3,743 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Session handoff — compress current context into a structured prompt for seamless continuation in a new session. Use when: switching sessions, running low on context, or needing to hand off work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when facing SEO algorithm questions, content strategy decisions, Threads growth planning, GEO optimization, AI tool selection for SEO, or evaluating SEO vendors. Triggers on any algorithm or content marketing decision — even without mentioning darkseoking. Every insight is backed by patent numbers or tested data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, implement, or evaluate GEODE's GEO capability with source-grounded stage diagnosis, frozen measurement contracts, and no-model preflight before live engine runs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scope, preregister, execute, audit, normalize, and publish GEODE evaluations with research-question, reproduction, attempt-lineage, trajectory, verifier-receipt, and immutable artifact contracts. Use for benchmark runs or comparisons, eval-artifact and cache-accounting audits, GPT or subscription result normalization, research question or hypothesis framing, retry diagnosis, trajectory publication, DPO or reward-data readiness reviews, and requests involving MCPMark, tau2, BFCL, Agent-World, HAL, Terminal-Bench, or Toolathlon.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ground GEODE design and evaluation work in Stanford CS329A Parts 2 and 5. Use for test-time compute, planning, multi-step reasoning, deep research, LATS, independent subplans, best-of-N, repair depth, measurement replication, verifier authority, and GEODE/Eco²/SIL/Crucible comparisons.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Researches and compares free and open source software projects in a supplied domain, using either user-named candidates or a discovered shortlist. Use when evaluating FOSS alternatives, comparing GitHub popularity, maintenance, licences, domain fit, trade-offs, or producing a linked HTML comparison report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate repeated code and consolidate duplication when a shared abstraction improves correctness or maintenance. Use after introducing similar logic or when repeated changes reveal a missing source of truth.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Used by the Reviewer agent during Phase 9 (DesignVerify) and Phase 11 (Quality) to evaluate frontend code. Assesses visual hierarchy, spacing consistency, accessibility, and detects formulaic 'AI slop' design patterns, providing actionable feedback to the Developer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate error handling, i18n, text overflow, and edge cases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audita una vista o componente frente al design system en lo que un script no puede comprobar — estados de interacción, los cuatro estados de datos, primitivas nativas frente a componentes reinventados y jerarquía visual. Úsalo cuando la persona pida revisar el cumplimiento del design system o si un componente sigue las guías (p. ej. "¿esta tarjeta sigue nuestro sistema?", "audita la vista de ajustes").
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates a structured attorney work product memorandum from an initial client consultation for commercial litigation. Extracts verifiable facts from uploaded documents, builds a chronological narrative, identifies parties and contracts, flags preliminary legal claims and defenses, and produces a prioritized action plan. Triggers at matter intake when a business client needs a foundational case evaluation document for a pre-filing commercial dispute.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts U.S. Customs and Border Protection binding ruling requests under 19 CFR Part 177 for tariff classification, valuation, origin, and marking determinations. Trigger when input mentions "binding ruling," "CBP ruling request," "19 CFR Part 177," "classification request," "HTSUS analysis," "transaction value," "country of origin," or "marking for import."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts a BSA/AML Risk Assessment for U.S. financial institutions per FinCEN, FFIEC, and OCC standards. Evaluates inherent risks (customer, product, geographic, transaction, third-party), control adequacy, and residual risk. Use when preparing annual BSA compliance assessments, post-acquisition integration reviews, or when business changes trigger reassessment under 31 U.S.C. § 5318(h).