「should」の検索結果

Suggests initiating inpatient CGM for select diabetic patients at high risk for hypoglycemia based on Table 3 criteria. Triggers include "Should I initiate CGM for this hospitalized diabetic patient at high risk for hypoglycemia?" or "Is inpatient CGM warranted for this patient?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill determines whether inpatient diabetic patients meet high-risk criteria for CGM initiation using Table 3 factors such as age ≥65 years, BMI ≤27 kg/m², type 1 diabetes, insulin regimen, and specific clinical conditions. It is triggered by clinician questions like "Should I assess this inpatient for CGM initiation based on hypoglycemia risk?" or "Is this patient a candidate for inpatient CGM?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Considers adapting the basal insulin rate at hospital admission for patients using insulin pump therapy. Triggered by clinician questions such as "Should we adjust the basal rate upon admission for pump therapy?" or when evaluating pump continuation versus transition to scheduled subcutaneous insulin.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

If CGM fails or is removed, revert the insulin pump to manual mode provided basic criteria for pump use in hospital are still met. Trigger phrase: "CGM failed, should we switch pump to manual mode?

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transition insulin pump to scheduled subcutaneous basal bolus insulin when anticipated hospital length of stay exceeds 1 to 2 days and pump expertise is unavailable. Triggers include: "Patient expected to stay >2 days, should we switch pump to scheduled insulin?

