「how」の検索結果

Owns where the business plays and how it wins over a multi-year horizon — portfolio choices, corporate development, strategic partnerships, and planning under uncertainty. Use this for a decision about which markets or businesses to be in, whether to build, buy, or partner, how to allocate capital across business lines, or when a long-horizon bet needs framing. Distinct from `chief-executive`, which arbitrates present-quarter conflicts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cooking close-ups, mukbang and eating vlogs. They work when every beat shows one visible change in the food and one matching sound, and the dish stays the same dish from first frame to last. Use when the user wants a Seedance 2.5 / 2.0 video prompt for this kind of clip (Food close-ups and eating ASMR; 中文触发词: 美食特写与吃播 ASMR, 美食, 吃播, ASMR, 烹饪), or asks how published cases of this type were prompted. Read references/cases.md before drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Every shot carries its own timecode and shows one visible change on a body. The dread comes from the chain — a look, veins, a bite, the next person — and the ending seals a door without settling anything. Use when the user wants a Seedance 2.5 / 2.0 video prompt for this kind of clip (Horror and suspense; 中文触发词: 恐怖悬疑短片, 恐怖, 悬疑, 惊悚), or asks how published cases of this type were prompted. Read references/cases.md before drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result). Local by default; commit it when a reviewer needs the trail to trust the result. Use for /show-me-your-work, autonomous or multi-phase runs, or work a human reviews after stepping away.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for "how does X work", code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement / ownership / layering questions ("where should this live", "which package owns this", "is this the right layer"). Explains subsystem architecture, runtime flow, onboarding mental models. Use why for motivation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies whether a scientific or biomedical claim is actually supported by the cited original papers rather than by citation drift, overstatement, selective citation, or correlation-to-causation inflation. Use this skill whenever a user wants to check whether a repeated statement, slide claim, manuscript sentence, review assertion, or “people often say” scientific conclusion is truly supported by the underlying primary literature. Always separate the claim itself, the cited paper(s), what the paper actually showed, what it did not show, and whether later retellings drifted beyond the original evidence. Never fabricate references, findings, study features, or citation chains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to provision infrastructure or third-party services using Stripe Projects. Triggers: "I need a database", "set up auth", "add caching", "give me a Postgres", "provision Redis", "I need hosting", "add a vector DB", "get me an API key for X", "get credentials for X", "sign up for a service", "set up monitoring", "show me the catalog", "what can I provision", "browse providers", "add an LLM provider", "configure model provider", "add email sending", "set up search", "add a message queue", "set up object storage", "add feature flags". Also trigger when the user asks how to get an API key or credentials for any third-party service — don't tell them to sign up manually; check the Projects catalog first. Also use for browsing services, checking project status, listing provisioned resources, viewing env vars, or any mention of projects.dev or adding/provisioning/connecting a cloud service.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be considered when you need to answer reflow machine maintenance questions or provide detailed guidance based on thermocouple data, MES data or defect data and reflow technical handbooks. This skill covers how to obtain important concepts, calculations, definitions, thresholds, and others from the handbook and how to do cross validations between handbook and datasets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for "how does X work", code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement / ownership / layering questions ("where should this live", "which package owns this", "is this the right layer"). Explains subsystem architecture, runtime flow, onboarding mental models. Use why for motivation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result). Local by default; commit it when a reviewer needs the trail to trust the result. Use for /show-me-your-work, autonomous or multi-phase runs, or work a human reviews after stepping away.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writing plays and screenplays in the Chekhovian mode (契诃夫戏剧法) — distilled from the complete plays (没有父亲的人/普拉东诺夫, 伊凡诺夫, 林妖→万尼亚舅舅, 海鸥, 三姊妹, 樱桃园, nine one-acts) plus Chekhov's own letters, Stanislavsky's and Nemirovich-Danchenko's rehearsal notes and 焦菊隐/童道明 criticism. Covers the four-act mood-based structure without central climax, off-stage events, "correct answer stated in Act 1 and refused", the announced event that never happens, three-layer endings (hope monologue + nihilist line + household action), no-villain conflict with environment, every character's object and catchphrase, one-way love chains, half-step-off dialogue, philosophy cut by thirst, the shortest words for the deepest pain, stage-direction and sound discipline, and how Chekhov revised The Wood Demon into Uncle Vanya. Use when the user wants an ensemble drama, a "nothing happens" play, subtext-heavy dialogue, a family estate / provincial story, an anti-climactic structure, or asks how to "Chekhov-ize" a script.