本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

dod-vva-rpg

Knowledge base from the DoD M&S VV&A Recommended Practices Guide (RPG web edition). Use for verification, validation, and accreditation of models and simulations — role responsibilities (user, developer, M&S PM, V&V agent, accreditation agent), fidelity, validation fundamentals, data V&V, risk-informed accreditation, T&E/V&V integration, referent development, and conceptual-model validation. Complements nasa-ms-7009 and T&E packs; does not replace DoDI 5000.61 or Service VV&A policies.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(19)

  • SKILL.md6.4 KB
  • chapters/ch01-key-concepts-and-vva-frame.md3.0 KB
  • chapters/ch02-user-role-new-simulations.md2.4 KB
  • chapters/ch03-developer-role-new-simulations.md2.4 KB
  • chapters/ch04-ms-pm-role-new-simulations.md2.3 KB
  • chapters/ch05-vv-agent-role-new-simulations.md2.5 KB
  • chapters/ch06-accreditation-agent-role.md2.3 KB
  • chapters/ch07-fidelity.md2.2 KB
  • chapters/ch08-validation-fundamentals.md2.6 KB
  • chapters/ch09-data-vv-new-simulations.md2.4 KB
  • chapters/ch10-risk-and-vva.md2.4 KB
  • chapters/ch11-te-vv-checklist.md3.8 KB
  • chapters/ch12-developing-the-referent.md4.7 KB
  • chapters/ch13-conceptual-model-development-and-validation.md5.5 KB
  • cheatsheet.md2.5 KB
  • glossary.md3.0 KB
  • LICENSE1.5 KB
  • PACK.yaml4.8 KB
  • patterns.md2.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

<!-- argument-hint: [topic, role, or chapter number] -->

DoD M&S VV&A Recommended Practices Guide (RPG)

Source: DoD VV&A RPG web edition (US Government work, public domain) | Chapters: 13

When to use

Reach for this pack when planning or reviewing Verification, Validation, and Accreditation (VV&A) for defense modeling and simulation — assigning role responsibilities, scoping V&V to intended use, setting fidelity/referent expectations, validating results or data, or framing accreditation risk and residual uncertainty for decision authorities.

Prerequisites: none — plain Markdown; no MCP server, API key, or licence tier needed at runtime.

How to Use This Skill

  • Without arguments — load the core frameworks below.
  • With a topic — ask about accreditation, intended use, referent, fidelity, data V&V, residual risk, or a named role.
  • With a chapter — ask for ch01 through ch13.

Supporting files: glossary.md, patterns.md, cheatsheet.md.

Core Frameworks & Mental Models

VV&A triad

ElementQuestionOutcome
VerificationDid we build the M&S right?Evidence the implementation matches the conceptual model / specs
ValidationDid we build the right M&S?Evidence of adequate accuracy vs the referent for intended use
AccreditationIs it acceptable for this use?Official determination by the Accreditation Authority

Intended use first

All V&V scope, fidelity, data pedigree, and accreditation criteria flow from a clear intended use statement. Vague use → unscoped V&V and non-defensible accreditation.

Role set (new development)

User · Developer · M&S Program Manager · V&V Agent · Accreditation Agent — each owns distinct products and acceptance points; collapsing roles without independence controls weakens credibility.

Referent and fidelity

Validation compares M&S behavior to a referent (reality, data, higher-fidelity model, or SME consensus) at the fidelity needed for the decision — not maximum fidelity everywhere.

Risk couples to accreditation

Accepting incorrect M&S results (Type II) usually dominates. Residual risk after V&V must be explicit in the accreditation recommendation.

Pack routing

  • nasa-ms-7009 — NASA models & simulations standard/handbook depth.
  • dote-te-guidebook / dod-te-guidebook — enterprise T&E; use when M&S supports DT/OT evidence.
  • This pack — DoD VV&A RPG role practices, validation fundamentals, data V&V, risk, T&E/V&V checklist, referent development, conceptual-model validation.

Chapter Index

#SectionKey content
ch01Key Concepts & VV&A FrameRPG purpose, spectrum of M&S, process overview
ch02User RoleNeeds, intended use, acceptance criteria, SME input
ch03Developer RoleDesign/build evidence, configuration, developer testing
ch04M&S PM RolePlanning, resources, integration of VV&A into development
ch05V&V Agent RoleV&V planning, independence, techniques, reporting
ch06Accreditation Agent RoleAccreditation package, recommendation, authority support
ch07FidelityFidelity dimensions, fitness for intended use
ch08Validation FundamentalsReferent, comparison methods, credibility
ch09Data V&VData verification/validation, pedigree, uncertainty
ch10Risk & VV&ADevelopment vs operational risk, Type I/II, mitigation
ch11T&E / V&V ChecklistIntegration cases, criticality bins, V&V vs DT/OT partitions
ch12Developing the ReferentValidation-referent identify/select/specify/approve
ch13Conceptual ModelContext/concept/elements; conceptual-model V&V

