「step」の検索結果

Take a guided tour of Open SaaS — walks you through step-by-step through the project structure, features, and customization checklist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured step-by-step problem decomposition and iterative analysis; explicit request only, never for regular coding tasks, and at most once per task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous multi-step investigation — deep research carried end-to-end without per-step approval; explicit request only, never for normal feature work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Documentation] Use when you need to generate a step-by-step demo guide (demo script / walkthrough) covering all main user stories and their test cases — scope from a named feature, else the current working context, else confirm with the user — explaining for each case how the domain data is stored/changed and how the domain solves the feature. Triggers: demo guide, generate demo guide, demo script, demo walkthrough, how to demo, prepare demo, sprint demo, user story demo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Implementation] Use when you need to implement a feature [step by step].

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activates a structured decorator framework that modifies how Claude reasons, responds, and formats output. Trigger this skill whenever a prompt contains one or more markers prefixed with +++, such as +++Reasoning, +++StepByStep, +++Tone(style=formal), or any other +++ marker, regardless of what follows in the prompt. Also trigger when the user asks to activate, list, or clear decorators, references the prompt decorator framework, or uses phrases like "use decorator", "apply +++", or "what decorators are available". This skill must be active for any +++ marker to take effect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

联想激活（启动效应等效）。不被用户直接触发，作为「能力层工具函数」由其他Skill调用。给定一个概念，在知识图谱中激活语义相邻的概念网络，返回Top-5邻居摘要给调用方。被 cognitive-ask Step 2c 和 cognitive-capture-fragment Step 2.5 调用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an agent architect who has learned the hard lessons of autonomous AI. You've seen the gap between impressive demos and production disasters. You know that a 95% success rate per step means only 60% by step 10.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and documents structured incident response playbooks that define step-by-step procedures for specific incident types aligned with NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks. Covers playbook structure, decision trees, escalation criteria, RACI matrices, and integration with SOAR platforms. Activates for requests involving IR playbook creation, incident response procedure documentation, response runbook development, or SOAR playbook design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ADHD-friendly output shaping for subagent responses. Lead with the next action, number multi-step tasks, end with one concrete next step, suppress tangents, restate state across turns, give specific time estimates, make wins visible, matter-of-fact errors, cap visible lists to 5, no preamble or closers. Loaded by genin, jonin, anbu, tokubetsu-jonin, and chunin when shaping final responses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

業務システムの操作手順書を構造化して作成するスキル。STEPフォーマット （Specific/Target/Expected/Proceed）による手順記述、ANSI Z535準拠の 注意・警告分類、トラブルシューティングガイドを含む包括的な操作マニュアルを 生成する。Use when creating operations manuals, standard operating procedures (SOP), user guides, or system operation guides. Triggers: "operations manual", "操作マニュアル", "手順書作成", "SOP", "操作手順", "standard operating procedure", "ユーザーガイド", "作業手順書", "運用マニュアル"

組織変革管理の専門コンサルタントスキル。システム導入、組織変革、DXプロジェクトにおける変革管理を支援。 ADKAR、Kotter 8-Stepフレームワークに基づき、ステークホルダー影響度分析、コミュニケーション計画、抵抗管理戦略を提供。 Use when managing organizational change, system implementations, digital transformation projects, or improving user adoption rates. Triggers: "change management", "organizational change", "system implementation", "user adoption", "change strategy", "stakeholder engagement".

Use when the user explicitly invokes the `if` skill or asks for a concise, laconic, no-fluff, or to-the-point answer. Do not trigger on the ordinary word or programming keyword `if`. Detailed, step-by-step, exhaustive, educational, or fixed-length requests activate only when they also include an explicit invocation or brevity request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

