4,773 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when project files changed since the last brain scan, CLAUDE.local.md was updated, or a periodic refresh is due. Rescans incrementally, writes new entities, decisions, and documents; needs project_brain.db (run /brain-init first).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user says brain, project knowledge, what do we know about, open tasks, or recent decisions, or runs /brain or /brain-update. SQLite project_brain.db tracker for entities, relationships, tasks, threads, decisions, events.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to refresh CLAUDE.local.md, regenerate project context, or after a brain-update session flush. Rewrites only the sentinel-delimited auto-generated section from the brain DB, preserving manual behavior rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user sends or generates an image, screenshot, video, audio or file and wants it saved, or asks to find past media (that diagram, the mockup from last week). Ingests and searches with local ChromaDB embeddings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post-run self-evaluation system that scores agent output on correctness, clarity, actionability, and conciseness. Use after /team runs, skill executions, or when explicitly asked to evaluate output quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build cost-safe geospatial SQL for BigQuery, DuckDB, Snowflake, Wherobots, and Postgres and/or render results on an interactive Dekart map.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when testing RevenueCat purchases/subscriptions, setting up sandbox testing, debugging a purchase/restore/trial, verifying entitlements or events, or writing an IAP QA plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Safely inspect and modify local Avibe configuration, routing, runtime settings, watches, scheduled tasks, Avibe Cloud remote access, and operational state. Also use it to report an Avibe bug, send product feedback, or file a feature request from the current conversation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deliver Avibe, backend, docs, avault and vault-sandbox PRs through worktrees, Codex review, CI, circuit breaking and gated close-out. Required on every Agent backend.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
YAML output format and approval criteria for platform design reviews. Load when generating review feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Demonstration preparation, audience-tailored presentations, feedback collection, and business outcome measurement. Load when preparing demos or measuring business value delivery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Database comparison catalogs, RDBMS vs NoSQL selection criteria, CAP/ACID/BASE theory, OLTP vs OLAP, and technology-specific characteristics
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dung khi leader phai DUYET output CHU cua team truoc khi trien khai — content brief co dung insight va dung pillar khong, CTA co ro khong; ads copy va creative co proof cho claim khong, dung tone khong, hook co nam trong 125 ky tu dau khong; verdict Approve / Revise / Redo kem feedback cu the. Kich hoat khi user nhac 'duyet brief', 'review ads copy', 'duyet content', 'check truoc khi chay', 'bai nay dang duoc chua', 'em viet the nay sep xem giup', 'duyet output team'. Khong dung cho — cham diem THIET KE va hinh anh thi dung skill 47-design-review; danh gia nang luc nguoi lam thi dung skill 65-team-performance-review; can nhieu goc nhin phan bien cho mot huong chien luoc thi dung skill 72-hoi-dong-marketing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dung khi can danh gia CON NGUOI trong team marketing dua tren du lieu — KPI scorecard theo tung vai tro writer, designer, media buyer; diem manh co vi du that; diem can cai thien; development plan 30-90 ngay; rubric cham 1-5. Kich hoat khi user nhac 'danh gia nhan vien', 'performance review', 'review nhan su', '1:1 review thang', 'nguoi nay lam duoc khong', 'co nen tang luong khong', 'feedback cho team member'. Khong dung cho — tong ket mot campaign thay vi con nguoi thi dung skill 63-campaign-retrospective; duyet chat luong mot output cu the thi dung skill 62-marketing-review; giao viec va dat deadline thi dung skill 64-team-brief.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a leader evaluates a marketing TEAM MEMBER using data — a KPI scorecard by role, strengths with real examples, areas to improve stated as observable behavior, a 30 and 90 day development plan, and a 1-5 rating rubric. Trigger on 'performance review for my marketer', 'evaluate a team member', 'monthly 1:1 review', 'feedback for my content writer', 'development plan for an employee', 'is this person underperforming'. Also use when the user is unhappy with someone and cannot articulate why. Not for — evaluating a campaign rather than a person, see `63-campaign-retrospective-global`; reviewing one piece of output, see `62-marketing-review-global`; scoring an external vendor, see `67-agency-vendor-brief-global`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a leader must review or approve TEXT-based team output before it ships — content briefs checked for angle, pillar, and CTA, ad copy and creative checked for substantiated claims, on-brand tone, a hook inside the first 125 characters, and platform policy, ending in an Approve, Revise, or Redo verdict with point-by-point feedback. Trigger on 'review this brief', 'approve the ad copy', 'check ads before launch', 'review team output', 'is this good enough to publish', 'my team keeps sending me drafts'. Not for — reviewing a visual design, see `47-design-review-global`; evaluating a person over a period, see `65-team-performance-review-global`; writing the copy yourself, see `05-ad-copy-global`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
根据指定的表拥有者和被授权用户，生成查询未被特定用户授权访问的数据表的SQL语句。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes meeting transcripts and recordings to uncover behavioral patterns, communication insights, and actionable feedback. Identifies when you avoid conflict, use filler words, dominate conversations, or miss opportunities to listen. Perfect for professionals seeking to improve their communication and leadership skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply test-driven development with small, behavior-focused feedback loops. Use when the user asks to build or fix something test-first, mentions red-green-refactor, or wants integration tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ultra-compressed code review comments. Cuts noise from PR feedback while preserving the actionable signal. Each comment is one line: location, problem, fix. Use when user says "review this PR", "code review", "review the diff", "/review", or invokes /caveman-review. Auto-triggers when reviewing pull requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Return brief playful positive, neutral or negative fortune game responses. Use for this Bot Generator Bot template; creates drafts or simulations within its declared scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Measures whether an automation suite builds release confidence via feedback-loop length, suite reliability, release cadence, and production escape rate, and emits a release_confidence verdict. Use when judging suite value, ROI, or pre-release trust; not for writing or healing tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-write audit for skill violations: checks planned code against loaded skill anti-patterns before any file write. Use when writing Flutter/Dart/TS code or editing SKILL.md files with active project skills. Load as composite; on auto-fixed violation, also load +common/common-learning-log.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。