3,370 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Comprehensive QA and testing skill for quality assurance, test automation, and testing strategies for ReactJS, NextJS, NodeJS applications. Includes test suite generation, coverage analysis, E2E testing setup, and quality metrics. Use when designing test strategies, writing test cases, implementing test automation, performing manual testing, or analyzing test coverage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review and create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality and design system compliance. Evaluates using three pillars: frictionless insight-to-action, quality craft, and trustworthy building. USE FOR: PR reviews, design reviews, accessibility audits, design system compliance checks, creative frontend design, UI code review, component reviews, responsive design checks, theme testing, and creating memorable UI. DO NOT USE FOR: Backend API reviews, database schema reviews, infrastructure or DevOps work, pure business logic without UI, or non-frontend code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality control and assessment for proteomics data. Use when evaluating proteomics data quality before downstream analysis. Covers sample metrics, missing value patterns, replicate correlation, batch effects, and intensity distributions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive quality control for flow cytometry and CyTOF data. Covers flow rate stability, signal drift, margin events, dead cell exclusion, and batch QC. Use when assessing acquisition quality or identifying problematic samples before analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality control for pooled CRISPR screens. Covers library representation, read distribution, replicate correlation, and essential gene recovery. Use when assessing screen quality before hit calling or diagnosing poor screen performance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality control metrics for ATAC-seq data including fragment size distribution, TSS enrichment, FRiP, and library complexity. Use when assessing ATAC-seq library quality before or after peak calling to identify problematic samples.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Screen US stocks for high-quality dividend opportunities combining value characteristics (P/E ratio under 20, P/B ratio under 2), attractive yields (3% or higher), and consistent growth (dividend/revenue/EPS trending up over 3 years). Supports two-stage screening using FINVIZ Elite API for efficient pre-filtering followed by FMP API for detailed analysis. Use when user requests dividend stock screening, income portfolio ideas, or quality value stocks with strong fundamentals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Screen US stocks for Stockbee-style selling-exhaustion hammer setups using prior momentum, pullback depth, undercut/reclaim, long lower-wick geometry, close-location, volume confirmation, quality/liquidity gates, and risk-distance scoring. Use when the user asks for Stockbee, Pradeep Bonde, exhaustion setup, selling exhaustion, hammer reversal, undercut reclaim, near-close reversal candidates, or pullback entries in high-quality funds-owned stocks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert Kanchi-style dividend investing into a repeatable US-stock operating procedure. Use when users ask for かんち式配当投資, dividend screening, dividend growth quality checks, PERxPBR adaptation for US sectors, pullback limit-order planning, or one-page stock memo creation. Covers screening, deep dive, entry planning, and post-purchase monitoring cadence.
Validate data quality in market analysis documents and blog articles before publication. Use when checking for price scale inconsistencies (ETF vs futures), instrument notation errors, date/day-of-week mismatches, allocation total errors, and unit mismatches. Supports English and Japanese content. Advisory mode -- flags issues as warnings for human review, not as blockers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing content quality, E-E-A-T, or publish readiness; runs a typed 80-item CORE-EEAT profile with evidence coverage, veto checks, and a fix plan. Not for structural tags/headers alone — use on-page-seo-checker; not for domain/citation trust — use domain-authority-auditor. 内容质量/EEAT评分
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "audit our brand narrative" or "is this message on-canon"; runs separate typed TALE truth, system, or effectiveness profiles and never averages them into one composite. Checks differentiation, canon, landing consistency, and evidence integrity. Not for launch readiness — use launch-readiness-auditor; not for social operations — use social-quality-auditor. 品牌叙事分层审计/发布前一致性放行
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "package our proof points", "build reusable stat cards and case snippets", or "put proof where each pillar makes its claim"; turns claims-ledger-approved proofs into reusable proof modules — stat cards, case snippets, testimonial blocks, comparison proofs — each pinned to a message-house pillar and the ledger claim ID it substantiates, and flags any pillar making a claim with no approved proof behind it. Never adjudicates a proof: unverified or ledger-absent proofs are marked '[needs source]' and routed to the claims candidates. Not for adjudicating or substantiating claims — use offer-claims-registry; not for fabricating a benchmark to fill a gap — a missing proof is flagged, not invented; not for scoring narrative quality — use narrative-quality-auditor. 证据模块/证据卡/客户案例/主张对齐