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Episode and season structure for TV series (剧集单集与季的结构) — teasers and cold opens, broadcast four/five/six-act grids with page anchors, three tests for finding the invisible acts in streaming scripts, act-out and cliffhanger taxonomies, Oberg's four information tools, A/B/C/runner weaving and scene-count ratios, the Calvisi pilot beat sheet, five-part scene structure, and season shape (tentpoles, bottle and container episodes, two-parters, finales). Merged from Calvisi, Douglas, Oberg, Landau, Goldberg & Rabkin, Miller, Rabkin and Blum, plus act lengths measured from published West Wing, Succession, Sopranos, Downton and Fleabag scripts. Use when breaking an episode into acts, deciding how many acts a script needs, placing act outs and cliffhangers, designing a teaser, weaving A/B/C stories and runners, beating out a one-hour pilot, auditing an episode that has no shape, reverse-engineering a show's structure, or planning a season's episode order (分幕、出幕、悬念结局、季弧、瓶子集).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show current context status and session health. Use to check how much context has been used, whether auto-compact is approaching, and what state will be preserved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dontbesilent 内容创作诊断。选题通过后，诊断怎么把这个选题做成好内容。 触发方式：/dbs-content、/内容诊断、「这个内容怎么做」「帮我看看这个文案」 Content creation diagnosis. After topic passes, diagnose how to turn it into good content. Trigger: /dbs-content, "how should I create this content", "review my copy"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when answering a question that needs data from a ktx-connected database - investigating, analyzing, "how many", "show me", "what's the breakdown of", finding records by value, exploring tables, comparing periods, explaining metrics, or any data-analysis request. Triggers even when the user does not say "analytics"; if the answer requires querying a configured ktx connection, this skill applies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to capture new reusable patterns into ktx's semantic layer - when a measure, segment, or join belongs in the catalog and how to write it generically so it stays small and useful over time. Loaded by the post-turn memory-agent only. The research agent does not write to the SL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Azure resource groups and generate detailed Mermaid architecture diagrams showing the relationships between individual resources. WHEN: create architecture diagram, visualize Azure resources, show resource relationships, generate Mermaid diagram, analyze resource group, diagram my resources, architecture visualization, resource topology, map Azure infrastructure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided first-time setup for Minutes — download whisper model, create directories, configure audio input. Use when the user says "set up minutes", "install minutes", "first time setup", "configure minutes", "get started with minutes", "how do I start using minutes", or when verify shows missing components.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and resolve Claude Code plugin and skill issues. This skill should be used when plugins are installed but not showing in available skills list, skills are not activating as expected, or when troubleshooting enabledPlugins configuration in settings.json. Triggers include "plugin not working", "skill not showing", "installed but disabled", or "enabledPlugins" issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a CONTRIBUTING guide that helps people contribute to an open-source project without friction. Use when asked to write a CONTRIBUTING.md, set up contribution guidelines, or make a repo welcoming to contributors. Produces a clear guide: how to set up, the contribution workflow, standards, PR expectations, and how to get help — lowering the barrier to a first PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calm a heated conflict — in person or in writing — before it does damage, by lowering the temperature instead of winning the point. Use when asked help me de-escalate this, this argument is getting heated, calm this situation down, or how do I respond without making it worse. Produces a read on what's actually driving the heat (often an unmet need under the surface argument), the de-escalation moves (acknowledge, slow down, find the shared ground), what to say and what to avoid, and how to steer toward resolution once the temperature drops — because you can't solve anything while everyone's activated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handle a dispute with a contractor — unfinished work, poor quality, overcharging, or a no-show — with a path that protects your money and your options. Use when asked to deal with a contractor dispute, my contractor did bad work / won't finish / overcharged, or how to get a builder to fix their work. Produces a read on your position (contract, payments, evidence), a firm-but-professional communication and demand path, documentation and payment-leverage guidance, and escalation options (mediation, licensing board, chargeback, small claims) — flagging that it's not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start a cross-team project with the collaboration contract that prevents the classic collisions — who decides what, how work flows between teams, the communication channels and cadence, and what done means — agreed before the first collision instead of during it. Use when asked kick off this cross-team project right, our two teams keep colliding, define how we'll work with the other team, or set up the partnership before we start. Produces the one-page contract: decision rights, interfaces, cadence, and the done-definition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Support a teenager through college applications without taking them over — the parent's actual jobs (logistics, finances, emotional ballast), the ownership lines that keep the application theirs, and the scripts for the hard moments. Use when asked how do I help my kid with college apps, how involved should I be, my teenager won't start their essays, or we disagree about the college list. Produces the role split, the family timeline, the money conversation framework, and the scripts for deadlock, rejection, and the essay you must not write.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。