「ties」の検索結果

Transform client hearing sheets and meeting notes into structured requirements documents. Use when converting raw hearing data (Japanese/English) into formal requirements, generating traceability matrices, identifying gaps/ambiguities, and mapping requirements to WBS items. Triggers include "hearing to requirements", "meeting notes to specs", "requirements traceability", "gap analysis for requirements", or requests involving hearing sheet analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, evaluating, documenting, modernizing, reviewing, refactoring, or implementing software architecture and code-level structure, including requirements, context, architecture style selection, microservices patterns, WebAssembly/WASI/Component Model, UMA portable capabilities, runtime contracts, capability graphs, governed MCP/agent orchestration, clean code, code smells, Rust crate/library API architecture, Cargo feature/MSRV/SemVer policy, unsafe/FFI/no_std/library testing, modularity, views, NFR tactics, IAM/auth, security patterns, cost estimation, architecture-as-code fitness functions, ADR/RFC work, and engineering execution plans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Android device offensive security, forensic extraction, and mobile app exploitation. Use this whenever the user needs to: break into or bypass the lock screen of an Android phone, extract data from a seized Android device for evidence, analyze or reverse-engineer an APK to find vulnerabilities, intercept communications on an Android device, exploit Android apps via deeplinks, steal crypto wallets or app data, set up rogue WiFi to target a phone, or plan any mobile device investigation or penetration test. Also trigger when the user mentions Android forensics, mobile pentesting, law enforcement phone extraction, device exploitation, WhatsApp or Telegram extraction from a phone, Android app reversing, CVE research for Android, or needing a chain of custody for mobile evidence. Even if the user describes the scenario casually or in another language, if they need to gain access to or pull data from an Android phone, use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Static application security testing (SAST) for changed source files — Vulnetix's built-in rule set plus optional Semgrep augmentation when `.semgrep` config is present. Use when reviewing a PR for code-level vulnerabilities, scanning a feature branch before merge, gating CI on critical findings, or running rule-specific checks for a known weakness class.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show what this repository has already decided about its vulnerabilities, read from the durable record rather than by scanning again — open versus resolved, the decision taken on each, and what is still waiting. Use when picking up triage after a break, auditing past decisions, onboarding to a repository with security history, or checking nothing high-severity is open before a release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a dataset or access rule before it joins an identity-graph build (access rules behave like datasets in NQL here). Enumerates failure modes (hub identifiers, high-degree nodes, suspicious values, over-connected identifiers), tests hypotheses in parallel, quantifies damage by rows / edges / entities, and proposes minimal filters ranked by severity. When issues are found, returns a validated `CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW` NQL the caller can run to produce a graph-ready clean source; if the data passes, says so and recommends it unchanged. Plans and authors the clean-view NQL; does not execute it. Use when: "audit this dataset before the graph build", "find bad edges in <source>", "check identity data quality", "recommend filters for the graph build", "quantify damage from <identifier_type>", "pre-graph DQ". (narrative-identity)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hand a research run over as a file — read `rs_open action=capabilities` for the formats this build writes, choose between `md`, `docx`, a self-contained `html`, the `ris`/`bib`/`enw` library exports and `tex`, pick `draft=watermark` while working or `draft=clean` to hand it over, and read `build/build.json` for what was built from which bytes. Use when a document is finished enough to leave the run, when a citation style or an export has to be chosen, or when a build refuses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compress review pressure into the right next action instead of more code by default. Classify findings, reject non-liabilities, and choose proof-only vs minimal-fix vs refactor-kernel, preventing one-patch-per-comment churn. Use after a code review — PR comments, reviewer suggestions, or audit findings — and especially when you are about to reflexively patch every comment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor long methods or large code blocks by extracting small, focused helper methods with clear names and narrow responsibilities. Use when asked to extract methods or run `/refactor:methods`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor a class toward the Single Responsibility Principle by identifying responsibilities, grouping cohesive behavior, and extracting