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing domain authority, trust, or citation credibility; runs a peer-relative 40-item CITE profile with evidence coverage and verified manipulation/penalty veto checks. Not for page-level content quality — use content-quality-auditor; not for backlink profiling alone — use offsite-signal-analyzer. 域名权威/网站可信度
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Team code quality checklist - use for checking Python code quality, bugs, security issues, and best practices
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs SQL analytics on SageMaker Catalog asset metadata tables exported as Apache Iceberg in S3 Tables. Covers governance queries, asset growth tracking, ownership audits, time-travel over catalog state, and metadata quality analysis. Applies when querying catalog inventory, finding assets without descriptions, comparing catalog snapshots, or auditing data ownership. Trigger phrases: catalog inventory SQL, how many assets, assets without descriptions, asset growth over time, who owns this data, catalog governance, data quality audit, catalog analytics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guided journey from a working-but-untested vibe-coded prototype to a production-ready product with tests, clean structure, a business-rules boundary, and resilience at scale. Orchestrates nine skills phase by phase - working-with-legacy-code, clean-code, refactoring-patterns, software-design-philosophy, clean-architecture, pragmatic-programmer, release-it, system-design, ddia-systems - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (TESTING.md, TECH-DEBT.md, IMPROVE-CODE-QUALITY-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to harden an AI-generated prototype, add tests before refactoring, make code safe to change, or says 'this works on my machine but I am scared to touch it'. For an aged codebase, remove-technical-debt; for greenfield structure, design-code-architecture; for a product and UX pass, improve-app; to optimize speed and structure, architecture-optimization. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full-site blog health assessment scanning all blog files for quality scores, orphan pages, topic cannibalization, stale content, and AI citation readiness. Runs canonical batch analysis before site-wide checks. Produces per-post scores and a prioritized action queue. Use when the user asks for a site-wide blog health check across many posts ("blog audit", "blog health", "audit all posts", "site audit of the blog"). For one post, or a quality score with fixes for a few named files, use blog-analyze instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and score blog posts on a 5-category 100-point scoring system covering content quality, SEO optimization, E-E-A-T signals, technical elements, and AI citation readiness. Includes AI content detection (burstiness, phrase flagging, vocabulary diversity). Supports export formats (markdown, JSON, table) and batch analysis with sorting. Generates prioritized recommendations (Critical/High/Medium/Low) with specific fixes. Works with any format (MDX, markdown, HTML, URL). Use when user says "analyze blog", "audit blog", "blog score", "check blog quality", "blog review", "rate this blog", "blog health check".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides comprehensive code review guidance for React 19, Vue 3, Angular 17+, Svelte 5, Rust, TypeScript, Java, Java 8, PHP, Ruby, Rails, Python, Django, FastAPI, Go, C#/.NET, Kotlin, Swift, Dart, Flutter, NestJS, C/C++, Zig, CSS/Less/Sass, Qt, and more. Covers architecture review, performance review, security audit, code quality anti-patterns, and common bugs across all ecosystems. Use when: reviewing pull requests, conducting PR reviews, code review, reviewing code changes, establishing review standards, mentoring developers, architecture reviews, security audits, performance reviews, checking code quality, finding bugs, giving feedback on code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establishes ownership, definitions, quality, access, and lineage for the organization's data. Use this when metrics disagree between teams, when nobody knows which dataset is authoritative, when setting up data ownership or access policy, when data quality is unreliable, or before opening a dataset to a wider audience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds and operates data pipelines — ingestion, transformation, orchestration, quality testing, and reliability of data delivery. Use this to design or debug a pipeline, decide batch versus streaming, add data quality checks, handle late or duplicate data, or work out why a dashboard's numbers changed without anyone changing the dashboard.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and runs the support function — channels, queues, routing, staffing, service levels, quality, and the metrics that show whether it is working. Use this to set up or fix support operations, choose channels, size a team, set or renegotiate service levels, reduce cost per contact, diagnose long queues or poor quality, or decide what to automate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。