「quality」の検索結果

Use when running the autonomous multi-agent build pipeline after /bdbrainstorm or /grill-me, when the user types /startcycle-graph or "run a startcycle", or when a task needs durable state, a review repair loop and an automated quality gate. Routes to the startcycle-dispatch Dynamic Workflow, which reads production_artifacts/state.json and invokes Architect, TechLead, UI/UX, Engineering, Media/EventTech, Reviewer, and Shipping in turn per .agents/graph.md's edge table — the agents never invoke each other.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

コード品質の最終確認。Skill: code-review (built-in) で correctness bug を検出 → main agent が findings を修正 → lint/ty 静的解析 → 条件付きで security-reviewer / critic を spawn (security 関連変更 or plan/requirements.md がある時のみ)。「品質チェックして」「品質ゲート通して」「レビューして」「コードを確認して」「PR 出す前にチェック」「セキュリティ大丈夫？」「コード見て」で発動。

Expert guide for crafting high-quality video prompts for Ozor.ai, the AI video generation platform. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Ozor, wants to create a launch video, product demo, feature announcement, explainer video, social ad, release notes video, investor update, tutorial, or any marketing video. Also trigger when the user asks for help writing video prompts, improving video output, structuring video scenes, choosing video formats, or wants best practices for AI video creation. Trigger on phrases like 'make a video', 'create a launch video', 'video for my product', 'Ozor prompt', 'video best practices', 'explainer video', 'product demo video', 'social clip', 'announcement video', or any request involving short-form video content for products and marketing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and improve existing Ozor.ai video prompts for better output quality. Use this skill whenever the user has an Ozor prompt that produced mediocre results, wants to improve a video prompt, needs help debugging why a video didn't turn out well, or wants expert feedback on their prompt before running it. Trigger on phrases like 'improve this prompt', 'optimize my Ozor prompt', 'why did my video look bad', 'fix this prompt', 'make this prompt better', 'review my Ozor prompt', 'the video didn't turn out right', 'prompt feedback', 'better results from Ozor', or any request to refine, debug, or enhance an existing Ozor video prompt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When asynchronously reviewing peer code before merging into the main branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design thinking and taste-building principles based on Dieter Rams. Use when making design decisions, reviewing UI quality, or building taste for any visual interface — web or native.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants a full ASO health audit, review their App Store listing quality, or diagnose why their app isn't ranking. Also use when the user mentions "ASO audit", "ASO score", "why am I not ranking", "listing review", or "optimize my app store page". For keyword-specific research, see keyword-research. For metadata writing, see metadata-optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design principles for building polished, native-feeling SwiftUI apps and widgets. Use this skill when creating or modifying SwiftUI views, iOS widgets (WidgetKit), or any native Apple UI. Ensures proper spacing, typography, colors, and widget implementations that look and feel like quality apps rather than AI-generated slop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for Swift Testing: test structure, #expect/#require macros, traits and tags, parameterized tests, test plans, parallel execution, async waiting patterns, and XCTest migration. Use when writing new Swift tests, modernizing XCTest suites, debugging flaky tests, or improving test quality and maintainability in Apple-platform or Swift server projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, review, or improve SwiftUI code following best practices for state management, view composition, performance, macOS-specific APIs, and iOS 26+ Liquid Glass adoption. Use when building new SwiftUI features, refactoring existing views, reviewing code quality, or adopting modern SwiftUI patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Craft a single, high-quality GitHub issue from a developer's description of a bug, unexpected behavior, or desired enhancement. Walks through reproduction, codebase exploration, and structured drafting so the issue is actionable on arrival. Use when user wants to file an issue, report a bug, request a feature, or document a problem they've encountered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tones down visually aggressive or overstimulating designs, reducing intensity while preserving quality. Use when the user mentions too bold, too loud, overwhelming, aggressive, garish, or wants a calmer, more refined aesthetic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, and micro-detail issues before shipping. Use when the user mentions polish, finishing touches, pre-launch review, something looks off, or wants to go from good to great.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics. Use when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications, or when any design skill requires project context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run convex-doctor static analysis, interpret findings, and fix issues across security, performance, correctness, schema, and architecture categories. Use when running convex-doctor, fixing convex-doctor warnings or errors, improving the convex-doctor score, or when asked about Convex code quality, static analysis, or linting Convex functions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, running, or judging an experiment on a Syntropic137 workflow - comparing prompt variants, fan-out vs single agent, adversarial cross-model review, model selection (can Haiku do this job), phase splits, or tool grants. Trigger phrases include "run a workflow experiment", "A/B the workflow", "does fan-out help", "which model for this phase", "is this prompt better", "measure review quality", "why did the workflow do that". Do NOT use for a one-off workflow run that is just doing work, for authoring a workflow that is not being compared against anything, or for debugging a single failed execution (that is ordinary debugging).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when acting as the orchestrator agent that drives Syntropic137 - running the dogfood loop, deciding what to dispatch next, landing agent PRs, deploying a beta, triaging failed executions, or keeping the scratchpad, paper cuts and retrospectives current. Trigger phrases include "orchestrator tick", "keep the loop running", "what should we dispatch next", "land these PRs", "why are PRs stacking up", "deploy the next beta", "pit stop", "the run failed, what now", "write the retro", "is the system helping", "scale quality", "learning loop for the orchestrator". Do NOT use for deciding whether one task belongs in a workspace or locally (see `dogfooding`), for turning one incident into an eval case (see `learning-loop`), for designing a workflow A/B experiment (see `workflow-experimentation`), or for release-branch and version-bump mechanics (see `devops`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for evaluation — inline evaluators, Inspect AI integration, and custom evaluators for measuring training progress. Use when the user asks about evaluation, metrics, benchmarks, or how to measure model quality during training.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when: reviewing or producing any external-facing prose — ADRs, proposals, GitHub comments, Telegram messages, cover letters, client drafts, or planner-mode wording. Removes AI-tell patterns and raises writing quality before output leaves the team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, review, or improve SwiftUI code following best practices for state management, view composition, performance, macOS-specific APIs, and iOS 26+ Liquid Glass adoption. Use when building new SwiftUI features, refactoring existing views, reviewing code quality, or adopting modern SwiftUI patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for quality focused software architecture. This skill should be used when users want to write code, design architecture, analyze code, in any case that relates to software development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomously deep-scan entire codebase line-by-line, understand architecture and patterns, then systematically transform it to production-grade, corporate-level professional quality with optimizations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Curated collection of high-quality prompts for various use cases. Includes role-based prompts, task-specific templates, and prompt refinement techniques. Use when user needs prompt templates, role-play prompts, or ready-to-use prompt examples for coding, writing, analysis, or creative tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。