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces an attorney-ready memo from a corpus of legal documents supplied by the user. Use when a user shows up with a folder, zip, or vault of case documents and asks for a case summary, case evaluation, litigation package, intake memo, matter overview, or "can you summarize this case for me." The skill ingests the corpus into a searchable index, OCRs anything non-searchable, inventories and diagnoses the practice area, loads the appropriate practice-area playbook module(s) (PI/tort, commercial litigation, IP infringement, or user-authored extensions), iteratively searches the corpus across eight core dimensions plus any module-specific dimensions, defers specialized document clusters (depositions, medical records, discovery, liens) to dedicated sibling skills, and synthesizes a cited memo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces internal case viability and conflict check memos for personal injury litigation intake. Screens conflicts, assesses liability and damages, checks statute of limitations, and outputs an accept/decline recommendation. Use when evaluating new PI intake, running conflict checks, assessing case merit pre-filing, or preparing acceptance memos.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI-powered bank compliance and regulatory review assistant - screen marketing materials, KYC documents, AML alerts, and NFRA/CBIRC compliance checks. Updated for 2025-2026 regulations including 商业银行资本管理办法 (Basel III China 2024), 消费者权益保护规定升级, FATF mutual evaluation 2025, and 反洗钱法修订. Keywords: bank compliance, KYC, AML, regulatory review, NFRA, Basel III, China banking, 合规审查, 合规审核, 监管合规, 反洗钱, KYC尽调, 客户身份识别, 受益人识别, 制裁筛查, 交易监控.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate contextual briefings for legal work. Supports three modes — daily brief (morning summary of legal-relevant items), topic brief (research synthesis on a specific legal question), and incident brief (rapid briefing for developing situations like data breaches or regulatory inquiries).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts filing-ready proofs of claim for U.S. bankruptcy proceedings using Official Form B 410 under FRBP 3001. Handles secured, unsecured priority, and general unsecured claims with proper valuation, documentation, and bar date compliance. Use when a creditor needs to file or amend a proof of claim in a bankruptcy case.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user faces brand impersonation, fake websites, phishing sites, or trademark infringement. Also use when the user mentions "fake site," "impersonation," "phishing site," "trademark infringement," "domain squatting," or "brand abuse." For monitoring, use brand-monitoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces an enforcement-aware Animal Welfare Act compliance audit for USDA/APHIS-regulated facilities. Maps Form 7002 inspection citations to verified 9 C.F.R. Parts 1-3 requirements, analyzes NCI severity and recurrence patterns, evaluates core compliance programs (PVC, IACUC, housing, records, transport), and outputs a prioritized corrective action plan with proof artifacts. Use when auditing AWA compliance, reviewing USDA inspection reports, preparing for license renewal, conducting diligence, or assessing enforcement risk. Trigger: Animal Welfare Act, AWA, USDA, APHIS, Form 7002, IACUC, PVC, exhibitor, dealer, research facility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
当AI智能体完成一段法律推理或论证后，需要对该推理结论进行自我评估，判断论证的整体强度与置信度，识别并标注推理链条中的薄弱环节。 触发条件包括但不限于： - 完成法律分析后需要给出结论可靠性评级 - 用户明确要求评估某一论证的说服力或可靠性 - 存在多个竞争性法律解释需要比较论证强度 - 推理过程中涉及不确定因素（事实不明、法律空白、争议观点）需要标注 - 为决策者提供风险提示，说明结论的局限性 - 对己方或对方的法律论证进行攻防强度评估 - 在法律意见书、备忘录等文书中需要附加置信度说明
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts a standalone API Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) for incorporation by reference into a master API license or terms-of-service agreement. Produces a publication-ready template with prohibited-use matrix, developer security checklist, graduated enforcement framework, AI/ML training restrictions, and versioning playbook. Trigger when a user needs to draft or update an API AUP, separate behavioral rules from core API terms, define prohibited API uses, add enforcement or change-management mechanics, or mentions acceptable use policy, developer security requirements, or API enforcement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces litigation-grade case summaries for animal law disputes including cruelty/neglect prosecutions, ownership/custody, dangerous animal designations, veterinary malpractice, and service/assistance animal accommodations. Builds exhibit-cited factual timelines, maps evidence to statutory elements, evaluates expert evidence, and assesses remedies with jurisdiction-specific legal research. Use when summarizing animal law cases, analyzing animal cruelty charges, pet custody disputes, dangerous dog hearings, veterinary malpractice claims, or assistance animal accommodation matters. Also trigger for animal forfeiture, bite liability, wildlife possession, or animal-related court filings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates structured analytical summaries of appellate documents covering procedural posture, issues on appeal, standards of review, and strategic assessment. Use when onboarding to an appeal, preparing for oral argument, evaluating appellate risk, or summarizing the appellate record.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。