「comp」の検索結果

Provides context about the regelrecht Figma design system and helps with Figma-related tasks like component lookups and design comparisons. Use this skill proactively when: implementing UI components, looking up Figma node IDs, comparing code with Figma designs, downloading Figma assets, or working with design tokens. Activate automatically when user mentions Figma, design system, component styling, or asks about RR-Components.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full ASVS 5.0 compliance assessment against a codebase and/or architecture diagrams. Reads all 346 controls from the companion CSV, performs targeted code analysis per control, and produces a complete matrix marked COMPLIANT / NON_COMPLIANT / NOT_RELEVANT — with per-control reasoning and evidence (code snippets, file:line references, diagram observations). Outputs a reviewed CSV matrix and a self-contained HTML evidence report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare ENCODE experiments across different biosamples, tissues, or cell lines to identify tissue-specific regulatory patterns. Use when the user wants cross-tissue comparison, cell-type comparison, tissue-specific elements, differential chromatin, biosample matching, disease vs normal comparison, developmental time course, constitutive vs variable regulation, or multi-tissue data availability mapping. Handles batch effect detection, biosample hierarchy, and comparison design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research competitor paid-ad presence, messaging, creative, formats, landing pages, keyword and auction signals, transparent ad libraries, and strategic gaps across supported platforms. Use for competitor ads, ad libraries, ad spy, competitive PPC analysis, competitor creative, Google Ads Transparency, Meta Ad Library, or paid-media competitor research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates comprehensive company activity summary across connected apps — Slack, GitHub, Notion, Linear, Gmail, and more. Use when user asks for company updates, daily summary, or what's happening across the org.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a combined Audit and Compensation Committee charter for U.S. boards, tailored for public or private companies with listing-standard compliance, independence criteria, and SOX readiness. Triggers when the user needs a board committee charter, audit committee charter, compensation committee charter, or governance mandate for SEC/NYSE/NASDAQ compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI compliance analysis for EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, GDPR, OECD, financial services regulations (SEC, FCA, FINRA, DORA, MiFID II), and other frameworks. Use when asked to generate a compliance checklist for an AI tool or use case, determine if a risk assessment is required, score an AI tool's risk level, identify where an AI tool or use case could run afoul of regulatory requirements, perform a gap analysis, recommend remediation steps, assess a vendor, draft an acceptable use policy, map training requirements, or review jurisdiction-specific AI rules. Triggers on phrases like "compliance checklist", "risk assessment", "risk score", "does this comply", "EU AI Act", "ISO 42001", "NIST AI RMF", "AI governance", "gap analysis", "vendor assessment", "acceptable use policy", "MNPI", "AI training requirements", or any request to evaluate an AI tool or use case for regulatory compliance or risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for deep Vue 3 best-practices review, recommendations, and the full ordered authoring workflow — built-in components (Teleport, Suspense, KeepAlive, Transition, TransitionGroup), animation techniques, slots, fallthrough attrs, custom directives, async components, render functions, plugins, and the post-functionality performance pass. Complements mk:vue (the everyday Composition API quick-reference). Invoke for "review my Vue", "Vue best practices", "recommend improvements", or non-trivial feature work needing the ordered workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Jetpack Compose navigation expert with type-safe routes, Hilt DI, and MVVM/MVI architecture. Activate on: Jetpack Compose navigation, Compose type-safe routes, Hilt dependency injection, MVVM Android, MVI pattern, Compose state management, NavHost, ViewModel. NOT for: XML layouts (use frontend-architect), iOS SwiftUI (use swiftui-data-flow-expert), React Native (use react-native-architect).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares a group of companies by products, positioning, market focus, and differentiators. Use when the user provides several company records and wants a structured competitive comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wardley Mapping for strategic positioning — map your value chain from customer need to underlying components, plot where each component sits on the evolution curve (novel to commodity), and spot the strategic plays that movement creates. Use this skill when someone wants to understand where their industry is heading, whether they're building things they should be buying, where competitors are vulnerable, what's about to become commoditised, or why their competitive advantage is eroding. Triggers on questions about build-vs-buy, component evolution, value chain analysis, commoditisation risk, or strategic positioning relative to market movement. Three modes — full diagnostic (build a map from scratch), review (update positions and reassess), and alert triggers (set tripwires for when components move). Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compose a comparison newsletter from Ahmad's OpenMark saves — A vs B vs C, side-by-side, table-driven. Use when Ahmad wants to compare tools, models, frameworks, approaches, or platforms across his saves. Trigger phrases include "compare", "X vs Y", "head to head", "which should I use", "differences between", "trade-offs between", "/newsletter-comparison". Output centers a markdown table with consistent columns, supports it with short prose blocks, ends with a clear recommendation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bindet das model-agnostische Computer-Use-Modul open-compute (Screenshot-Wahrnehmung, Windows-UIA-Elementklicks, sicherheitsgegatete Aktionen) fuer ALLE Agenten des Systems ein -- Claude Code, Codex und agy/Antigravity. Nutzen, wenn ein Dienst eine interaktive GUI- oder Browser-Aktion braucht, die kein reiner Text-/API-Weg loesen kann (Paradebeispiel: Tailscale-Reauth im Browser, sonstige Login-/Consent-Dialoge, Dialogfenster-Klicks). Standard ab 2026-08-02: open-compute statt Aufgeben oder Abwarten nutzen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Product marketing and go-to-market strategy for B2B SaaS launches and positioning. Use this skill when planning a product launch, developing positioning and messaging, analyzing competitive landscape, building customer advocacy programs, designing a win/loss interview program, working out why we lose deals, designing GTM strategy, creating category positioning, planning analyst briefings, or deciding which country to expand into and how far to localize. Also use it for brand marketing and demand creation — how much to spend on brand versus performance, what to measure when a brand campaign produces no conversion event, and how to answer "we cannot attribute it". Also triggers on: positioning, product launch, competitive intelligence, messaging, customer advocacy, win/loss analysis, win/loss interviews, why we lose deals, closed-lost analysis, loss reason, close-reason field, competitive displacement, displace an incumbent, rip and replace, competitive takeout, switch from a competitor, win deals from a competitor, incumbent contract, renewal window, auto-renewal notice period, switching costs, EU Data Act, cloud switching rights, why do we lose to no decision, GTM, category design, analyst briefing, G2 review, international expansion, market entry, expand into Europe, which country should we launch in next, localization, translate our site, in-country go-to-market, regional GTM, is cold email legal in Germany, brand marketing, brand awareness, brand vs performance, brand versus demand gen, demand creation, demand capture, 95-5 rule, out of market buyers, category entry points, distinctive brand assets, mental availability, brand tracking, brand health, brand lift, share of search, how do we measure brand, justify brand spend, brand budget.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research competitor paid-ad presence, messaging, creative, formats, landing pages, keyword and auction signals, transparent ad libraries, and strategic gaps across supported platforms. Use for competitor ads, ad libraries, ad spy, competitive PPC analysis, competitor creative, Google Ads Transparency, Meta Ad Library, or paid-media competitor research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'compa...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MUST USE whenever the user wants to automate a real desktop or sandbox - clicking, typing, scrolling, screenshotting, running an OS shell command, or handing a high-level 'open browser and do X' task to an autonomous computer-use agent. Wraps the trycua/cua Python toolkit via its `cua` CLI - pynput-based, cross-platform (macOS / Linux / Windows). NO custom tools are registered; you call `cua` through pi's built-in bash and read screenshots back through the Read tool. Triggers: cua, computer use, computer-use, GUI automation, screenshot the desktop, click on the screen, type into the active app, scroll the page, control my computer, drive my browser, sandbox, docker sandbox, QEMU sandbox, Lume sandbox, ComputerAgent, cua do, cua sandbox, 컴퓨터 자동화, 스크린샷 찍어, 내 컴퓨터 조작, 브라우저 열어서, 샌드박스, 화면 자동화, 마우스로 클릭, 키보드 타이핑, computer use 위임, 자동으로 클릭, 자율 에이전트로 처리.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for using completers — TokenCompleter and MessageCompleter for text generation during RL rollouts and evaluation. Use when the user asks about generating text, completing messages, or using completers in RL environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent framework security features against the standard - Any request like "is my agent OWASP compliant?", "check ASI compliance", or "agentic security audit"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wear OS (Kotlin) の androidx.wear API・Watch Face Format (WFF) リファレンス。 Wear Compose の CurvedLayout, rotary input, ambient mode, ScalingLazyColumn。 Tiles / ProtoLayout, ComplicationDataSourceService と ComplicationData 型, Health Services (MeasureClient, ExerciseClient, PassiveMonitoringClient), WFF の XML 要素・式・コンプリケーションスロット・ユーザー設定。

