Query the wiki to answer questions. Searches wiki pages, synthesizes answers with citations, and optionally files valuable answers back as new wiki pages. Use when the user asks a question about the knowledge base.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
1,399 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Query the wiki to answer questions. Searches wiki pages, synthesizes answers with citations, and optionally files valuable answers back as new wiki pages. Use when the user asks a question about the knowledge base.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Researches a topic by breaking it into subtopics, gathering factual information with reasoning, and producing a structured summary with key findings and open questions. Use when the user asks to research, investigate, look up, summarize a topic, or says 'what is known about...' or 'learn about...'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Semantic search over ingested documents using RAG (LlamaIndex/ChromaDB or Foundational RAG)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ingest a raw source document into the wiki. Reads the source, extracts key information, creates or updates wiki pages, maintains cross-references, and logs the operation. Use when the user adds a new source or says 'ingest this'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Academic paper search via Google Scholar using Serper API
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advanced web search using Tavily API for current information retrieval
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews code diffs and files for security vulnerabilities (OWASP Top 10), error handling, complexity, naming conventions, and performance issues. Use when the user asks to review a PR, pull request, diff, merge request, or code changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides installation of gitagent and creation of first agent with scaffolding, configuration, and validation. Use when the user is new to gitagent, asks how to get started, wants to install gitagent, set up their first agent, or says 'how do I start?'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Model selection by provider health, not task complexity. Tier 0 (local) handles most tasks. Paid models are break-glass only. Fallbacks activate on 429 or timeout — never on perceived task difficulty.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Converts agent definitions between frameworks — exports to Claude Code, OpenAI, CrewAI, Lyzr, and GitHub Models formats, and imports from Claude, Cursor, and CrewAI projects. Use when the user wants to convert an agent, migrate to another framework, export to LangChain/AutoGen/CrewAI, or import from existing automation tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "build programmatic SEO pages", "generate pages at scale", "rank on a high-authority third-party site", "borrow domain authority", "build a vs / alternative page", "do local SEO", "optimize a Google Business Profile", or "fix NAP" — one page-build router with four modes: programmatic (template × dataset systems), parasite (barnacle publishing on Medium/Reddit/LinkedIn/GitHub), comparison (vs / alternative pages in four formats), and local (GBP + NAP + citations + location pages), each with its own thin/duplicate, honesty, or reputation-abuse guardrail. Not for finding what to target — use keyword-research or content-gap-analysis; not for drafting one standalone article — use content-writer; not for scoring a page for publish — use content-quality-auditor. 程序化SEO/批量页面/寄生SEO/借势权重/对比页/vs页/替代页/本地SEO/谷歌商家档案/NAP一致性
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "package our proof points", "build reusable stat cards and case snippets", or "put proof where each pillar makes its claim"; turns claims-ledger-approved proofs into reusable proof modules — stat cards, case snippets, testimonial blocks, comparison proofs — each pinned to a message-house pillar and the ledger claim ID it substantiates, and flags any pillar making a claim with no approved proof behind it. Never adjudicates a proof: unverified or ledger-absent proofs are marked '[needs source]' and routed to the claims candidates. Not for adjudicating or substantiating claims — use offer-claims-registry; not for fabricating a benchmark to fill a gap — a missing proof is flagged, not invented; not for scoring narrative quality — use narrative-quality-auditor. 证据模块/证据卡/客户案例/主张对齐
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "track competitor influencer marketing", "see who my rivals partner with", or "benchmark my influencer program"; produces a competitor partnership roster, campaign and content-strategy breakdown, performance estimates, and a gap/opportunity list. Not for finding your own new creators — use influencer-discovery. 竞品达人合作追踪/竞品营销分析
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "pre-launch check the landing page", "run a Quality-Score preflight", or "verify ad-to-page message match before launch"; produces an ad↔page continuity report — message-match gaps, above-the-fold check, page-speed read, form-friction count, mobile-render flags — as a pass/fix punch list. Not for redesigning or rewriting the page — use landing-optimizer; not for scoring the account or the RQS — use ad-account-auditor. 落地页体验预检/广告落地页一致性检查
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "QA my conversion tracking before launch", "check my UTMs / pixel / event firing", "set up a tracking pre-flight", or "set the dedup rule so Meta and Google stop double-counting"; builds and fixes the measurement plumbing — conversion-event firing, UTM hygiene, cross-platform dedup rules, attribution-window alignment, and offline/iOS-ATT modeled-gap flags — as a pre-flight checklist plus a UTM/event-spec builder. Not for scoring R1/R2 — that is a scored veto in ad-account-auditor; not for account structure — use campaign-architect. 付费广告转化追踪QA/UTM规范/跨平台去重
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare UX patterns, features, strengths, and gaps across rival products. Use when you need to know what others actually do. For deliberately adopting their conventions, use `jakobs-law` (interaction-design).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inventory and prioritise accumulated design inconsistencies across a product. Use when drift has built up over time. For token coverage specifically use `design-token-audit` (designer-toolkit); for WCAG gaps use `accessibility-audit` (design-systems).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute automate SOC 2 audit preparation including evidence gathering, control assessment, and compliance gap identification. Use when you need to prepare for SOC 2 audits, assess Trust Service Criteria compliance, document security controls, or generate readiness reports. Trigger with phrases like "SOC 2 audit preparation", "SOC 2 readiness assessment", "collect SOC 2 evidence", or "Trust Service Criteria compliance".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze code coverage metrics and identify untested code paths. Use when analyzing untested code or coverage gaps. Trigger with phrases like "analyze coverage", "check test coverage", or "find untested code".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Claude-native deep research using DAG-based query planning, parallel subagent execution, and gap-driven iteration. No external API needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze job postings, calculate match scores, identify gaps, and create application strategy
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Researches the app being cloned and reads what its real users say in public reviews (App Store, Google Play, G2, Capterra, Trustpilot, Reddit, Hacker News, its own feature-request board), then ranks what they hate, what is missing and what is unsolved, turns it into a fix plan for the clone and a positioning angle you can sell. Every quote is real, verbatim and linked. Use when the user says "what do people hate about X", "read the reviews", "how do I make mine better", "find the gap", "what features are missing", "how do I position this", "make it sellable", or after /replica-diff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Race condition and TOCTOU testing for web apps. Use when testing one-time operations, concurrent HTTP abuse, rate-limit bypass, Turbo Intruder gates, HTTP/2 single-packet attacks, and CWE-362-style synchronization gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GraphQL and hidden parameter testing playbook. Use when exploring introspection, batching, undocumented fields, hidden parameters, schema abuse, and GraphQL authorization gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。