Assess and improve cloud portability — identify lock-in, prioritize abstraction, and design migration paths. Use when asked "how locked in are we", "reduce vendor lock-in", or "plan a cloud migration".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
397 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Assess and improve cloud portability — identify lock-in, prioritize abstraction, and design migration paths. Use when asked "how locked in are we", "reduce vendor lock-in", or "plan a cloud migration".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design meeting and communication cadence — what meetings to run, how often, who attends, and what decisions they make. Use when asked to "design our meeting structure", "what meetings should we have", "reduce meeting load", or "build our operating rhythm".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build or audit compliance program — SOC2, GDPR, HIPAA, or ISO 27001 readiness assessment, gap analysis, and remediation roadmap. Use when asked to "do we need SOC2", "are we GDPR compliant", "what does our compliance program need", or "build a security policy".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operational efficiency audit — identify waste, redundancy, and friction across processes, tools, and team workflows. Use when asked to "audit our operations for waste", "where are we inefficient", "what tools are we paying for but not using", or "reduce operational overhead".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Document or redesign a business process — standard operating procedure (SOP), process map, RACI, and owner assignment. Use when asked to "document this process", "write a runbook", "design how we handle X", or "map the process for Y".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and run OKR program — company objectives, team key results, cascade design, and quarterly review cadence. Use when asked to "design our OKRs", "are our OKRs good", "cascade goals to teams", or "run a quarterly OKR review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft a contract or policy document from a description or template. Use when asked to "draft an NDA", "write an MSA", or "we need a vendor contract".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Codified expertise for returns authorization, receipt and inspection, disposition decisions, refund processing, fraud detection, and warranty claims management. Informed by returns operations managers with 15+ years experience. Includes grading frameworks, disposition economics, fraud pattern recognition, and vendor recovery processes. Use when handling product returns, reverse logistics, refund decisions, return fraud detection, or warranty claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Codified expertise for demand forecasting, safety stock optimization, replenishment planning, and promotional lift estimation at multi-location retailers. Informed by demand planners with 15+ years experience managing hundreds of SKUs. Includes forecasting method selection, ABC/XYZ analysis, seasonal transition management, and vendor negotiation frameworks. Use when forecasting demand, setting safety stock, planning replenishment, managing promotions, or optimizing inventory levels.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate complex work from an active gpt-6-astra or gpt-6.1-sol Codex session. The detected lead owns decomposition, integration, and verification; Astra keeps the hardest reasoning in the lead, while Sol escalates unusually difficult units to Astra. Both route bounded work to Sol at medium effort, mechanical work to Luna, and can use a cross-vendor Claude peer. Not for routine single-context work. Use when the user explicitly asks to orchestrate, delegate, fan out, parallelize, assign subagents, obtain independent checks, or have Codex act as tech lead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate or audit a live Qualtrics survey via the v3 APIs without breaking fielding: publish gating, quotas, flow routing, embedded data, panel-vendor redirects, read-back verification, and a read-only pre-fielding audit. Use when publishing or patching a fielding instrument, when a quota counts but never blocks, or before launch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert FinOps guidance for cloud, AI, and SaaS technology spend. Covers AI cost management, agentic FinOps, GenAI capacity planning, self-hosted vs managed inference, Anthropic billing, open-weight vendor APIs (DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, GLM), AWS (EC2, Bedrock, SageMaker, Savings Plans, CUR), Azure (reservations, AHB, OpenAI PTUs), GCP (Vertex AI, BigQuery), OCI, Kubernetes cost allocation, data platforms (Databricks, Fabric F-SKUs, Snowflake), tagging governance, SaaS management (SAM, shadow IT), AI coding tools (Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, Codex), ITAM, allocation, showback, chargeback, anomaly management, KPIs and benchmarking, waste detection playbooks, workload onboarding and M&A, and GreenOps (cloud carbon, CSRD). Use for any question about technology cost or waste in your estate - expiring commitments or RIs, NAT gateway bills, idle VMs, snapshot sprawl - and for commitment sizing, rightsizing, allocation, SaaS sprawl, AI dev tool spend, or connecting spend to business value. Built by OptimNow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when developing, reviewing, packaging, debugging, or answering questions about DeepSeek Harness (DSH) plugins — the plugin-based agent harness on vendored Cordis. Applies the official plugin-development constraints (plugin contract, cordis.yml layers, services/events/effects, tool DSL, bundles/profiles) backed by the dsh-plugin-guide knowledge base.