Directory technique generates and what alerts a defender: Kerberoasting produces Event 4769 with RC4 encryption (0x17) and an MDI alert, DCSync produces Event 4662 with the DS-Replication-Get-Changes GUID, AS-REP roasting produces Event 4768 with no pre-auth, LSASS dumping is blocked by EDR, plus a lateral-movement telemetry table by protocol (SMB/WMI/WinRM/RDP/DCOM). Use this whenever you run or plan an offensive AD technique and need to know what noise it makes, when writing the engagement's detection notes, or when a defender wants to know what to monitor. Teaches red teamers what is loud and blue teamers what to watch. Standard-tooling knowledge, no vendor engine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze contracts for risks, check completeness, and provide actionable recommendations. Use when a user asks to review a contract, check an agreement for red flags, analyze contract terms, find risky clauses, review an NDA, evaluate a service agreement, or audit employment contract terms. Supports employment contracts, NDAs, service agreements, and vendor contracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized Preact development skill for standards-based web applications with native-first architecture and minimal dependency footprint. Use when building Preact projects, particularly those involving data visualization, interactive applications, single-page apps with HTM syntax, Web Components integration, CSV/JSON data parsing, WebGL shader visualizations, or zero-build solutions with vendored ESM imports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SE Ranking AI visibility analyst (extension). Tracks AI Share-of-Voice across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and AI Mode in a single query. Highest-impact new extension per the v2 gap analysis — no other vendor covers all 5 AI platforms in one API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns open-ended requests into things to think WITH instead of answers to accept. Audits the hidden assumptions inside a topic, inverts them into sharp "what if" provocations, branches each one outward, and delivers a mind map plus written wonderings. Portable version, no vendor-specific tools required, works on any conversational assistant. Fire this when the person signals they want to open up a space and think alongside the assistant: "wonder about X", "what are the weird angles on X", "help me think about what this could be", "I want to explore, not decide yet". Do NOT fire when the same topic is attached to a request for concrete, usable, or decided output: a named deliverable, a count ("give me 5 names"), a deadline, or a "which / what should I pick" question. When it is genuinely unclear which they want, this skill opens by asking one line rather than branching. Not for factual lookups or executing a plan already chosen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design error handling, structured logging, and observability with OpenTelemetry (traces, metrics, logs), error classification, recovery patterns (retry with jitter, circuit breaker, bulkhead, timeout), error budgets/SLOs with burn rate alerts, and production incident triage. Use when user asks to implement error handling, logging, monitoring, observability, OpenTelemetry, error boundaries, circuit breakers, retry logic, or SLO tracking. Do NOT use for incident runbooks (use runbook-gen), vendor-specific APM setup (Datadog, Sentry agent config), or K8s debugging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the diff adds, upgrades, re-sources or re-pins a dependency - manifests, lockfiles, go.mod replace, Docker base images, GitHub Actions uses, Terraform modules, submodules, vendored code or curl-pipe-sh installs

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lifts the task's scope for one task. The session, its reviews and fix-the-class then look across the whole codebase and every repo that shares its code, data or vendors, and every problem found anywhere is handled by the usual rules. Runs only when the user types it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help plan an event — from a birthday dinner to a wedding. Scales to the size of the occasion. Handles venue research, guest lists, timelines, vendors, and budgets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates neuromarketing studies and neural-data law. Use when judging EEG, fMRI, eye-tracking, or GSR ad study or vendor, or if signals are regulated neural data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-source research with citations using You.com. Use for questions that need several sources compared and synthesized, such as library or framework comparisons, tool and vendor evaluations, market research, or deep-dive reports. Routes between a cost-conscious agentic search loop and the one-shot `you-research` MCP tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when comparing two or more code implementations against a spec or requirements doc. Triggers on "which repo is better", "compare these implementations", "evaluate both solutions", "rank these codebases", or "judge which approach wins". Also covers choosing between competing PRs or vendor submissions solving the same problem. Does NOT review a single codebase for quality — use code review skills instead. Does NOT evaluate strategy docs — use strategy-review. Requires a spec file and 2+ repo paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs contract-driven compliance review of insurance certificates and endorsements against CRE/site-access and vendor agreement requirements. Produces pass/fail/conditional determinations, deficit lists, and broker-ready remediation instructions. Use when reviewing COI packets, ACORD 25 forms, or endorsements for additional insured, primary and non-contributory, waiver of subrogation, completed operations, umbrella alignment, limits adequacy, or insurer rating compliance. Trigger terms: COI, ACORD, additional insured, certificate holder, cancellation notice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces requirement-by-requirement CRE insurance certificate compliance reviews by analyzing ACORD 25 certificates and endorsements against Access Agreement terms. Use when the user mentions COI review, insurance compliance, ACORD 25 analysis, Additional Insured verification, primary/non-contributory status, waiver of subrogation, vendor insurance audit, CGL compliance, umbrella follow-form, broker-ready deficiency instructions, certificate holder vs. additional insured, AI endorsements (CG 20 10, CG 20 37), or carrier rating checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinates credit monitoring and identity theft protection services for individuals affected by a data breach. Covers vendor selection criteria, enrollment logistics, coverage duration (12-24 months), identity theft insurance options, communication to affected individuals, and enrollment rate tracking. Keywords: credit monitoring, identity protection, breach response, Experian, enrollment, identity theft insurance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews CRE insurance certificates (ACORD 25) and endorsements against Access Agreement insurance requirements, producing a pass/fail compliance determination with broker-ready deficiency instructions. Verifies coverage limits, Additional Insured status, primary/non-contributory language, waiver of subrogation, umbrella alignment, and carrier qualifications. Use when reviewing COIs, ACORD forms, vendor or contractor insurance, site access insurance, or Additional Insured endorsements in commercial real estate transactions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the BuildAI PostgreSQL database (read-only). Returns results as JSON for construction project data — projects, RFIs, submittals, budgets, change orders, daily logs, punch lists, insurance, vendors, pay applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。