「claude-skills」の検索結果

Write a Product Requirements Document (PRD). Use when the user says "write a PRD", "document this feature", "product requirements for X", "write requirements", "I need a PRD", "pitch this feature", or wants to formalize a feature or product idea into a structured doc - even if they don't explicitly say "PRD".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract UX tasks from a product spec and save as ux-tasks.md in the same spec folder. Use this skill when: - The user wants to generate UX work items from a spec - The user says "UX tasks", "what does UX need to do", "extract UX work", "UX deliverables" - The user wants to hand off a spec to the UX/design team - The user asks "what screens need designing" or "what UX decisions are open"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Surface and visualize hidden dependencies blocking delivery. Use when the user says "map our dependencies", "what's blocking what", "dependency audit", "why are teams blocked", "we have a bottleneck", "draw out the dependencies", or asks to identify cross-team blockers - even if they don't explicitly say "dependency mapping". Based on "Making Work Visible" by Dominica DeGrandis (time theft, invisible work, flow blockers).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality gate for product specifications before stakeholder review. Use this skill when: - A spec draft is ready and you want to validate it before sending to Engineering, Design, and QA - You want to check a spec against your template's completeness rules - You need to catch vague language, missing sections, or gaps before review - You want a pass/fail scorecard with specific fix suggestions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run product discovery to identify what to build. Use when the user says "product discovery", "how do I know what to build", "validate this idea", "talk to customers", "are we building the right thing", "discovery process", or wants to reduce the risk of building something users don't want - even if they don't say "discovery".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze flow metrics to identify delivery bottlenecks and improve throughput. Use when the user says "flow metrics", "why is delivery slow", "cycle time analysis", "WIP analysis", "throughput review", "what's our lead time", "DORA metrics", "where is work getting stuck", "Kanban metrics", or wants to diagnose delivery performance using data - even if they don't explicitly say "flow metrics review". Based on "Making Work Visible" by Dominica DeGrandis (WIP limits, flow blockers, time thieves) and "Accelerate" by Forsgren, Humble & Kim (DORA metrics, delivery performance indicators).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scope a milestone to a fixed time window with variable scope. Use when the user says "scope this milestone", "what fits in the sprint", "cut scope for the release", "define the MVP for this milestone", "we need to ship by [date] what do we cut", "shape the work to fit the cycle", or needs to make hard scope decisions under a time constraint - even if they don't explicitly say "milestone scoping". Based on "Shape Up" by Ryan Singer (appetite, shaping, betting table) and "The Art of Project Management" by Scott Berkun (milestones as forcing functions, scope as a variable).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a structured weekly or bi-weekly program status report for stakeholders. Use when the user says "write a status report", "program update", "stakeholder update", "weekly status", "RAG status", "program health report", "what do I send to leadership", "write the update for [program]", or needs to communicate delivery progress - even if they don't explicitly say "status report". Produces a concise, scannable report with RAG status, blockers, and decisions needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prioritize a feature backlog or list of ideas. Use when the user says "help me prioritize", "prioritize this backlog", "RICE score these", "MoSCoW", "opportunity solution tree", "what should we build first", "rank these features", or has a list of items and needs to decide order - even if they don't explicitly say "prioritization".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain a centralized living risk register across projects. Use this skill when: - You need to create or update a risk register for a project or feature - You want to consolidate risks from individual specs into one register - You need to review and update risk status, mitigations, and owners - You want a cross-project risk view

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a velocity-based release roadmap with risk buffers. Use when the user says "release plan", "when will we ship", "plan the next release", "map sprints to milestones", "estimate our release date", "how many sprints until done", or wants to translate a backlog into a delivery timeline - even if they don't say "release planning". Based on "Agile Estimating and Planning" by Mike Cohn (velocity, story points, cone of uncertainty, risk buffers).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run structured exploratory testing sessions using test charters, timeboxing, and heuristics. Use when user says "exploratory testing", "charter-based testing", "explore the app", "unscripted testing", "session-based testing", "find unknown bugs", or needs to test an area without predefined scripts - even if they don't explicitly say "exploratory".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run and document QA test execution cycles - smoke tests, regression suites, exploratory testing sessions, and release readiness checklists. Use this skill whenever a QA engineer needs to structure or report on active testing work. Trigger on phrases like "run smoke tests", "start a regression cycle", "exploratory testing session", "test this build", "release checklist", "is this build stable", "log test results", "what passed and what failed", "document my testing", "create a test run report", or any request to execute and record test outcomes. Also trigger when someone says "we need to test before release" or "can you help me track what I've tested".