Topic Index

TopicChapters
Accreditation / authority decisionch01, ch06, ch10
Intended use & requirementsch01, ch02, ch04
Verification practicesch03, ch05
Validation / referent / face validationch07, ch08, ch12, ch13
Data verification & validationch09
Fidelity selectionch07, ch08, ch12
Risk, residual risk, Type I/IIch10, ch06
Role responsibilities (RACI-like)ch02–ch06
Independence of V&Vch05, ch06
Test & evaluation interfacech01, ch05, ch10, ch11
T&E / V&V checklistch11
Conceptual model (simulation / federation)ch13, ch03, ch08
Decision analysis / evidence for decisionsch06, ch08, ch10
SME usech02, ch05, ch08, ch12

Supporting Files

Scope & Limits

  • Synthesized from selected new-development role guides plus fidelity, validation, data V&V, risk, T&E/V&V checklist, developing-the-referent, and conceptual-model special topics of the DoD VV&A RPG web edition (role set retrieved 2026-08-16; leftover chapters retrieved 2026-08-17). Not a substitute for DoDI 5000.61, Service regs, or program accreditation authority direction.
  • Legacy-simulation role guides and the remaining ~14 special topics were not packaged (selection). The Use Case Overview is HTML-only on the live index and was not ingested.
  • Does not reproduce long source passages; use official publications for citation in contracts or formal accreditation records.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Signpost (not a knowledge pack) for the automotive standards landscape: ISO 26262, ASPICE, SAE J3016, UNECE R155, UNECE R156, and the NHTSA vehicle set. Contains NO source content: designation, edition, owner, status, and an official catalogue URL only. Use when you need to identify or locate an automotive standard. Most are paywalled or carry no redistribution grant and cannot be packaged; the one open path is the nhtsa-vehicle pack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

cisa-cpg

無料

Knowledge base from CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals 2.0. Use for prioritized IT/OT baseline cyber goals aligned to NIST CSF 2.0 (including GOVERN), critical-infrastructure hygiene, MSP/supply-chain expectations, and board-friendly outcome language. Covers CPG 2.0 goals only; does not replace full CSF programs, sector-specific goals (SSGs), or CSET tooling detail.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

Knowledge base from DAFMAN 63-119 (15 April 2021), Mission-Oriented Test Readiness Certification. Use for continuous MOTRC replacing single-point OTRR thinking: framework/applicability, Certification Official vs PM roles, review cycle and exit criteria, certification memo/decertify gates, DT&E/contractor evidence, ITT integration and cyber resiliency, and the 31-template matrix. DAF T&E readiness process only—does not replace DoDI 5000.89, AFI 99-103, or multi-service lead policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

Knowledge base from the DoD Systems Engineering Guidebook (OUSD R&E, February 2022). Use for the DoD SE process model — the 16 SE processes (8 technical management + 8 technical) mapped to ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, the event-driven technical reviews and audits across the Major Capability Acquisition life cycle (ASR, SRR, SFR, PDR, CDR, SVR/FCA, PRR, PCA), the Systems Engineering Plan (SEP), risk/issue/opportunity management, TPMs and leading indicators, system-of-systems and digital engineering, and the 24 design considerations (RAM, system safety, HSI, system security engineering, MOSA, supportability, etc.). Acquisition-program oriented: thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting law, and non-DoD or commercial life cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

Knowledge pack from 'Towards Digital Engineering: The Advent of Digital Systems Engineering' (Huang et al., Old Dominion University, arXiv:2002.11672, 2020). Use when reasoning about digital engineering, the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy and its five goals, the Authoritative Source of Truth, digitalization vs. digitization, digital augmentation, digitalized models, provenance, unique identification, and the four-level (vision/strategy/action/foundation) DSE research framework. Covers the conceptual/vision layer of the field. SCOPE LIMITS: this is a single ~28-page vision paper, not a methods handbook — it is thin on step-by-step procedures, tooling, case studies, and quantitative evaluation, and it predates 2020 so it does not cover later digital-engineering standards or recent AI/LLM advances. Use the sebok pack for established SE canon and MBSE depth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

Knowledge base from the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy (2018, OUSD/ODASD(SE)). Use for the Department of Defense's five digital engineering goals — (1) formalize the development, integration, and use of models; (2) provide an enduring authoritative source of truth; (3) incorporate technological innovation; (4) establish supporting infrastructure and environments; (5) transform the culture and workforce — plus their focus areas, the document-to-model and design-build-test→model-analyze-build shifts, model formalisms/provenance, governance and access control of the authoritative source of truth, and the coordinate→plan→pilot→sustain rollout. A vision-and-policy strategy, deliberately non-prescriptive. Does NOT provide a how-to method, tool tutorials, MBSE/SysML mechanics, or implementation-plan content; thin on metrics, acquisition-policy detail, and step-by-step procedure. Excludes the CAC-gated Digital Engineering Body of Knowledge (DEBoK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs82026年10月9日 更新

jgsystemsconsulting のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する