「drive」の検索結果

Knowledge base from NASA-STD-8729.1A — NASA's R&M (Reliability and Maintainability) standard covering spaceflight and support systems (Revision A, 2017-06-13). Use for NASA's objectives-driven R&M framework — the R&M objectives hierarchy (one Top Objective decomposed into four sub-objectives, paired with tailorable strategies), how R&M requirements are established inside the SMA Plan required by NPR 7120.5, the SMA Technical Authority concurrence/independent-evaluation governance, milestone vs. readiness review gates, the reliability/maintainability/availability vocabulary (Ai vs. Ao, the failure causal chain, risk as a triplet), and the R&M Evidentiary Methods catalogue (FMEA/FMECA, FTA, RBDA, RCM, LORA, plus the space-environment and parts-pedigree analyses). Scoped to NASA spaceflight and support systems and to assurance planning: it is an objectives-and-strategies standard, so it deliberately does NOT prescribe step-by-step analysis procedures (those live in the referenced NASA Preferred Reliability Practices) and is thin on facility R&M, detailed math/derivations, and non-NASA or commercial life cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA Requirements Engineering Management Handbook (DOT/FAA/AR-08/32). Use for writing requirements for real-time, embedded control systems — the avionics/medical slant — via the Handbook's eleven recommended practices: system overview and boundary (monitored/controlled variables), operational concepts (use cases), environmental assumptions, change-tolerant functional architecture (dependency diagrams), safety-driven architecture revision (FHA/PSSA/fault tree), system modes, detailed behavior and performance requirements (ideal value + tolerance + latency), the four-variable model bridge to software requirements (MON/CON/NAT/REQ, IN'/REQ'/OUT', DO-178B mapping), subsystem allocation, and rationale. Carries the Isolette Thermostat and Flight Control System worked examples. Slanted toward control systems with sensors and actuators; thin on information-system / enterprise / agile requirements, on requirements-management tooling, and on the formal-methods internals of SCR/RSML/SpecTRM (it names them, does not re-teach them). Does not reproduce the IEEE/DO-178B/ARP standards it cites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA Human Factors Design Standard (HF-STD-001B, 2016) — the FAA's consolidated human-factors / human-systems-integration design criteria for systems it manages, operates, or maintains. Use for requirement-level design rules on: general human-factors design principles; automation and function allocation; designing equipment for maintenance; displays, controls, and visual indicators; alarms, audio, and voice communications; the computer-human interface (information presentation, coding, interaction styles, windows, dialogue); keyboards, input devices, and workstation/workplace ergonomics; system security, personnel safety, environment, anthropometry, and user documentation; plus intended-use and tailoring guidance. It is a quantified, source-attributed synthesis (heavily citing MIL-STD-1472G, MIL-HDBK-759C, DOD-HFDG-ATCCS, NUREG-0700, NASA-STD-3000, ANSI, OSHA, ISO 9241). Complements nasa-hsi as a parallel HSI tradition from the civil-aviation domain. Scope limits: it is design criteria, NOT an HSI lifecycle/process model (use nasa-hsi, nasa-npr-7123, or dau-se-guidebook for process); it does NOT reproduce the third-party standards it cites; it is FAA-acquisition-oriented (ATC, towers, TRACONs, airway facilities), not a general consumer-UX guide; and it is thin on modern touchscreen/mobile, web, and AI-driven interface patterns and on quantitative human-reliability analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA NPR 7150.2D — NASA Software Engineering Requirements. Use for NASA's Agency-wide software-engineering requirements: the software classification scheme (Classes A–F), the Requirements Mapping Matrix and class-driven applicability, tailoring and Technical Authority governance, the SWE-### 'shall' requirements across software management (Ch 3) and the engineering life cycle (Ch 4), the supporting disciplines (configuration management, risk, peer reviews/inspections, measurement, non-conformance — Ch 5), safety-critical and cybersecurity requirements, IV&V applicability, traceability, and the Appendix A definitions. Does not cover detailed software-assurance/safety procedures (see NASA-STD-8739.8), implementation how-to and document content (see NASA-HDBK-2203), the systems-engineering process framework (see NPR 7123.1), or program/project management (see NPR 7120.5).