「what」の検索結果

Create new Synapse skills from conversation. Describe what you want the skill to do and I'll generate it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

以固定的九节结构生成美国司法意见书的详细法学院案件简报：记忆钩子、事实、程序历史、 法官投票、判决要旨、逐意见分析、五个未来适用假设情形、评论和已核实的关键引文。 还构建投票表、跨案件一致性表、基于视角的评论，以及 article、Beamer 和案例教科书章节格式的 LaTeX。 当有人要求简报案件、分析或解释意见、为学生总结决定、从判决要旨生成假设情形、 评论判决、制表法官投票方式，或将案件分析转换为 LaTeX 时使用。触发词包括 "brief this case"、"case brief"、"explain the holding"、"what did the court hold"、 "hypotheticals based on"、"critique this opinion"、"vote table"、"Beamer presentation"、 "chapter brief"，以及在教学情境中对司法意见或最高法院决定的任何引用。 需要网络搜索来核实引文、投票和判决要旨。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

法律事项的运营性计费执行。月度账单准备和计费指示、LC 发票审查和代垫款处理、客户账单质询回应、现金流建模（LC 付款义务与客户收款对比）、杠杆和消耗分析（人员配置组合、预测总成本、利润轨迹）。触发词：‘prepare the bill’（准备账单）、‘billing instruction’（计费指示）、‘end of month billing’（月末计费）、‘LC invoice’（LC 发票）、‘local counsel invoice’（本地顾问发票）、‘pass through as disbursement’（作为代垫款转付）、‘client querying the invoice’（客户质疑发票）、‘billing dispute’（计费争议）、‘cashflow gap’（现金流缺口）、‘when will we get paid’（我们何时能收到付款）、‘LC payment due’（LC 付款到期）、‘leverage analysis’（杠杆分析）、‘staffing mix’（人员配置组合）、‘predicted total cost’（预测总成本）、‘burn rate by grade’（按职级消耗率）、‘are we on track’（我们在轨道上吗）、‘what will this matter cost’（此事项将花费多少）。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

