4,907 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Verifies legal citations and retrieves source material using the case.dev Legal Research API and CLI. Use when validating a citation, confirming a case exists, pulling source text, finding related authorities, extracting citations from a brief or opinion, or building a filing-ready authority check without branded citator terminology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces structured aviation law summaries with Bluebook citations covering U.S. and international regulatory frameworks, treaties, and case law. Use when drafting an aviation law summary, FAA/DOT/TSA compliance overview, Montreal/Warsaw Convention liability analysis, air service agreement review, accident liability synopsis, or aviation regulatory research memo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts board-ready Anti-Money Laundering compliance programs for U.S. financial institutions under BSA/FinCEN requirements. Covers CIP, CDD, EDD, SAR/CTR reporting, OFAC screening, risk assessment, training, independent testing, and governance structures. Use when creating or updating AML policies, BSA compliance programs, or financial institution regulatory documentation. Trigger keywords: AML, BSA, FinCEN, Bank Secrecy Act, anti-money laundering, SAR, CTR, OFAC, CIP, CDD, KYC, compliance program.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces litigation-grade case summaries for animal law disputes including cruelty/neglect prosecutions, ownership/custody, dangerous animal designations, veterinary malpractice, and service/assistance animal accommodations. Builds exhibit-cited factual timelines, maps evidence to statutory elements, evaluates expert evidence, and assesses remedies with jurisdiction-specific legal research. Use when summarizing animal law cases, analyzing animal cruelty charges, pet custody disputes, dangerous dog hearings, veterinary malpractice claims, or assistance animal accommodation matters. Also trigger for animal forfeiture, bite liability, wildlife possession, or animal-related court filings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces structured U.S. adoption-law summaries for litigation and client-facing use. Use when asked to summarize adoption law, draft pre-filing research briefs, create jurisdiction-specific issue memoranda, or prepare client education documents. Triggers: adoption summary, domestic adoption, intercountry adoption, Hague adoption, foster care adoption, TPR in adoption, stepparent/relative adoption, post-adoption rights.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts an Adverse Event Reporting Policy compliant with 21 CFR 312.32 (IND safety reporting), 21 CFR 314.80 (postmarketing), and ICH E2A, with multi-jurisdictional overlays (EMA, PMDA, Health Canada). Covers seriousness/causality frameworks, expedited reporting timelines, roles, documentation standards, training mandates, and QA mechanisms. Use when drafting or updating an adverse event reporting policy, pharmacovigilance policy, AE/SAE reporting SOP, or safety reporting framework for a pharmaceutical company, CRO, biotech, or clinical research institution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fetch external sources (web/arXiv/GitHub) into scanner-gated wiki CANDIDATES, never canonical pages: guarded, capped, scanned. NOT for local knowledge (mk:wiki) or markdown fetch (mk:web-to-markdown).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bootstraps a new project end to end: research, design, plan, scaffold, implement, docs. Explicit invocation only. NOT for autonomous builds (mk:autobuild); NOT for existing-repo work (mk:cook).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture, gate, query, and render long-term project knowledge through the gated `mewkit wiki` subsystem. Use to create a wiki, propose/approve candidates (scanner-gated), hand off a skill's terminal artifact as a scanned candidate, recall context, search the FTS index, or list pages. Agents may only PROPOSE candidates; canonical pages are written only via human approve. NOT for short-lived JSON memory (see mk:memory); NOT for fetching external sources (see mk:wiki-research); NOT for HTML snapshots (see mk:wiki-render).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates structured multi-file implementation plans before build. Scope-aware: trivial tasks exit early, simple tasks get fast plans, complex tasks get full research + phase files + validation. Enforces Gate 1. Activated by /mk:plan or /mk:cook. NOT for ticket complexity analysis against an existing codebase (see mk:planning-engine); NOT for CEO-level scope review of existing plans (see mk:plan-ceo-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating a new project from scratch — orchestrates the full journey from idea to running code. Research → design → plan → scaffold → implement → docs. Explicit invocation only — never auto-activates. CLI = project infrastructure (.claude/), bootstrap = application code + full pipeline. NOT for autonomous multi-hour builds of specified products (see mk:autobuild); NOT for single-task feature work on existing projects (see mk:cook).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fetch daily arXiv announcements (cs.RO), filter by research relevance, generate a structured markdown digest, and sync matched papers to a Zotero collection with arXiv PDFs attached.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured SE task evaluation using 15 benchmark definitions from claude-code-harness research
