「lua」の検索結果

The way to answer "how are my production AI agents doing?" and to run the team's agent-observability deployment — reach for it even on casual phrasing that names no tool. Trigger when the user wants to: • inspect agent telemetry — did agents error/fail/go flaky; sessions, events, latency, token usage, slowest models; eval/quality scores and whether quality dropped; • operate the deployment — ack/assign/resolve/mute/dismiss issues (alerts, reports, and audit findings) with notes; run and triage audits; see who has access and change roles (e.g. read-only); create or scope API keys (e.g. a push-only CI key); change settings; run saved or ad-hoc ClickHouse queries. Served by the `fp` CLI against FailproofAI Cloud. NOT for writing or designing an evaluator service / scoring logic (that's `agenteye-evaluator`), adding SDK/instrumentation to your app (that's `failproofai-sdk`, imported as `failproofai_sdk`), debugging the collector/daemon, or unrelated dev work (why a build/CI run failed, rotating non-FailproofAI Cloud secrets).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffolds eval.yaml evaluation specs for skills, custom agents, and redistributable gh-aw workflow packages in the dotnet/skills repository. Use when creating skill or workflow-package tests, writing evaluation stimuli, defining graders and rubrics, sizing an eval for statistical power, or setting up test fixture files. Handles the Vally eval.yaml schema, fixture organization, and overfitting avoidance. Do not use for running or debugging existing evals (use improve-skill-quality) nor for skills authoring (use create-skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses and fixes skills in the dotnet/skills repository that lose to their own baseline, fail to activate, time out, or return "no credible improvement". Use when an evaluation verdict is a regression or underpowered, when a skill regressed after a change, when /evaluate reports no results, or when deciding whether a weak skill should be strengthened or retired. Do not use for scaffolding a brand-new skill (use create-skill) or a brand-new eval (use create-skill-test).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze skill quality", "evaluate this skill", "review skill quality", "check my skill", or "generate quality report". Evaluates local skills across description quality, content organization, writing style, and structural integrity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses a research paper outline (.qmd file) against structured criteria from Kosuke Imai's empirical research guide. Evaluates the abstract and section outline for: research question clarity, stated contributions, hypotheses and testable implications, data description, planned results and inferential approach, and robustness checks. Detects causal papers from the abstract and conditionally assesses identification strategy only when causal framing is present. Produces a structured markdown report with PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL assessments and actionable suggestions. Use when asked to assess, evaluate, review, or check a paper outline, abstract-and-outline, or research plan in a .qmd file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the ScholarEval framework to systematically evaluate scholarly work across quality dimensions (novelty, rigor, significance, and clarity). Use to critique academic papers, research proposals, literature reviews, or grant applications and produce a structured, criterion-based assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Single-page SEO audit: content quality under Google's E-E-A-T framework and Helpful Content guidelines, on-page factors, search intent, technical signals and readability. Pulls GSC data for the page, crawls the live HTML, checks metadata, schema, internal linking and depth, and produces a scored report with fixes. Use whenever the user wants to analyze a specific page or URL, not the whole site. Trigger on: "analyze this page", "audit this URL", "how is this page doing", "evaluate my blog post", "check this landing page", "page SEO", "content quality check", "is this page good enough", "review this page's SEO", "what's wrong with this page", "how can I improve this page", "page analysis", "single page audit", "content audit for [URL]", or any request naming a specific URL/page for SEO evaluation. If the user provides a specific URL (not just a domain), this is likely the right skill; use /seo-analysis for full-site audits instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

将内容支柱与多种格式交叉，生成选题矩阵，每个格子产出一个可直接执行的选题。 当用户说"选题矩阵""批量选题""选题池""内容矩阵""一次多个选题""支柱×格式""选题规划表"时使用。 和 skill-topic-evaluator 的区别：本 SKILL 批量生成选题池；topic-evaluator 评估单个选题是否值得做。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