欧盟 AI 法案知识引擎——以 70 份官方欧盟来源文件为基础的权威监管问答（包括 2026 年委员会关于 Art. 6 高风险分类的指南草稿——一般原则、附件 I、附件 III）。基于完整条例文本、委员会指南、EDPB/EDPS 意见、《实践守则》、协调标准、FRIA 指南、事件模板和行业特定指引，以条款级引用回答关于 AI 法案的任何问题。当用户询问"EU AI Act"、"AI Act regulation"、"Regulation 2024/1689"、"KI-Verordnung"、要求"explain an AI Act article"、"what does Article X say"、"AI Act requirements"、"AI Act penalties"、"AI Act timeline"、"GPAI obligations"、"high-risk AI"、"prohibited AI practices"、"AI Act and GDPR"、"fundamental rights impact assessment"、"AI Act standards"、"AI Act national implementation"、"AI literacy"、"serious incident reporting"、"Digital Omnibus"、"AI regulatory sandbox"，或任何关于欧盟人工智能监管的问题时，应使用本技能。德语术语同样触发："KI-Gesetz"、"KI-Verordnung"、"Hochrisiko-KI"、"KI-Kompetenz"、"Grundrechte-Folgenabschaetzung"、"GPAI-Verhaltenskodex"。对于产出分类决定而非知识答案的评估工作流，提议在会话内运行结构化风险等级分类。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose what kind of knowledge to transfer between teacher and student models: response, feature, or relational, and decide among offline, online, self, or cross-modal distillation schemes. Best for distillation strategy selection, capacity-gap diagnosis, and transfer planning. Activate on "knowledge distillation", "teacher-student", "soft labels", "feature distillation", "online distillation", or "cross-modal transfer". NOT for generic compression checklists or unrelated training work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs human-in-the-loop review points for DAG workflows. Determines what to present to the human, how to collect feedback, and how to route approve/reject/modify decisions back into the DAG. Use when adding approval gates, designing review UX, or handling human feedback in agent workflows. Activate on "human review", "approval gate", "human-in-the-loop", "human gate", "approval workflow", "user review step". NOT for executing human gates at runtime (use dag-runtime with Temporal signals), general UX design, or chatbot conversation design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Matches natural language task descriptions to appropriate skills using semantic similarity. Handles fuzzy matching, intent extraction, and capability alignment. Activate on 'find skill', 'match task', 'semantic search', 'skill lookup', 'what skill for'. NOT for ranking matches (use dag-capability-ranker) or skill catalog (use dag-skill-registry).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organizing digital life for legacy, emergency access, and death preparedness. Specializes in password management, account documentation, digital asset preservation, and ensuring loved ones can access what they need.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decides HOW to mutate a DAG when a node fails, quality is below threshold, or new information changes the plan. Selects from mutation strategies (add node, replace agent, fork paths, loop back, downgrade model) based on failure type, cost budget, and execution history. Activate on "DAG failed how to fix", "mutation strategy", "replan on failure", "adaptive DAG", "recovery strategy", "what to do when node fails". NOT for detecting failures (use dag-quality), executing mutations (use dag-planner), or runtime execution (use dag-runtime).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Learns from DAG execution history to improve future performance. Identifies successful patterns, detects anti-patterns, and provides recommendations. Activate on 'learn patterns', 'execution patterns', 'what worked', 'optimize based on history', 'pattern analysis'. NOT for failure analysis (use dag-failure-analyzer) or performance profiling (use dag-performance-profiler).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Time-travel debugging for DAG executions. Inspect agent state at any node, replay decisions with modified inputs, compare execution traces side-by-side, and identify where reasoning diverged. Inspired by LangGraph Studio's state-editing model and Temporal's event history. Activate on "debug DAG", "replay execution", "time travel debug", "inspect node state", "what went wrong at step", "compare runs", "execution diff". NOT for live monitoring (use dag-runtime + websocket-streaming), failure analysis (use dag-ops), or general code debugging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates comprehensive, context-aware code review checklists tailored to the specific codebase, programming language, and team standards. Analyzes PR diffs and suggests what reviewers should focus on.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Describe patterns that may indicate bad-faith or manipulative communication including gish gallop, whataboutism, tone policing, motte-and-bailey, sealioning, lying by omission, deflection, and strategic evasion. Use when the user suspects manipulation, notices repeated non-engagement, wants to analyze debate tactics, or mentions 'bad faith', 'deflection', 'manipulation', 'dodging the question', 'avoiding the issue', 'gaslighting', 'moving goalposts'. Describes behavioral patterns without making psychological diagnoses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architecture and systems design for building always-on AI agents with episodic memory. Covers the memory hierarchy (core/recall/archival), persistence layers, agent server infrastructure, vector stores, and framework selection. Provides concrete deployment patterns for agents that maintain identity and learn across sessions. Activate on: "always-on agent", "persistent agent architecture", "episodic memory system", "agent memory design", "long-running agent", "stateful agent", "agent that remembers", "MemGPT architecture", "Letta deployment", "/always-on-agent-architecture". NOT for: choosing what data to feed the agent (use always-on-agent-inputs), brainstorming applications (use always-on-agent-applications), safety and privacy concerns (use always-on-agent-safety), general agentic patterns (use agentic-patterns).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safety, privacy, cost management, and frank advice for building always-on AI agents with episodic memory. Covers data hygiene, privacy risk surfaces, runaway cost prevention, scope creep, psychological effects of persistent AI companions, and responsible deployment patterns. This is the skill that tells you what can go wrong and how to prevent it. Activate on: "agent safety", "always-on agent privacy", "agent cost control", "persistent agent risks", "AI companion safety", "agent data hygiene", "runaway agent costs", "parasocial AI risk", "/always-on-agent-safety". NOT for: architecture design (use always-on-agent-architecture), input design (use always-on-agent-inputs), application brainstorming (use always-on-agent-applications), healthcare compliance specifically (use hipaa-compliance).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design decisions for when and what sounds to use in web apps, mobile apps, and desktop native apps — plus how to create them with AI. Covers UI sound vocabulary (confirms, alerts, transitions, errors), platform conventions (iOS, macOS, Material), creating sounds with AI tools (ElevenLabs, AudioCraft, Stable Audio), Web Audio API for procedural sounds, haptic-audio pairing, and the psychology of satisfying vs. annoying UI sounds. Activate on 'app sounds', 'UI sounds', 'notification sound', 'sound design app', 'earcons', 'sonic branding', 'interaction sounds', 'feedback sounds', 'app audio', 'satisfying sounds'. NOT for professional audio engineering (use sound-engineer), Windows 3.1 retro sounds specifically (use win31-audio-design), music composition (use sound-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data structures and serialization formats for agent-to-agent communication. Covers message envelopes, structured output schemas, capability declarations, task handoff payloads, error/retry signaling, and context windows as data structures. Deep comparison of A2A protocol, MCP, OpenAI function calling, and LangChain message types. Teaches when to use rigid schemas vs free-form with validation, typed vs untyped, streaming vs batch. Activate on: "agent message format", "agent communication schema", "agent-to-agent protocol", "A2A protocol", "MCP message format", "structured output for agents", "agent interop", "interchange format", "agent serialization", "task handoff format", "capability declaration". NOT for: what agents say to each other (use agent-conversation-protocols), orchestration topology (use multi-agent-coordination), building agent infrastructure (use agentic-infrastructure-2026).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-ship docs sync: cross-reference the diff and update README/ARCHITECTURE/CONTRIBUTING/AGENTS.md + CHANGELOG to match what shipped. Use on 'update/sync docs'; suggest after a PR opens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow navigator: scans project state (plans, reviews, tests, git) and recommends the next pipeline step. Use for 'what next?' or 'where am I?'. NOT for complexity routing (mk:scale-routing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekly-cadence engineering retrospective. Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics with persistent history and trend tracking. Team-aware: breaks down per-person contributions with praise and growth areas. Use when asked to "weekly retro", "what did we ship", or "engineering retrospective". Proactively suggest at the end of a work week or sprint. NOT for per-session or per-task reflection (see mk:memory / Phase 6 Reflect).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Proactively suggest when the user says a feature is ready for testing or asks "does this work?". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage JIRA issue relationships via the jira-as wrapper: link, unlink, blockers, dependencies, clone, bulk-link. Triggers: 'link KEY blocks KEY', 'what blocks KEY', 'clone KEY', 'unlink KEY from KEY'. NOT for sprint/epic relationships (mk:jira-agile).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes ticket complexity and maps dependencies against an existing codebase before sprint planning. Triggers on 'how complex is this ticket', 'what should we work on first', 'can we fit this in the sprint', 'tech review before planning', 'plan the sprint'. NOT for writing implementation plans (see mk:plan-creator); NOT for scope/ambition review (see mk:plan-ceo-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-ship documentation update. Reads all project docs, cross-references the diff, updates README/ARCHITECTURE/CONTRIBUTING/CLAUDE.md to match what shipped, polishes CHANGELOG voice, cleans up TODOS, and optionally bumps VERSION. Use when asked to "update the docs", "sync documentation", or "post-ship docs". Proactively suggest after a PR is created and before it merges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。