5,200 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use the Microsoft.Extensions stack correctly across Generic Host, dependency injection, configuration, logging, options, HttpClientFactory, and other shared infrastructure patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use free built-in .NET maintainability analyzers and code metrics configuration to find overly complex methods and coupled code. Use when a repo needs cyclomatic complexity checks, maintainability thresholds, or complexity-driven refactoring gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The complete Go development skill. REQUIRED for ALL Go work — writing, refactoring, reviewing, generating, scaffolding, or discussing Go code, including any change to .go files. Use whenever the user mentions Go, Golang, go.mod, a Go package, or asks to build a Go backend service, CLI, library, script, MCP server (Model Context Protocol), or AI/LLM agent with tool calling or ReAct-style reasoning. Routes by project type to the right architecture, conventions, and review checklist. Highly opinionated; overrides generic Go style and lint guidance on conflicts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use whenever the user mentions Betaflight, FPV drone firmware, flight-controller config, PID/filter/rates tuning, or blackbox log analysis — or shares a Betaflight artifact: a CLI diff/dump (lines like 'diff all', 'set ', 'feature ', 'resource ') or a .bbl/.bfl blackbox log, even when not named as such — or runs a chirp tuning session via Sweep Studio / FPVLogForge (a chirp log ID to analyse, 'analyse log', 'résultat chirp', iterative Bode/step/Ms tuning). Covers flight symptoms (oscillations, wobble, propwash, jello, hot motors, drift), motor/ESC and RX/ELRS/CRSF setup, builds from 3" to 10" (cinewhoop, tinywhoop, longrange, X-class), version migrations (4.4 → 4.5 → 4.6), and configuring a new drone from scratch (setup wizard). Trigger even when phrased casually ("mon drone wobble", "PID help", "config FC") — under-triggering is worse than over-triggering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TypeScript and JavaScript performance and code-quality rules, usable in any framework. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring hot paths, data-structure choices, async flows, or bundle-size-sensitive code. Triggers include "optimize this function", "too slow", "reduce allocations", "bundle size", "lazy load", "speed up imports", or general code review of utilities and services.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Git-native issue tracking (beads), coding guidelines, knowledge injection, and spec-driven planning for AI agents. Drop-in replacement for bd/Beads with simpler architecture. Use for: tracking issues/beads with dependencies, creating bugs/features/tasks, planning specs, implementing features from specs, code reviews, committing code, creating PRs, loading coding guidelines (TypeScript, Python, TDD, golden testing, Convex, monorepo patterns), code cleanup, research briefs, architecture docs, agent handoffs, and checking out third-party library source code. Invoke when user mentions: tbd, beads, bd, shortcuts, issues, bugs, tasks, features, epics, todo, tracking, specs, planning, implementation, validation, guidelines, templates, commit, PR, pull request, code review, testing, TDD, test-driven, golden testing, snapshot testing, TypeScript, Python, Convex, monorepo, cleanup, dead code, refactor, handoff, research, architecture, labels, search, checkout library, source code review, or any workflow shortcut.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for code generation, feature work, bug fixes, refactoring, and code review when a change creates or reshapes a multi-step flow, state lifecycle, side-effect or decision ownership, cross-unit composition, or boundary contract. Also use it when an existing structural problem makes those elements hard to trace or verify. Structural change is optional. Mechanical edits, throwaway experiments, and coherent local changes stay with their current owner and focused verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reflective pass over your memory — merge duplicates, fix stale facts, prune what no longer matters. Use when the user asks to clean up or review what you remember, or when memory has grown cluttered or contradictory.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Show the state of terum-skills on this machine — team, clone, session hook, pending work, machine facts — and whether a newer CLI release exists, as Markdown boards. Use when the user asks whether terum-skills is set up, in sync or up to date, or when something about it seems off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit code for correctness and rigor — logic errors, silent error swallowing, wishful thinking, and unjustified fallbacks. This is not a style review; it's a logic review. Use when you want a focused correctness audit separate from the full code-police pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iteratively study and apply elegant coding patterns. Each iteration - understand the code, research what simple and elegant code looks like, apply learnings, verify with CI. Use as a standalone refactoring pass or when the user asks to make code more elegant, simple, or idiomatic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Derived from Andrej Karpathy's observations. Use ALWAYS when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code. Covers assumption surfacing, simplicity, surgical edits, and goal-driven execution with verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured task planning with clear breakdowns, dependencies, and verification criteria. Use when implementing features, refactoring, or any multi-step work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when starting a new feature, product, or system design. Eliminates the spec-implementation gap by making specifications the primary artifact that drives code generation. Keywords: SDD, spec-driven, PRD, feature spec, user stories, implementation plan, specification, acceptance criteria, Given-When-Then.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test-Driven Development workflow principles. RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate a question against high-trust primary sources and capture the findings as a Markdown file in the repo. Use when the user wants a topic researched, docs or API facts gathered, or reading legwork delegated to a background agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement authentication and authorization with Better Auth - a framework-agnostic TypeScript authentication framework. Features include email/password authentication with verification, OAuth providers (Google, GitHub, Discord, etc.), two-factor authentication (TOTP, SMS), passkeys/WebAuthn support, session management, role-based access control (RBAC), rate limiting, and database adapters. Use when adding authentication to applications, implementing OAuth flows, setting up 2FA/MFA, managing user sessions, configuring authorization rules, or building secure authentication systems for web applications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build, review, refactor, or architect ASP.NET Core web applications using current official guidance for .NET web development. Use when working on Blazor Web Apps, Razor Pages, MVC, Minimal APIs, controller-based Web APIs, SignalR, gRPC, middleware, dependency injection, configuration, authentication, authorization, testing, performance, deployment, or ASP.NET Core upgrades.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when implementing or managing persistent, hierarchical memory systems for AI agents. Covers cross-session state, fact supersession, and self-managed memory tools to enable long-term recall and adaptive agent behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dead code cleanup and consolidation specialist. Removes unused code, duplicates, and refactors for maintainability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a pull request or contribution deeply, explain it tutorial-style for a maintainer, and produce a polished report artifact such as HTML or Markdown. Use when asked to analyze a PR, explain a contributor's design decisions, compare it with similar systems, or prepare a merge recommendation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。