「criteria」の検索結果

Use when managing multiple initiatives across time horizons (now/next/later, H1/H2/H3), balancing risk vs return across portfolio, sizing and sequencing bets with dependencies, setting exit/scale criteria for experiments, allocating resources across innovation types (core/adjacent/transformational), or when user mentions portfolio planning, roadmap horizons, betting framework, initiative prioritization, innovation portfolio, or resource allocation across horizons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate detailed implementation plans for complex tasks. Creates comprehensive strategic plans in Markdown format with objectives, step-by-step implementation tasks using checkbox format, verification criteria, risk assessments, and alternative approaches. All plans MUST be validated using the included validation script. Use when users need thorough analysis and structured planning before implementation, when breaking down complex features into actionable steps, or when they explicitly ask for a plan, roadmap, or strategy. Strictly planning-focused with no code modifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create hierarchical project plans optimized for solo agentic development. Use when planning projects, phases, or tasks that Claude will execute. Produces Claude-executable plans with verification criteria, not enterprise documentation. Handles briefs, roadmaps, phase plans, and context handoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete Product Owner / Product Manager capability — a wiki-style knowledge map of product practice in active software development: the role and its boundaries, strategy cascade (vision → OKRs → roadmap → backlog), continuous discovery, backlog craft (epics, INVEST stories, acceptance criteria), prioritization frameworks (RICE, MoSCoW, Kano, WSJF), sprint delivery, metrics (North Star, AARRR), stakeholder management, and anti-patterns. The PO/PM owns what gets built, in what order, and why — including the end-to-end user flows and user journeys. Use when scoping a product or feature, decomposing an idea into outcomes/epics/stories, prioritizing a backlog, defining an MVP, mapping user journeys, measuring success, or saying no to a stakeholder. Pairs with super-ui-ux-design, which owns how each screen looks and behaves.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

QA engineering workflows on top of Playwright. Use when a QA engineer asks to design test cases from a ticket, PRD or acceptance criteria, decide what to automate, write a bug report from a failing test or trace, convert manual test cases (TestRail, Xray, CSV) into Playwright specs with case-ID traceability, or review Playwright test code and pull requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides comprehensive memory file management capabilities including auditing, quality assessment, and targeted improvements for files such as CLAUDE.md. Use when user asks to check, audit, update, improve, fix, maintain, or validate project memory files. Also triggers for "project memory optimization", "CLAUDE.md quality check", "documentation review", or when a project memory file needs to be created from scratch. This skill scans memory files, evaluates quality against standardized criteria, outputs detailed quality reports with scores and recommendations, then makes targeted updates with user approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Canonical rules for finding, creating, and updating Shift GitHub issues. Use whenever the user asks to file, create, open, update, triage, or search for an issue, or when substantial work needs an issue before a pull request. Prevents duplicates and defines acceptance criteria and pull-request closure semantics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When a founder needs to qualify inbound leads, define their ICP, build a lead scoring model, set MQL criteria, or route prospects through pipeline stages. Activate when the user mentions lead scoring, ICP, MQL, SQL, lead qualification, inbound leads, or pipeline design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prequalify subcontractors based on safety, financial, and performance criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert passed QA Contract criteria to automated tests

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate QA Contract with numbered Gherkin scenarios (G#N) and acceptance criteria (AC#N)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates clear, testable specifications from feature descriptions with user stories. Use when starting a new feature and needing a spec before planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforces validation and evidence before claiming work complete. Use before declaring implementation done, creating a PR, or submitting deliverables for review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a go-to-market war room for a launch, repositioning, price change, or new product. Convenes opposing expert and customer-persona viewpoints to debate the plan, surfaces the risks that kill launches, and returns a go/no-go call plus a phased rollout plan with owners, sequencing, and kill criteria. Use before any launch you can't easily walk back.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates structured OKR plans (Objectives and Key Results) for teams and companies following Google/Intel methodology. Takes company goals, team function, quarter, and current metrics to produce a comprehensive okr-plan.md with objectives, key results, scoring criteria, alignment mapping, tracking cadence, and retrospective templates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates customized client onboarding checklists with phased tasks, ownership assignments, dependencies, acceptance criteria, and email templates. Adapts to consulting, SaaS, or agency engagement models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and run a labelled eval set for a System One model (Jev, Von, or any typed-decision config), then sweep criteria wordings and thresholds against it. Use when a Jev/Von classification is wrong or unreliable, when choosing between the hosted API and a local open model, when tuning noul thresholds, or before shipping any typed-decision feature. Produces an accuracy-by-wording matrix and a calibrated threshold.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score and filter topics for X content creation using weighted criteria. Use when user wants to evaluate collected materials, filter topics by score, or mentions "filter topics", "score materials", "x-filter", "选题筛选". Applies 10-point scoring system with customizable weights.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vendor certification acceptance criteria and equivalence mapping. Covers ISO 27701, SOC 2 Privacy, APEC CBPR, EU Code of Conduct evaluation, certification scope analysis, gap supplementation requirements, and cross-framework equivalence assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides privacy program maturity assessment using the AICPA/CIPT Privacy Maturity Model with five levels: Ad Hoc, Repeating, Defined, Managed, and Optimized. Covers assessment methodology across ten privacy domains, scoring criteria, gap analysis, maturity roadmap generation, and benchmarking against industry peers. Keywords: privacy maturity, AICPA, maturity model, assessment, roadmap, benchmarking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts Privacy Impact Assessment for large-scale systematic monitoring under GDPR Article 35(3)(c). Covers CCTV and video surveillance, employee monitoring, location tracking, internet monitoring, and behavioural analytics. Applies EDPB WP248rev.01 criteria for systematic monitoring of publicly accessible areas. Keywords: DPIA, large-scale monitoring, CCTV, employee monitoring, systematic monitoring, surveillance, location tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts pre-DPIA threshold screening to determine whether a full Data Protection Impact Assessment is required under GDPR Article 35. Applies the EDPB WP248rev.01 nine-criteria test, national supervisory authority blacklists, and organisational risk appetite to produce a documented screening decision. Keywords: threshold screening, DPIA trigger, pre-DPIA, WP248, Article 35(1), blacklist, screening decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements the right to be forgotten in search engines under GDPR Article 17 and the CJEU Google Spain ruling (C-131/12). Covers delisting request procedures, criteria assessment balancing privacy against public interest, and geographic scope determination. Activate for right to be forgotten, search delisting, Google Spain, de-indexing queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。