Deep consistency audit of the entire repository — launches 4 parallel specialist agents to find factual errors, code bugs, broken references, count mismatches, and cross-document inconsistencies, then fixes all issues and loops until clean. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants a comprehensive repository-wide check — not a targeted review of a single file. Triggers include: "audit", "deep audit", "find inconsistencies", "check everything", "run a full audit", "are there any broken references", "check the whole repo", "something feels off", "run the audit loop", or after making broad changes across multiple files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Systematic audit and review by Referee 2. Two modes — "deck" reviews slide presentations for rhetoric, visual quality, and compile cleanliness; "code" performs cross-language replication and econometric audit of empirical pipelines. Use when reviewing slides, auditing code, or verifying replication.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Verify that every quantitative claim in the paper is traceable to an analysis output file, and that no important output was omitted. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants to check that the paper and analysis are consistent before submission. Triggers include: "run the quality gate", "check the paper matches the analysis", "verify consistency", "does the paper match my results", "check my numbers", "are my tables right", "quality check before submission", "verify my claims", "make sure everything is consistent", "double-check the paper against my output files", or any pre-submission integrity check between paper text and computed results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Comprehensive manuscript review covering argument structure, econometric specification, citation completeness, and potential referee objections. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants substantive academic feedback on a paper — not just surface edits. Triggers include: "review my paper", "give me feedback on this draft", "what would a referee say", "anticipate referee objections", "act as a referee", "check my identification strategy", "is my argument convincing", "review this manuscript", "critique my paper", "will this pass review", or any request for deep critique of academic writing beyond typos and grammar.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Run the R code review protocol on R scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, domain correctness, and professional standards. Produces a report without editing files. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants their existing R code evaluated or audited — not when they want new analysis written. Triggers include: "review my R script", "check my R code", "is my code replication-ready", "audit this R file", "does this code follow conventions", "will this reproduce", "check my analysis script", "code review", "review-r", or when the user has an existing .R file and wants quality feedback rather than new code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Download, split, and deeply read academic PDFs. Use when asked to read, review, or summarize an academic paper. Splits PDFs into 4-page chunks, reads them in small batches, and produces structured reading notes — avoiding context window crashes and shallow comprehension.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Run a 6-agent pre-submission referee report for an academic paper targeting a specified journal
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Converts LaTeX article-class .tex documents to Quarto .qmd format for multi-format publishing (HTML, PDF, Word). Use when asked to convert, port, migrate, or translate a .tex LaTeX file to Quarto; when porting an academic paper or manuscript from LaTeX to Quarto; when a .tex document needs to render to HTML, Word, or Typst PDF. Covers preamble → YAML front matter, section headings, text formatting, math, citations (natbib/biblatex), cross-references, figures, tables, lists, footnotes, hyperlinks, and special characters.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Unwraps hard-wrapped markdown files so that each sentence ends with a newline instead of mid-sentence line breaks. Joins continuation lines within a paragraph into single lines, then re-breaks at sentence boundaries (period, question mark, exclamation point). Preserves blank lines, headings, fenced code blocks, block quotes, and list items. Use when asked to unwrap text, fix line breaks, reflow sentences, or clean up hard-wrapped markdown or .qmd files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Create and compile beautiful Beamer presentations following the Rhetoric of Decks philosophy. Use when making slides, creating decks, or compiling .tex presentation files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Takes a proofread or apsa-style report file (or any markdown file using **Original:** / **Recommended:** syntax) and rewrites the original source file with git merge conflict markers so the user can accept or reject each suggested edit using VS Code or Positron's built-in merge conflict UI. Branch names are "original" and "claude-edits". Use when asked to apply edits, insert conflict markers, or set up merge resolution for a copy-edit report. Supports an optional @sec-label argument to restrict markers to one section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Prose quality checker for Quarto (.qmd) files, grounded in William Zinsser's *On Writing Well* (30th Anniversary Edition). Checks for clutter, weak verbs, hollow qualifiers, clichés, inflated academic voice, poor leads and endings, pronoun and tense inconsistency, and unclear explanation. Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to improve prose quality, tighten writing, reduce clutter, or apply Zinsser's writing principles to a draft. For grammar and punctuation, use the proofread skill. For APSA style rules, use the apsa-style skill. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Cleans a Quarto (.qmd) file by replacing LaTeX holdovers with proper Quarto/Pandoc syntax so the document renders correctly to HTML, PDF (Typst/LaTeX), and Word. Fixes citations (\citep → [@key]), cross-references (\ref → @label), figures (\includegraphics → markdown), tables, text formatting (\textbf → **bold**), inline math (\( \) → $ $), hyperlinks (\href → [text](url)), footnotes (\footnote → ^[]), list environments, section headings, and R Markdown chunk options (dot-style → #| YAML). Use when asked to clean, fix, modernize, or port a Quarto or R Markdown document; when LaTeX commands appear in a .qmd file; when a document fails to render to Word or Typst; or when citations/cross-references do not appear in non-LaTeX output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Two-stage paper screening - abstract scoring then deep dive for specific data extraction
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Collaboratively build and refine paper screening rubrics through brainstorming, test-driven development, and iterative feedback
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
This skill should be used when the user asks to "search for academic papers", "find working papers on SSRN", "look up a DOI", "download paper PDF", "check open access availability", "search NBER papers", "find arXiv preprints", or "search CrossRef". Provides unified search, metadata retrieval, and PDF download across arXiv, NBER, SSRN, CrossRef, OpenAlex, Unpaywall, and Semantic Scholar. Covers economics, finance, social science, CS/AI, and all academic disciplines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Econometrics skill for Synthetic Control Method (SCM). Activates when the user asks about: "synthetic control", "SCM", "synthetic counterfactual", "donor pool", "placebo test", "in-space placebo", "in-time placebo", "MSPE ratio", "Abadie Diamond Hainmueller", "augmented synthetic control", "penalized SCM", "synthetic DID", "合成控制", "合成控制法", "捐助池", "安慰剂检验", "合成反事实", "合成DID", "政策评估"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Evaluate a paper's contribution novelty, identify best-fit SSCI journal fields and ABS star rating, and recommend 20 target journals. Trigger when user says "paper submission" / "paper-submission" / "投稿评估" / "期刊推荐" / "target journal" / "选刊".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Generate a complete academic literature survey from scratch using multi-agent orchestration. Searches academic databases (OpenAlex, CrossRef, Unpaywall), downloads PDFs, builds BibTeX, drafts a LaTeX review, compiles it, reviews for quality, and revises based on feedback — all automated. Use this skill whenever the user asks to "generate a literature review", "write a survey paper", "review recent papers on [topic]", "create a survey of [field]", "综述", "文献综述", "survey papers in top journals", or wants a multi-agent pipeline to produce a publishable-quality literature review. Also trigger when the user wants to search multiple journals for papers on a topic and synthesize findings into a structured document. Works for any academic field but optimized for economics journals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Revise an academic paper based on internal review comments. Reads review report or annotated manuscript, then applies revisions one by one with user approval. Trigger when user says "self revise" / "paper-selfrevise" / "内部修改" / "根据审稿意见修改".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Econometrics skill for OLS regression and linear models. Activates when the user asks about: "run OLS", "linear regression", "ordinary least squares", "interpret regression results", "heteroskedasticity", "multicollinearity", "regression assumptions", "robust standard errors", "GLS", "WLS", "fit a regression model", "check regression diagnostics", "OLS假设", "最小二乘法", "线性回归", "回归系数", "残差检验", "异方差", "多重共线性", "普通最小二乘", "稳健标准误", "回归诊断"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Find free legal full-text versions of scholarly articles via Unpaywall
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Econometrics skill for machine learning methods in causal inference. Activates when the user asks about: "causal forest", "generalized random forest", "GRF", "double machine learning", "DML", "debiased machine learning", "LASSO for variable selection", "post-LASSO", "heterogeneous treatment effects", "CATE", "conditional average treatment effect", "BLP analysis", "CLAN analysis", "causal tree", "honest estimation", "因果森林", "双重机器学习", "异质性处理效应", "条件平均处理效应", "LASSO变量选择", "机器学习因果推断", "去偏机器学习"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新
Run a structural estimation pipeline — routes to /workflows:work with estimation context from empirical-playbook
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6712026年10月15日 更新