METAINFORMANT rules for directory docs/rna/amalgkit/steps. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define, validate, run, resume, and audit repo-local multi-step automations with current `asc workflow` and `.asc/workflow.json`, including step outputs and safe release/TestFlight workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA-STD-8729.1A — NASA's R&M (Reliability and Maintainability) standard covering spaceflight and support systems (Revision A, 2017-06-13). Use for NASA's objectives-driven R&M framework — the R&M objectives hierarchy (one Top Objective decomposed into four sub-objectives, paired with tailorable strategies), how R&M requirements are established inside the SMA Plan required by NPR 7120.5, the SMA Technical Authority concurrence/independent-evaluation governance, milestone vs. readiness review gates, the reliability/maintainability/availability vocabulary (Ai vs. Ao, the failure causal chain, risk as a triplet), and the R&M Evidentiary Methods catalogue (FMEA/FMECA, FTA, RBDA, RCM, LORA, plus the space-environment and parts-pedigree analyses). Scoped to NASA spaceflight and support systems and to assurance planning: it is an objectives-and-strategies standard, so it deliberately does NOT prescribe step-by-step analysis procedures (those live in the referenced NASA Preferred Reliability Practices) and is thin on facility R&M, detailed math/derivations, and non-NASA or commercial life cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge pack from 'Towards Digital Engineering: The Advent of Digital Systems Engineering' (Huang et al., Old Dominion University, arXiv:2002.11672, 2020). Use when reasoning about digital engineering, the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy and its five goals, the Authoritative Source of Truth, digitalization vs. digitization, digital augmentation, digitalized models, provenance, unique identification, and the four-level (vision/strategy/action/foundation) DSE research framework. Covers the conceptual/vision layer of the field. SCOPE LIMITS: this is a single ~28-page vision paper, not a methods handbook — it is thin on step-by-step procedures, tooling, case studies, and quantitative evaluation, and it predates 2020 so it does not cover later digital-engineering standards or recent AI/LLM advances. Use the sebok pack for established SE canon and MBSE depth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NASA Digital Engineering Acquisition Framework Handbook (NASA-HDBK-1004). Use for acquiring digital/model-based data under contract: the Data Requirements Description (DRD) instrument and the Appendix A DRD suite (TDP, MBx, CDMP, CSA, CR, FCA/PCA, SDT, EMDAL, REF, MRI); the Data Type 1-5 control scale; SOW/RFP/Cost-Volume contract language and data rights (FAR/DFARS, Table 3 license categories); the Requirements Exchange Format (REF/ReqIF, UUID schema) and Master Records Index; model-based data definition (MBSE, CAD/PMI, M&S credibility, BOM, release-state mapping, PLM); digital data collaboration, the four owned architectures, and interoperability standards (MIL-STD-31000, STEP/ISO 10303, ASME Y14); the four MBE interoperability use cases; and MBE Plan development. Scope is the acquisition and contracting side of digital engineering. Does not reproduce ISO/STEP/ASME/MIL-STD/SAE standard text, and the companion NASA-HDBK-1009A carries the deeper digital-engineering practitioner detail this handbook defers to.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy (2018, OUSD/ODASD(SE)). Use for the Department of Defense's five digital engineering goals — (1) formalize the development, integration, and use of models; (2) provide an enduring authoritative source of truth; (3) incorporate technological innovation; (4) establish supporting infrastructure and environments; (5) transform the culture and workforce — plus their focus areas, the document-to-model and design-build-test→model-analyze-build shifts, model formalisms/provenance, governance and access control of the authoritative source of truth, and the coordinate→plan→pilot→sustain rollout. A vision-and-policy strategy, deliberately non-prescriptive. Does NOT provide a how-to method, tool tutorials, MBSE/SysML mechanics, or implementation-plan content; thin on metrics, acquisition-policy detail, and step-by-step procedure. Excludes the CAC-gated Digital Engineering Body of Knowledge (DEBoK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured problem solving in 6 steps: Problem definition, goals, brainstorming, evaluation, implementation, and review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares a change request pack (description and justification, scope, schedule, implementation plan, risk as stated, rollback, test evidence as provided, communications, approvals route) from an engineer's notes, ticket or pull request description, with UNKNOWN for anything not provided and a question list for the engineer. Never rates risk or marks a change tested or approved. Use when the user asks to "write the change request for this", "fill in the change ticket from my notes", "prepare the CAB submission" or "turn this pull request into an RFC". Do not use for the step-by-step procedure with commands and rollback, use runbook-drafter instead; for release notes describing what shipped, use release-notes-writer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts one knowledge article or known-error article from a resolved incident or ticket thread: symptoms as reported, environment, cause exactly as the resolver stated it, resolution steps as performed, workaround with its limits, verification, things tried without effect, related records, keywords and proposed metadata, every statement traced to a ticket note or marked UNKNOWN, with a redaction log and a question list for the knowledge owner. Never decides a root cause, adds a step or publishes. Use when the user asks to "write a KB article from this ticket", "turn this resolved incident into a knowledge article", "draft a known error record for this", "document the fix we just did" or "make this thread into a how-to for the service desk". Do not use for a procedure the team will execute (runbook, operating procedure, playbook), use runbook-drafter instead; for a post-incident review, use incident-postmortem-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns process notes, a walkthrough or interview transcript, a transcript of a meeting recording or a stale existing procedure into a draft standard operating procedure: purpose and trigger, scope, definitions, roles with a RACI table, numbered steps with the check that closes each one, records produced, controls as stated, and open questions for the process owner. Every step traces to the source or reads UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "write an SOP from these notes", "turn this walkthrough into a procedure", "document how we do this", "draft the standard operating procedure for", "build a RACI for this process" or "tidy up this old procedure". Do not use for technical runbooks with commands and rollback, use runbook-drafter instead; for meeting minutes and action lists, use transcript-to-actions. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns reported data problems (messages, tickets, meeting notes, complaints) into one DRAFT issue log: one row per issue with the symptom as reported, dataset and fields named, reproduction steps, affected reports, first seen date, reporters, a suggested owner, and blank severity, root cause and status cells for the owner. Never asserts a root cause, severity or fix. Use when the user asks to "log these data issues", "turn these complaints about the numbers into an issue list", "build the data quality backlog", "which reports are hit by this data problem" or "write up the reproduction steps for this data bug". Do not use for exploring or profiling a dataset, use dataset-insight-pack instead; for an IT incident write-up, use incident-postmortem-drafter; for tracking fix actions once assigned, use corrective-action-tracker. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。