862 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Property Screener — searches for properties matching investment criteria with pre-built screens for Cash Flow, Appreciation, BRRRR, First-Time Buyer, and Short-Term Rental strategies plus custom criteria support
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write clear acceptance criteria for features. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with acceptance-criteria related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate acceptance criteria and feature completion. Use when checking if features pass, validating test results, verifying acceptance criteria, or determining feature completion status.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when authoring INVEST-compliant Salesforce user stories from gathered requirements: shaping the As-A/I-Want/So-That stem, writing Given-When-Then acceptance criteria, sizing complexity (S/M/L/XL), splitting stories that are too large for a sprint, and emitting handoff metadata that names the next downstream agent. Trigger keywords: user story, INVEST, story splitting, story sizing, As-A I-Want So-That, story handoff, recommended_agents, backlog item shape. NOT for requirements elicitation or stakeholder interviews (use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf). NOT for the Given-When-Then technique itself in depth (use admin/acceptance-criteria-given-when-then). NOT for UAT test case design (use admin/uat-test-case-design). NOT for backlog prioritization (use admin/moscow-prioritization-for-sf-backlog).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when setting up, configuring, or troubleshooting Marketing Cloud Journey Builder — including entry sources, activities, decision splits, wait activities, goals, exit criteria, journey versions, test mode, or journey analytics. Triggers: 'journey builder setup', 'entry source configuration', 'decision split not routing', 'exit criteria not removing contacts', 'goal not tracking conversion', 'journey version publishing', 'journey re-entry settings', 'wait activity date field'. NOT for coding a custom activity or entry source — use apex/marketing-cloud-custom-activities. NOT for business units and sender profiles — use admin/marketing-cloud-engagement-setup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill determines whether an adolescent or adult patient meets DSM-5 criteria for gender dysphoria (gender incongruence) by evaluating the presence of at least two of six specified criteria over a minimum 6-month duration, accompanied by clinically significant distress or impairment. It is triggered when a clinician queries whether the patient's reported symptoms align with gender dysphoria, such as persistent incongruence between experienced/expressed gender and designated gender.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when work produces a deliverable, factual claim, dataset, code change, decision, publication, deployment, automation, or irreversible action whose failure would matter; when the user asks for a quality gate, acceptance criteria, QA, completeness, validation, audit, evidence, preflight, release readiness, or a definition of done; or before claiming completion on medium- or high-risk work. Automatically decide whether a formal gate is warranted, derive task-specific pass/fail criteria, gather evidence, and block unsupported completion. Make sure to use this skill even when the user does not say "quality gate" if consequential work needs acceptance criteria or completion evidence. Skip formal gating for trivial, reversible, low-impact requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scores inbound leads against the qualification rubric the user supplies (criteria, scale, weights, thresholds and disqualifiers as given): one DRAFT scorecard per lead with the evidence quoted per criterion, UNKNOWN wherever the lead's information is missing, totals shown with and without the UNKNOWN criteria, a ranked list and a suggested next step such as a qualification call, a request for missing details, nurture or a courteous decline. Use when the user asks to "score these inbound leads", "qualify this lead against our rubric", "run the web form submissions through our lead criteria", "which of these leads should sales call first" or "build a lead scorecard". Do not use for preparing the first call with a lead, use discovery-call-prep instead; for an existing account's growth plan use account-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "plan my launch tier", "how big should this launch be", or "build a launch risk register with kill criteria"; produces a tier decision (Tier 1 flagship all-channel / Tier 2 targeted / Tier 3 changelog-level), a launch-type declaration (new-product / feature / relaunch / partnership with co-marketing split), an effort calibration matrix (tier to channel intensity and asset scope), D0/W1/M1 KPI targets (labeled Estimated), a risk register (likelihood x blast-radius, owners, mitigations, kill criteria / rollback thresholds), and a T-8w to T+4w timeline skeleton. Not for picking the launch date or window — use launch-window-planner; not for creator-channel launch campaigns — use campaign-planner. 发布分级/发布类型/风险登记册/kill criteria