对社媒帖子草稿进行互动潜力评分，基于历史表现数据输出结构化评分卡。 当用户说"帖子打分""评分""这条能火吗""发布前评估""内容质量分""评分卡""草稿评估"时使用。 和 skill-topic-evaluator 的区别：evaluator 评还没做的选题潜力，本 SKILL 评已写好的草稿质量； 和 skill-social-performance-review 的区别：本 SKILL 评单条草稿（发布前），review 做月度组合复盘（发布后）。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LQF Machine Learning Expert Guide - Routed skill for ML/Statistical Modeling with Critical Discussion Mode. Triggers on: machine learning, modeling, prediction, training, classification, regression, clustering, deep learning, neural network, model evaluation, feature engineering, hyperparameter tuning, overfitting, underfitting, baseline, ablation study, critique my approach, review my model, is this a good idea, should I use, what's wrong with, evaluate my solution, challenge my assumptions, discuss my approach Engages in critical discussion with minimum 3 rounds of iterative refinement. Challenges both user proposals and own suggestions with fact-based critique. Demands evidence and baselines before accepting solutions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate trained machine learning models with the right metrics and comparison logic. Use for benchmark review, threshold selection, calibration, validation, and model comparison; not for feature engineering or leakage auditing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Filesystem RAG benchmarks: corpus/, train.json, evaluate_rag.py (RAGAS quality). Not for prod monitoring, latency/throughput benchmarking (use rag-perf), or evals outside this repo layout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, configure, and chain repo-native Nemotron customization steps into single-step or multi-step pipelines: curation, translation, SFT/PEFT (AutoModel or Megatron-Bridge), pretraining/CPT, RL alignment (DPO/RLVR/GRPO/RLHF), BYOB/MCQ benchmarks, checkpoint conversion, ModelOpt optimization, env profiles, and evaluation of trained checkpoints or existing/hosted endpoints. Use when a request names a Nemotron step or workflow, or asks to clean, translate, train, fine-tune, align, convert, optimize, evaluate, or compose these into a pipeline. Do NOT use for frontend/dashboard/visualization work, generic ML advice, billing/access, or non-Nemotron coding tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the root-level workflow runtime policy or rule-based rollouts and verify simulator success. Use for evaluation, checkpoints, or local controllers; do not use for replay or dataset annotation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fine-tune models on Microsoft Foundry using SFT (supervised), DPO (preference), or RFT (reinforcement with graders). Covers dataset preparation, training job submission, deployment, and evaluation. USE FOR: fine-tune, SFT, DPO, RFT, training data, grader, distillation, fine-tuned model, training job, large file upload, calibrate grader, deploy fine-tuned model, evaluate fine-tuned model. DO NOT USE FOR: general model deployment without fine-tuning (use deploy-model), agent creation (use agents), prompt optimization without training (use prompt-optimizer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess whether source code is ready to deploy to Azure — the check BEFORE infrastructure work. Evaluates build health, app completeness, dependencies and local services, stack compatibility, and deployment feasibility. Answers questions about what your app needs before it can be deployed — frameworks, dependencies, and configuration. Checks whether dependencies are compatible and identifies deployment blockers and unsupported frameworks. WHEN: "evaluate my repo", "is my app ready to deploy", "what does my app need to deploy", "what do I need before deploying", "does my app need", "can I ship this to Azure", "scan my repo for issues", "is this app deployable", "check if my app is ready for Azure", "do I need a Dockerfile", "what's blocking my deployment", "are there any blockers", "are my dependencies compatible", "does Azure support my framework", "what needs to change before deploying", "check my app configuration".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, deploy, evaluate, optimize, fine-tune, and manage Microsoft Foundry agents, models, and resources end to end. USE FOR: foundry, azd ai agent, azd provision/deploy, hosted agent scaffold/develop/run/deploy/troubleshoot, prompt agent create, managed harness agent create, GitHub Copilot harness agent, create agent, update agent, add tool to agent, invoke agent, agent insights, evaluate agent, batch eval, continuous eval, continuous monitoring, agent CI/CD, optimize prompt, improve prompt, optimize agent instructions, Agent Optimizer scaffold, dataset curation from traces, deploy model, model fine-tuning (SFT/DPO/RFT), Foundry project, RBAC, role assignment, permissions, quota, capacity, region, deployment failure, AI Services, create Foundry resource, knowledge index, customize deployment, onboard, availability, training-data, grader, distillation, large file upload. DO NOT USE FOR: Azure Functions, App Service, general Azure deploy (use azure-deploy), general Azure prep (use azure-prepare).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Azure AI Projects SDK for .NET. High-level client for Azure AI Foundry projects including agents, connections, datasets, deployments, evaluations, and indexes. Use for AI Foundry project management, versioned agents, and orchestration. Triggers: "AI Projects", "AIProjectClient", "Foundry project", "versioned agents", "evaluations", "datasets", "connections", "deployments .NET".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates market bubble risk through quantitative data-driven analysis using the revised Minsky/Kindleberger framework v2.1. Prioritizes objective metrics (Put/Call, VIX, margin debt, breadth, IPO data) over subjective impressions. Features strict qualitative adjustment criteria with confirmation bias prevention. Supports practical investment decisions with mandatory data collection and mechanical scoring. Use when user asks about bubble risk, valuation concerns, or profit-taking timing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive US stock analysis including fundamental analysis (financial metrics, business quality, valuation), technical analysis (indicators, chart patterns, support/resistance), stock comparisons, and investment report generation. Use when user requests analysis of US stock tickers (e.g., "analyze AAPL", "compare TSLA vs NVDA", "give me a report on Microsoft"), evaluation of financial metrics, technical chart analysis, or investment recommendations for American stocks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Selects, deploys, and customizes AI models on Amazon SageMaker. Training or Processing jobs, fine-tuning (SFT/DPO/RLVR/RLAIF), model selection, dataset preparation, evaluation, SageMaker or Bedrock deployment, inference optimization and endpoint diagnostics. Covers the full lifecycle from planning through production. Use when fine-tuning models on SageMaker, choosing which base model to customize, fine-tune, or deploy from SageMaker JumpStart or Hub, SageMakerPublicHub, or the SageMaker public model catalog, transforming or validating training data, evaluating model quality, deploying or optimizing endpoints, configuring IAM/S3 for training, or managing SageMaker Managed MLflow. Use for endpoint health, failures, latency, logs, metrics, errors. Covers Serverless Model Customization, Nova and OSS deployment paths, and PySDK v3. NOT for Ground Truth labeling, Feature Store, or general-purpose AWS infrastructure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds, configures, debugs, and optimizes AWS observability - operator-symptom questions and detecting Omni vs classic CloudWatch. CloudWatch on an already-reporting service: Log Insights, metric/composite/anomaly alarms, custom metrics/EMF, dashboards, X-Ray/ADOT tracing, canaries, CloudTrail, Dynamic Instrumentation (live breakpoints/snapshots), the Application Signals service map, and fleet health views. CloudWatch Omni on an existing Space: SQL over logs and traces, PromQL over metrics, Omni dashboards, Omni alerts, context graph for root cause, programmatic/IaC access (API/SDK/CLI/CloudFormation), driving Omni from a coding agent or skills, and evaluating AI agent quality from traces - on-demand and online scoring of live traffic, readback, custom evaluators. For first-time setup - creating an Omni Space, granting access, ingestion, or ADOT instrumentation for Application Signals (ServiceEvents, CI/CD metadata) or Omni - use setting-up-cloudwatch-observability. Not for app logging or threat detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。