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD Systems Engineering Guidebook (OUSD R&E, February 2022). Use for the DoD SE process model — the 16 SE processes (8 technical management + 8 technical) mapped to ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, the event-driven technical reviews and audits across the Major Capability Acquisition life cycle (ASR, SRR, SFR, PDR, CDR, SVR/FCA, PRR, PCA), the Systems Engineering Plan (SEP), risk/issue/opportunity management, TPMs and leading indicators, system-of-systems and digital engineering, and the 24 design considerations (RAM, system safety, HSI, system security engineering, MOSA, supportability, etc.). Acquisition-program oriented: thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting law, and non-DoD or commercial life cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA Risk Management Handbook (NASA/SP-2011-3422). Use for risk-informed decision making, continuous risk management, performance commitments, risk scenario diagrams, risk disposition types, risk burn-down schedules, objectives hierarchies, deliberation and alternative selection, risk driver identification, and RM planning for space and safety-critical programmes. Does not cover domain-specific PRA methods (fault trees, event trees) in procedural depth — see NASA PRA Procedures Guide for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Erkennt Nutzeraufträge der Form "hole aus einem Ordner immer bestimmte Dateien und sammle sie an einem Ziel" und richtet dafür das Modul file-collect-sort-action (CLI fcsa) ein — ein konfigurationsgetriebener Agent, der Ordner scannt, Dateien per Schablone kategorisiert und gestufte Aktionen anwendet (move/copy/duplicate-check/delete/OCR/place-information). Nutze diesen Skill bei Sätzen wie "hole aus <Ordner> immer <Dateiart> und sammle sie in <Ziel>", "sortiere den Ordner X automatisch nach ...", "sammle eingehende Dateien aus ... in ...", "räume diesen Ordner regelbasiert auf" oder "verschiebe alle <Dateiart> aus <Ordner> automatisch". Richtet IMMER zuerst einen Dry-Run ein und schaltet erst nach ausdrücklichem Nutzer-Go scharf; Löschen bleibt grundsätzlich im _trash-Modus.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidenzbasierte Windows-Speicherbereinigung mit kontrolliertem Notfallmodus, physischer Belegungsmessung, Prozess- und Entstehungsforensik sowie reversiblen Maßnahmen gegen wiederkehrende Speicherfüller.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Baut und betreibt ein anbieterneutrales Self-Care-Kernset für geplante LLM-Aufgaben und Desktop-App-Automationen. Ergänzt deterministisches Policy-Linting, Lock- und Modell-Governance, semantische Prompt-Prüfung, konsistente Mehrflächen-Updates, Mini-Checks und Regeldatei-Hygiene. Nutzen, wenn ein Agent seinen nativen Scheduler entdecken oder eine bestehende Automations-Flotte mit Rollback, Readback und Löschschutz kontinuierlich verbessern soll. Löst aus bei automation self-care, Scheduler-Task-Pflege, Desktop-App-Automations-Wartung, Automations-Flotten-Audit, selbstheilende Zeitpläne, core-set-textautomations, basic-text-automations, textbased-automation-core, textbased-automation-drivers, textbased-governance-automations oder textbased-desktopapp-automations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teststrategie-Berater für Softwareprojekte — wählt die richtigen Teststufen (Unit/Integration/System/Abnahme), Testarten (funktional, nicht-funktional, änderungsbezogen) und Testentwurfsverfahren (Äquivalenzklassen, Grenzwerte, Entscheidungstabellen, explorativ) für die jeweilige Situation und SDLC-/CI-Phase, inkl. Testpyramide, CI/CD-Gates, Shift-Left und Best Practices. Nutze diesen Skill IMMER, wenn Tests geschrieben, geplant, priorisiert oder bewertet werden sollen — bei "schreibe Tests", "Teststrategie", "Testplan", "Testkonzept", "was/wie soll ich testen", "welche Tests fehlen", "Testabdeckung verbessern", "QA aufsetzen", Fragen zu Regression/Smoke/Sanity/Last/Stress/Security-Tests oder beim Einrichten einer Test-Pipeline — auch wenn "Test" nur beiläufig fällt. Abgrenzung — für die TDD-Schleife selbst superpowers:test-driven-development, für Bug-Diagnose bugfix-protocol, für systematische Bug-Suche bugsweep nutzen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts an architecture or design decision record (ADR) from the discussion notes, design review minutes, chat threads and diagram descriptions the user provides: context, decision drivers, options considered with arguments as stated, the decision as the group worded it, consequences and a review date, with every factual claim tagged evidenced, asserted or UNKNOWN so unsupported claims are marked for the author to substantiate. Use when the user asks to "write an ADR", "document the architecture decision", "record why we chose this design", "turn