「eval」の検索結果

A C-level strategy advisory board, run as a team of named specialist agents, that takes an executive from a raw strategic question to a defended, board-ready recommendation. Use this skill whenever the user faces a significant business decision or wants strategic analysis — market entry, build-vs-buy, M&A, digital transformation, annual planning, portfolio prioritization, pricing, a big investment, a competitive threat, a turnaround. Trigger on requests like "should we invest in / build / buy / enter…", "develop a strategy for…", "evaluate this opportunity", "make the business case", "stress-test this plan", "run a pre-mortem", or "prepare a board presentation" — in any language, even when the user doesn't say the word "strategy". Also trigger when the user names a board member (Drucker, Porter, Christensen, Graham, Grove, Wack, Taleb, Minto) or asks to convene the board / open a boardroom session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score candidate CVs on a 100-point scale against a Job Description. Use this skill when the user wants to evaluate, score, rank, or screen candidate CVs/resumes against a JD. Also trigger when the user mentions 'review CV', 'screen resume', 'rate candidates', 'shortlist', or any context involving matching resumes to job requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate the Ryuumonbuchi MCP server for headless Ghidra reverse engineering. Use when driving decompilation, disassembly, patching, type and symbol recovery, memory edits, transactions, and Ghidra project analysis through a Ryuumonbuchi server (stdio or streamable HTTP). Covers the safe read-only-first workflow, session and address discipline, mutation and transaction rules, headless.run, task and error recovery, raw ghidra.call/ghidra.eval/ghidra.script escape hatches, and a sleep/timing-gate bypass recipe.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

US Insurance Specialist for life, disability, long-term care, and annuity planning. Conducts needs analysis, compares policy types (term, whole life, universal, variable), explains underwriting classes, recommends benefit amounts and riders, analyzes disability income protection (own occupation vs any occupation), evaluates long-term care costs and hybrid policies, and structures annuities (immediate, deferred, fixed, variable) for retirement income. Use for insurance needs calculations, policy comparisons, or state insurance regulation compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Insurance program review, coverage adequacy testing, contractor insurance verification, builder's risk/OCIP/CCIP evaluation, and property tax escrow management for AM, PM, and Development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Insurance policy analysis, claims evaluation, coverage assessment, and risk management for individuals and businesses

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive demo: Generate pseudo-labels from a strong teacher model, build a cheap student function, and evaluate accuracy. Showcases pseudo-labeling and teacher-student distillation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a structured initial contact summary memorandum from a potential client's first interaction with the firm. Captures case facts, liability indicators, damages, insurance details, and screening criteria. Use during client intake to support conflict checks, case evaluation, and engagement decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments (FRIA) for high-risk AI systems as required by EU AI Act Article 27. Use when (1) deployers of high-risk AI systems (Annex III) need to assess fundamental rights impacts before first use, (2) public bodies or private entities providing public services are deploying AI systems, (3) credit scoring or insurance risk assessment AI systems are being deployed (Annex III 5b, 5c), (4) evaluating impact on natural persons' fundamental rights (dignity, liberty, privacy, data protection, non-discrimination, children's rights, etc.), or (5) creating EU AI Act Article 27 compliance documentation with market surveillance notification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates environmental liability exposure with remediation cost estimation, regulatory compliance requirements, and insurance coverage assessment. Use when analyzing environmental liabilities, estimating cleanup costs, or assessing environmental risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Genera carta de rechazo de cobertura fundada en Ley 17.418 y póliza, con control de plazo art. 56 y evaluación de riesgo de daño punitivo

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Database of insurance claim precedents and comparable settlements for evaluating claim values

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze insurance claims workflow systems for intake optimization, adjudication rules, subrogation, litigation management, and settlement analytics. Use when: 'audit claims process', 'review FNOL workflow', 'evaluate claims automation', 'check subrogation recovery', 'assess claims fraud detection', 'optimize claims cycle time', 'review Guidewire ClaimCenter setup'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates health insurance plan structures with actuarial value, network analysis, and cost projection. Use when analyzing health plans, comparing coverage, or projecting healthcare costs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to review or audit actuarial models (reserving, pricing, capital) - Someone asks about loss triangle analysis or reserve adequacy - You are evaluating IBNR calculations, chain ladder methods, or Bornhuetter-Ferguson - A project involves insurance pricing, GLM rating models, or ratemaking - You need to assess Solvency II SCR calculations or RBC compliance - Someone mentions actuarial opinions, ASOP compliance, or SOA standards - You are reviewing stochastic models, ESG configurations, or DFA frameworks - A codebase uses actuarial libraries (chainladder, lifetables, ChainLadder R package) TRIGGER PHRASES: "actuarial", "loss reserving", "IBNR", "chain ladder", "premium pricing", "mortality table", "Solvency II", "capital adequacy", "ratemaking", "GLM pricing", "risk-based capital", "reserve analysis", "actuarial opinion"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert knowledge of Behandlingsresultat (treatment result) domain in melosys-api. Use when: (1) Understanding result types and their meaning (FASTSATT_LOVVALGSLAND, MEDLEM_I_FOLKETRYGDEN, etc.), (2) Working with periods - Lovvalgsperiode, Medlemskapsperiode, Anmodningsperiode, Utpekingsperiode, (3) Debugging vedtak/decision metadata, criteria evaluation, or social insurance charges, (4) Understanding EU/EEA coordination logic and Article 16 exception handling, (5) Working with trygdeavgift (social insurance charge) calculations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates life insurance product structures with cash value analysis, cost comparisons, and suitability assessment. Use when analyzing life products, comparing insurance costs, or assessing product suitability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates loss reserve adequacy with development triangle analysis and actuarial methods. Use when analyzing reserves, interpreting loss triangles, or assessing reserve adequacy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures insurance company financial analysis with combined ratio, reserve adequacy, and capital metrics. Use when analyzing insurance financials, evaluating combined ratios, or assessing reserve strength.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guide for Knowledge Graphs, GraphRAG, Microsoft GraphRAG, Neo4j Text2Cypher, multi-hop relational retrieval, and hybrid vector-graph search / Panduan ahli Knowledge Graph, GraphRAG, dan pencarian relasional multi-hop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage vendor relationships — vendor selection scorecard, contract review checklist, renewal tracking, and vendor consolidation audit. Use when asked to "evaluate this vendor", "review this contract", "track vendor renewals", or "reduce our SaaS spend".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Theory-backed design audit — names the principle violated, cites the source, shows the fix. Use when asked to "evaluate design quality", "check if this follows design principles", "theory check", "design exam", "audit against best practices", or "what's wrong with this design".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to audit UI for visual quality, check design consistency, review brand alignment, evaluate design system compliance, or find visual issues before a launch. Examples: "audit our UI", "check visual consistency", "review the design for issues", "is our UI on-brand", "find visual bugs", "design QA before launch".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert 5-dimension design critique — philosophical, scored, actionable. Use when asked to "critique this design", "expert review", "score my design", "how does this look", "is this good design", "design feedback", or "review this UI". Different from /form-audit (which is technical QA for consistency/compliance) — form-critique evaluates design as a craft object: philosophy, hierarchy, execution, function, and innovation each scored 0–10 with a punch list. Add "as a report" or "give me a visual report" to produce an HTML file with SVG radar chart, evidence cards, and Keep/Fix/Quick-wins action lists — useful for design reviews and stakeholder presentations instead of CLI output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。