5,644 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Score whether a news event is worth newsjacking, or whether a user's pitch idea is actually newsworthy to journalists. Uses calibrated anchors, hard anti-inflation rules, standing checks, timing windows, and brand-safety kill switches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs systematic root cause analysis to identify the true source of bugs, errors, and unexpected behavior through structured investigation phases — not just treating symptoms. Use when a user reports a bug, crash, error, or broken behavior and needs to debug, troubleshoot, or investigate why something is not working; especially for complex or intermittent issues across multiple components. Applies the Five Whys method, hypothesis-driven testing, stack trace analysis, git blame/log evidence gathering, and causal chain documentation to isolate and confirm root causes before applying any fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and fix game performance problems methodically — measure with the engine profiler first, reason about the frame-time budget, locate the CPU-vs-GPU bottleneck, then apply the right fix: object pooling, draw-call batching, fewer allocations/GC spikes, and asset budgets. Engine- neutral method that pairs with each engine's profiler. Use when the user mentions performance, optimize, low/dropping FPS, frame drops, stutter, lag, profiler, frame budget, draw calls, batching, garbage collection/GC spikes, object pooling, or "the game runs slow".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit or defend Octane performance. Use when a change can affect per-render, per-node, scheduling, compiler-output, SSR, hydration, or bundle cost, or when asked whether something is fast enough. Holds the V8-shape, DOM, and scheduling rules hot-path code must follow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a family meeting to make a big care decision together. Use when asked help me run a family meeting about care, we need to decide together about mom's care, my siblings and I disagree about our parent, or facilitate a care decision. Produces an agenda and structure for the meeting, how to prepare (facts, options, everyone's input), ground rules to keep old family dynamics from derailing it, how to include the person being cared for, ways to work through disagreement toward a decision, and clear next steps with owners. Not legal, medical, or financial advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pressure-test a business or side-hustle idea before you sink money and months into it — find the real demand, the risky assumptions, and the cheapest way to test them. Use when asked to validate my business idea, is this a good business idea, test my side hustle, or should I start this. Produces a read on the core assumptions the idea depends on, who the customer really is and whether the pain is real, the cheapest experiments to test demand before building, a rough viability check (market, competition, economics), and a go/refine/rethink call — honest, not a cheerleader.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft the hard personal message you keep putting off — chasing money a friend owes, backing out of plans, checking in after a fight, following up on an unanswered text. Use when asked to help send an awkward text, how to say something uncomfortable to a friend, word a difficult personal message, or bring up something touchy. Produces a couple of calibrated options, the one line to open with, and the send/wait/call judgement call — warm, honest, and not a doormat.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check whether a raise, more hours, or a new job could cost you more in lost benefits than you gain — the 'benefits cliff' — before you accept it. Use when asked will a raise hurt my benefits, benefits cliff, if I make more will I lose my food stamps or medicaid, or should I take more hours. Produces a plain map of which benefits phase out at what income (and which cut off suddenly vs. taper), a rough read on whether a specific income change helps or hurts net, the ones with hard cliffs to watch (childcare, Medicaid, housing), the moves that soften a cliff, and where to get a real benefits screening. Not financial/benefits advice; points to a benefits counselor.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked to check whether a figure is audited, which headline numbers sit outside the audited accounts, what 'adjusted' or 'underlying' means in this report, or who is vouching for the numbers in the highlights. For every headline figure in the highlights, chairman's statement and CEO review of an uploaded annual report, states whether it sits inside or outside the audited statements and what was added or removed versus the nearest audited number. Produces a boundary table, the list of figures outside the boundary, and a plain-English summary of who is vouching for what. Educational, not financial advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit whether the organisation's AI spend actually paid — measured against baselines, not vendor math or vibes. Use when a CFO asks what the AI tools returned, when renewing AI contracts, when consolidating overlapping AI subscriptions, or to build the measurement plan before the next spend. Produces an ROI audit with per-tool verdicts (keep/consolidate/cut), the honest-measurement method behind each number, and a baseline plan for whatever can't be scored yet. To forecast ROI before an investment use roi-estimator; this skill measures what already happened.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when triaging, classifying or landing Dependabot pull requests in this repo — clearing the open Dependabot queue, deciding whether a bump needs a WW Jira ticket, or checking whether a bump's build actually passed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user says `aegis:update`, asks to update or upgrade an installed Aegis method-pack, wants the latest Aegis version, or asks whether Aegis is current on this host.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer one cited question: how code works, or whether a repeated pattern deserves a rule. Use when: asked how, why, or whether to enforce a pattern.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit claims that work is done or shipped against the diff or repo. Use when: asked whether something really got done, even if it looks obvious.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing conflicts in a Bethesda plugin set — determining for a record (or a plugin's records) which override wins, what the conflict label is, what references it, and whether the configuration is safe or breaking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when planning or building the whole Bethesda modpack incrementally — batch strategy, rollback point, naming convention, separator discipline, attribution, and declaring 风格 before adding mods. Triggers - "build a modpack", "plan the pack", "batch strategy", "rollback point", "naming convention", "declare 风格", "策展整合包", "整合包规划". NOT for deciding whether one mod belongs (evaluating-bgs-mods), installing one mod from author instructions (interpreting-mod-author-instructions), load order mechanics (writing-bgs-load-order), or record conflicts (xedit-conflict-audit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding how to correctly download/install a Bethesda mod per the author's instructions — triggers "how do I install", "FOMOD choices", "which file to download", "author说明", "install instructions", "which variant", "按作者说明安装", "这个mod怎么装". NOT for deciding whether to include the mod (use evaluating-bgs-mods), load order editing (writing-bgs-load-order), record conflicts (xedit-conflict-audit), archive operations (using-bgs-archive), Papyrus work (using-bgs-papyrus), or translation/export tasks (using-bgs-translator).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How AgentGuards enforces its guardrails in Codex — fully automatic, via hooks, with nothing for you to call. Load this if asked how AgentGuards works, whether you need to screen something yourself, or why no agentguards check_input / authorize_action tools are available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ALWAYS invoke this skill before asking the user any technical question or offering options, and whenever they ask to be asked in plain words - "ask simple", "ask me simply", "ask me in plain words" - in any language. ALWAYS invoke it too when the user asks for your view on a technical choice: whether it is worth doing, more than the problem needs, or replaceable by something simpler, and which option you would take. Invoke it even when the code makes the answer look obvious: the checks are what make the answer more than a guess. Rewrites the question in plain words and always ends with one marked recommendation. A structural choice first passes six checks, shown as a table: effort now, simpler substitute, extra work later, lock-in, over-engineering, easy to undo. Doing nothing is always weighed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debugging-method traps: run the discriminating experiment first, read build logs bottom-up, treat an empty actual as unwritten, audit shared handles before removing a feature, read commit history critically. Use when a fix is not converging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when targeting Environmental Health Perspectives or deciding whether an environmental-health manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the public-health-relevance and methodological-rigor bar, epidemiological/toxicological expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when defending the research design of an American Educational Research Journal (AERJ) manuscript — quantitative (multilevel, IRT, quasi-experimental, RCT), qualitative (case study, ethnography, interview), or mixed methods. AERJ judges each tradition on its own terms against the AERA reporting standards. Strengthens the design; it does not write code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when targeting the Journal of Cleaner Production or deciding whether a cleaner-production/sustainability manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the cleaner-production contribution and methodological-transparency bar, LCA/system-boundary expectations, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。