these design review notes into a decision record" or "draft the design decision log entry". Do not use for a business or governance decision with no technical design, use decision-memo-builder instead; for the change ticket that implements the decision, use change-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive ffmpeg through the media_run tool as an argv array - remux instead of re-encode, map streams explicitly, trim at keyframes, scale and crop, extract audio and frames, and build GIFs, contact sheets and concatenations. Covers the flags this pack injects, reading a failure from its exit code and last log lines, and the version-dependent spellings to hedge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organize user-scoped CLEC episodes into traceable Traditional Chinese Obsidian pages. Use when Codex must group X, pCloud, Google Drive, Bilibili, Odysee, and RSS or Podcast sources by five-digit episode number; obtain and review transcripts through media-transcript; clean readable transcripts with the confirmed CLEC lexicon; anonymize students; or build the standard three-layer episode page.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pi-cua-integration is a Pi/Senpi extension that bridges Cua (trycua/cua) for computer-use sandboxes and host control. MUST USE when the user asks to drive a desktop UI, take screenshots, run a "computer use" task, control a sandbox, or invoke any cua_* tool. Triggers - "cua", "computer use", "sandbox", "screenshot the desktop", "click the screen", "take over the browser", "샌드박스 켜줘", "스크린샷 찍어", "내 컴퓨터에서 자동화".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mouse, keyboard, and scroll primitives for cua_click / cua_type / cua_key / cua_scroll. Reference for action shapes, modifier keys, key chord syntax, and screenshot-driven targeting workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive the user's host machine directly through Cua, with no sandbox. Maps to Cua's Localhost API. Higher risk - the agent can click, type, and run shell commands on the real desktop. Use only when the user explicitly opts in and read the safety section first. Triggers - "control my computer", "click here", "use my real Chrome", "no sandbox", "내 컴퓨터 자동화".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

永続化ドキュメント（Steering Documents）を初期生成します。プロダクトのコードを自動解析し、ユーザーへのヒアリングを組み合わせて6種のドキュメントを生成します。併せて generate-working-docs のテンプレートをプロダクト用にカスタマイズします。「永続化ドキュメントを作成して」「steering docs を作って」などで呼び出されます。

開発作業ドキュメントを自動生成します。YYYYMMDD_要件名の形式でディレクトリを作成し、requirements.md、design.md、tasklist.md、testing.mdを生成します。「開発作業ドキュメント作成」「開発ドキュメント作って」「ドキュメント生成」などで呼び出されます。

Use when working with TBQ3 or TB language code, including strategy generation, syntax questions, trading functions, Bar strategies, event-driven trading, Plot drawing, examples, or TB-specific code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refresh WhatsApp text into an Obsidian vault (data layer, dashboard, group labels, contact notes). Text only, never downloads media, and pulls the recent window the live companion bridge exposes rather than a full multi-year archive. Semi-automatic by design: it drives the live bridge and needs the phone nearby. Triggers: "/whatsapp-sync", "pull whatsapp".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stop a Google Takeout export from expiring undownloaded: detect the ready-to-download mails with a deterministic zero-token scan, report the live links with days remaining, then drive the download and vault import. Triggers: "/takeout-pull", "is my takeout ready", "pull my takeout".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive NotebookLM over a programmatic CLI with no browser: turn a vault slice into an audio overview, study guide or mind map, and fold the artifacts back into the vault. Browser automation is the fallback if CLI auth breaks. Triggers: "/notebooklm", "make an audio digest of <topic>", "podcast from the vault".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Onboard a new machine as a receive-only follower on a multi-machine agent network: it reads the shared vault, canon, skills and memory, runs nothing heavy locally (no RAG, reindex or GPU), and never receives executable hooks from the hub. Checklist-driven, with a verify step at each stage. Triggers: "/follower-onboard <machine>".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive the current task to a verified result instead of stopping at a plausible report. Use when the user says /continue, keep going, not done yet, push further, or is unhappy with the result. Rebuilds requirements from the conversation, re-checks real state, fixes root causes, verifies from the consumer side, offloads side quests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。