「ker」の検索結果

Verify cross-component wiring and data flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect documentation drift against filesystem state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes your recent Claude Code chat history to identify coding patterns, development gaps, and areas for improvement, curates relevant learning resources from HackerNews, and automatically sends a personalized growth report to your Slack DMs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative worker-reviewer cycle that spawns a critic subagent to score work 1-10 and provide actionable feedback, then revises until a quality gate is met. Use when implementing features, writing specs, reviewing existing code, or completing any task where quality matters more than speed. Trigger phrases: "use review-loop", "polish this", "iterate on this", "/review-loop", "review with feedback loop".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Context for ongoing migration from old Portfolio Buddy app. Use when: fixing bugs, adding migrated features, checking feature parity, or understanding why certain code exists. Contains list of 40 features being migrated and known issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CoinGecko API documentation - cryptocurrency market data API, price feeds, market cap, volume, historical data. Use when integrating CoinGecko API, building crypto price trackers, or accessing cryptocurrency market data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cryptofeed - Real-time cryptocurrency market data feeds from 40+ exchanges. WebSocket streaming, normalized data, order books, trades, tickers. Python library for algorithmic trading and market data analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate AI videos with Google Veo, Seedance 2.0, HappyHorse, Wan, Grok and 40+ models via inference.sh CLI. Models: Veo 3.1, Veo 3, Seedance 2.0, HappyHorse 1.0, Wan 2.5, Grok Imagine Video, OmniHuman, Fabric, HunyuanVideo. Capabilities: text-to-video, image-to-video, reference-to-video, video editing, lipsync, avatar animation, video upscaling, foley sound. Use for: social media videos, marketing content, explainer videos, product demos, AI avatars. Triggers: video generation, ai video, text to video, image to video, veo, animate image, video from image, ai animation, video generator, generate video, t2v, i2v, ai video maker, create video with ai, runway alternative, pika alternative, sora alternative, kling alternative, seedance, happyhorse

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

YouTube thumbnail design with specific dimensions, contrast rules, and mobile preview optimization. Covers safe zones, text placement, face expression psychology, and A/B testing. Use for: YouTube thumbnails, video cover images, click-through optimization. Triggers: youtube thumbnail, thumbnail design, video thumbnail, click through rate, ctr optimization, youtube cover, video cover image, thumbnail maker, thumbnail tips, youtube design, video preview image

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Process JSON with jq and YAML/TOML with yq. Filter, transform, query structured data efficiently. Triggers on: parse JSON, extract from YAML, query config, Docker Compose, K8s manifests, GitHub Actions workflows, package.json, filter data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Presentation creation, editing, and analysis. When Claude needs to work with presentations (.pptx files) for: (1) Creating new presentations, (2) Modifying or editing content, (3) Working with layouts, (4) Adding comments or speaker notes, or any other presentation tasks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure process costs and fork budgets when changing startup, per-file, per-test, parallel workers, reporting, or coverage paths; use for fork census and performance comparisons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, manage, or connect to a headless Windows 11 VM running in Docker with SSH access. Use when the user wants to spin up, stop, restart, or SSH into a Windows VM.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Split a multi-call LM workflow by cognitive load, not by accuracy: let one strong model make the few reasoning decisions and a cheap model do the many mechanical executions (Aider architect+editor, DSPy optimizer-LM vs task-LM, vLLM speculative draft+target, LangGraph supervisor+worker are the same shape). Use when designing or cost-optimizing a pipeline that calls an LM many times, when deciding which steps need a strong reasoner vs a cheap executor, or when adding an escalation valve for when the cheap tier degrades. Search keywords: reduce LLM cost, cheaper model, lower token cost, model cascade, route to cheap model, strong model plus cheap model, LLM cost optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision protocol for wiring a verify-then-fix loop around a code-editing LLM agent. The agent edits → runs lint/test → reads the output → fixes → re-runs, bounded by an iteration cap and an escalation rule. Activates whenever a coder agent has a verifiable success criterion (exit code, type-checker output, failing assertion) and the user wants the agent to converge to "green" on its own. Framework-agnostic — wraps Aider's `--auto-lint`/`--auto-test`, an OpenHands SWE-Bench loop, a manual LangGraph cycle, or Claude Code's bash tool just the same.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide where to enforce structured LM output (constrain at decode time with Outlines vs validate-and-retry with Instructor vs grammar with Guidance) and which failure stance to take (Assert/hard-fail vs Suggest/soft-retry). Use when an LM's output is parsed or typed by downstream code and you must pick one enforcement library plus its failure handling, when malformed output is burning tokens on retries, or when choosing between decode-time vs validation-time constraints for local vs API models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operating-system distillation of LlamaIndex — the leading RAG / document-agent framework. Activate when the calling agent must build, debug, harden, or evaluate a Retrieval-Augmented Generation pipeline over unstructured/private data, decide between RAG primitives (Index types, retrievers, query engines, routers, agents), or pick LlamaIndex vs LangChain / Haystack / raw vector store for a coding task. Encodes the 5-layer mental model (Documents → Nodes → Indices → Retrievers → Query Engines / Response Synthesizers), the canonical RAG bootstrap SOP from baseline `VectorStoreIndex` through hybrid + reranker + eval-loop hardening, the official 13-failure-mode checklist, and 5 dilemma cases distilled from docs, GitHub issues, and 2025 production post-mortems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the symbol-notation section of a mathematical-modeling paper against the full paper. Check table coverage, symbol meanings, units, overloading, case and subscript consistency, first-use definitions, formula usage, and visible table formatting. Use for symbol-table diagnosis, not general paper review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a Chinese mathematical-modeling problem-analysis section against the original problem, checking task classification, data reasoning, cross-problem linkage, model-choice rationale, validation planning, chapter boundaries, and the overall solution framework. Use for diagnosis, not automatic full rewriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the model establishment, numerical solution, result analysis, model validation, and sensitivity or robustness sections of a mathematical-modeling paper against the complete problem. Use for core-model-section diagnosis, not automatic full-paper scoring or unsupported recomputation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a user-provided Chinese mathematical-modeling abstract without requiring the problem statement or full paper, identify concrete writing defects, and prioritize revisions. Use when the user asks to check, diagnose, or improve a modeling-paper abstract; do not claim coverage or factual consistency that cannot be verified without the problem or paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check a mathematical-modeling paper's in-text citations, bibliography, appendix length and content, code, supporting files, reproducibility, consistency, and anonymity. Use when the user provides a paper or related materials and wants one consolidated P0-P3 audit; do not generate or invent missing sources or programs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a complete mathematical-modeling competition paper with an atomic checklist covering abstract readability, page structure, typography, headings, pagination, figures, tables, equations, anonymity, metadata, visual balance, and page allocation. Return the review in chat or Markdown by default, and provide the bundled single-sheet checklist when the user requests a reusable form. Use when the user provides a PDF or Word paper and asks for a full-paper format and writing-compliance audit; do not replace technical model correctness review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a mathematical-modeling paper's model-assumption section against the complete problem statement. Diagnose whether each assumption is necessary, evidence-based, compatible with the task, appropriately simplified, and usable by the later model. Use for assumption review, not automatic full-paper review or unsupported assumption generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。