focused classes. Use when the user says `/srp`, asks for SRP refactoring, or runs `/refactor:srp`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review public repository changes for secrets, private paths, signing identities, bundle IDs, generated artifacts, local logs, and private workflow leaks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load for footer settings, templates, social/legal links, copyright, tenant customization, instance governance locks, footer HAL capabilities, or footer admin UI/API changes; not for generic page layout footers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load for EF Core entities/configurations, semantic value persistence, portable constraints, DbContext/query filters, repositories/specifications, migrations, model snapshots, transactions, or seeded lookup tables; use query-optimization specifically for N+1 or slow SQL diagnosis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load when EF Core reads are slow, emit N+1 or excessive SQL, over-fetch, track too many entities, cause high DB load, or need projection/split-query/compiled-query analysis; not for general migrations, DbContext setup, or repository conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load when editing Blazor `.razor.css`, scoped selectors, `::deep`, BEM class names, RTL/logical CSS properties, or styling nested MudBlazor components; not for global design tokens or non-Blazor CSS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up bundle IDs, capabilities, signing certificates, provisioning profiles, and encrypted signing sync with the asc cli. Use when onboarding a new app, rotating signing assets, or sharing them across a team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatic code splitting (autoCodeSplitting), .lazy.tsx convention, createLazyFileRoute, createLazyRoute, lazyRouteComponent, getRouteApi for typed hooks in split files, codeSplitGroupings per-route override, splitBehavior programmatic config, critical vs non-critical properties.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break a feature or project area into frontier items and update `memory/PLAN.md`. Re-run to retire completed work, reorder priorities, or add new items.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full type inference philosophy (never cast, never annotate inferred values), Register module declaration, from narrowing on hooks and Link, strict:false for shared components, getRouteApi for code-split typed access, addChildren with object syntax for TS perf, LinkProps and ValidateLinkOptions type utilities, as const satisfies pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 3 (Incident Response Recommendations for Cybersecurity Risk Management). Use for CSF 2.0-aligned incident response life cycles, IR roles, Community Profile priorities for DE/RS/RC and preparation, playbooks, coordination, and continuous improvement. Covers 800-61r3 only; does not replace CSF 2.0 full text, SP 800-61r2 tactical playbooks, or sector-specific breach-notification law.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA Human Systems Integration (HSI) Practitioner's Guide (NASA/SP-2015-3709). Use for HSI process implementation, lifecycle phase activities, function allocation, ConOps development, HSI Plan writing, HSI metrics (MOE/MOP/TPM/KPP), HITL testing strategy, HSI team organisation, scaling/tailoring for program size, and V&V planning. Does not cover the specific human engineering design standards (NASA-STD-3001 content) or detailed HFE methods beyond what the guide itself provides.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD Test & Evaluation Enterprise Guidebook (OUSD R&E, August 2022). Use for DoD test and evaluation (T&E) across the Adaptive Acquisition Framework — the four test communities (contractor testing, developmental DT&E, operational OT&E, live-fire LFT&E); the five operational events (Operational Demonstration, EOA, OA, IOT&E, FOT&E) and the OTRR gate; the T&E Strategy / TEMP and its IDSK, with the upstream documents that feed it and the test plans that decompose it; the T&E organizations and oversight roles (USD(R&E), DOT&E, TRMC, the Service Executives and OTAs, the T&E WIPT, CDT); and pathway-specific T&E for all six acquisition pathways (Urgent Capability, Middle Tier, Major Capability, Software, Defense Business Systems). Statutory anchors include 10 U.S.C. §4171 (IOT&E) and §4172 (LFT&E/FUSL). This is guidance, not policy: it points outward to DoDI 5000.89 and the DoDI 5000-series for binding detail, and is thin on detailed test statistics/design-of-experiments methodology, cost estimating, the Acquisition of Services pathway, and any CUI/CAC-gated companion guides.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD M&S VV&A Recommended Practices Guide (RPG web edition). Use for verification, validation, and accreditation of models and simulations — role responsibilities (user, developer, M&S PM, V&V agent, accreditation agent), fidelity, validation fundamentals, data V&V, risk-informed accreditation, T&E/V&V integration, referent development, and conceptual-model validation. Complements nasa-ms-7009 and T&E packs; does not replace DoDI 5000.61 or Service VV&A policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。