Android アプリ開発 (Kotlin) の画面遷移・Navigation リファレンス。 Jetpack Compose, androidx。Navigation 3 (stable), NavDisplay、 Navigation Compose, NavHost, composable, 型安全ルート、 Fragment ナビゲーション, NavHostFragment, Safe Args、 ディープリンク, App Links, assetlinks.json、 予測型戻る (OnBackPressedDispatcher)。

The live fieldwork layer for psycho-logic — go look at the actual target market NOW instead of reasoning from your training-data stereotype of it. Use when a psycho-logic move needs grounding in a specific place: the user asks 'what do competitors in [region/country] actually do', 'what's the real price band / norm here', 'how do local leaders position themselves', 'research this market before we localise', 'what signals trust to buyers in X', or is about to launch/adapt in a market you haven't studied. Runs structured web research in the local language — local competitors and their signals, price bands, category conventions, review/trust sources, local terminology, taboos and regulations — and synthesises a compact perception profile the four moves consume. Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic; pair with cultural-context (the lens that tells you what to look for). 日本語・中文の相談（「現地の実態を調べて」「调研当地市场」）にも使う。

Compares Hi-C contact maps between conditions across the right scale -- differential bin-pair contacts (multiHiCcompare, diffHic), differential A/B compartments (dcHiC), differential TAD boundaries (delta insulation), and differential loops (diffloop, DiffHiChIP) -- with distance-stratified between-sample normalization, replicate-aware NB-GLM FDR, HiCRep SCC reproducibility gating, and CNV correction for cancer/aneuploid samples. Use when comparing Hi-C between treatment and control, finding differential contacts/compartments/boundaries/loops, normalizing two maps of unequal depth, choosing a replicate-aware test, gating replicates with SCC, or correcting copy-number artifacts before a tumor-vs-normal comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose tasks into structured, outcome-defined process entries with complexity triage. Load when user says "decompose this", "break this down", "what steps do I need", "plan this out", "what's the process for", "how do I approach this", or when any complex task needs structured execution planning. Includes a problem-understanding pass before complexity triage. Routes to `problem-to-plan` when the user needs planning deliverables (spec + plan + TODO). Does NOT replace brainstorming — brainstorming is design approval (upstream), this is execution planning (downstream).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。