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use on any core for first-run planning intake — Phase 0 runs the vendored BMAD-METHOD planning shelf, shared by every core, and Phase 1 (mining `04-prd.md` into intent records plus the Add-ons/sync-and-remote-entities decision) is full-stack-app's and pwa-app's shared procedure — identical mechanics, a different decision at step 5/8. Phase 0 also defines compressed intake, the path a user's explicit "just build it" choice takes on full-stack-app, pwa-app, authored, and copywriting cores: one batched round of questions in place of the shelf, writing a thinned archive at the same paths so Phase 1 (or, on copywriting, that core's own mining step), `ux-planner`, and the Re-entry pass all keep their documented source. Also use for the Re-entry pass, which mines new scope into additional intents without re-running the shelf, on any core with a module axis to add an intent to (full-stack-app, pwa-app, authored) — landing-page has none, so its own new-scope path runs through `hedgehog-landing-loop`'s Correction Protocol instead. Invoked by the `planner` agent, which decides the path; don't run standalone. landing-page runs this skill's Phase 0 on first run, then mines the same archive through `hedgehog-landing-loop`'s own planning-intake section, that core's counterpart to this skill's Phase 1. copywriting runs this skill's Phase 0 the same way (full or compressed), then mines the same archive through `hedgehog-copywriting-loop`'s own planning-intake section into a what/audience/register brief — no module axis, so its own new-scope path runs through that loop's Correction Protocol rather than the Re-entry pass below. An authored core runs this skill's Phase 0, then `hedgehog-core-design`, then this skill's Phase 1 mining against the designed layer sequence. A brownfield adoption (`hedgehog-adopt`) never runs this skill's shelf at all — the drivers BMAD elicits are already settled facts of a repo that already exists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses going-concern viability with 13-week cash flow models, liquidity runway, and critical vendor analysis. Use when evaluating liquidity crises, building 13-week models, or assessing near-term solvency.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
EZMM writer-stage adapter for the vendored PaperOrchestra skill pack. Use by default during pipeline/04-paper-writing for outline-first paper drafting, literature-review planning, section writing, and refinement discipline. The adapter maps EZMM runtime artifacts to PaperOrchestra-style inputs, runs PaperOrchestra-first writing automatically, and returns EZMM-compatible paper.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decommission a validated computerized system at end-of-life. Covers data retention assessment by regulation, data migration validation (mapping, transformation, reconciliation), archival strategy, access revocation, documentation archival, and stakeholder notification. Use when a validated system is being replaced, reaching end-of-life without replacement, vendor support is discontinued, multiple systems are consolidating, or regulatory changes render a system obsolete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Upgrade gstack to the latest version. Detects global vs vendored install, runs the upgrade, and shows what's new. Use when asked to "upgrade gstack", "update gstack", or "get latest version".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and verify a vendor-neutral PCB/PCBA manufacturing release from one frozen design revision. Use when generating or auditing Gerber, drill, IPC-2581/ODB++, BOM, CPL/pick-and-place, assembly drawings, constraints, renders, DFM evidence, hashes, or release manifests, and when preventing mixed-revision fabrication or assembly uploads.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gathers information from multiple sources in parallel, compares what they say, flags where they agree or conflict, and delivers a clean synthesis with a confidence rating for each finding. Useful for making evidence-backed decisions, when evaluating competing claims, during due diligence on a vendor or market, and for building research briefs before strategy sessions. Use when the user says "research this", "synthesize multiple sources", "compare sources", "research report", "what does the evidence say", "gather information on", or "deep dive into".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for a SIGMA detection rule, "write a SIGMA rule for X", or `/hash-investigation` / `/malware-analysis` surfaces behaviour worth a vendor-agnostic detection. Format spec + writing guide.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to know where a piece of reporting actually came from — the user gives an article URL and asks "where does this come from?", "who is the original source?", "is this just a rewrite?", or another skill needs the provenance chain before grading or citing a report. Follows an article's links and named attributions back to the originating vendor, government, victim or actor document and returns the chain, the primary's stated access and confidence language, publication dates, and every hop it could not resolve. Deterministic — a script or the Liberty91 platform resolves the chain; the model does not reconstruct it from memory. Invoked by /quality-of-information-check, /threat-actor-profiling, /campaign-tracking and /intelligence-writing. Works on any URL with no API key.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks about supply-chain attacks, third-party / vendor compromise (SolarWinds, Kaseya, 3CX, MOVEit, XZ-utils-style), software-bill-of-materials risks, or library / dependency-injection attacks. Self-updating knowledge cell.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need CrowdStrike Falcon Intelligence on an indicator (IOC reputation for an IP, domain, hash, or URL — malicious confidence, linked actors, malware families, reports) OR on an adversary (threat-actor profile, origin/target search, MITRE ATT&CK TTPs, finished intel reports). Answers questions like "look up 1.1.1.1", "what TTPs does Charming Kitten use?", "which threat actors operate from Russia?", and "latest report on Mustang Panda". Commonly invoked by the four /*-investigation skills, /ioc-enrichment-workflow, /threat-actor-profiling, and the regional espionage cells. Other agents/skills can chain this for vendor-authoritative actor and finished-intel context. Requires a Falcon Intelligence subscription.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。