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and write QA test artifacts - test cases, test plans, acceptance criteria, API test specs, and PR testability reviews. Use this skill whenever a QA engineer or SDET needs to translate requirements, user stories, or feature specs into structured test documentation. Trigger on phrases like "write test cases", "create a test plan", "define acceptance criteria", "review this PR for testability", "write API test specs", "test coverage for this feature", "what should we test", "how do we test this", or any request to structure what and how to test before execution begins. Also trigger when a developer asks "is this testable?" or a PM asks "what are the edge cases?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write unit and integration tests. Use when the user says "write tests for this", "add test coverage", "how do I test this", "TDD", "red green refactor", "unit test this function", "test this module", "I need tests for", or has code that lacks tests - even if they don't explicitly say "write tests".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Document a design system component. Use when the user says "design system docs", "document this for the design system", "add this to the design system", "design token", "component library docs", "style guide", "design system entry", or wants to formally document a pattern, component, or token for team-wide use - even if they don't explicitly say "design system".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rewrite UI copy directly on Figma files to be simpler, jargon-free, and terminologically consistent. Trigger when: user says "rewrite copy", "simplify copy", "fix the text", "copy audit", "UX copy review", "clean up the wording", shares a Figma URL and mentions copy/text/wording, or asks to make text simpler/clearer/more consistent on a Figma file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build interactive "living workflow" flowcharts in the visual style of https://statuesque-starship-49757d.netlify.app/revenue-engine - vanilla HTML/CSS/JS files with a horizontal step bar, a vertical trunk that grows per step, tool-to-tool columns with animated payload pills between brand-marked tool nodes, alternating left/right step descriptions, and per-step outputs. Use whenever the user says "build a flowchart", "interactive flowchart", "living workflow", "revenue engine flowchart", "demand gen flowchart", "GTM workflow diagram", "process diagram with animations", "Nebor-style flowchart", or asks to recreate the workflow visual from the Nebor site. Always asks which flowchart to build (Revenue Engine / Demand Gen / CRM & RevOps / Custom) and waits for explicit approval of the step + tool + edge table before generating any files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a pre and post-deployment checklist. Use when the user says "deploy to production", "deployment checklist", "release checklist", "pre-deploy checks", "is this ready to deploy", "deployment readiness", "reduce deployment risk", "change management", or is about to ship code to production and wants to reduce failure risk - even if they don't explicitly say "deployment checklist".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a structured incident response. Use when the user says "we have an incident", "production is down", "service is degraded", "on-call response", "p0 incident", "something is broken in prod", "help me manage this incident", "incident commander", or there is an active production issue requiring coordinated response - even if they don't explicitly say "incident response".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a blameless postmortem after an incident. Use when the user says "postmortem", "post-incident review", "PIR", "what happened in that incident", "incident review", "blameless postmortem", "5 whys", "how do we prevent this again", or needs to document learnings from a production incident - even if they don't explicitly say "postmortem".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write an operational runbook. Use when the user says "write a runbook", "on-call documentation", "how to operate this service", "alert runbook", "troubleshooting guide for ops", "what to do when this alert fires", "operational procedures", or needs to document how to run, troubleshoot, or respond to a service - even if they don't explicitly say "runbook".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design clean and consistent APIs. Use when the user says "design an API", "API design review", "design these endpoints", "REST API for X", "GraphQL schema", "API contract", "how should this endpoint work", "review my API design", or wants to create or improve an API interface - even if they don't explicitly say "API design".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write recurring newsletter issues with a consistent format and POV using the Curiosity Gap (George Loewenstein) and David Perell's Online Writing framework. Different from one-off emails (use /content-writer or /email-nurture). Use when the user asks for a newsletter, weekly/monthly newsletter, "write this week's issue", recurring email, Substack issue, internal newsletter, or any periodic publication with subscribers. Reads brand voice and content library from knowledge/. For a nurture or lifecycle sequence, see email-nurture. For long-form thought leadership, see thought-leadership-writer. For the monthly plan, see social-calendar.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。