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill suggests using real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and algorithm-driven insulin pumps (ADIPs) rather than multiple daily injections (MDIs) with self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) three or more times daily for adults and children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Trigger phrases include "Should I use RT-CGM+ADIP or MDI+SMBG for this T1D patient?" or "Is intensive pump therapy indicated for this patient?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses whether hysterectomy and oophorectomy are medically necessary as part of gender-affirming surgery for transgender patients. Triggered when a patient is planning gender-affirming surgery and clinicians need to determine if total hysterectomy and oophorectomy should be included.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The guideline suggests checking serum magnesium and phosphate levels and repleting if low in patients receiving antiresorptive therapy for hypercalcemia of malignancy. Clinicians should consider this when they note electrolyte abnormalities or inquire about supportive care during bisphosphonate or denosumab treatment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides choice among spironolactone, eplerenone, and esaxerenone for primary aldosteronism based on comparative efficacy, safety, and patient-specific factors. Triggers include when initiating MRA therapy and asking 'Which MRA should I prescribe?' or considering switching agents due to adverse effects, cost, or need for potassium supplementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill recommends computed tomography (CT) as the initial imaging modality for primary aldosteronism (PA) evaluation in Japan, citing its accessibility and comparable performance to MRI. It is triggered when a clinician orders imaging for suspected PA and asks 'What imaging should I start with?' or seeks a cost-effective initial evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recommends antihypertensive therapy including mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) for patients with a positive primary aldosteronism (PA) screening test who decline confirmatory testing. Triggers include when a patient has positive screening but refuses additional tests and asks "What should I treat with?" or initiates empiric therapy, with preference for MRAs in typical PA presentations (e.g., spontaneous hypokalemia, resistant hypertension, adrenal tumor on CT).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Determines whether to recommend adrenalectomy or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for primary aldosteronism based on PA subtype and patient/surgical factors. Triggered after subtype confirmation when clinicians ask “Should this patient have surgery or medical treatment?” or discuss treatment options with the patient.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides selection of the optimal confirmatory test (CCT, SIT, FUT, OSLT) for primary aldosteronism based on patient safety and feasibility. Triggers include when a clinician asks “Which confirmatory test should I use?” or evaluates patient comorbidities before testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recommends ACTH stimulation during AVS to improve success rate of bilateral selective catheterization, acknowledging unclear impact on diagnostic accuracy for laterality. Triggers include when setting up AVS and asking 'Should I administer ACTH?' or considering procedural optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suggests considering mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists when benefits outweigh risks in pregnant or preconception PA patients with uncontrolled hypertension and hypokalemia. Triggered when standard therapy fails and clinicians ask 'Should I consider MRAs despite pregnancy?' or when assessing risk‑benefit of MRA use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recommends potassium supplementation for hypokalemia management in PA patients who are pregnant or planning pregnancy. Triggered when a pregnant PA patient presents with low serum potassium and asks 'How should I treat hypokalemia?' or when electrolytes are reviewed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Determines whether to screen a patient with hypertension for primary aldosteronism based solely on the presence of hypertension. Use when a clinician asks whether to screen a hypertensive patient for PA, triggered by phrases such as "should we screen for aldosteronism" or "evaluate for secondary hypertension".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculate the Maryland Aggregate Pathology Index (MAPI) on a deceased donor procurement kidney biopsy to predict graft survival and decide single vs dual vs discard allocation. Trigger when a clinician asks "what's the MAPI score", "interpret donor kidney biopsy", "should I use this marginal kidney", "MAPI cutoff for transplant", "procurement biopsy scoring", or has histology results from a deceased donor kidney and needs an objective grading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide when to order coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring in a primary-prevention patient and interpret the result per the 2026 ACC/AHA multisociety dyslipidaemia guideline. Covers the Class 1 indication (men ≥40 / women ≥45, borderline / intermediate PREVENT-ASCVD risk, uncertainty about LLT), CAC score interpretation (0, 1–99, 100–299, ≥300, ≥1000), how CAC modifies LDL and non-HDL goals, when to repeat CAC, and pitfalls (incidental CAC on non-cardiac CT, radiation, cost). Use when a clinician asks should I order a CAC score, CAC indications, what does CAC 150 mean, treatment goals with CAC score, repeat CAC frequency, CAC in a smoker, CAC vs CCTA, is CAC useful in intermediate risk. Grounded in the 2026 ACC/AHA multisociety dyslipidaemia guideline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill suggests using prednisolone as an alternative glucocorticoid when hydrocortisone is unavailable for emergency treatment of adrenal crisis. Dexamethasone is the least-preferred option and should only be administered if no other glucocorticoid is available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work a primary-prevention patient through the 2026 ACC/AHA multisociety dyslipidaemia guideline CPR framework — Calculate (10-year and 30-year PREVENT-ASCVD), Classify (low / borderline / intermediate / high), Personalize (demographic, clinical, biomarker, and reproductive risk enhancers), and Reclassify (coronary artery calcium scoring where appropriate). Use when a clinician asks how to assess ASCVD risk for primary prevention, who needs a statin, borderline risk patient what to do, intermediate risk should I start a statin, risk enhancers to look for, premature family history of ASCVD how does it change risk, pregnancy-related risk factors, PCOS and cardiovascular risk. Grounded in the 2026 ACC/AHA multisociety dyslipidaemia guideline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Order and interpret lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] measurement at least once in a lifetime, apply the risk-enhancer threshold (≥125 nmol/L or ≥50 mg/dL), and run cascade screening of first-degree relatives for premature ASCVD, familial hypercholesterolaemia, or elevated Lp(a) per the 2026 ACC/AHA multisociety dyslipidaemia guideline. Covers the Class 1 lifetime measurement, how elevated Lp(a) affects LLT initiation and intensification, the cascade screening indications, the interaction of Lp(a) with ASCVD risk estimation, and current therapeutic limitations. Use when a clinician asks when to check Lp(a), how often to repeat Lp(a), elevated Lp(a) what next, treatment for high Lp(a), should I screen my patient's family, Lp(a) and statins, cascade screening indications. Grounded in the 2026 ACC/AHA multisociety dyslipidaemia guideline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set absolute LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and ApoB treatment goals, PLUS percent LDL-C reduction, for a primary-prevention patient on lipid-lowering therapy per the re-introduced treatment goals in the 2026 ACC/AHA multisociety dyslipidaemia guideline. Covers goals by PREVENT-ASCVD category (low / borderline / intermediate / high), by CAC score, in severe hypercholesterolaemia / FH, in diabetes with multiple ASCVD risk factors, and the ApoB targets once LDL-C and non-HDL-C goals are met. Use when a clinician asks what LDL goal to aim for, LDL target for intermediate risk, non-HDL goal, ApoB target, dual goals on statin, patient at goal or not, how low should LDL go, statin not enough what next. Grounded in the 2026 ACC/AHA multisociety dyslipidaemia guideline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Derive an execution roadmap from a project's vision/spec docs by first principles, then diff that fresh derivation against the existing roadmap to prove the task ORDER is correct. Use this whenever the user wants to review, validate, re-derive, or sanity-check an execution roadmap or delivery plan; asks whether the tasks/epics are "in the right order"; suspects a task is scheduled before its prerequisite (a producer-after-consumer / dependency-inversion error like "OpenAPI after the web client that consumes it", OR a cross-cutting inherited default like observability/auth/tenancy scheduled after the feature work that inherits it — a seam-after-consumer error); wants to find missing tasks, circular dependencies, or over-fragmented epics; or wants to compact a plan to raise velocity. Also trigger on "review the roadmap", "re-derive the plan from the spec", "is this the right build order", "check the dependency graph of our epics", "which task should come first". It reads the vision + spec corpus, decomposes actors → use-cases → modules → epics → typed tasks, identifies cross-cutting inherited-default seams, builds a real dependency graph with hard + soft (seam) edges (deterministic helper), breaks cycles, topologically orders, compacts, and emits a derived roadmap PLUS a delta report against the current one — it never blindly overwrites a hand-crafted roadmap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。