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write clear acceptance criteria for features. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with acceptance-criteria related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn vague preferences about employers into criteria that can actually be used to choose between them: for each one, what would have to be seen to confirm it, whether it comes from firsthand experience or from an untested assumption, whether it is a must, a nice-to-have, or something to avoid, and which pairs of criteria pull against each other while both being treated as required, then test the set against real candidates. Use when a new graduate is working out what to select employers on, when someone who has decided to move needs criteria for where to apply, or when a stated axis like "a place I can grow" needs to be made checkable; do not use to recommend an industry, job, or employer, to score or rank candidates, or to judge someone's stated preferences.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write and refine high-quality user stories — INVEST criteria, "As a X, I want Y, so that Z" format, Gherkin acceptance criteria when applicable, definition of ready, anti-patterns, and a review checklist. Use when creating or reviewing user stories, PRD section 6, backlog items, or acceptance criteria. Do NOT use for technical specs, architecture decisions, or task decomposition.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AIエージェントが読むスキルや指示文を、手順・参照情報・完了条件に整理し、必要な資料を読む条件の明確化や重複の削減まで支援する文書作成・編集のスキル。
絞り込んだ競合を九つの観点で採点し、根拠付きの比較カードと戦略の二軸図に整理するスキル。各社の強みや、自社が狙う領域の競合を確認します。
AIへの依頼文から目的や不足情報を整理し、作業範囲に合うECCのコマンドやスキルを提案します。診断と改善理由を添え、そのまま貼り付けて使える依頼文に書き直します。
Jiraの課題を取得し、要件やテスト条件を整理するスキルです。進捗コメントの追加、ステータス変更、課題検索を開発作業の流れで扱えます。
判断が必要な課題を一文で整理し、三つの選択肢の長所・短所と推奨案をまとめます。完了条件と実行手順も添え、チームに共有する提案づくりを支えます。
Protocol-driven study screening for systematic, scoping and rapid reviews. Turns a proposal or PROSPERO protocol into confirmed eligibility rules, then screens titles/abstracts and full texts with two blinded AI reviewers and a third-reviewer adjudicator: ordered exclusion codes, no silent defaults, resumable batch runs, QC (seed studies, near-miss rechecks, kappa and PABAK), PRISMA 2020 counts, EndNote/Zotero RIS groups, an Excel log, a methods draft and a literature_corpus handoff to academic-paper. Reads RIS, PubMed .nbib, Web of Science and CSV exports; removes duplicates. 8 modes: protocol, quick, pilot, ta-screen, ft-screen, adjudicate, audit, report. Use it to screen records against eligibility criteria, pilot screening, resolve screening conflicts, audit exclusions or report the selection process. Triggers on: screen these papers, title/abstract screening, full-text screening, screening conflicts, inclusion criteria, PRISMA flow, غربالگری مقالات, اسکرینینگ عنوان و چکیده, معیارهای ورود و خروج.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads and summarises ScenarioRunner output — the criteria pass/fail tables from --output/--file, the machine-readable --json and --junit result files, and the criteria JSON written alongside a --record recording — and runs the metrics module (metrics_manager.py) to compute custom measurements over a recorded run offline, without the simulator. Use when the user asks "did the scenario pass", "why did it fail", "summarise these results", "compare these runs", or wants distance/speed/lane metrics from a recording.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conducts structured requirements workshops to produce feature specifications, user stories, EARS-format functional requirements, acceptance criteria, and implementation checklists. Use when defining new features, gathering requirements, or writing specifications. Invoke for feature definition, requirements gathering, user stories, EARS format specs, PRDs, acceptance criteria, or requirement matrices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Filter and select sequences by criteria (length, ID, GC content, patterns) using Biopython. Use when subsetting sequences, removing unwanted records, or selecting by specific criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and open FinViz screener URLs from natural language requests. Use when user wants to screen stocks, find stocks matching criteria, filter by fundamentals or technicals, or asks to open FinViz with specific conditions. Supports both Japanese and English input (e.g., "高配当で成長している小型株を探したい", "Find oversold large caps with high ROE").
Use when the user asks to "design an early access program", "set up a waitlist and beta stages", or "define beta graduation criteria"; produces a waitlist→concept→alpha→beta→GA stage ladder with per-stage purpose and opt-in semantics, quantified graduation criteria per stage (labeled Estimated), a cohort-gating and invite-throttling plan, tester recruitment with launch-day social-proof prep, a feedback-loop spec where every status change notifies its subscribers, and a referral-loop mechanism spec (invite codes, anti-abuse). Not for waitlist acquisition strategy or the capture-flow spec — use list-growth-designer; not for the canonical stage record — use launch-registry. waitlist/内测阶梯/抢先体验/毕业标准/反馈闭环
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute automate SOC 2 audit preparation including evidence gathering, control assessment, and compliance gap identification. Use when you need to prepare for SOC 2 audits, assess Trust Service Criteria compliance, document security controls, or generate readiness reports. Trigger with phrases like "SOC 2 audit preparation", "SOC 2 readiness assessment", "collect SOC 2 evidence", or "Trust Service Criteria compliance".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。