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish, author, restructure, or audit human-first processor Architecture, Design, Research, Review, and Verification documentation. Use for progressive documentation scaffolding, authority maps, reading paths, document-type content contracts, length-budgeted splitting, or maintainability reviews. Do not use as a substitute for cycle-accurate microarchitecture analysis or RTL implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill for ANY of the following — do not skip it even if the query seems simple: strategic decisions, business analysis, thesis building, complex problem solving, geopolitical analysis (non-market), philosophical reasoning, academic research, system design, decision under uncertainty, long-form thinking, or any question that benefits from First Principle deconstruction and multi-agent reasoning. ALWAYS use this skill when the user asks about: why something works the way it does, whether a decision is correct, how to think about a complex problem, what could go wrong, analyzing a situation from multiple angles, or any "should I..." question involving real-world trade-offs. This is NOT a market/trading skill — for financial markets, BTC, gold, stocks, forex, macro economics, use money-atlas-intelligence-os instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate several distinct UI directions for a screen or flow before committing to one. Produces 2-4 named interface directions with layout logic, component choices, and tradeoffs, optionally with generated mockup images. Use when the user says "ideate the UI", "give me layout options", "design directions for this screen", "explore the interface", or after context/research and before prototyping. Part of the Product Design set.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrator for the Product Design skill set — turn early ideas into reviewable prototypes. Routes to the right sub-skill (get-context, research, audit, ideate, image-to-code, url-to-code, prototype, qa, share) based on where you are in the design process. Use when the user gives a high-level design goal like "design a UI for X", "prototype this idea", "rebuild this screen", "review our flow", or isn't sure which design step they need. Delegates to design-* skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when user says "simmer this", "refine this", "hone this", "iterate on this", or asks to improve a specific artifact over multiple rounds. Runs an iterative refinement loop with investigation-first judges that read the code, understand the problem, and propose evidence-based improvements. Auto-selects single judge or multi-judge board based on complexity. Works on any artifact type: documents, prompts, specs, emails, creative writing, API designs, pipelines, codebases. Supports multi-file workspace targets, runnable evaluators, and open-ended optimization (model selection, pipeline topology, prompt tuning).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Judge subskill for simmer. Scores a candidate artifact against user-defined criteria on a 1-10 scale and produces ASI (highest-leverage direction) for the next generator round. Supports judge-only, runnable evaluator, and hybrid evaluation modes. Do not invoke directly — dispatched as a subagent by the simmer orchestrator.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reflect subskill for simmer. Records iteration results in trajectory table, tracks best candidate, handles regression rollback, and passes ASI forward to the next round. Supports both single-file and workspace modes. Do not invoke directly — called by simmer orchestrator after each judge round.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Judge board subskill for simmer. Dispatches a panel of judges with different lenses, runs one deliberation round where they challenge each other's scores, then synthesizes consensus scores + single ASI. Drop-in replacement for simmer-judge that produces identical output format. Do not invoke directly — dispatched by the simmer orchestrator when JUDGE_MODE is board.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generator subskill for simmer. Produces an improved version of the artifact based on the judge's ASI feedback. Handles both single-file and workspace targets. Do not invoke directly — dispatched as a subagent by the simmer orchestrator.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Setup subskill for simmer. Inspects the artifact or workspace, infers evaluation contracts and search space, proposes a complete assessment to the user, and produces a setup brief after confirmation. Conversational, not form-based — the agent does the work of understanding the problem, then presents what it found. Do not invoke directly — called by simmer orchestrator.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AutoResearch-inspired self-evolution loop for ANY Claude Code skill. Finds flaws, fixes them, benchmarks against a diverse prompt pool (anti-overfitting), and uses blind A/B judging. Fully automated — no human input needed during the loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。